Celtics done in by too many missed jumpers vs. Spurs


Celtics done in by too many missed jumpers vs. Spurs

SAN ANTONIO Throughout most of Saturday's loss at San Antonio, Doc Rivers was fuming about what he saw as a lack of consistency in the calls on the floor.

Rivers' hunch was based in large part on the fact that the Spurs went to the free throw line 20 times compared to just eight trips for a Celtics team that averages 22.1 free throw attempts per game which ranks 18th in the league.

But the way the game was called should serve as a cautionary tale for teams like Boston that live by the jump-shot.

Finding a better balance between exploiting what is a clear strength - shooting jumpers - while exploring other ways to score going to the basket will be among the challenges Boston will have in Tuesday's game at Chicago.

Boston (12-11), riding a two-game losing streak now, has proven to be one of the league's better shooting teams when it comes to mid-range shots.

According to NBA.comstats, Boston is the connecting on a league-best 46.1 percent of their mid-range shots. Meanwhile the Bulls are shooting 42 percent on corner 3s which ranks seventh in the league.

While some might question the C's shot selection in Saturday's 101-88 loss to the Spurs as being too dependent on scoring from the perimeter, Celtics guard Jason Terry liked the looks for the most part the C's were getting.

"The shots we got were great," said Terry who had 18 points off the bench. "You can't turn those down. I know all of us want to say, 'Don't shoot jump shots. Get to the basket.' But a lot of them were wide open."

In the first half, he was right.

That is why Boston took 23 shots of at least 15 feet in the first half, and nailed 12 of them. In the second half, San Antonio's defense limited Boston to just 17 shot attempts of 15 feet or more with the C's hitting just four.

"We switched more (defensively in the second half)," explained Spurs guard Tony Parker who had a game-high 22 points to go with eight assists. "We just tried to play better defense. It sounds basic but that's what we did."

And the Spurs ability to pull away in the second half was also in part because of their ability to find a better balance between knocking down long-range shots while still getting points going to the basket or from the free throw line.

In the first half, San Antonio was 7-for-20 shooting on field goal attempts of 15 feet or further away. In the second half, they were 7-for-15.

And remember, both teams shot an identical 38-for-81 from the field.

While the Celtics have made progress in some areas since the start of the season, they still struggle to generate points around the paint other than Kevin Garnett post-ups and Rajon Rondo drives into the lane.

Paul Pierce still attacks the rim from time to time, but the 35-year-old is transitioning into being more of a perimeter shooter who doesn't generate as many points as he has in the past on isolation plays.

There's a growing concern among some Celtics players that they're having too many nights where the offense is dictating the play of the defense - a recipe for failure both in the short and long-term.

"If the shots don't fall, we have to have a defensive consistency," Pierce said. "We should be able to score between 90-96 points and still try to find a way to win the game with our defense."

Boston has to do what other teams are doing to them - make adjustments.

And one of the first needs to be to figure out other ways to generate points besides jumpers which as we've seen thus far this season, is an up and down affair - just like the Celtics record.

Julien thankful for B's video tribute, "happy he can move on"

Julien thankful for B's video tribute, "happy he can move on"

BOSTON – It was the final piece of closure for former Bruins coach Claude Julien when he made his return to TD Garden for the first time as the bench boss for the Montreal Canadiens on Wednesday night. Julien stood on the visiting bench, watched a first period video tribute of appreciation for his 10-years guiding the Bruins and then received the warm, thankful ovation from the B’s fans that still very much appreciate his efforts that resulted in a 2011 Stanley Cup title. 

Unfortunately for him and the Canadiens he also presided over a lifeless, limp effort from his Montreal club in a 4-1 loss to the Bruins where his team simply couldn’t derive any emotion or juice from his return to Boston. Julien said in both French and English that that his Habs simply “laid an egg” on the road, and that was disappointing for him given that Montreal already has their backs against the wall for a possible playoff spot. 

Instead Julien’s biggest bright spot in the game turned out to be the video tribute from the Bruins midway through the first period, for which he was greatly appreciative. 

“It’s always something that you kind of dread a little bit because it’s a little emotional, and at the same time [you’re] trying to keep your emotions intact there so you can coach a game and stuff like that. But, you know, I appreciate what they did for me,” said Julien following his second loss to the Bruins in five days. “As I said, I’ve got nothing but good things to say about this organization that gave me the opportunity to spend 10 years here. At the same time I’m kind of happy it’s over so we can move on now, but that doesn’t mean you forget what’s happened here. It’s always going to be with you. But now I’m in another chapter of my coaching career, and I’ve got to think about that.”

Julien’s counterpart, Bruce Cassidy, called the video tribute a “classy move” by the Bruins organization after the game had been settled, and there’s no doubting it was the right move for a coach that won over 400 games during his 10 years leading the Bruins. It was also the final chapter in his Bruins book as Julien now has completely moved on to his new gig guiding the Canadiens where it seems like his work is most definitely cut out for him. 

Will the real Jaguars defense please stand up?


Will the real Jaguars defense please stand up?

FOXBORO -- Are we giving the Jaguars defense too much credit?

The numbers, on the surface, paint Jacksonville's defense as one of the best the NFL has seen in years. They finished the season as the league's top passing defense in terms of yards allowed, and they were second when it came to points allowed, total yards and sacks.

MORE - Bortles earning respect from teammates, Patriots

Then there are the postseason awards that have been bestowed upon their defensive regulars. Jalen Ramsey, AJ Bouye, Calais Campbell and Malik Jackson have all been named Pro Bowlers. Ramsey and Campbell are First-Team All-Pros, while Bouye and Telvin Smith are Second-Teamers. Campbell is in the running for Defensive Player of the Year. 

So why, then, is there this lingering feeling that the Jaguars defense isn't all it's cracked up to be? They allowed Ben Roethlisberger to heave his way to 42 points in the Divisional Round. In Week 16, they gave up 44 to Jimmy Garoppolo and the Niners. Hell, Blaine Gabbert and the Cardinals put up 27 and beat them in Week 12. 

Those results don't exactly scream "all-time defense." So what is Jacksonville? Overrated? Properly rated? 

One thing is for certain: The Jags played an easy schedule. The combined winning percentage of their opponents in 2017 was a league-low 44 percent. And when it comes to the defense in particular, they had the second-easiest schedule in the league, according to Football Outsiders. It didn't hurt that they were able to play the Colts with Jacoby Brissett, the Texans before Deshaun Watson became a star and after he got hurt, and the NFL's No. 23-ranked Titans offense. Twice. Each. They also got the Ravens (No. 27 offense), Jets (No. 28), Bengals (No. 32), Browns (No. 24) and Cardinals (No. 22). Add it all up and that's nine games -- more than half their schedule -- against bottom-third NFL offenses. Two more games came against a Houston offense that featured starting quarterbacks Tom Savage and TJ Yates. 

When you dig into the analytics it's harder to find ways to poke holes in Jacksonville's credibility as a top-tier defensive unit. Pro Football Focus grades the Jags as their No. 1 defense, and it's really not close. Football Outsiders calls them their No. 1 defense in terms of DVOA. Even when you factor in some of its recent performances -- like letdowns versus the Steelers and Niners -- Jacksonville is still the league's No. 4 defense in weighted DVOA, which is adjusted so that games that were played earlier in the season are gradually less important. 

At the same time, the analytics can be occasionally unkind to the Jaguars. Football Outsiders has them ranked as one of the most inconsistent defenses in the league. According to their variance statistic, Jacksonville is the fourth most inconsistent defense in football. A deeper dive into the numbers has also located an apparent soft underbelly of the Jaguars defense. Per Warren Sharp of Sharp Football Analysis, the Jaguars are dominant against three-receiver sets -- No. 1 in the league, in fact -- but they're the No. 23 defense in the NFL when it comes to defending personnel groupings that feature one or two wide receivers. That would explain, in part, why the Titans (who Sharp rated as the least-likely team to employ three-receiver sets this season) and Niners (who went with more "21" and "12" personnel looks late in the season) were able to beat the Jaguars. 

The most difficult argument against the legitimacy of the Jaguars' defensive rankings is the talent they put on the field on a weekly basis. Their roster, defensively at least, stacks up with some of the most imposing defensive units in recent memory. The Seahawks had four First and Second-Team All-Pros on their defense in 2014. The Broncos defense had five Pro Bowlers in 2015. The Jaguars have five players who were named either All-Pros or Pro Bowlers or both this year, and they probably should've had a sixth in pass-rusher Yannick Ngakoue, who recorded 12 sacks (eighth in the NFL) and a league-best six forced fumbles. 

The verdict? The Jaguars defense is loaded with blue-chip players. It will be the best unit the Patriots offense has seen this year. But they have been inconsistent, they have holes -- which we touched upon in this week's Quick Slants the Podcast with Jerod Mayo -- and there remains the very real possibility that Tom Brady and his teammates will light up the Gillette Stadium scoreboard on Sunday. 

Now, is Brady healthy? Good question. Will he have enough time to throw? We'll see. But if the answer to both of those questions is "yes" (or "enough"), then the Patriots should be headed to Minnesota. This Jaguars defense is very good, but it's far from inpenetrable.