Ray Ratto

Time catches up to T.O.


Time catches up to T.O.

I think we have reached the end of the road on the Bring Terrell Owens back saga, if ever there was one.His flameout in Arena Football 2, or whatever the hell it was, was as sad as it was predictable, because that isnt the springboard back to the bigs, but another rung down the ladder. It doesnt mean to be that, but it is.And this, only a week or so after rumors that he might want to make a comeback with either the Raiders or 49ers were swirling about the easier-to-amuse sectors of the Internet.

REWIND: T.O. wants to play for 49ers, Raiders
Now were not here to put the boot in now that hes down. He had a long, productive and weird career in the NFL, and he will be remembered just that way. He had his swings, he took them. Lots of players were gone sooner and did much less.But for you younguns out there as well as you who like to cling to your fandom past, this just in. Athletes get old. They pass out of the game and rarely get back in. Their skills fade, their speed diminishes, their strength wanes. There is a point at which they just cant do it any more.This seems elemental, but now ask yourselves how many times you wanted Barry Bonds to make a comeback. Or how many times you think Randy Moss can be invigorated with new surroundings. Or how many times you thought Alex Smith or JaMarcus Russell would have been helped by a motivated T.O.RELATED: Maiocco -- Moss, T.O. run different routes
You fell in love with their skills at the height of their powers, and thought they would never fade. You thought that their attitude would preserve them in ways that their muscles might not. You thought they would always be as young as your memories.(For those of you who, on the other hand, hated them and wanted them gone right away, you had other players you did like for whom you imbued just that power, so if it helps at all, change the name).But that isnt either the normal progression or the even the abnormal progression. Most careers are bell curves. You rise from nothing, you arc as high as you can, and then you ease back down. There is the occasional spike here and there, but they are rare. You always think your guy can beat the odds, but the odds are what they are because they reflect reality.And if you still cling to the notion that politics is keeping Owens from making the comeback he so richly deserves, well, youre mostly wrong. He used those cards already, most recently in Cincinnati. Yes, there are some coaches and general managers and owners who wouldnt touch him under any circumstances, but he found five who would. Five, including two painfully conservative operations in Buffalo and Cincinnati.Now its done, and for those of you who still carry his torch, thats just the way it goes. Time moves on. Its okay to cling to your past old folks do it all the time but it is the past.This may be of help to you all as Moss goes into his 14th year and fifth team. Maybe he has more to go, and maybe he doesnt. Well find out soon enough, and if he is on E, Jim Harbaugh will not hesitate to move him along.All athletes are not the same, you see. Maybe Moss benefits from having 2011 off; maybe he doesnt. Maybe hes got more Minnesota than Tennessee left in his legs and arms and head. Maybe hes gone through his Oakland phase and doesnt want to end it that way. Maybe he looks at the odds and spits, with both accuracy and distance. But if its done, then its done, and his career will stand on what he has done, good and bad. It wont be a tragedy, or the man keeping his foot on the neck. Itll be time, and truth, that got him. Just as it has surely and finally gotten Terrell Owens.Ray Ratto is a columnist for CSNBayArea.com

NBA All-Star Game more and more reveals personalities rather than skills


NBA All-Star Game more and more reveals personalities rather than skills

The voting for the NBA All-Star starters was properly instructive to both Adam Silver and the public at large about exactly what the game is meant to be – which is why I totally get their decision not to televise the All-Star draft.

It’s really a personality test for everyone involved, for good and ill.

I think having a draft nobody can see is idiotic, stealing an idea the NHL used and then discarded years ago and then not employing the reason why they did it to begin with, but if the All-Star Game is really an expression of ego, then the next best thing to having no draft is having one nobody can see.

The All-Star Game really only functions as a coronation of the elite by the elite, a festival of mutual backslapping friend-rewarding that has nothing to do with the playing of the game, or the moving of the T-shirts or jerseys or expensive hotel rooms. This is about stratifying the player pool so that everyone knows who’s who and what’s what.

Everything else is irrelevant, and the draft reinforces that. Kevin Durant not wanting to be a captain is strategic thinking by a future industrialist. Stephen Curry not minding being a captain is the perfect who-cares statement for someone who doesn’t mind playing the game because objecting to it takes too much work. LeBron James being a captain is the perfect political muscle-flexing that fits his personality.

Damian Lillard already assuming that he won’t be named to the team is a statement about his being considered the perpetual one-level-down guard. Russell Westbrook being named and then controlling the ball as he would in a regular season game is a statement about how he views his place as a disruptor. And on and on and on – the All-Star Game more and more reveals personalities rather than skills.

Does televising the draft help us understand the actual meaning of the event? Maybe, but the NBA would prefer you consider it a festival of the game itself, which it plainly isn’t. Proof, you say? 192-182 in 2017. 196-173 in 2016. 163-158 in 2015. 163-155 in 2014. There hasn’t been a normal-looking score in 15 years, which means it’s not a game at all.

That isn’t the news, though. It’s that the NBA has made this is a three-day event – the day the captains and starters are named, the day the reserves are picked, and the day that teams are chosen. And every bit of it is about the reaction to that. There is no show thereafter, and the players know it. They care about the selections, because that’s how they’re keeping score.

So go team. Whatever the hell that means.


Who is now the Warriors' biggest rival?


Who is now the Warriors' biggest rival?

Earlier we discussed how the Golden State Warriors have seemingly moved beyond hating on NBA officials (three technical fouls in 18 days is a stunning reversal of their formerly disputatious form), but we may have forgotten one new reason why they have found a more Buddhist approach to the cutthroat world of American competitive sport.

They lack someone new to hate.

Their much-chewed-upon rivalry with the Los Angeles Clippers actually lasted two years, and now the Clippers are busy trying to prevent military incursions into their locker room from the Houston Rockets. Their even more famous archrivalry with the Cleveland Cavaliers seems to be imploding – with the total connivance of the Cavs themselves – before our eyes. Even cutting off their hot water made them laugh when two years ago not letting the Warriors' wives get to the game on time torqued them mightily.

And since we know that you locals desperately need a bête noire for your heroes (even though their biggest foe is actually their own attention spans), let us consider the new candidates.


The Rockets have been among the Warriors’ most persistent contender/pretenders, having faced them in both the first round of the 2017 postseason and the conference finals in 2015. Both ended in 4-1 Warrior wins as part of a greater piece – Golden State is 19-4 against the Rockets in the Warriors’ bad-ass era, 10-2 at home and 9-2 on the road, and has finished an aggregate 59.5 games ahead of the Rockets in the past three and a half years.

Hateable players for Warrior fans include James Harden and Chris Paul, while Rockets fans loathe Draymond Green and Kevin Durant and work their way down from there.

RIVALRY RATING (out of 32,353): 19. The Rockets need to win a playoff series before even matching the Clippers, who as we all know came and went in a moment.


The previous platinum standard in Western Conference basketball, the Spurs have never really gone away, though they have aged. Their pedigree is not in dispute, and Steve Kerr has essentially become the next generation of Gregg Popovich. It is hard to create a rivalry out of such shamelessly mutual admiration.

Hateable players for Warrior fans include . . . uhh, maybe Kawhi Leonard for winning two Defensive Player Of The Year Awards instead of Draymond Green, though that’s not much to go on, frankly. Spurs fans hate Zaza Pachulia for stepping beneath Leonard and ending last year’s series before it started.

RIVALRY RATING (out of 23): 1. If they didn’t have to play against each other, I suspect these two teams would date.


The Thunder’s 3-1 collapse in 2016 is all but ignored now because the Warriors did the same thing one series later, but lifting Kevin Durant was quite the consolation prize for Golden State, and the definitive finger in the eye for the Thunder, who turned their team over completely to Russell Westbrook, for good and ill. Even with the additions of Paul George and Carmelo Anthony are still trying to relocate their stride.

Hateable players for Warrior fans include Westbrook and Anthony for defining the I-need-the-ball-in-my-hands-to-function generation, and owner Clay Bennett for Seattle SuperSonics nostalgics. Thunder frans hate Durant, followed by Durant, Durant, Kim Jong-un, Durant, leprosy, Draymond Green’s foot, and Durant.

RIVALRY RATING (out of 440): 220. Westbrook is a human lightning rod, Anthony is the antithesis of what Warriors now regard basketball (they’d have loved him a quarter-century ago), and Stephen Adams for getting his goolies in the way of Green’s foot. Plus, some savvy Warrior fans can blame OKC for extending their heroes to seven games, thus making the final against Cleveland that much more difficult. This could work, at least in the short term.


Damian Lillard is a much-beloved local. Plus, the Blazers have never interfered in the Warriors’ universe save their 1-8 postseason record. There are no truly hateable players on either side, though Stephen Curry threw his first mouthpiece in Portland, and Green is a perennial.

RIVALRY RATING (out of 1): 0.


The new pretender to throne, with the Eastern Conference’s version of Kerr in Brad Stevens. Even better since taking advantage of Kyrie Irving’s weariness with LeBron James, and until proven otherwise the team the Warriors should most concern themselves with.

Hateable players for Warrior fans include Irving, who made the only shot in the last five minutes of Game 7 of the 2016 Finals, while Celtics fans hate Durant for not signing with them.

RIVALRY RATING (out of 67.7): 26, though this will rise if the two teams meet in the Finals. The last time they did, Bill Russell owned basketball.


Still too remote to adequately quantify, though Toronto, Miami and Milwaukee are clearly difficult matches for the Warriors. If you put them together, Kyle Lowry, Demar DeRozan, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Khris Middleton and Hassan Whiteside with Goran Dragic and Eric Bledsoe coming off the bench, coached by either Eric Spoelstra or Jason Kidd, would make a fun team for the Warriors to play against. Probably not functional, but fun.

And finally:


Some decade the two teams’ geographical proximity will matter, but for now, they remain essentially two full professional leagues away from each other. We just mentioned them so Kings fans wouldn’t feel any more slighted than they already do.