Bears

Brian Hoyer using time-honored simple approach to running Bears offense

Brian Hoyer using time-honored simple approach to running Bears offense

Bears coaches awarded Brian Hoyer the offensive game ball for his performance in the Bears’ 17-14 win over the Detroit Lions, a game in which he methodically directed the Bears offense to 408 yards and controlled the ball for more than 33 minutes.

With many more efforts like last Sunday’s – 28-for-36 passing, 302 yards, 2 touchdowns, zero interceptions – he will be awarded the Bears starting-quarterback job, which would make the Bears the third team he has started for in his career. Hoyer, who’d started 26 career games before joining the Bears on a one-year contract last offseason, may have gotten his Chicago shot because of injury but is now positioned to keep the job through performance.

His first task, however, is keep it simple and direct, because that is precisely what has put him in this position.

With every situation that I’ve dealt with in my career, dealing with the quarterback situation, at this point I’m just trying to keep doing what I’m doing,” said Hoyer, whose NFL record as a starter is 16-12 going into next Sunday in Indianapolis. “Keep doing what I’m asked, and when I get a chance to play, play the best I can. That’s really all I’m trying to focus on.”

That’s not always easy. Quarterbacks are centerpieces of football teams, Chicago is a Bears town, which makes Hoyer the primary non-Cubs story rippling through sports coverage. Even if Hoyer is living in a cone of silence, others close to him aren’t.

“I try not to pay attention to the media, but when friends, family members reach out to you, you kind of figure it out,” Hoyer said. But for me, I’m not putting too much into it. I’m just trying to prepare the best I can and do what I’m asked of.”

Hoyer’s strength in coaches’ evaluations is obvious: He has thrown zero interceptions in 97 pass attempts spanning the last two games and part of a third (Philadelphia). The offense has incurred no delay-of-game penalties on Hoyer’s watch.

“He’s been very efficient moving the offense, done a nice job getting us in and out of the huddle, and distributing the ball to the right guy,” said offensive coordinator Dowell Loggains.

[SHOP BEARS: Get your Bears gear right here]

Maybe none of Hoyer’s success, however small the Chicago sample size so far, should be a surprise. He suffered through some of the Johnny Manziel quarterback circus while with the Cleveland Browns in 2014 and was 10-6 in starts for the Browns over 2013-14.

Hoyer is older now (31) but “he’s not a different player,” Loggains said. “You know, he had a really good year for us in 2014. I think he’s a little more confident because he’s played more, and taken a team to the playoffs. I see his personality coming out a little more. He’s just excited to be out there with the guys and helping us win a game last week.”

Interestingly, Hoyer’s Bears course has roughly paralleled that of Josh McCown, whose career high point came in 2013 when he replaced Cutler on two injury occasions. McCown approached the one-season heights of his 2013 (101.0 passer rating) once in his career, ironically in Cleveland as Hoyer’s successor in 2015 (93.3 rating).

Hoyer play over his two-plus games has produced a lofty 103.3, like McCown’s the reflection of being nearly interception-free. For his career, Hoyer has a respectable interception rate of 2.4 percent. By comparison, Cutler had a solid 2015, with a pick-rate of 2.3 percent but is a below-average 3.3 percent over his career.

The Hoyer mission statement is precisely matched with Loggains’ notion of a quarterback’s job: Facilitate and enable the other 10 members of the offense to do theirs.

The approach that has worked is virtually identical with that of McCown: “Just trying to go out and execute the game plan,” Hoyer said. “I think Dowell has done a good job of coming up with plays and knowing where our strengths are and I think really the offense kind of coming together.

“The offensive line really kind of jelling together. They’ve been playing better, giving me some time to throw the ball. And you know, a bunch of receivers, tight ends, everybody making plays, the running game going. So I think it’s just the total of the whole offense improving each week and that’s what we touched on. Just learn from the mistakes, keep doing the things we’re doing well, keep doing those and keep progressing.”

Unfinished Bears job a 'bitter pill' for John Fox, but the legacy lies beyond just the W-L record

john_fox_mullin_story.jpg
USA TODAY

Unfinished Bears job a 'bitter pill' for John Fox, but the legacy lies beyond just the W-L record

When John Fox succeeded Marc Trestman in 2015, neither he nor the Bears were looking at the situation and Fox as any sort of “bridge” hire – a de facto interim coach tasked with winning, but just as importantly, developing and getting a team turned around and headed in a right direction.

The heart of the matter is always winning, but in the overall, the mission statement also includes leaving the place better than you found it. Fox did that, which is very clearly the sentiment upstairs at Halas Hall as the Bears move on from Fox to Matt Nagy.

“It would’ve been nice to see it through,” Fox said to NBC Sports Chicago. “That’s kind of a bitter pill but you sort things out and move forward.

“I do think it’s closer than people think. We inherited a mess... but I felt we were on the brink at the end. I think that [Halas Hall] building is definitely different; they feel it. I do think that it was a positive.”

(Fox is probably not done coaching at some point, but that’s for another time, another story, and anyway, it’s his tale to tell when he feels like it. Or doesn’t.)

One measure of the Bears change effected: Virtually the entire Trestman staff, with the exceptions of receivers coach Mike Groh and linebackers coach Clint Hurtt, was jettisoned along with Trestman. By contrast, Nagy has retained not only virtually the entire Fox defensive staff under coordinator Vic Fangio, but also arguably the single most important non-coordinator offensive coach by virtue of position responsibility – Dave Ragone, the hands-on mentor of quarterback Mitch Trubisky.

Obvious but extremely difficult decisions are coming, as to shedding personnel and contracts – Josh Sitton, Pernell McPhee, Willie Young being among the most difficult because of tangible intangibles that no organization wants to lose.

“Bridge” results

Fox was never intended as a bridge coach but the results point to that function having been served. To exactly what end remains to play out under Nagy and the quarterback whom Ragone and Fox’s handling began developing.

Rick Renteria was one of those “bridge” guys for the Cubs, intended to be part of pulling out of or at least arresting the slide into the Mike Quade-Dale Sveum abyss, and leaving something for Joe Maddon. The late Vince Lombardi effectively served as that, at age 56 and for an unforeseen one-year for a Washington Redskins organization that’d gone 13 years without a winning season before Lombardi’s 1969 and needed a radical reversal. The culture change was realized over the next decade under George Allen and Jack Pardee, much of the success coming with the same players with whom Washington had languished before the culture change.

The Bears were in that state after the two years of Trestman and the three years of GM Phil Emery, certain of whose character-lite veteran player acquisitions (Martellus Bennett, Brandon Marshall) and high-character launchings (Brian Urlacher) had left a palpable pall over Halas Hall. A Fox goal was to eradicate that, which insiders in Lake Forest say privately was accomplished even amid the catastrophic crush of three straight seasons of 10 or more losses, and with injuries at historic levels.

What happens next is in the hands of Nagy and GM Ryan Pace, after a third John Fox franchise turnaround failed to materialize. Or did it? Because much of the core, from Trubisky through the defensive makeover, came on Fox’s watch, like him or not.

“You wish some things would’ve happened differently obviously,” Fox said, “but there was a lot positive that happened.”

2017 Bears position grades: Defensive Line

2017 Bears position grades: Defensive Line

2017 grade: B+

Level of need: Medium

Decisions to be made on: Mitch Unrein (free agent), John Jenkins (free agent)

Possible free agent targets: Jared Crick, Frostee Rucker, Dominique Easley

This unit was consistently the Bears’ best in 2017, with Akiem Hicks playing at a Pro Bowl level (don’t let his exclusion from the game fool you on that) and Eddie Goldman putting together a rock-solid, healthy year. 

Hicks signed a four-year contract extension just before the season began and rewarded the Bears with a dominant year, racking up 8 ½ sacks and 15 tackles for a loss. Goldman played in and started 15 games and was a key reason why the Bears limited opposing rushers to four yards per carry, tied for the 10th-best average in the league. 

But while the Bears’ defensive line was certainly good, it wasn’t as good as it could’ve been. These words from Vic Fangio ring true for Hicks and Goldman:

“I think they all have a lot more to give to us than we’ve seen,” Fangio said. “And it’s our job to get them to improve and become even better players. That will be more important to us than anybody we can acquire between now and whenever our first game is. So, and I know it’s always sexy to talk between now and the first game, you know, who are you going to draft, who’s in free agency, etc., but we’ve got to get our so-called good players playing even better. And that will be critical.”

Hicks will enter Year 3 in Fangio’s scheme, while 2018 will be Goldman’s fourth. It’ll also be a critical year for Jonathan Bullard and Roy Robertson-Harris, who’ve flashed potential at times but haven’t been able to turn that into consistent success on the field. 

And that’s where we begin to look ahead to free agency and the draft. Is the Bears’ evaluation of Bullard -- their 2016 third-round pick -- positive enough to hand him a bigger role in 2018? That’s question No. 1 to answer, with No. 2 then being if the team should try to re-sign Mitch Unrein. 

It may be a bit risky to move forward with Bullard, given how popular Unrein was among the Bears’ defensive coaching staff. 

“He’s one of the glue guys on the defense and the team,” Fangio said last November. “Every team needs a few of those guys who are going to do everything right, full speed, hard and tough all the time, and that’s Mitch.”

Defensive line coach Jay Rodgers offered this up about Unrein back in October: “He allows those guys to play fast,” with “those guys” being Hicks and Goldman. 

Statistically, the 30-year-old Unrein doesn’t  jump off the page, but he did record a career high 2 ½ sacks in 2017. Perhaps there would be some benefits to continuity in the Bears’ base 3-4 defensive line.

Worth noting too is this position isn’t a huge need, given Unrein usually played between 40 and 55 percent of the Bears’ defensive snaps on a per-game basis last year. Keeping Unrein for a relatively low cap hit would make some sense, as opposed to testing free agency to replace him.

Jared Crick is coming off back surgery and an ineffective 2016; Dominique Easley is coming off his third torn ACL this decade; Frostee Rucker is in his mid-30’s. The Bears could look to pick a 3-4 defensive end in April, but that would be a pretty quick re-draft of the position and would be an indication they don’t think much of Bullard. This seems like a position where keeping the status quo is likely, save maybe for replacing John Jenkins with a different backup behind Goldman.