Red Sox

Rajai Davis knows what three straight playoff wins look like


Rajai Davis knows what three straight playoff wins look like

BOSTON — The last time a team won three straight playoff games, Rajai Davis was in the unfortunate position to have a front-row seat.

Davis, the Red Sox pinch-runner and backup outfielder, famously hit a Game 7 home run in the World Series last year against the Cubs. That Game 7 proved to be the Cubs’ third straight win over the Indians, completing a comeback after Cleveland held a 3-1 advantage in the Fall Classic.

“They’re thinking, they just want to get it over with,” Davis said Saturday. “You know, I know that’s how we were. [You don’t want it going] the extra games because you never know what can happen. Especially they’re coming here, to our home park, so it’s a matter of: we [the Red Sox] got to take care of tomorrow. 

“We got to go out and do it. We have to just play better than them. We have to want it more than them. If we don’t want it more than them, they’re gonna win, that’s the bottom line. They wanted it more than us up till now. Until we want it more than them, we got to play better. We got to show it.”

Doug Fister has the ball for the Sox in what could be their final game of 2017. He had an interesting little take on the matter.

“Talking with a buddy last night about it, there's nothing to lose, with everything to lose,” Fister said.

Without getting too existential, it stands to reason that the team with a big advantage does all of a sudden acquire a pressure: they are now supposed to win. But Davis felt the pressure remains with the team trailing in the series.

“I think the pressure’s all on the other team, on the team that has to come back — but you still have to win,” Davis said. “I mean it takes a lot to win in this game. You got to do a lot of things to win ball games. You know, No. 1 pitching. No. 2 defense. And no. 3 you got to put some runs together. At least one, you know, if you’re gonna shut ‘em out. But it takes a lot to win.”

Asked if watching the Cubs last year gave him reason to believe in the Sox now, Davis noted the differences in the two teams. 

"Cubs had definitely a different team than we have right now,” Davis said. “I don’t remember how many games they won, they had the personnel to really do that, to pull that off. They had the pitching. They had everything that they needed. We have all those things, but it’s putting it together tomorrow. And that’s the key. Can we put it together tomorrow? If we do, we’ll win.”

Steadiness, unsurprisingly, was what was preached Saturday. The Sox did appear calm and relaxed when the clubhouse was open to the media after Saturday’s workout. There was no big team meeting planned, with the coaching staff striving for normalcy. The Sox do feel they’ve been tested enough times that they’re not in an unfamiliar place.

The Sox have acknowledged the firepower of the Astros isn’t something the Sox can match one-for-one at the plate. Astros manager A.J. Hinch said Saturday that his team isn’t yet looking toward the next round, however.

“We're happy with where we're at because we're in the best position possible coming into this series where we won both games,” Hinch said. “But we have pretty good perspective on this team. I don't see any sense of entitlement. I don't see a team that's starting to look forward to the next series. We're not there yet. That mentality will be entrenched in this team and our guys will respond accordingly. 

“So you want to draw up a 2-0 lead in any five-game series, sign me up. I'm in. It's a tremendous opportunity, but it's only an opportunity that you can move on to the next game and get to the finish line. We do need to play well to beat these guys. We're at their home stadium, it is a tough place to play. Our guys are keeping all that in perspective and go into Game 3 as hungry as ever.”

*  Sox manager John Farrell again left the door open for a potential start for David Price later in the series. “Anything as it relates to who would start in Game 4 on Monday, we'll get to that when we get through tomorrow,” Farrell said. “But we have a couple of different ways we can go with that in terms of the starter for Game 4. … I would anticipate he'll be available tomorrow. So how that impacts going forward, it's too early to tell.”

*  Mookie Betts (left wrist) and Dustin Pedroia (left knee) should be good to go on Sunday. “A hundred percent of what he is right now,” Farrell said. 

*  Farrell said Chris Sale is available in relief in Game 3. (But reasonably, it’s hard to imagine the Sox would actually use him.)


Report: Ex-Red Sox reliever Reed gets deal with Twins


Report: Ex-Red Sox reliever Reed gets deal with Twins

He was dubbed "Closer B" by Red Sox manager John Farrell when acquired at the trade deadline last summer, now Addison Reed is "Closer B Gone" the Twins.

The right-handed reliever, 29, has agreed to a two-year, $16.75 million free-agent deal with Minnesota, pending a physical, Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports and reports. 

Reed began last season with the Mets and had 19 saves and a 2.57 ERA before being traded to the Red Sox, where he had a 3.33 ERA in 29 games (27 innings) without a save as a setup man for Craig Kimbrell.  

Red Sox, Mookie Betts far apart on salary and heading toward arbitration


Red Sox, Mookie Betts far apart on salary and heading toward arbitration

The Red Sox and star right fielder Mookie Betts intend to go to an arbitration hearing in February, and there were signs this was coming even a year ago.

Betts was the only arbitration-eligible player on the Red Sox who did not settle on a contract with the team on Friday, when a deadline arrived for all teams and arbitration-eligible players to exchange 2018 salary figures. Jackie Bradley Jr., Xander Bogaerts and Drew Pomeranz were the biggest names to avoid hearings.

Betts filed for a $10.5 million salary and the Red Sox filed at $7.5 million.  Betts and the Red Sox agreed previously that if no figure could be settled on by the Friday deadline, they would proceed to a hearing, assistant general manager Brian O'Halloran said. 

A three-person panel of arbitrators therefore is set to determine what Betts makes in 2018: either the $7.5 million figure the Sox filed or the $10.5 million figure Betts' camp submitted. The arbitrators won't settle on a midpoint for the parties. 

O'Halloran noted to the Globe there are no hard feelings involved.

Nonetheless, such a large gap would seem to provide incentive to settle. The parties technically could still decide to do so, but that would take a change of course from the present plan. The idea was to settle any time before Friday, and they did not. 

Betts is asking for near-record money for a first-year arbitration eligible player. Kris Bryant set the record Friday with a $10.85 million settlement.

The hearings can be difficult for player-team relations because teams have to make the case in front of the player that he is worth less money than he wants.

Betts, 25, hit .264, with 24 homers, 102 RBI, 25 stolen bases and a .803 OPS in 2017, numbers that fell from his American League MVP runner-up performance in 2016, but were nonetheless very strong and coupled with first-rate defense.

This offseason is Betts' first of arbitration eligibility. In the first three years of service time in a players' career, there's no recourse if you don't like the salary a team is offering. Teams can pay players anything at league minimum or above. 

The only option a player has in those first three years is to make a stand on principle: you can force the team to technically "renew" your salary, which notes to everyone that you did not agree to the salary. Betts and his agents did that in 2017 when the Sox paid him $950,000, a very high amount relative to most contract renewals.

Some of the standard thinking behind forcing a team to renew a contract is that if an arbitration case comes up down the road — and one now looms for Betts — it's supposed to show the arbitrators that the player felt even in seasons past, he was underpaid.

Still, the Sox may have effectively combatted that perception by paying Betts almost $1 million on a renewal. Per USA Today, that $950,000 agreement in 2017 was "the second-highest one-year deal ever for a non-arbitration-eligible player with two-plus years of big league service." Mike Trout got $1 million in 2014.