Bears

Bears: Jermon Bushrod paying it forward, even if it costs him his job

jermond-bushrod-bears-insider-1029.png

Bears: Jermon Bushrod paying it forward, even if it costs him his job

Jermon Bushrod is living nothing less than the NFL version of “pay it forward:” Laid up with an injury, the Bears’ left tackle finds himself in that uniquely NFL alternate universe, where the ethos demands that when you’re injured, your job becomes supporting and mentoring your own replacement – because very often that’s exactly what someone once did for you.

Eight years ago Bushrod was a mid-round draft choice of the New Orleans Saints, playing in a total of just three games (zero starts) over the span of 2007-08. Then Saints Pro Bowl left tackle Jammal Brown suffered a torn ACL and other injuries in early 2009, and Bushrod was catapulted into the starting lineup.

Thus began a stretch of 82 consecutive starts for Bushrod at left tackle, taking Brown’s job and eventually leading to Brown being traded away. Notably, it was Brown who provided help and support for his reluctant replacement.

Now Bushrod finds himself in a situation eerily similar to what his was in 2009.

[SHOP: Gear up Bears fans!]

Bushrod suffered a concussion and right-shoulder injury in the Bears’ loss at Seattle. He has not been able to get back on the field since, cleared for the concussion but still hindered by the shoulder, and is not expected to play Sunday against the Minnesota Vikings, which would be the fourth missed game for a stalwart who’d missed just three games total over the previous six years.

In his place, Charles Leno Jr. has taken over at left tackle, possibly for good, at least this season. But that has come with the committed help from Bushrod, even if it contributes to Bushrod losing his job to the youngster.

“Eight years ago I was that same guy who was just practicing, I was that same guy and someone got hurt and I got thrown in there,” Bushrod said. “You never do this yourself; you have to lean on the older guys, lean on getting help.

“What would I be doing for myself, for this league, if I wasn’t helping to bring the people under me to a better place, better mindset? And if my number’s called when I get back in there, then it is what it is. If not, then I have to be mentally tough and help these guys out and doing my part.

“Because I had that. I wouldn’t be doing myself, this league or any of these young guys any favors if I shied away from this.”

[MORE: Bears face another stress point with Grasu's status uncertain vs. Vikings]

Bushrod is frustrated. He admits it. But the frustration is at just not being able to do a job he has loved and provided for his family, not at Leno or the prospect of losing his job.

His future in Chicago is obviously problematic, for a variety of reasons. Leno continuing his development can make Bushrod expendable with the latter’s $6.5 million base and bonus. Kyle Long projects at tackle long-term and not necessarily at his current right-tackle billet.

But Bushrod, who has lent his expertise with Long, is philosophical.

“I was in the same situation [as Leno],” Bushrod said. “This is how I got my opportunity and I was thrown in the fire. [At] 31 years old, I’m still playing. So at the end of the day, I don’t have much I can be upset about. It’s upsetting that I can’t contribute the way that I want to and I’ve always been used to.”

Bushrod laughed on Thursday at the thought of “coach” Bushrod, given his experience as a mentor while injured. The Bears could come up with worse assistants.

[ALSO: Vikings defense already good and only getting better]

Jay Cutler was sacked at the rate of once every 12.7 dropbacks as a Bear from 2009-2012. Bushrod was signed in 2013. Since Bushrod’s arrival, as either the left tackle or assistant coach, Cutler has been sacked once every 17.6 dropbacks.

Obviously not all due to Bushrod. But “I think he’s the standard,” Cutler said. “You know exactly what you’re gonna get out of him, a true pro, each and every day comes to work and tries to get better. You know at the end of the day, he’s gonna do that.”

“At the end of the day… .” A phrase used by both the quarterback and his primary protector.

“At the end of the day,” Bushrod said, "I have to take this process day by day, week by week, keep myself forward physically and mentally. I can tell you right now: It’s a tough position to be in, but at the end of the day, I have to fight to be a professional, help the guys around me and get myself right.” 

Unfinished Bears job a 'bitter pill' for John Fox, but the legacy lies beyond just the W-L record

john_fox_mullin_story.jpg
USA TODAY

Unfinished Bears job a 'bitter pill' for John Fox, but the legacy lies beyond just the W-L record

When John Fox succeeded Marc Trestman in 2015, neither he nor the Bears were looking at the situation and Fox as any sort of “bridge” hire – a de facto interim coach tasked with winning, but just as importantly, developing and getting a team turned around and headed in a right direction.

The heart of the matter is always winning, but in the overall, the mission statement also includes leaving the place better than you found it. Fox did that, which is very clearly the sentiment upstairs at Halas Hall as the Bears move on from Fox to Matt Nagy.

“It would’ve been nice to see it through,” Fox said to NBC Sports Chicago. “That’s kind of a bitter pill but you sort things out and move forward.

“I do think it’s closer than people think. We inherited a mess... but I felt we were on the brink at the end. I think that [Halas Hall] building is definitely different; they feel it. I do think that it was a positive.”

(Fox is probably not done coaching at some point, but that’s for another time, another story, and anyway, it’s his tale to tell when he feels like it. Or doesn’t.)

One measure of the Bears change effected: Virtually the entire Trestman staff, with the exceptions of receivers coach Mike Groh and linebackers coach Clint Hurtt, was jettisoned along with Trestman. By contrast, Nagy has retained not only virtually the entire Fox defensive staff under coordinator Vic Fangio, but also arguably the single most important non-coordinator offensive coach by virtue of position responsibility – Dave Ragone, the hands-on mentor of quarterback Mitch Trubisky.

Obvious but extremely difficult decisions are coming, as to shedding personnel and contracts – Josh Sitton, Pernell McPhee, Willie Young being among the most difficult because of tangible intangibles that no organization wants to lose.

“Bridge” results

Fox was never intended as a bridge coach but the results point to that function having been served. To exactly what end remains to play out under Nagy and the quarterback whom Ragone and Fox’s handling began developing.

Rick Renteria was one of those “bridge” guys for the Cubs, intended to be part of pulling out of or at least arresting the slide into the Mike Quade-Dale Sveum abyss, and leaving something for Joe Maddon. The late Vince Lombardi effectively served as that, at age 56 and for an unforeseen one-year for a Washington Redskins organization that’d gone 13 years without a winning season before Lombardi’s 1969 and needed a radical reversal. The culture change was realized over the next decade under George Allen and Jack Pardee, much of the success coming with the same players with whom Washington had languished before the culture change.

The Bears were in that state after the two years of Trestman and the three years of GM Phil Emery, certain of whose character-lite veteran player acquisitions (Martellus Bennett, Brandon Marshall) and high-character launchings (Brian Urlacher) had left a palpable pall over Halas Hall. A Fox goal was to eradicate that, which insiders in Lake Forest say privately was accomplished even amid the catastrophic crush of three straight seasons of 10 or more losses, and with injuries at historic levels.

What happens next is in the hands of Nagy and GM Ryan Pace, after a third John Fox franchise turnaround failed to materialize. Or did it? Because much of the core, from Trubisky through the defensive makeover, came on Fox’s watch, like him or not.

“You wish some things would’ve happened differently obviously,” Fox said, “but there was a lot positive that happened.”

2017 Bears position grades: Defensive Line

2017 Bears position grades: Defensive Line

2017 grade: B+

Level of need: Medium

Decisions to be made on: Mitch Unrein (free agent), John Jenkins (free agent)

Possible free agent targets: Jared Crick, Frostee Rucker, Dominique Easley

This unit was consistently the Bears’ best in 2017, with Akiem Hicks playing at a Pro Bowl level (don’t let his exclusion from the game fool you on that) and Eddie Goldman putting together a rock-solid, healthy year. 

Hicks signed a four-year contract extension just before the season began and rewarded the Bears with a dominant year, racking up 8 ½ sacks and 15 tackles for a loss. Goldman played in and started 15 games and was a key reason why the Bears limited opposing rushers to four yards per carry, tied for the 10th-best average in the league. 

But while the Bears’ defensive line was certainly good, it wasn’t as good as it could’ve been. These words from Vic Fangio ring true for Hicks and Goldman:

“I think they all have a lot more to give to us than we’ve seen,” Fangio said. “And it’s our job to get them to improve and become even better players. That will be more important to us than anybody we can acquire between now and whenever our first game is. So, and I know it’s always sexy to talk between now and the first game, you know, who are you going to draft, who’s in free agency, etc., but we’ve got to get our so-called good players playing even better. And that will be critical.”

Hicks will enter Year 3 in Fangio’s scheme, while 2018 will be Goldman’s fourth. It’ll also be a critical year for Jonathan Bullard and Roy Robertson-Harris, who’ve flashed potential at times but haven’t been able to turn that into consistent success on the field. 

And that’s where we begin to look ahead to free agency and the draft. Is the Bears’ evaluation of Bullard -- their 2016 third-round pick -- positive enough to hand him a bigger role in 2018? That’s question No. 1 to answer, with No. 2 then being if the team should try to re-sign Mitch Unrein. 

It may be a bit risky to move forward with Bullard, given how popular Unrein was among the Bears’ defensive coaching staff. 

“He’s one of the glue guys on the defense and the team,” Fangio said last November. “Every team needs a few of those guys who are going to do everything right, full speed, hard and tough all the time, and that’s Mitch.”

Defensive line coach Jay Rodgers offered this up about Unrein back in October: “He allows those guys to play fast,” with “those guys” being Hicks and Goldman. 

Statistically, the 30-year-old Unrein doesn’t  jump off the page, but he did record a career high 2 ½ sacks in 2017. Perhaps there would be some benefits to continuity in the Bears’ base 3-4 defensive line.

Worth noting too is this position isn’t a huge need, given Unrein usually played between 40 and 55 percent of the Bears’ defensive snaps on a per-game basis last year. Keeping Unrein for a relatively low cap hit would make some sense, as opposed to testing free agency to replace him.

Jared Crick is coming off back surgery and an ineffective 2016; Dominique Easley is coming off his third torn ACL this decade; Frostee Rucker is in his mid-30’s. The Bears could look to pick a 3-4 defensive end in April, but that would be a pretty quick re-draft of the position and would be an indication they don’t think much of Bullard. This seems like a position where keeping the status quo is likely, save maybe for replacing John Jenkins with a different backup behind Goldman.