Red Sox

Red Sox reflect on tragedy in Texas

191542.jpg

Red Sox reflect on tragedy in Texas

By Maureen Mullen
CSNNE.com Follow @maureenamullen
BOSTON In the Red Sox clubhouse before Fridays game against the Orioles, the mood was somewhat subdued. Much of the talk was about the tragedy at Rangers Ballpark in Arlington, Texas, Thursday when a fan was killed, falling from the stands trying to catch a ball tossed to him by Rangers left fielder Josh Hamilton.

The players expressed sympathy for the victim, Shannon Stone, a firefighter who was at the game with his 6-year-old son Cooper, as well as for Hamilton.

Its an unfortunate situation, said Darnell McDonald. Obviously, you dont ever want to see something like that happen. You want to get the fans involved when they come to a game and watch a game. You like to give them a ball. But its just a real freak thing.

As a player you dont want to see anything like that happen to a fan. So, it definitely makes me think twice about throwing a ball up there. I dont want to be the guy that throws a ball and something like that happens. So, might just have to wait till after the game or something.

I feel bad for that persons family, said David Ortiz. Nobody on the baseball field want to see something like that going down. I know Josh got to feel bad about what happened. But its not like he planned it or anything like that. You dont have to feel bad for what he did because that wasnt his idea.

The players could relate to Hamilton, and what he might be going through right now.

That could have been anybody, McDonald said. Its just a freak thing. Its unfortunate it happened to him. But thats something that could have happened to any one of us as a player.

You feel bad for him, because you know that's probably going to stick with him the rest of his life, said Carl Crawford. You never want to have a situation like that where you know you're thinking about something like that in the back of your head.

Whether or not MLB will or should issue directives instructing players when, how, or if they can throw balls into the stands remains to be seen. But, as Ortiz pointed out, its difficult to legislate everything.

What happened was an accident, he said. How many times do we hit foul balls that people try to catch? You going to tell us not to hit foul balls, too?

Accidents are going to happen and what can you do about it? Just because youre tossing a ball to a fan doesnt mean youre going to kill him or you expect something like that to happen. It happens one every 5000 times or probably more. Its sad, man, when you have things going down like that. I know that Hamilton is feeling awful right now because everythings going down in his face like that. You pray for the victims family. Its sad to see things going down like that. But we all come to the field to have fun and to make sure the audience and the fans have fun. Thats the last thing going through your head.

Fenway Park has not had such an incident. But with seats atop the 37-foot Green Monster, added before the 2003 season, there is a horrifying specter that it could happen.

You have the Green Monster right here, said Crawford. Any time you throw the ball, it kind of reaches and then a fan reaches over a little bit. You just hope nothing bad happens.

You don't like to think that's going to happen all the time. You want to think positive and think that they could judge the ball better not to reach over if it doesn't reach. So, you want to think the ballpark's completely safe.I dont think anyone thinks something like a death is going to happen, especially over a baseball, said McDonald. But now that something like this has happened, its got us all thinking. We're just going to have to use different ways and do different things to get fans souvenirs.

Thats the last thing going through your head, said Ortiz. Sometimes I have tossed balls to the fans and when I see people jumping out of nowhere trying to catch it. You go, Hey, whats going on? Its just a baseball. But what we do is just trying to please the fans, not trying to let anybody get hurt."

Maureen Mullen is on Twitter at http:twitter.commaureenamullen

Report: Ex-Red Sox reliever Reed gets deal with Twins

red_sox_addison_reed_080317.jpg

Report: Ex-Red Sox reliever Reed gets deal with Twins

He was dubbed "Closer B" by Red Sox manager John Farrell when acquired at the trade deadline last summer, now Addison Reed is "Closer B Gone"...to the Twins.

The right-handed reliever, 29, has agreed to a two-year, $16.75 million free-agent deal with Minnesota, pending a physical, Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports and TheAthletic.com reports. 

Reed began last season with the Mets and had 19 saves and a 2.57 ERA before being traded to the Red Sox, where he had a 3.33 ERA in 29 games (27 innings) without a save as a setup man for Craig Kimbrell.  
 

Red Sox, Mookie Betts far apart on salary and heading toward arbitration

red-sox-mookie-betts.jpg

Red Sox, Mookie Betts far apart on salary and heading toward arbitration

The Red Sox and star right fielder Mookie Betts intend to go to an arbitration hearing in February, and there were signs this was coming even a year ago.

Betts was the only arbitration-eligible player on the Red Sox who did not settle on a contract with the team on Friday, when a deadline arrived for all teams and arbitration-eligible players to exchange 2018 salary figures. Jackie Bradley Jr., Xander Bogaerts and Drew Pomeranz were the biggest names to avoid hearings.

Betts filed for a $10.5 million salary and the Red Sox filed at $7.5 million.  Betts and the Red Sox agreed previously that if no figure could be settled on by the Friday deadline, they would proceed to a hearing, assistant general manager Brian O'Halloran said. 

A three-person panel of arbitrators therefore is set to determine what Betts makes in 2018: either the $7.5 million figure the Sox filed or the $10.5 million figure Betts' camp submitted. The arbitrators won't settle on a midpoint for the parties. 

O'Halloran noted to the Globe there are no hard feelings involved.

Nonetheless, such a large gap would seem to provide incentive to settle. The parties technically could still decide to do so, but that would take a change of course from the present plan. The idea was to settle any time before Friday, and they did not. 

Betts is asking for near-record money for a first-year arbitration eligible player. Kris Bryant set the record Friday with a $10.85 million settlement.

The hearings can be difficult for player-team relations because teams have to make the case in front of the player that he is worth less money than he wants.

Betts, 25, hit .264, with 24 homers, 102 RBI, 25 stolen bases and a .803 OPS in 2017, numbers that fell from his American League MVP runner-up performance in 2016, but were nonetheless very strong and coupled with first-rate defense.

This offseason is Betts' first of arbitration eligibility. In the first three years of service time in a players' career, there's no recourse if you don't like the salary a team is offering. Teams can pay players anything at league minimum or above. 

The only option a player has in those first three years is to make a stand on principle: you can force the team to technically "renew" your salary, which notes to everyone that you did not agree to the salary. Betts and his agents did that in 2017 when the Sox paid him $950,000, a very high amount relative to most contract renewals.

Some of the standard thinking behind forcing a team to renew a contract is that if an arbitration case comes up down the road — and one now looms for Betts — it's supposed to show the arbitrators that the player felt even in seasons past, he was underpaid.

Still, the Sox may have effectively combatted that perception by paying Betts almost $1 million on a renewal. Per USA Today, that $950,000 agreement in 2017 was "the second-highest one-year deal ever for a non-arbitration-eligible player with two-plus years of big league service." Mike Trout got $1 million in 2014.