Bears

Jay Cutler's success as FOX analyst not the biggest question hanging over ex-Bears QB

Jay Cutler's success as FOX analyst not the biggest question hanging over ex-Bears QB

Jay Cutler stepping away from one microphone venue he despised in favor of another to begin another career made for interesting discussion about his suitability to be a commentator for FOX football coverage. But while his performance as an analyst ultimately will answer questions about his abilities behind a microphone, left unanswered will ultimately be the ones about his abilities behind center.

The bigger story behind Cutler’s move was why a quarterback who totaled more passing yards than the likes of Kurt Warner and Sonny Jurgensen, and more TD passes than Joe Flacco, couldn’t find a quarterback job at age 34. Jeff George got one at 34. Ryan Fitzpatrick had one at 34. Josh McCown has had four since he turned 34.

Yet in a league where painfully few teams have one legitimate starting quarterback, Cutler could not land a job as a second-stringer. FOX was willing to take a chance on Cutler in a job he’d never done before. Nobody in the NFL was willing to take a flyer on a guy who’d had 11 years of seasoning.

Whether or how much he really wanted a job after the Bears cut ties has been cited as a possible factor. Regardless, the Houston Texans weren’t interested and that’s a playoff-intent team with Tom Savage as their starter, at least until Deshaun Watson assumes his rightful place as that. The New York Jets didn’t even nibble, content with McCown. Cleveland was fine with DeShone Kizer in the second round.

You have to assume it wasn’t talent; never was, for that matter. (Hopefully his fan base doesn’t start blaming his supporting cast of booth- or panel-mates if he doesn’t do well at this job.)

Peter King, longtime NFL chum from Platteville Days, posited in an excellent MMQB piece that “Cutler was a little too smart for his own good.” FOX colleague-to-be Charles Davis’ glowing comments to Adam Jahns over at the Sun-Times notwithstanding, production meetings with the weeks’ broadcast teams during his playing time here were marked by more than a few instances of bizarre, rude behavior.

Cutler defenders cite his having seven different offensive coordinators in the span of his last nine seasons (including Rick Dennison in Denver) as a cause for his consistent mediocrity. Maybe the NFL looks at it from exactly the opposite direction, that Cutler was part of why no coordinator since Dennison survived longer than two years coaching him. John Fox is the first of four Cutler head coaches to see him ousted, not the other way around.

[RELATED: Will Bears fans finally get to see another side of Jay Cutler in his new role as FOX broadcaster?]

Wonder how the scene might’ve gone in Houston if GM Rick Smith had signed Cutler and walked into coach Bill O’Brien’s office…

“Bill, I have some good news and some bad news. The good news is I signed Jay Cutler for you. The bad news is, I signed Jay Cutler for you.”

The Bears had no thought whatsoever of opting to hold onto Cutler while putting a young franchise guy in their pipeline, the way Andy Reid and Kansas City did behind Alex Smith. The reasons were more than anybody-but-Cutler and don’t matter here, but that his own team didn’t want to keep him over a lesser-credentialed Mike Glennon is a statement.

Now Cutler is in a position where he can make his own statement, or statements; in fact, that’s kinda his job now. And maybe he really didn’t want to play anymore, didn’t say so explicitly but projected it (there’s that body-language thing again). None of this is to say Cutler’s a bad guy, or even a really bad quarterback. But that nobody in a QB-lite league wants a quarterback with more than 32,000 passing yards does stand as the final mystery over an individual, a lot of whose career was shrouded in it.

SportsTalk Live Podcast: Should Bears use Jags/Vikes as blueprints and build an elite defense over offense?

viks-d-stl-pod.jpg
USA TODAY

SportsTalk Live Podcast: Should Bears use Jags/Vikes as blueprints and build an elite defense over offense?

On this episode of the SportsTalk Live Podcast, David Schuster (670 The Score), Dan Cahill (Chicago Sun-Times) and Jordan Bernfield join David Kaplan on the panel.

The Bulls keep on winning. Should they try to make the playoffs? NBCSportsChicago.com’s Vincent Goodwill joins the guys to discuss.

Plus, with Bortles, Foles and Keenum starting in this weekend’s Championship Games should the Bears prioritize improving their defense this offseason?

Will Bears see instant improvement under Matt Nagy? Putting his first-year expectations in context

0116_matt_nagy.jpg
USA TODAY

Will Bears see instant improvement under Matt Nagy? Putting his first-year expectations in context

Circling back around from the playoffs to the Bears, or at least to the Bears using the current postseason as a bit of a prism, magnifying glass, measuring stick, all of the above:

The ultimate question, obviously meaningfully unanswerable for perhaps another 10 or 11 months, revolves around expectations that were ushered in along with Matt Nagy and the rest of his coaching staff. One early guess is that there’ll be an inevitable positive bump in the record, the only true measuring stick. Depending on changes in practices, strength training, luck, whatever, Nagy might fare better than John Fox simply by virtue of having a presumably healthier roster — pick any three Bears who were injured during the 2017 season: Leonard Floyd, Cameron Meredith, Eric Kush, Kyle Long, Pernell McPhee, Mitch Unrein, Kevin White and Willie Young — and a broken-in Mitch Trubisky from the get-go.

This is far from a given, however. Far, far from a given for the Bears. Of the 10 coaches hired in the 50 years since George Halas stopped, only Fox, Dick Jauron and Dave Wannstedt improved on the winning percentage of their immediate predecessor. All dipped, save for Jack Pardee, who in 1975 equaled the 4-10 finish of Abe Gibron before him. And Pardee was getting Walter Payton in that year’s draft, so things started looking up in a hurry.

And maybe that should be the expectation for Nagy, who projects to get some or all of Fox’s wounded back, plus a draft class beginning with No. 8 overall.

Better Bears record in 2018? Maybe, but ...

The Bears are perhaps something of an anomaly (imagine that) in the near constant of incoming coaches failing to improve matters in their first years. One of the more memorable aspects of this writer’s first year on the Bears beat (1992) — besides the obvious pyrotechnics of Mike Ditka’s epic final season — was the startling turnarounds effected by first-year (and first-time) NFL coaches that year, with several teams on the Bears’ schedule that year, meaning there were chances to study those in depth.

Consider: Bill Cowher took the Steelers from 7-9 to 11-5, Dennis Green took the Vikings from 8-8 to 11-5, Mike Holmgren took the Packers from 4-12 to 11-5, Bobby Ross took the Chargers from 4-12 to 11-5, and Dave Shula took the Bengals from 3-13 to 5-11.

The Bears played all but the Chargers that year, losing twice to Green, once to Holmgren and defeating the Cowher and Shula teams. Holmgren’s Packers didn’t make the playoffs, but he had to make an in-season quarterback change, which worked out pretty well long-term (Brett Favre).

Bears coaching-change history notwithstanding, the Nagy bar should be well above the five wins of Fox’s 2017. Nagy is a first-time head coach, but none of Cowher, Green, Holmgren, Ross or Shula had ever been NFL head coaches previously, either. Green and Ross had been college head coaches, albeit Green with a losing record and Ross barely .500 in those tenures.

And those coaches were taking over in the last year before the advent of free agency, which began in 1993. The Bears “landed” Anthony Blaylock and Craig Heyward. The Vikings secured Jack Del Rio. The Packers, Reggie White.

Odd years coming

Expectations vs. results will be interesting to observe in quite a few places this season. In some spots, the situation wasn’t completely broken but they “fixed” it anyway, in the dubious tradition of the Bears axing Lovie Smith after consecutive seasons of 11-5, 8-8 and 10-6 — two more wins (29) than Fox and Marc Trestman had combined (27) over the next five years.

Sometimes that sort of thing can work out. Phil Jackson did get the Michael Jordan Bulls to the next level that Doug Collins hadn’t. And Joe Maddon got the Cubs over the Rick Renteria hump, though adding Kris Bryant, Dexter Fowler and Jon Lester probably helped, too. Fox got the Broncos into a Super Bowl with Peyton Manning, but Gary Kubiak won one with Manning. Fox’s Broncos went against the 2013 Seattle Seahawks, one of the top 10 defenses of all time, while Kubiak had the good fortune of instead having one of the all-time great defenses in 2015.

But back to current NFL case studies:

— The Lions fired Jim Caldwell after a 9-7 season, his third winning year out of four there, two of those going to the playoffs.

— The Titans concluded their playoff year with the exit of Mike Mularkey, his reward for a second straight 9-7 that reversed four straight losing years under others.

— Chuck Pagano had five .500-or-better seasons with the Colts, didn’t have Andrew Luck all year, and was fired two years after going 5-3 with Matt Hasselbeck filling in for Luck.

What the expectations are in those venues is their business, just as it was when Phil Emery launched Smith in a fashion similar to the Titans with Mularkey. Smith didn’t reach the 2012 playoffs but would have been fired for anything short of a Super Bowl appearance, as Mularkey was for only winning one playoff game with Marcus Mariota as his quarterback.

All of which makes the Nagy/Pace Era more than a little intriguing. Nagy takes over a team with a No. 2-overall quarterback, as Mularkey did with Mariota. Some of Mularkey’s undoing traced to failing to maximize Mariota with an offense suited to how his quarterback plays his best, and force-fitting a player into a scheme is high-risk at best.

That doesn’t really apply in the case of a conservatively wired Fox, who directed that the offense be kept under ball-security control with a rookie quarterback. Fox and Dowell Loggains arguably were as constrained by Trubisky as he was by them.

But Nick Foles flourished with the Eagles under Chip Kelly and Doug Pederson, struggling a bit under Jeff Fisher. Case Keenum, a teammate of Foles when the Rams played in St. Louis, was so-so under the defense-based Fisher with the Rams, yet went supernova this year under the defense-based Mike Zimmer with the Vikings, which speaks to the value of the right coordinator irrespective of the head coach’s offensive or defensive background.

In the end Nagy’s achievements will be player-based. They always are. What he can do with what he’s got and given, via draft, free agency or whatever, vs. the successes and non-successes of others in his situation, is the work in progress now.