Levine: It's the right thing to do


Levine: It's the right thing to do

By Rich Levine

The way some guys in the media are talking, you'd swear the new policy on helmet-to-helmet contact is about to turn the NFL into an intramural flag football league.

Mike Golic spent a chunk of his radio show Tuesday lamenting that the decision marks the end of the NFL as we know it. Trent Dilfer did the same on TV. Kirk Herbstreit thinks that league execs are letting their emotions get the best of them, and sending mixed messages to defensive players. Matt Millen? He's so upset that you'd have thought the NFL just outlawed taking receivers in the first round of the draft.

"So, one weekend of games is gonna change the way you play the game?" Millen screamed from the Monday Night Football set. "That's stupid!"

Yes, Matt. That is stupid. What you said is unbelievably stupid.

Don't get me wrong. I understand why these guys are frightened by the prospect of a wussified NFL. This is a league prided on toughness inhuman, almost unfathomable toughness and when you limit a player's ability to exhibit that toughness, or create a situation where he has to think twice about how hard he should hit a guy, you're taking away from the game. And I agree, it should be avoided at all costs.

But here's what I don't understand.

Why do they think that more serious punishments for breaking the rules will be responsible for any of that? Why are they so convinced that increasing the penalty for an action that is already, and has been for a while now, illegal, will make players any less decisive or intense?

After a lot of thinking, I've come up with only one possible explanation: They're completely missing the point.

Honestly, they think the NFL overreacted to all the violence in last week's games? Come on, if the NFL was overreacting, they would have suspended both James Harrison and Dunta Robinson, and sentenced Brandon Meriweather to three months in an isolation chamber.

If they were overreacting they would have come out with a ruling that said, "Any helmet-to-helmet contact, of any kind, will result in a suspension." It would become the equivalent of making contact with a referee. It wouldn't matter how hard you did it, or if it was even intentional. If you made contact with another player's helmet, you'd be gone. Suspended. End of story.

If the NFL was overreacting, they'd have ordered ESPN to cease production on their "jacked Up" segment and had an intern comb through the NFL Films archives and delete every "Boom! He's on his back!" of John Madden's career.

But they didn't do any of those things. They didn't overreact. They just reacted.

What else were they supposed to do? Ignore it?

In one weekend, you had a college football player paralyzed during a game. You had multiple illegal and well-publicized helmet-to-helmet hits. You had multiple players leave games with concussions. You had players visibly and frighteningly twitching on the ground, and waking up thinking they were Batman. This at a time when a week doesn't go by when you dont hear a story about some ex-NFL player battling through permanent, debilitating football-related injuries; when we're learning more and more about the long-term effects of concussions; when players have morphed into Universal Soldiers, not everyday Joes who hammer beers, smoke cigarettes and keep second jobs during the offseason.

Meanwhile, after the games on Sunday, you had the guys who delivered those hits walking around without even the slightest bit of remorse. If anything, they were celebrating themselves. They were lauded by teammates. One Patriot even cited Meriweather's hit as the turning point in the game.

Things had gotten out of control, and if the NFL didn't make some sort of move towards remedying this issue, they were never going to. Or maybe they just would have waited until one of their own players was paralyzed. And then everyone would have criticized them for that.

So the league reacted, and honestly, the reaction wasn't even that drastic.

They didn't even change the rules. It's not like they're saying, "OK, from now on, any hit that results in a concussion, or any other injury, or even just looks kind of scary, will end in a suspension."

That's what Millen and those guys seem to be missing. Everything that was legal last Sunday morning, will still be this Sunday. You'll just be punished more for breaking the rules. All this change does is deter cheaters and cheap-shot artists from acting like morons; how does that not make the game better?

One argument the anti-suspension guys like to fall back on is that not every helmet-to-helmet hit is intentional. They point out, and rightfully so, that with the game being played as fast as it is, and these players going as hard as they are, some helmet-to-helmets are unavoidable. On a given play a receiver or running backs' head can shift at the last second, and in that case, the collision wouldn't even be the defender's fault. "How can you suspend him?" they wonder. "How is that fair?"

And they're right. It wouldn't be fair.

But again, they're misinterpreting what's actually going on here. It's not like there's going to be an illegal hit in a game, and then Roger Goodell has 90 seconds to rule on a suspension over the loud speaker. These hits are going to be broken down and dissected like JFK's assassination footage. The NFL's probably going to take a little time and do more than their due diligence before making a decision. And let's be honest, is it that hard to tell the difference between an accidental collision and a clear, unabashed cheap shot?

With the technology we have now, the suspension-worthy plays will be pretty obvious.

These new penalties are not going to change the way players approach the game. Or if they do, it will only affect the players who are, in actuality, ruining the so-called sanctity of it. There's a reason it's always the same four or five guys getting fined for hits to the head. Those are the people these new terms are for. If a guy plays within the rules, nothing is different. He can still deliver a crushing blow. He can still make a receiver think twice about coming across the middle. He can still affect the game through intimidation. He just can't take his head, or his forearm, or his shoulder and blatantly try to decapitate a defenseless receiver.

Real quick, lets go back to Super Bowl XXXVI. Do you remember how badly the Patriots secondary screwed with the Rams receivers? Of course you do. It's one of the main reasons New England won the game.

By the end of the first quarter, Lawyer Milloy and Tebucky Jones had pounded and punished Torry Holt and Isaac Bruce to the point where they'd have rather made out with Kurt Warner's wife than run another route over the middle. They took them completely out of their games. They destroyed the Greatest Show on Turf.

And you know what? If that game was played this Sunday, not one of those Patriots defenders would draw a suspension, or even a fine, for how they played. That's because they didnt break any rules. They played good, clean, tough football.

And the league has no intention of ever taking that away, because, as Matty Millen would say: "That's stupid!"

Rich Levine's column runs each Monday, Wednesday and Friday on Rich can be reached at Follow Rich on Twitter at http:twitter.comrlevine33

In a surprise move, Chiefs sign Darrelle Revis


In a surprise move, Chiefs sign Darrelle Revis

KANSAS CITY -- The Kansas City Chiefs needed help in their leaky defensive backfield.

Darrelle Revis was ready to provide it.

So the AFC West leaders signed the seven-time Pro Bowl cornerback on Wednesday, a surprising midseason move involving a big-name player. Revis played for the New York Jets last season, but his massive salary cap number combined with a decline in performance led to his release in late February.

Still, the Chiefs were desperate to find a cornerback to play opposite Marcus Peters. Terrence Mitchell, Kenneth AckerSteven Nelson and Phillip Gaines have all failed to hold down the spot.

"He's ready to go now," Chiefs coach Andy Reid said in a conference call with reporters. "He was coming off the wrist (injury) and that he had last year, you know - this is when he was ready to go. We felt the same way. So it was a nice, mutual agreement that took place and here we are."

Reid did not rule out Revis playing Sunday against Buffalo, either.

Four days is typically a quick turnaround for a player to get acclimated to a team, especially one that hasn't played a snap since the end of last season. But Revis has a few things going for him: He has a vast amount of experience from which to draw, he is already familiar with defensive coordinator Bob Sutton's system having played for him with the Jets, and the Chiefs really have nothing to lose.

They enter the game with the 28th-ranked pass defense in the league, hemorrhaging more than 250 yards per game. That includes a 417-yard performance by Oakland's Derek Carr a few weeks ago.

"We've had some young guys trying their hearts out and doing a nice job for us, too," Reid said. "It's a win-win. You get a veteran guy and you have some young guys that will continue to grow."

Perhaps coincidentally, the Chiefs visit the Meadowlands to face the Jets on Dec. 3.

Revis at one point was considered the best cornerback in the league, picking off 29 passes over 10 seasons with the Jets, Buccaneers and Patriots. He won a Super Bowl ring with New England.

He parlayed that into a five-year, $39 million contract to return to the Jets, but a wrist injury slowed him down a couple of years ago. Revis struggled most of last season, looking as if the 32-year-old had lost a step for the first time, and the Jets made the decision to let him go.

He's spent the past summer and fall keeping in shape.

"He's been around awhile. He looks great physically," Reid said, "but time does that, time will take a step away from you. But he's a smart guy, knows how to play the game and that becomes important at this point in his career. I'm not telling you he can't still run, he can run."

Good enough to help the Chiefs (6-4), who had dropped four of their past five?

"Darrelle is a proven player in this league and we are excited to add him," first-year Chiefs general manager Brett Veach said in a statement. "He's had a Hall of Fame career and his leadership and playing experience will be valuable to our defense."

That may be where he is most beneficial: His experience. The Chiefs have little veteran presence in their secondary after safety Eric Berry was lost to a season-ending injury.

"You're talking about one of the all-time great players at that position," Reid said. "It's just a matter of getting him back in the swing of things and seeing where he's at. He's excited to be here. We are excited to have him. I would think his role would be to step in and be a starter."

Patriots-Dolphins injury report: Tom Brady sits out with Achilles injury

Patriots-Dolphins injury report: Tom Brady sits out with Achilles injury

FOXBORO -- Tom Brady and Rob Gronkowski both sat out of the entirety of Wednesday's practice at Gillette Stadium. 

Brady is dealing with an Achilles injury, per the injury report released by the Patriots. The Boston Herald has reported that Brady will play despite the issue. It's unclear when exactly Brady suffered the injury, but Brady was hit low by Raiders pass-rusher Khalil Mack in the fourth quarter on Sunday, and Mack was called for a roughing-the-passer penalty.

Gronkowski, like teammate David Andrews, is dealing with an illness. Patrick Chung, who left Sunday's game briefly, has an ankle issue. 

Here's the full injury report for both the Patriots and Dolphins . . . 


C David Andrews (illness)
QB Tom Brady (Achilles)
OT Marcus Cannon (ankle)
S Patrick Chung (ankle)
TE Rob Gronkowski (illness)
WR Chris Hogan (shoulder)

WR Danny Amendola (knee)
TE Marellus Bennett (shoulder/hamstring)
DT Malcom Brown (ankle)
CB Eric Rowe (groin)
WR Matthew Slater (hamstring)


LB Stephone Anthony (quadriceps)
G Jermon Bushrod (foot)
QB Jay Cutler (concussion)
DE William Hayes (back)
T Laremy Tunsill (illness)

RB Senorise Perry (knee)
S Michael Thomas (knee)