Bears

Five reasons to watch tonight's "Bulls Classics"

583296.png

Five reasons to watch tonight's "Bulls Classics"

Five things to watch in tonight's Comcast SportsNet's "Bulls Classics" broadcast of the Bulls' 117-116 win over the Milwaukee Bucks on Feb. 16, 1989, in which Michael Jordan scored 50 points, including the game-winning shot:

1) In something that was a staple for Jordan throughout his career, perhaps the most impressive aspect of his 50-point outing wasn't the gaudy numbers, but the manner in which he accumulated the high point total. He shot 16-for-26 from the floor, including splitting a pair of three-point attempts, and nailed 17 of his 18 shots from the charity stripe. In addition, he snared eight rebounds, dished out five assists and swiped three steals on the evening in Chicago Stadium. For good measure, he knocked down his final attempt, a mid-range jumper, with one second remaining in the contest to give the Bulls the one-point victory.

2) In the 1988-89 season, the Bulls were still coming into their own, but were making strides toward being the franchise that would dominate much of the next decade of NBA basketball. It was center Bill Cartwright's first season in Chicago after being traded from the New York Knicks for power forward Charles Oakley. Cartwright, who finished with 11 points and eight boards that night, wasn't a star, but he was a consistent, legitimate pivot presence and paved the way for Horace Grant to join fellow second-year forward Scottie Pippen in the Bulls starting lineup. As for Grant and Pippen, they were still somewhat raw, developing young players, but their near-identical stat lines -- Grant recorded 18 points, six rebounds, five assists and a blocked shot, while Pippen went for 17 points, five apiece of rebounds and assists, to go along with two blocks and four steals -- offered a glimpse of the well-rounded veterans they'd later become. The Bulls went on to finish the regular season with a 47-35 mark and advanced all the way to the Eastern Conference Finals, where they'd suffer a painful -- literally and figuratively -- defeat to the hated Detroit Pistons after knocking off the Knicks and Central Division rival Cleveland in the first two rounds of the playoffs.

3) Milwaukee was no slouch in those days, as the Bucks actually finished with a better regular-season record than neighboring Chicago before losing in the Eastern Conference semifinals. Jack Sikma and Terry Cummings were a formidable big-man tandem and the wing trio of star Sidney Moncrief, sixth man Ricky Pierce, a dangerous scorer and Paul Pressey -- credited by many as the game's first "point forward," as he was deployed by former coach Don Nelson -- was also quite strong, although Pierce and Moncrief both missed that February 1989 game on Madison Street.

4) Not only is Milwaukee close in proximity to Chicago, but that season's edition of the Bucks featured some local flavor. The aforementioned Cummings, reserve Tony Brown and then-aging backup point guard Rickey Green all hail from the Windy City, while Sikma is from nearby Kankakee, Ill.

Fun fact: Milwaukee reserve Tito Horford is the father of current NBA All-Star Al Horford of the Atlanta Hawks.

5) An inordinate number of players from this game went on to coaching careers. Cartwright is an assistant with the Phoenix Suns and Bulls starting point guard Sam Vincent is currently a head coach in the D-League, although he previously was the head coach of the Charlotte Bobcats. Milwaukee, however, takes the cake. Starting point guard Jay Humphries and backup big man Paul Mokeski also coached in the D-League, Pressey is a Cavaliers assistant, Moncrief is back with the Bucks as an assistant, Sikma is on the Minnesota Timberwolves' new staff and Brown was most recently a Clippers assistant under Dunleavy. Dunleavy actually coached against the Bulls in the 1991 NBA Finals, when he was at the helm of the Lakers. Blue-collar forward Larry Krystowiak (24 points, game-high 18 rebounds) was actually the Bucks head coach for a short stint, sandwiched between college head-coaching jobs at his alma mater, the University of Montana, and his current position at the University of Utah.

Bears ’18 offseason dramatically different from ’17 but with difficult money-management issues looming

ryan_pace.jpg
USA TODAY

Bears ’18 offseason dramatically different from ’17 but with difficult money-management issues looming

About this time a year ago the Bears were setting up for the annual NFL beauty pageant in Indianapolis, sitting with the No. 3 pick in the 2017 draft and with myriad roster decisions to address with both that draft and free agency. Because of the Bears’ lofty draft position, even more scrutiny and attention swirled around the college prospects (Deshaun Watson, Jamal Adams, Solomon Thomas, not enough on Mitch Trubisky as it turned out, a testimonial to GM Ryan Pace’s ability to keep a secret).

But what was developing in free agency was arguably of even greater significance in what was then the short term, at least for John Fox, as it turned out. And the changed landscape this year bodes considerably better for Pace and the Bears. At least in one important respect.

First, a perspective from last year’s pre-Combine period...

Because of the unsettled quarterback situation – the Bears were working toward Mike Glennon and cutting Jay Cutler two weeks later – and concerns about a possible lame-duck situation for Fox, free agents and their agents were willing to look at the Bears but only if the Bears would pony up excessive guaranteed dollars. The worry any time a coach is heading into a tipping-point year is that if things go badly, the coach and staff are gone, and the resulting changes will alter the job situation of that particular veteran player.

So the likes of cornerbacks A.J. Bouye or Stephon Gilmore opted for less total money from Jacksonville and New England, respectively, because the Bears weren’t offering higher guarantees to compensate for the uncertainty.

(One of the reasons then-President/CEO Michael McCaskey stated to this reporter for firing Mike Ditka after the 1992 season was a concern over the negative pall Ditka cast over playing for the Bears as the NFL prepared for the 1993 start of free agency. A quarter-century later, Pace didn’t fire Fox because of free agents’ aversion to Fox, but the overall wasn’t making Pace’s job any easier.)

Would Alshon Jeffery have stayed if...

On a slightly different tack: Would Alshon Jeffery have given the Bears a more receptive look had the quarterback position been addressed sooner in the Fox/Pace tenure? Jeffery took less from the Eagles in a one-year prove-it deal, not because Philadelphia was so much warmer than Chicago, but in large part because of where the offensive arrow was pointing in Chicago with Fox, Dowell Loggains and an unsettled quarterback situation.

Not insignificantly in the Jeffery case: Jeffery had four choices – Bears, Indianapolis, Minnesota, Philadelphia. The Colts weren’t sure about Andrew Luck, coming off shoulder surgery and ultimately missing all of ’17. The Vikings were resting then on brittle Sam Bradford, whose knee broke down early, and Case Keenum wasn’t CASE KEENUM at that point. The Bears with Loggains and Glennon? Jeffery didn’t go with Philadelphia, Doug Pederson and Carson Wentz only for the money, which did come anyway.

The Bears have “fixed” all of those issues in the year that’s played out since Jeffery signed with the Eagles almost concurrent with the Bears moving on from Cutler. None of that matters now in the least with Jeffery, Bouye, Gilmore or any other options that demanded too much guaranteed money or spurned the Bears back then, but it does matter going into the run-up to free agency over the next couple weeks.

Why this in fact matters more than the draft is that, while sound organizations are grounded in quality drafting, the reality is that in virtually every offseason, more starters for that season are acquired via free agency than the draft. Last year’s draft centerpiece was Trubisky, though he wasn’t supposed to start last season. But free agents Glennon, Prince Amukamara, Marcus Cooper, Quintin Demps and Markus Wheaton and Kendall Wright were.

The money pit

Longtime Bears and NFL personnel chief Bill Tobin once remarked back in the beginning of free agency, “Just because you pay a guy $2 million doesn’t make him a $2-million player.” That still applies, adjusted for inflation. And that could make this free agency dicey for the Bears.

Because price isn’t always determined solely on quality; it’s a matter of supply and demand. And while the Bears are among those with the greatest estimated space under the projected cap of $178 million, the others way up on the list include Cleveland, Indianapolis, the Jets, Houston and Tampa Bay – all teams with five or fewer wins in ’17 and expected to be the most aggressive in using free agency to fix gaping holes. The Bears have a lot of money to spend, but so do a whole lot of others.

Meaning: A lot of dollars will be chasing a select few players, which will make some of them overpaid, not unlike Glennon was last offseason (how many apparently better options were there?) or a couple of others, who will be paid like $2 million players even if they aren’t, adjusted for inflation.

The result is another offseason of brinksmanship for Pace, this time in need of better results than his first three free agencies if the outcome for his second head coach is to be better than it was for his first.

Would potential bargains like Mike Moustakas or Carlos Gonzalez make sense for White Sox?

0225-mike-moustakas-carlos-gonzalez.jpg
USA TODAY

Would potential bargains like Mike Moustakas or Carlos Gonzalez make sense for White Sox?

The 2017-18 baseball offseason continues to be, well, the 2017-18 baseball offseason, even with spring training games being played in Arizona and Florida.

A bunch of names remain on the free-agent market, including All-Star players who thought they would be in for big multi-year contracts. But as teams continue to deny the wishes of guys who expected to get big deals, the suggestion that those players might end up needing to take one-year offers if they want to play during the 2018 season is becoming a more common talking point.

So with potential bargains to be had for some pretty big-name players, do the White Sox jump into the waters and try to lock up a potential future piece on the cheap? Though they aren’t expected to contend this season, the White Sox have been mentioned in a pair of recent reports surrounding a pair of All-Star position players: Mike Moustakas and Carlos Gonzalez.

MLB.com's Jon Morosi wrote last week that the White Sox are a potential fit for Moustakas, who has sat and watched as former Kansas City Royals teammate Eric Hosmer received a huge contract from the San Diego Padres. Moustakas set a new Royals record last season with 38 home runs but has yet to find a team.

The White Sox, connected to Baltimore Orioles star Manny Machado earlier this offseason, seem to have a current big leaguer or highly ranked prospect locked into almost every position on the diamond for the foreseeable future, but third base isn't necessarily one of them. Jake Burger was last year’s top draft pick, though there’s speculation he could slide over to first base. The team still envisions him as a big league third baseman, for what it’s worth.

Moustakas is 29 and already has seven big league seasons under his belt, including a pair of All-Star appearances and a pair of trips to the World Series, including the Crowns’ championship back in 2015. His 38 homers and 85 RBIs in 2017 were both career highs. He slashed .272/.314/.521, the final of those three numbers the best mark of his career.

Moustakas has rarely hit for average or reached base at too high a clip, though those recent power numbers would be intriguing at a hitter-friendly park like Guaranteed Rate Field, where he has 10 career dingers, 26 career RBIs and a .249/.308/.456 career slash line as a visitor.

Certainly Moustakas would be a buzz-worthy addition, and if the White Sox could get him for a good value thanks to this slow-moving market, that adds incentive to bring him aboard. A short contract would have even more incentive for the rebuilding White Sox, who would have the option to either sign him to a long-term deal or deal him away in a deadline deal depending on his immediate production levels.

But for fans hoping the White Sox will spend big on a third baseman in one of the next two offseasons — Machado is a free agent next winter, and Colorado Rockies star Nolan Arenado is set to hit the market the winter after next — slotting in an outside addition at the hot corner now could impact those plans.

Gonzalez is a completely different story, a three-time All Star during his 10-year big league career who is just three seasons removed from a 40-homer campaign in 2015. The 32-year-old Gonzalez also has a trio of Gold Gloves to go along with his 215 career home runs. FanRag’s Jon Heyman listed the White Sox as a possible landing spot for CarGo this weekend.

But his walk year in Colorado was not a very good one by his standards. In 136 games for a Rockies team that ended up in the playoffs, he slashed .262/.339/.423, all those averages way down from his usual level of production. And his power numbers plummeted to 14 homers and 57 RBIs after he combined for 65 homers and 197 RBIs in 2015 and 2016.

The good news for the White Sox is that down year makes Gonzalez far more affordable. Should he command only a one-year contract, the White Sox could take a flier, stick him in the outfield — which still has an unresolved spot with few strong offensive options for center field — and trade him should he bounce back in a big way. Or, at 32, perhaps he’s a guy the White Sox could opt to keep around should he prove valuable and the rebuild continues to move along ahead of schedule.

Gonzalez seems the less risky move at this point, as Moustakas could still be looking for a multi-year contract. But the White Sox have plenty of financial flexibility and flexibility in their decision-making should they add either guy and he proves worthy of a midseason deal or a long-term look.