Patriots

Things picking up for Red Sox

839519.jpg

Things picking up for Red Sox

Now that the Winter Meetings are underway, the Red Sox have signed Mike Napoli and the offseason floodgates are officially open, it wont be long before the 2013 Sox roster rounds into shape.

Of course, thats not to say that getting there will be easy. I dont think anyone envies the position that Ben Cheringtons in right now, and what hell have to withstand in the days and weeks ahead.

Hey, Larry. I really think we should pull the trigger on Swisher . . .

No!

But Larry, I thought you said . . .

No!

OK, fine. Then what do you thin

No! And go fetch some grape juice! Me and Wally are thirsty!

Nah, Im just kidding. Its much worse than that. But despite any and all obstacles, Cherington has some work to do.

So, what should he do?

The first step in determining that is to determine what they need, and the first step in determining that is to determine what they have. On that note . . .

The Sox have four starting pitchers: Jon Lester, Clay Buchholz, Felix Doubront and (gulp) John Lackey

They have a catcher (SaltyRoss), a first baseman (Napoli), a second baseman (Pedroia), a shortstop (Iglesias), a third baseman (Middlebrooks), a center fielder (Ellsbury) and two corner outfielders better suited for a platoon (GomesKalish).

They have a bullpen: Bailey, Bard, Melancon, Tazawa, Breslow and maybe Atchinson and Rich Hill. Theres also Franklin Morales, who Cherington said will kick off camp as a starter, but is just as likely to end up back in the pen. (But there's no Alfredo Aceves, who was last seen boarding a spaceship for the planet Gramula sometime in early October.)

So, thats what the Sox have.

Add it all up, and this is what they need:

1. Starting pitching

2. Another bat; an outfield bat.

Now, in a perfect world, the Sox will address both issues. In any world, theyll address both issues. But what I mean is that in a perfect world, theyll spare no cost in acquiring the best outfield bat and strongest starting arm available and re-stock the team for competition in the ever-improving AL East.

But more than likely, the Sox will prioritize.

Gordon Edes argued yesterday that Josh Hamilton would be an ideal fit for the Sox, but I disagree. In fact, I dont know how Edes could have written an entire Hamilton-to-the-Sox story, without making one mention of his off-the-field issues; that hes injury prone; that he hit .368 with 21 homer last April and May, but then .245 with only 22 homers from June through September; or that he missed important games during the heat of the 2011 pennant race (as the Rangers ship was sinking) with a sinus infection.

Ideal . . . what?

Honestly, Id rather have Nick Swisher.

On one hand, no ones crazy about the idea of giving up a second round pick to acquire the former Yankee. After all, in the past, the second round has brought Boston players like Dustin Pedroia and Jon Lester. On the other hand, its also brought guys like Jeffrey Morris, Jonathan Egan and Michael Hall. Who? Exactly. Its a crap shoot.

And while, compared to Hamilton, the ceiling is much lower for Swishers production, Swishers foundation is far more solid and reliable.

Hamilton has played 150 games in a season only once in his career (2007). Swisher appeared in 150 games ever year from 2006-2011, and just missed that number last year with 148. Also, here are Swisher home run totals for the past eight years: 21, 35, 22, 24, 29, 29, 23, 24.

Thats production you can set your smart phone to, and when you consider that steady and reliable are two qualities that the Sox have yearned for over the last few years, Swisher makes more sense. At the very least, he's the safer choice.

But if were being honest (and hey, why not?), I think starting pitching should still be No. 1 on the Sox priority list.

While theres an instinct to look at the line-up and freak out over the lack of explosiveness, the truth is that power is not required to win a World Series.

Just look at the Giants: The were dead last in the majors in homers last year. The Cardinals were 13th the year before (and had only two guys go over 30). In 2010, the Giants ranked 10th in homers but were led by the mighty Aubrey Huff (26) and Juan Uribe (24).

Even if the Sox dont sign another outfielder (even though we know they will), they still have three guys in that line-up (Ellsbury, Papi and Napoli) who are capable of hitting 30 homers, as well as three guys (Salty, Pedroia and Middlebrooks) who should be good for right around 20.

The power is OK. Theyre still going to score runs. Far more important, is finding a way to stop the other guys from scoring.

For whatever reason, I'm optimistic about Jon Lester this year. With the return of Farrell, the absence of Beckett (although itd be nice if Lackey was gone), Lester's poised for a bounce back season. I also think that Clay Buchholz, another year older, wiser and stronger, will continue to challenge Lester for the title of proverbial ace.

But after that . . . ehhhh . . .

Doubront had a promising rookie season, but there are still questions. John Lackey hasnt pitched in a year and wasnt very good before that. Is Morales the answer at No. 5? Maybe in spurts, but regardless, the Sox need pitching more than they need another big bat.

Of course, the bad news is that theres really not an impact starter out there. That is, unless you consider Zach Grienke an impact starter, but even then, hes not a good fit for Boston.

Dan Haren might have been good for a quick fix, but he reportedly just signed a one-year deal with the Nationals.

After that:

Kyle Lohse, who's coming off a fantastic season in St. Louis (16-3, 2.86 ERA), might work, but he'll be asking for a lot, is 34 years old and spent the last seven years pitching in the NL.

How about Brandon McCarthy? The 29-year-old has been effective these last three years in Oakland and Texas (last season, with the A's, he was 8-6 with a 3.24 ERA). He also has a great personality and attitude that might be a boon for the Sox depressing rotation. On the down side, over these last three years, McCarthy's made 17, 25 and 18 starts, respectively. So durability could be an issue. (Although last year's freak line-drive accident was hardly avoidable)

Anibal Sanchez is young and exciting but he's reportedly asking for 90M (no thanks). Ryan Dempster is old and probably better suited for the National League. Freddy Garcia? Good lord, no!

I'll tell you who I kind of like: Shaun Marcum. He's still youngish (he turns 31 next week), he has experience pitching in the AL East with Toronto and in the three years since his Tommy John surgery, he's gone 33-19 with a sub-3.70 ERA.

For short money, come on Ben, why not take a chance?

Right after you're done grabbing Wally's grape juice.

Rich can be reached at rlevine@comcastsportsnet.com. Follow Rich on Twitter at http:twitter.comrich_levine

Tom Brady on pace for huge numbers, so why is he down on his play of late?

Tom Brady on pace for huge numbers, so why is he down on his play of late?

FOXBORO -- Tom Brady is on pace for 5,224 yards passing in 2017, just a shade under his total from his career-high in 2011. He's on track to have 34 touchdowns and just five picks. Barring a continued run of ridiculous efficiency from Kansas City's Alex Smith, those numbers would be MVP-caliber in all likelihood.

But Brady's not thrilled with the way he's played of late. What gives? 

MORE PATRIOTS:

In his past two games, he hasn't thrown the football as consistently as he would have liked. After starting the season with a 10-to-0 touchdown-to-interception ratio, he's 3-to-2 in the last couple of weeks. His accuracy has been at times pinpoint (as it was on his 42-yard completion to Brandin Cooks to help set up a Rob Gronkowski score against the Jets), but it has also been uncharacteristically erratic.

He was picked deep down the middle of the field by Buster Skrine last week, but the more concerning throw may have been the quick out-route to Gronkowski that Skrine dropped for what should have been an easy interception. Brady missed Phillip Dorsett on what looked like it could have been a long touchdown with Dorsett running free behind the defense. He threw behind Chris Hogan twice in the game, one of which opened up Hogan to a rib-shot that landed him on the injury report this week.

Against the Jets, Brady was not sacked and he was hit only four times -- a light day for him compared to other weeks this season when he's been battered. Yet he still completed just under 53 percent of his passes for 257 yards and a season-low 6.76 yards per attempt. 

"Well, I've got to hit the open . . . If the throws are there I've got to be able to make them," he said on Friday. "It's disappointing when I don't. To me, it just comes back to technique and fundamentals and making sure everything is working and that's the consistent daily thing that you're working on. I'm always working on my accuracy.

"I wish I hit them all. I'm capable of hitting them all and I need to be able to do that. I said last week that some of these games wouldn't be as close if I was playing better in the red area. I think some of those missed opportunities in the pass game with me hitting guys would really help our team. Hopefully, I can do a better job for this team."

Brady is no longer listed on the Patriots injury report, but he dealt with a left shoulder injury against both the Bucs and the Jets, and it's worth wondering if that somehow impacted how his passes traveled in those games. Balance is key in Brady's world, and even though he can make flat-footed throws look easy, perhaps an injury to his front side limited his ability to place the ball where he wanted. 

Keeping Brady upright could go a long way in helping the 40-year-old regain his form from Weeks 2-4 when he didn't dip below a 104 quarterback rating. Bill Belichick said earlier this week that part of the reason the Jets pass-rush wasn't quite as effective as others they'd faced this year was his team's ability to run the ball. Productive rushing attempts on first and second down mean manageable third downs, which mean shorter pass attempts. Those of course, in theory, lead to less time standing in the pocket and a healthier quarterback.

"It's great," Brady said of his team's recent surge running the football. "I mean, to be able to run the ball consistently in the NFL is important for every offense. It does take a lot of . . . I wouldn't say pressure, it's just production. If 400 yards of offense is what you're looking for and you can get 150 from your running game, the 250 has got to come in the passing game. If you're getting 50 yards in the rushing game then it means you've got to throw for more.

"I don't think it's pressure it's just overall you're going to get production in different areas and the backs are a big part of our offense and handing the ball off to them is an easy way for us to gain yards if we're all coordinated and doing the right thing. But those guys are running hard. The line is doing a great job up front finishing blocks and so forth."

Against the Falcons and their talented -- though underperforming -- offense this weekend, the running game could be key. First, it could help the Patriots defense by controlling possession and keeping Matt Ryan, Julio Jones, Devonta Freeman and Tevin Coleman off the field. Next are the obvious advantages for the signal-caller who could use a stress-free day in the pocket to help him solve his recent accuracy issues. 

NBC SPORTS BOSTON SCHEDULE

Bruins goalie decisions may become tougher than you might think

Bruins goalie decisions may become tougher than you might think

BRIGHTON, Mass – The good news for Tuukka Rask on Friday is that there was no dark, quiet room required for the Bruins goaltender when he reported to the Warrior Ice Arena practice facility for treatment for his concussion.

Instead, the Bruins goalie got going on the concussion protocol after getting steam-rolled by Anders Bjork at practice on Wednesday morning and started the road back to recovery from his first concussion suffered at the NHL level. In the further good news department, Bruins backup netminder Anton Khudobin stepped up in Rask’s absence and stopped 26-of-29 shots in a winning effort over the Vancouver Canucks on Thursday night.

MORE:

So now Khudobin has twice as many wins as Rask in half as many starts in the opening two weeks of the season. That’s certainly good for the Russian backup that stumbled out of the starting gate last season but has really fortified his spot early this year with a strong training camp followed by a .928 save percentage and 2.16 goals against average this year.  

“I’ve been there before. I’ve played many games in a row before in the AHL and the NHL, so it’s the same routine. It’s just harder to be honest when you’re playing one game every two weeks or something,” said Khudobin. “I’ll talk to Goalie Bob about what I did good or bad, get ready for practice, stretch it out and warm it up, go get it at practice and get ready for the games.”

That’s in stark contrast to Rask, who has a pair of losses to the worst team in the NHL last season, the Colorado Avalanche, and a defeat out in Las Vegas where he was out-dueled by Bruins castoff Malcolm Subban. The defense hasn’t been particularly good in front of him in those games and the team only scored a total of four goals in Rask’s three losses, but the All-Star netminder was also far from sharp with an .882 save percentage to start the season.

The home loss to Colorado, in particular, was a poor performance from Rask where he buried his team with an early deficit once a couple of soft goals by him in the first period. Compounding the lack of quality play from Rask was his odd choice to cease talking about team performance with the media following the loss to the Golden Knights.

“I just try to go out there and give us a chance to win every night. That’s what I’m focused on. I’m not going to comment anymore on team play that much,” said Rask after the Sunday loss in Vegas. “We can just talk about goaltending. That’s just the way it is. Sorry.”

It certainly sounded and felt like Rask was directed to only talk about his own play by somebody higher up in the Bruins organization, and it was that kind of a development rather than the Bruins goalie passive-aggressively dissing his teammates. But that kind of directive from the organization would also speak to some pre-existing friction between Rask and his teammates where past criticism has perhaps rubbed some of them the wrong way.

It felt that way when Rask and David Krejci spoke about things in a tense dressing room in Las Vegas following last weekend’s loss, and it felt that way late last season when the Finnish goalie stayed home in Boston while watching Khudobin win one of the biggest games of the season in Brooklyn against the Islanders. At times in the past, something hasn’t always felt quite right about the dynamic between Rask and the rest of the Bruins, and it’s not a particularly good sign that both parties seemed to already be headed down that path just five games into this season.

All of this makes for some very interesting timing with the Anders Bjork collision into Rask that knocked him for a loop, and has now opened the door wide for Khudobin to start a few games in a row. Should Khudobin play well and continue to backstop a winning hockey team playing hard in front of him, it will make for a much tougher goalie decision than some might anticipate. Rask is clearly the better goaltender in terms of talent, upside, resume and accomplishments over the last eight years, but the question becomes how much is that offset by the Bruins team potentially playing a better brand of hockey with Khudobin between the pipes.

Maybe it’s because Khudobin is the backup and the Bruins are trying to play tighter defense in front of him, but it’s hard to argue the fact that Boston seems to play a smarter, stronger game when the backup gets the call.  

“That’s what I’m there for, but at the same time, I wasn’t thinking, 'Oh maybe [Rask] is going to get hurt and he’s not going to play [the next few games].' I’m not thinking that way, definitely,” said Khudobin. “I was just focusing on my practice. Whatever coach is going to tell me after the practice, then I will keep moving from that point.”

The best-case scenario for the Bruins is that Khudobin plays good, strong, winning hockey in Rask’s absence and that in turn lights a fire under the No. 1 goaltender after he looked fairly laissez-faire in his first few games this season. That’s what everybody saw out of Rask late last season when he was called out by the Bruins coaching staff and challenged by a red-hot Khudobin pushing for some big game starts.

Perhaps that is exactly the kind of collective kick to the hockey pants that’s needed for Rask to start carrying the Bruins team once he gets healthy again.

A deeper question, however, would involve asking how much longer the Bruins want to hitch their wagons to a $7 million a year goalie that needs to mentally recharge his batteries from time to time, and who begins to wilt performance-wise if he makes more than 55-60 start in an NHL season. Members of the Rask Fan Club will point to his career .922 save percentage, but it's been three years since he's been able to consistently reach that level of performance. 

The older Rask, 30, gets, the more baggage is getting added on with a performance level that’s dropped from his Vezina Trophy-winning days. Some of that is clearly about the defense getting a makeover in front of him, but it’s also about Rask just not always being as consistently good when Boston needs him most in the big games.

Khudobin certainly wouldn’t be the long-term answer for the Bruins, and the jury is out on whether or not Zane McIntyre has a future in the NHL as a goalie. So there’s no long-term solution if they suddenly decided to go away from Rask for any reason. But if this humble hockey writer was coaching the Bruins and Khudobin goes on a winning tear over the next few weeks? A healthy Rask wouldn’t automatically be handed his No. 1 workload upon his return, and it would be a couple of goalies splitting time to decide who wants it more.  

That kind of situation might not be up to goaltender controversy standards at this early point in the season, but there’s nothing wrong with making Rask grind for it a little when he does come back after breezing through some early season losses. 

NBC SPORTS BOSTON SCHEDULE