Will bounty pacts be more prevalent in the future?


Will bounty pacts be more prevalent in the future?

A team melee broke out this week during the New Orleans Saints' mini-camp. The Seattle Seahawks were stripped of two organized team activity practices after the NFL found them in violation of CBA rules after they admittedly performed excessive contact and hitting during off-season practice sessions.

Why is this even remotely shocking? This is just another example of the New Orleans Saints' 'bounty gate' scandal. The Seahawks' infractions unfolded because of a culture that will always exist in the NFL. Seattle's' environment is no different than the foul words captured on tape by former Saints defensive coordinator, Gregg Williams--buttons were pushed by coaches to get players to respond aggressively and perform in an overly competitive environment.

Why on earth are NFL players acting so aggressively in meaningless OTA's or mini-camp?

It doesnt matter if its bounty payments distributed by Saints coaches or the mantra of 'competition' preached by Seahawks head coach Pete Carroll. They are equal as both coaches encourage an environment for overaggressive behavior. There was no money involved, other than a days pay for these players to go off in Seattle or New Orleans. This is the off-season; players dont receive a weekly paycheck.

The new CBA dictates teams are only allowed 10 OTA sessions. Seattles behavior must have been reported early on for the league to investigate. As a former NFL player, I know this type of behavior, environment, and culture exists on all 32 teams.

Why would coaches break rules by having players knock around their own teammates? Was it an attempt by players to impress coaches, teammates, or earn a job or bonus for off-season workouts performed?

There are many reasons, but the competitive environment to earn an NFL roster spot mixed with coach speak fuel is not leaving the NFL anytime soon. There weren't any non-contractual paid incentives for an OTA practice session.

Are we to assume the Seahawks' practice just happened to be an overzealous day at work?

Hardly. There was probable cause and the NFL investigated like they did for 'bounty gate'.

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell recently proclaimed that bounties are no longer a part of the NFL culture. What coaching staff needs bounties? Its been proven this last week that players will do it to their own teammates for free.

I thought this environment and culture didnt exist anymore. Goodell said so. If the bounty culture is eradicated from the NFL as the commissioner has claimed, wait until next years offseason OTA sessions. Players will make bounty pacts to fight early and often, knowing it will lead to OTA cancellations.

Why not? If safety is so paramount in the NFL, players can insure there won't be any excessive practices with a simple non-contractual agreement. In baseball, no one can predict a rain-out, but NFL players just received a couple of guaranteed rain-outs from Roger Goodell.

2017 Bears position grades: Inside Linebacker

2017 Bears position grades: Inside Linebacker

2017 grade: B+

Level of need: Low

Decisions to be made on: Christian Jones (free agent), John Timu (free agent), Jonathan Anderson (free agent); Jerrell Freeman has reportedly been cut

Possible free agent targets: Demario Davis, Preston Brown, Anthony Hitchens, Avery Williamson, Navorro Bowman, Derrick Johnson

How the Bears rate Nick Kwiatkoski will be the key to figuring out what this unit will look like in 2018. Defensive coordinator Vic Fangio thought Kwiatkoski finished last season strong, but strong enough to rely on him in 2018 as the starter next to Danny Trevathan?

The thing with the Bears’ inside linebackers, though: Trevathan makes whoever is playing next to him better. The problem is Trevathan hasn’t been able to stay on the field — he missed time in 2017 with a calf injury and a one-game suspension, and missed half of 2016 after rupturing his Achilles’. Trevathan hasn’t played a full 16-game season since 2013, so durability is an issue for the soon-to-be 28-year-old.

So that leads to this question: Do the Bears need to find someone in free agency, regardless of how they value Kwiatkoski, who’s also missed time due to injuries in his first two years in the league?

Free agency could provide a few options. Demario Davis had a career high 97 tackles for the New York Jets last year and has never missed a game as a pro. Preston Brown had some decent production in Buffalo and also hasn’t missed a game since being drafted in 2014. Avery Williamson may not be a world-beater but has only missed one game in his four years in the NFL.

The Bears could also opt for someone who fits more of a rotational mold, like Dallas’ Anthony Hitchens, or try to lure a veteran linebacker like Navorro Bowman (who played for Vic Fangio in San Francisco) or Derrick Johnson (who Matt Nagy knows from his Kansas City days) to play next to Trevathan and/or Kwiatkoski.

The Bears could opt to keep the status quo and re-sign Christian Jones and John Timu for depth, and enter 2018 with Kwiatkoski and Trevathan as the team’s starters (Jerrell Freeman, who suffered a season-ending injury and then was hit with his second PED suspension in as many years, was cut on Tuesday). Signing a starting-caliber free agent isn’t out of the question, either, but there is a third option for the Bears if they appear to stand pat in free agency: Draft an inside linebacker in April. If that’s the route they go, Georgia’s Roquan Smith could be the guy. But again, those more pressing needs at other positions could mean the Bears don’t burn a first-round pick on an inside linebacker.

With Josh Sitton on his way out, what’s next for the Bears’ offensive line?

With Josh Sitton on his way out, what’s next for the Bears’ offensive line?

The first major move of Ryan Pace’s 2018 offseason hit on Tuesday, as NFL Network reported the Bears will not exercise Josh Sitton’s $8 million option for 2018. 

The move accomplishes two things for the Bears: 1) It frees up about $8 million in cap space and 2) Removes a veteran from the offensive line and creates a hole to fill, presumably by a younger free agent or draft pick. 

The 31-year-old Sitton signed a three-year deal with the Bears after Green Bay cut him just before the 2016 season, and was a Pro Bowler his first year in Chicago. Sitton played 26 of 32 games in two years with the Bears, but him being on the wrong side of 30 was likely the biggest factor here. If the Bears saw his skills eroding, releasing him now and netting the cap savings while going younger at the position does make sense. 

“Going younger” doesn’t guarantee the Bears will draft Notre Dame brawler Quenton Nelson, though that did become a greater possibility with Tuesday’s move. Nelson might be one of the two or three best offensive players in this year’s draft, and offensive line coach Harry Hiestand knows him well from the four years they spent together at Notre Dame. 

There’s a natural fit there, of course, but a few reasons to slow the Nelson-to-Chicago hype train: Would he even make it to No. 8? Or if he’s there, is taking a guard that high worth it when the Bears have needs at wide receiver, outside linebacker and cornerback? Still, the thought of Nelson — who absolutely dominated at Notre Dame — pairing with Hiestand again is tantalizing, and Nelson very well could step into any team’s starting lineup and be an immediate Pro Bowler as a rookie. 

If the Bears go younger in free agency, Matt Nagy knows 26-year-old guard Zach Fulton (No. 25 in Bleacher Report’s guard rankings) well from their time in Kansas City. Fulton — a Homewood-Flossmoor alum — has the flexibility to play both guard positions and center, which could open the door for Cody Whitehair to be moved to left guard, the position he was initially drafted to play (though the Bears do value him highly as a center, and keeping him at one position would benefit him as opposed to moving him around the line again). There are some other guys out there — like Tennessee’s Josh Kline or New York’s Justin Pugh — that could wind up costing more than Fulton in free agency. 

Or the Bears could look draft an offensive lineman after the first round, perhaps like Ohio State’s Billy Price, Georgia’s Isaiah Wynn or UTEP’s Will Hernandez. How the Bears evaluate guards at the NFL Combine next week will play an important role in how they go about replacing Sitton. 

The trickle-down effect of releasing Sitton will impact more than the offensive line, too. Freeing up his $8 million in cap space -- which wasn't a guarantee, unlike cutting Jerrell Freeman and, at some point, Mike Glennon -- could go toward paying Kyle Fuller, or another top cornerback, or a top wide receiver, or some combination of players at those positions (as well as outside linebacker). The Bears were already in a healthy place cap-wise; that just got healthier on Tuesday.