Bears

Franchise tag just the first step for Forte

690046.png

Franchise tag just the first step for Forte

The anticipated franchise designation was assigned to running back Matt Forte on Friday. It isnt projected to make Forte particularly happy, even with its 7.7 million guaranteed money when he signs the contract. But it does project to keep him a Chicago Bear, and that was really the point.

It also is not likely to be the end of contract transactions for Forte.

The expectation is that he and agent Adisa Bakari, who has met with GM Phil Emery since Emery succeeded Jerry Angelo, will agree to a longer-term contract. That will allow the Bears to give Forte more guaranteed money and to average out the money over more years rather than full deal hitting in this contract year, which it does with the franchise tag.

Forte has hinted that he would be a little hard to find around Halas Hall if he received the tag. And the two sides have until July 15 to work out a longer deal.

The Bears gave an offer to Forte at the outset of last training camp and did not move enough to suit Fortes side, leaving him to play out the 2011 season under his rookie deal for less than 600,000.

Forte didnt hold out over that situation. The tag isnt what he wants, but New England guard Logan Mankins, who was tagged by the Patriots before he eventually worked out a long-term deal, told CSNChicago.com during Super Bowl week that holding out over the tag is simply too much money to leave on the table.

The 2012 tag is not the only leverage the Bears have in the Forte situation.

The collective bargaining agreement allows teams to apply the tag for a second year, albeit for more money but still not for the amount Forte would expect to net under a multi-year deal.

Forte, who missed four games this season with a knee injury, is at some risk even with the 2012 tag. It is a one-year pact and the team is under no obligation to use the tag a second time or work on a new contract if Forte is injured again.

How ‘spatula hands’ Adrian Amos is a perfect representation of the Bears’ defense 

amos.jpg
USA Today

How ‘spatula hands’ Adrian Amos is a perfect representation of the Bears’ defense 

Adrian Amos grew up a Ravens fan, and would go play football with his dad on a field in the shadow of M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore. So what was the best game of his career on Sunday — eight tackles and a 90-yard pick six — carried more meaning for the Bears’ safety. 

“This was a dream come true coming back to play in this stadium,” Amos said. “That’s a blessing in itself. Not a lot of people from Baltimore get the chance to do that, to be in this stadium.”

Amos played nearly 2,000 career snaps before recording his first NFL interception on Sunday, when he was in the right place to snag a ball Kyle Fuller — another Baltimore native who was outstanding against the Ravens — tipped pass. Amos always was regarded as a sure tackler who could be counted on to stick to his assignments, but for whatever reason he never was able to get himself an interception. 

“Sometimes, I call him ‘spatula hands’ because he doesn’t catch a lot of balls,” defensive end Akiem Hicks said. 

“Akiem’s always got the jokes,” Amos said. Hicks never actually called Amos “spatula hands” to his face, and after dropping that line to the media, he told Amos what he said (“He’s got jokes for everybody,” Amos added). 

Homecomings and jokes aside, Amos is playing his best football right now, and that’s been huge for a Bears defense that’s needed to replace plenty of key players before the halfway point of the season. Amos, who lost his job when the Bears added Quintin Demps and Eddie Jackson in the offseason, is starting in place of Demps, who broke his arm Week 3 against the Pittsburgh Steelers. 

“At that time, there was a guy playing better than him,” coach John Fox said of Amos losing his starting job in training camp. “And, at this time, he’s playing the best in the group. And that’s why he’s playing out there.”

Amos played a grand total of one defensive snap in Weeks 1 and 2, but has played every single defensive snap — as well as 26 special teams snaps — in the last two weeks. He had eight tackles against both Minnesota and Baltimore, and against the Ravens, he notched a tackle for a loss and two pass break-ups. 

This Bears defense showed in the first five weeks of the season to be a “fine” group, one that wouldn’t make many mistakes, but also wouldn’t make a lot of plays. That changed on Sunday, with Bryce Callahan picking off a pass, Christian Jones forcing a fumble and Amos notching an interception. 

Like the Bears defense this year, Amos was a solid player who hadn’t made a lot of big plays in his career. And like the Bears’ defense on Sunday, Amos finally made a critical play when it counted. 

“It’s just a mindset thing,” Amos said. “Just staying focused. Stay confident in my ability. Just keep working, being aggressive, just put my head down and work, that’s all I know.”

SportsTalk Live Podcast: Should the Bears let Mitch Trubisky throw more?

usatsi_10349127.jpg
USA TODAY

SportsTalk Live Podcast: Should the Bears let Mitch Trubisky throw more?

Adam Jahns (Chicago Sun-Times), Ben Finfer (ESPN 1000) and Jordan Cornette (The U/ESPN 1000) join Kap on the panel. Justin Turner hits a walk-off 3-run HR off of John Lackey to give the Dodgers a 2-0 lead in the NLCS. So why was Lackey even in the game? How much blame should Joe Maddon get for the loss?

The Bears run the ball over and over and over again to beat the Ravens in overtime, but should they have let Mitch Trubisky throw the ball more?