Times have changed at Gillette Stadium


Times have changed at Gillette Stadium

With seven weeks remaining on the regular season, it's a little early to assume too much about the 2012 Patriots. Despite all we've seen and learned about this team, there's still time for something to click on defense. (In Talib We Trust?) There's still time for the offense to find a consistent identity and nurse itself back to health. While seven weeks may not be an NFL lifetime, recent history leaves us well aware of how much everything can and will change.

The 2005 Steelers were 7-5 after 13 weeks, before winning four straight, and then four more on their way to a title. The 2011 Giants were 7-7 after 15 weeks, before sneaking into the playoffs and never looking back. The 2011 Patriots were 6-3 after 10 weeks, the same place they are now, amidst an eerily similar whirlwind of questions and concerns. They didn't lose another regular season game and came within one improbable drop (Wes Welker) and one improbable catch (Mario Manningham) of winning it all. In turn, to think that we'll feel the same way about the Patriots on the eve of the playoffs as we do right now is more unrealistic than Karl Rove's argument for Ohio.

But at the same time, with more than half a season in the books, the Patriots Picture is certainly coming into focus. Unlike the Celtics, who are still at a stage when nothing is real, and every assumption leaves you susceptible to ultimate embarrassment, 10 weeks in the NFL is a pretty solid sample size. And while keeping in mind that nothing's set in stone, I feel pretty comfortable making the following two simple, yet wildly important statements:

No. 1: The Patriots offense is fine. Not perfect, but fine. Fine enough to almost guarantee 30 points a week a number theyve now reached in six of nine games (while finishing with 29 in one of the three misses). For all the concerns about drops, injuries, inconsistent play calling and Bradys phantom flinching, when you can count on 30 points, you can generally chill out. The offense will be OK.

No. 2: The Patriots defense is not fine. Not by a long shot. After yesterdays game, Bill Belichick was somewhat defensive (pun sort of intended) when pressed about Buffalos 31-point explosion. I just got through saying that I think they have a real good group of skill players that are hard to tackle," he said. "Part of that is a credit to them, but we've got to do a better job.

And you know, its easy to look at the Bills roster with a gunslinging QB, two elusive running backs, a fleet of athletic receivers and an enormous, sure-handed tight end and believe the hype. But in reality, Buffalos offense isnt very good. They entered Sunday ranked 18th in points and 21st in yards. In their previous four games, they scored 30 points only once (against the 32nd ranked Titans defense). In the other three, they scored three points against the 49ers, 19 points against the Cardinals and nine points against the Texans. Lastly, yesterday was only the second game all season in which the Bills amassed more than 400 total yards. The other time? Yup, Week 4 against the Pats.

If you want to get into the nitty gritty of what makes New England's defense such a disaster, Tom E. Curran has you covered here. For this column, lets just say: For now, the defense is as bad as the offense is good. As a result, we've seen, and will continue to see a lot of these Patriots games come down to the wire. Yesterday won't be the last time that one defensive stand will serve as the difference between victory and defeat. And in that case, if history's any indicator, well have absolutely no clue what to expect.

Will they force a miraculous turnover like they did against Arizona? Surrender 72 yards in a minute like they did against the Ravens? Give up a crunch time bomb like they did in Seattle? Strip-sack the quarterback like they did against the Jets? Pull an end zone interception out of their ass like they did on Sunday? Its a total crap shoot. There's no rhyme or reason as to how things will unfold. All you can do is hold your breath and hope for the best while undoubtedly fearing the worst.

Yesterday afternoon, I was in the stands at Gillette for New England's latest psychological thriller, and all I can say is that there's no question that this defense has wreaked havoc on the state of Patriots Nation. But before I explain, a quick disclaimer:

I'm admittedly the poster boy for the changing face of Patriots fans in this post-dynasty era. Back in 2003, when I officially moved back to Boston (after four years of college in New York and a quick pit-stop in Vermont) my father bought season tickets from a friend, and from that moment we didn't miss a game for five years. Actually, that's not true. We missed one game: The snowstorm against Miami. But even skipping that was an unbelievably difficult decision, and we regretted it the whole afternoon. Back then, Gillette was everything to us. It wasn't a Patriots home game unless we were there to support them. We were part of the masses that trekked to Foxboro every single Sunday to be part of what, at the time, was without question one of the greatest home crowds in the NFL.

But times have obviously changed. Earlier this month,'s Gregg Rosenthal wrote a story where he ranked the best home crowds in the league, and broke them down into four categories: Top Tier, Next Level, Middle of the Pack and Bottom Rung. Pats fans were in the Bottom Rung, and honestly, as much as it hurts, it's hard to disagree. Anyone who was at yesterday's game will tell you that the crowd by NFL standards was pretty much a non-factor; a far cry from the glory days. And the question is: How did this happen?

The most common answer is that increased ticket prices and a deflating economy have phased out the real fans and turned Gillette into an apathetic country club, and to a certain extent that's true. But it goes deeper than that. After all, tickets prices have always been expensive. For most fans, going to a game (even more, having season tickets) has always been about sacrifice. There have always been better, more sensible and pressing ways to spend your money. But these days, more and more die hard Patriots fans are choosing not to. Over the years, the idea of battling the cold and traffic grew less and less appealing to my father and I, and we sold off most of our tickets. A few years back, we started having trouble finding buyers. Last year, we couldn't even give away tickets to some of the games. This year, we gave the tickets up all together. It was emotional decision, but at the end of the day, it just wasn't worth it anymore. And I know we're not the only ones who feel that way.

The most obvious reason is the vast improvement of the at-home viewing experience. HD TVs, the Red Zone and fantasy football have turned Sundays on the couch into one of the most enjoyable experiences in a sports fan's life. My dad and I still get together every Sunday, and forge the same Patriots memories. We still scream and yell like we're crammed into Section 121, but it's hard to beat the warmth of the living room and the ability to keep tabs on the rest of the league over on Channel 899. Then again, the enhanced at-home experience isn't unique to New England. Every NFL city's dealing with these technological threats, but not all of them are suffering through the same home field heartache.

What is unique to New England, however, are the three Super Bowl victories in four years; the fact that, over this past decade, Patriots fans have been spoiled beyond belief. And when that kind of success is followed by seven years of coming up short, it's only natural to experience a significant drop in interest and intensity. In other words, the regular season just doesn't mean as much as it used to around here. The regular season has become a formality; something that the Pats merely have to survive in order to assume their automatic playoff berth. There's no urgency in Weeks 1-17 because we've trained to believe that Weeks 1-17 don't matter. That the Pats can start 1-2 and still win the Super Bowl, or go 14-2 and get upset by the Jets in the first round. It makes it less likely for fans to want to deal with the increasing inconveniences of an afternoon at Gillette, and for the fans that do make the trip, it makes it harder to get that lost in the moment; to let loose and really believe that a third down stop here or a goal line stand there will have any significant impact on the season's outcome. Combine that with the still burning resentment of two crushing Super Bowl losses, and these days Gillette's filled with far more cynicism than enthusiasm. And honestly, you can understand why.

The in-game experience at the stadium doesn't help matters either. While the Jumbotron still features plenty of "Let's get loud" graphics and clips of players trying to pump up the crowd at key moments, for some reason there's no sound. The stadium speakers are completely muted. And while I assume there's a reason for this, I'm sure that it makes no sense. As someone who spends way too much time at the Garden, I can tell you that Celtics fans are never more rabid than when Kevin Garnett's face and voice comes over the Jumbrotron. When he looks everyone in the eye and says: "Yo, this fourth quarter. We need you Celtics fans. Come on, I need to feel it. I need to FEEEEEEEEEEEL IIIIITTTTTTT!" You don't get the same vibe at Gillette when Brandon Spikes pops up on the screen to deliver some weird form of motivational sign language. I don't get it. Spikes is the perfect guy for this kind of situation, too. He's closest the Patriots have to KG; a player who's 100 percent insane, and whose insanity is beyond contagious. Instead, he's basically a mime. He's useless.

And speaking of the Jumbotron, I still have no idea why the Pats refuse to show controversial replays. What do they think is going to happen if the crowd sees a replay they don't like? Are they going rush the field and riot like it's a soccer match in Senegal? No. They're not. In fact, they're going to get loud. And angry. And not the kind of contrived anger that comes from the Jumbotron silently encouraging fans to stand up and cheer on third down GENUINE ANGER AND EMOTION. The very thing that the stadium lacks. For instance, Spikes' hit to the head on Ryan Fitzpatrick was the perfect opportunity to get the fans riled up yesterday. Forget the fact that no one even got a chance to see the hit because we were all watching the ball. Forget that the ref made the right call. But that was an essential play. A play the fans deserved to see again, and one that would have without question taken the intensity to a level that the crowd had yet to reach. It would have helped the Patriots! But there was nothing. No replay. It was like the play never happened. Instead, the screen cut to shot of the Pats doofy mascot standing in a sea of cheerleaders and holding a sign that said "Let's Get Loud!"

No one got loud.

But when it comes down to it, it really comes backs to my initial point.

The defense.

Because the truth is, despite all the factors that interfere with Patriots fans being as enthusiastic and intimidating as they were once upon a time, the fans are still looking for a reason to get crazy. They're still drunk. They're still wound up. They still want to make the best of their Sunday escape from reality and scream and yell with everything they've got.

But with this defense, it's really hard.

Back in the glory days, the crowd and the defense were a team. They worked in tandem. The fans put every ounce of energy and passion into making life hell for the opposing team. They went out on a limb, put their pride on the line, and let the visiting offense know that there was no way in hell that they were going to score. And the Patriots always backed them up. They earned every decibel of sound and respect.

In 2012, the defense hasn't earned anything. And it's hard for the fans to lose themselves in the moment when they're simultaneously bracing for collapse; when after nine weeks, all they can do is hold their breath and hope for the best. During that final drive yesterday, there was no confidence in the air; no intensity coming from the crowd. It was just fear. And when Devin McCourty picked off that pass, there was no fingering pointing and taunting in the Bills direction. There was just one enormous sigh of relief. It's tough situation. It's really unfortunate. But that's just the way it is.

Thankfully, the Pats still have seven more weeks to try and change it.

Rich can be reached at Follow Rich on Twitter at http:twitter.comrich_levine

Tom Brady on pace for huge numbers, so why is he down on his play of late?

Tom Brady on pace for huge numbers, so why is he down on his play of late?

FOXBORO -- Tom Brady is on pace for 5,224 yards passing in 2017, just a shade under his total from his career-high in 2011. He's on track to have 34 touchdowns and just five picks. Barring a continued run of ridiculous efficiency from Kansas City's Alex Smith, those numbers would be MVP-caliber in all likelihood.

But Brady's not thrilled with the way he's played of late. What gives? 


In his past two games, he hasn't thrown the football as consistently as he would have liked. After starting the season with a 10-to-0 touchdown-to-interception ratio, he's 3-to-2 in the last couple of weeks. His accuracy has been at times pinpoint (as it was on his 42-yard completion to Brandin Cooks to help set up a Rob Gronkowski score against the Jets), but it has also been uncharacteristically erratic.

He was picked deep down the middle of the field by Buster Skrine last week, but the more concerning throw may have been the quick out-route to Gronkowski that Skrine dropped for what should have been an easy interception. Brady missed Phillip Dorsett on what looked like it could have been a long touchdown with Dorsett running free behind the defense. He threw behind Chris Hogan twice in the game, one of which opened up Hogan to a rib-shot that landed him on the injury report this week.

Against the Jets, Brady was not sacked and he was hit only four times -- a light day for him compared to other weeks this season when he's been battered. Yet he still completed just under 53 percent of his passes for 257 yards and a season-low 6.76 yards per attempt. 

"Well, I've got to hit the open . . . If the throws are there I've got to be able to make them," he said on Friday. "It's disappointing when I don't. To me, it just comes back to technique and fundamentals and making sure everything is working and that's the consistent daily thing that you're working on. I'm always working on my accuracy.

"I wish I hit them all. I'm capable of hitting them all and I need to be able to do that. I said last week that some of these games wouldn't be as close if I was playing better in the red area. I think some of those missed opportunities in the pass game with me hitting guys would really help our team. Hopefully, I can do a better job for this team."

Brady is no longer listed on the Patriots injury report, but he dealt with a left shoulder injury against both the Bucs and the Jets, and it's worth wondering if that somehow impacted how his passes traveled in those games. Balance is key in Brady's world, and even though he can make flat-footed throws look easy, perhaps an injury to his front side limited his ability to place the ball where he wanted. 

Keeping Brady upright could go a long way in helping the 40-year-old regain his form from Weeks 2-4 when he didn't dip below a 104 quarterback rating. Bill Belichick said earlier this week that part of the reason the Jets pass-rush wasn't quite as effective as others they'd faced this year was his team's ability to run the ball. Productive rushing attempts on first and second down mean manageable third downs, which mean shorter pass attempts. Those of course, in theory, lead to less time standing in the pocket and a healthier quarterback.

"It's great," Brady said of his team's recent surge running the football. "I mean, to be able to run the ball consistently in the NFL is important for every offense. It does take a lot of . . . I wouldn't say pressure, it's just production. If 400 yards of offense is what you're looking for and you can get 150 from your running game, the 250 has got to come in the passing game. If you're getting 50 yards in the rushing game then it means you've got to throw for more.

"I don't think it's pressure it's just overall you're going to get production in different areas and the backs are a big part of our offense and handing the ball off to them is an easy way for us to gain yards if we're all coordinated and doing the right thing. But those guys are running hard. The line is doing a great job up front finishing blocks and so forth."

Against the Falcons and their talented -- though underperforming -- offense this weekend, the running game could be key. First, it could help the Patriots defense by controlling possession and keeping Matt Ryan, Julio Jones, Devonta Freeman and Tevin Coleman off the field. Next are the obvious advantages for the signal-caller who could use a stress-free day in the pocket to help him solve his recent accuracy issues.