Patriots

Smart men making dumb points on 18-game season

191543.jpg

Smart men making dumb points on 18-game season

By TomE. Curran
CSNNE.com
DALLAS - To describe NFL commissioner Roger Goodell as an intelligent man wouldbe a vast understatement. Yet this intelligent man, who's been solid and logical in so many difficult decisions since taking over, is losing credibility in trying to sell players and fans on an 18-game season. Mike Florio at ProFootballTalk.comhad a post on this earlier on Sunday.In it, Florio detailed how fans responding toPFT posts on the 18-game season continually take exception to Goodell's assertion that thisis what they want done to address the shoddy level of play in two of the four preseason games."Please do not speak for me," wrote one commenter. "I dont need an 18-game season. I just dont WANT to pay regular-game prices for preseason." That comment got 1,050 nods of assent from readers and just 50 disagrees. A reduced preseason will strip down-the-roster players of valuable game reps to make an impression on coaches and improve. An expanded regular season will batter top-of-the-roster players' bodies for two more weeks of high-intensity play, taking out the twopreseason weeks (1 and 4) inwhich they can throttle it back. The aim is not to satiate fans desire for more football. It's to be able to sell two more games of import to the networks and pump up TV and game-day revenue accordingly. Yet Goodell- doing the owners' bidding - insists otherwise. To his own detriment."Fans have clearly stated that they dont like the quality of our preseason," said Goodell. "Our structure is a 20-game format. We have four preseason games and 16 regular-season games. Repeatedly, the fans have said the quality of the preseason doesnt meet NFL standards. That is one of the basis on which we started to look at the 18-and-two concept, by taking two of those low quality, non-competitive games and turn those into quality, competitive games that the fans want to see; they want to support. I talk to fans all the time. I get that feedback from them, including season-ticket holders who are the ones who are going to those preseason games and paying for those preseason games. I feel an obligation to make sure we are doing the best we can to present the best football, and that includes asking how do we make the preseason as effective as possible and the regular season as effective as possible, and I believe we are on the right track to get that done."But how can an NFL that's taking an interest in player health and safety possibly pretend that two more high-intensity games will not result in more injuries? Patriots' owner Robert Kraft was asked exactly that on Friday by the Boston Globe's Shalise Manza-Young"It makes sense if you think about it quickly, but if we were to have this longer season, it probably means we're going to . . . Ithink we're going to have to expand our rosters. you're going to have to have depth, have players who can play," Kraft sputtered."Half of the plays our team played last year were by first- and second-year players," said Kraft. "I like that. To be good in this league year-in and year-out, you have to grow some players. I think Coach Bill Belichick and the staff and the personnel people have developed a system where we do that. And I think what will happen is we'll expand the roster and more players will play for us."Sweet lord, what?!Here's Goodell taking a crack at the same question. "You always have to keep safety as a priority, under any format," he said. "Injuries occur in preseason games, including the four preseason games (aside: or walking on the icy sidewalks of Dallas for that matter), so you have to try to look to see what you can do in the offseason."Weve talked very extensively about - do you alter the OTA structure and what happens within the OTA structure?" Goodell asked."Do you alter the training camp period? Do we need extensive training camp periods, and how much contact should occur? What happens in the regular season? Do we really need to have players practicing in pads at some points during the season? I think all of those things have been addressed by the ownership for the last couple of years. Our committees have been focused on this. John Madden and Ronnie Lott and the safety committee are looking at these issues. All of this is going to help us make better decisions and the right decision to make the game as safe as possible.If you want the game as safe as possible - and as high quality as it is - you leave it alone and do your money-grab somewhere else. Tom E. Curran canbe reached at tcurran@comcastsportsnet.com.Follow Tom on Twitter at http:twitter.comtomecurran

EX-PATS PODCAST: Why does it seem Patriots secondary is playing better without Gilmore?

ex-pats-podcast17.png

EX-PATS PODCAST: Why does it seem Patriots secondary is playing better without Gilmore?

On this episode of The Ex-Pats Podcast...

0:10 - Mike Giardi and Dan Koppen give their takeaways from the Patriots win over the Falcons including the defense coming up strong against Atlanta but New England still taking too many penalties.

2:00 - Why it felt like this game meant more to the Patriots, their sense of excitement after the win, and building chemistry off a good victory.

6:20 - Falcons losing their identity without Kyle Shanahan as offensive coordinator and their bad play calling and decisions on 4th downs.

10:00 -  A discussion about Matt Ryan not making the throws he needed against the Patriots and if he has falling off the MVP caliber-type player he was last season.

14:00 - How and why the Patriots secondary seems to be playing better without Stephon Gilmore and why Malcolm Butler has been able to turn up his play as of late.

Mother Nature gets between Belichick and his Patriots-Falcons film study

gillette_stadium_fog_102217.jpg

Mother Nature gets between Belichick and his Patriots-Falcons film study

If your team makes a goal-line stop in the fourth quarter, but you can't see it on the All-22 tape, did it even happen? 

Bill Belichick said the fog that hovered above the Gillette Stadium turf on Sunday night didn't impact the play on the field, but it did make its imprint on the game in other ways. First of all, spotters and coaches up at the press level had some difficulty relaying information to coaches on the sidelines. Video on the hand-held tablets for sideline use -- as well as the old-school still-frame pictures Belichick prefers -- was also obstructed. 

Then on Monday, as coaches tried to digest the film, the fog butted in on the process again. 

"It affected us a lot this morning because it’s hard to see the game," Belichick said during a conference call. "The fourth quarter is – I don’t know – pretty close to a white-out on the sideline film. The sideline cameras are at the top of the stadium, so that’s a tough shot.

"The end zone cameras are a little bit lower and they get a little tighter shot, so the picture is a little bit clearer. But, on that shot, a lot of times you’re not able to see all the guys on the perimeter. It’s kind of an in-line shot.

"Yeah, the first half, start of the third quarter, it’s all right. As they get into the middle of the third quarter and on, for those of us with aging eyes, it’s a little strained to see it, and then there’s a point where you can’t really see it at all, especially from the sideline. So, yeah, it affected us."

Belichick re-iterated that the fog didn't do much to the product on the field (other than maybe making life difficult for kick and punt-returners), refuting Julio Jones' claim from late Sunday night. When it came to digesting the film, though, that was another story.

"It was more, I’d say, just tougher for, whether it be our video camera or the fans that were sitting in the upper deck. It’s just there was too much interference there," Belichick said. "It was probably hard to see the game. I know when we tried to look at the pictures in between series – you know, I don’t look at the tablets, so I won’t get into that – but the pictures, it was kind of the same thing. It was hard to really be able to make out exactly what you were seeing."