Eagles Film Review: Carson Wentz not even given chances to go deep

Eagles Film Review: Carson Wentz not even given chances to go deep

This week's Eagles Film Review is going to be a little different. Normally, we show you something that reveals itself in the coaches tape, and still will. The difference this time is we can't necessarily show you why Carson Wentz wasn't throwing deep against the Cowboys on Sunday, because by and large, he wasn't even given the chance.

The biggest takeaway from watching all 47 of Wentz's dropbacks in the Eagles' 29-23 loss is how few of those calls even had a shot at stretching the field.

There were 19 attempts marked as "quick passes" — throws under 10 yards that generally went to the first read — eight of which were slant patterns. Another nine attempts were wide receiver or running back screens, and six more more were checkdown passes. After everything was said and done, Wentz threw just seven passes over 10 yards in the air.

That tells only part of the story. The Eagles had just nine plays the entire game where at least one route was run 20 yards down the field, either by design or because the ball was out of Wentz's hand before it could develop. Even if we account for the 11 dropbacks inside the red zone, that's still just nine out 36 passing plays that even threatened the Cowboys deep, or one in four.

And while nine plays might seem like enough for Wentz to turn it loose at some point, even just once, that's not accounting for the coverage, the pass-rush or the situation. Quite a few of those opportunities came while Wentz was leading a scoring drive with less than two minutes in the first half and during a touchdown drive in the third quarter. Can't complain about those results.

Nonetheless, those two series make up most of the good examples that we have where the Eagles had a receiver of any kind operating 20 yards down the field. We'll take a look at them, but they're probably about what you would expect.


This is 1st-and-10 from the Eagles' 25-yard line in the second quarter and one of the first times all game the offense considers pushing the ball downfield. The Cowboys' zone concept employed by the cornerback and safety has the crossing pattern well covered though, and Wentz wisely dumps the ball down to Ryan Mathews rather than force the issue.

It's not that the Cowboys' zone look was unbeatable. Here we see a similar combination and defensive scheme on 2nd-and-10 from the Dallas 22, and this time the cornerback trails the receiver toward the middle of the field. Tight end Zach Ertz might find some empty space running toward the corner of the end zone here.

Except take a closer look at the pocket. Feeling the pressure close in on his blind side, Wentz isn't comfortable waiting for the routes to develop, so he checks it down to Darren Sproles for a gain of four.

And it's difficult to argue with the decision, quite honestly. Maybe if he waits it's a touchdown to Ertz, maybe it's a sack. By taking the safe way out, the Eagles lived to fight another day and wound up getting six a few plays later anyway.

Well what about straight-up fly routes?

Normally, the Cowboys have at least one safety over the top.

This is 2nd-and-6 from the Eagles' 37-yard line, and there's only 36 seconds remaining in the first half — an ideal time to pick up a huge chunk of ground. The offense is going to attack the seam, but with a single-high safety patrolling deep center field in addition to man-to-man coverage, there's not much to assess. Nelson Agholor is open at the bottom of the screen, and the wideout's seven-yard gain is good for a first down. The Eagles would get three on the drive, by the way.

Once again, the Cowboys have a single-high safety on 1st-and-10 from the Cowboys' 45 as the third quarter is coming to an end, only this time the coverage is shaded to the side of the vertical. It's a good route combination actually, because the safety must respect the deep route and can't come crashing down on Ertz crossing over the middle. He'll pick up 11 and the first down.

But the moral of the story is the same: The deep route is nothing more than a decoy here. Even if it turns into a one-on-one, will it even be open?

Good question. There was roughly one decent example of a one-on-one route going 20 yards down the field this entire game. You judge whether the opportunity is there.

Third quarter, 2nd-and-6, and full disclosure, this is the same touchdown drive as earlier. Yet here we are, looking at a receiver in one-on-one coverage, no safety in sight, and the receiver Wentz ultimately does target, Dorial Green-Beckham, in tight coverage down the sideline.

Of course, Green-Beckham is going to break in and beat his man for a 14-yard gain. And that receiver going deep? The defensive back is in lockstep with him. There's no move here, unlike with DGB. If it's not open now, why would it be 20, 30 yards down the field? Not like anybody on this team has shown themselves consistently capable of making a tough catch either.

We may have just found the one shot all game Wentz could've taken and it wasn't open.

Of course, just because Eagles receivers have trouble getting open or capitalizing on attempts down the field isn't an excuse to stop trying. The fact that only 25 percent of the offense's plays even gave Wentz the option to throw long is an issue. Defenses may not respect these players, but at this rate, they won't have to respect the possibility the quarterback might hit them over the top.

It's not like all of the short stuff is working anyway. Wentz completed 15 of 19 "quick passes" for 107 yards and 6 of 9 screens for 17 yards for an average of 4.4 yards per attempt. That would be just half decent for a running back, let alone in the passing game.

But it's by design to some extent too, and it's not really Wentz's fault. If the Eagles don't unshackle him, it's not going to get any better regardless of bad receivers or rookie mistakes. Simply put, the offense needs to be willing to take chances, and it all starts with the game plan and coaching.

The Eagles won the Super Bowl! So how come I'm not happy?

USA Today Images

The Eagles won the Super Bowl! So how come I'm not happy?

It’s now been two weeks since the Eagles finally won their first Super Bowl. In that time, I’ve re-watched the game five times, re-watched the parade 15 times, and purchased six Super Bowl champions t-shirts, four sweatshirts and five hats. And that’s just from the next morning.

We won, like I’ve always wanted. We’re Super Bowl champs. It wasn’t a dream. I was led to believe that once the impossible happened and we reached the promised land, I'd have nothing more to worry about, ever again. 

So how come I’m still not happy?

I’ll tell you why: It’s because of Cris Collinsworth’s bias. And the unfair coverage of our celebrations; the national media won’t tell you this, but once the Super Bowl was over, not a single Eagles fan punched a horse.

There were the ridiculous crowd-size estimates. And Mike Francesa objecting to Jason Kelce’s language and calling for him to be cut. And the oddsmakers putting our Super Bowl odds below the Patriots’.  And Duracell, for that tweet about Philly fans throwing batteries. Disgraceful. From now on, I’m only throwing Energizers. I’ve also yet to hear an apology from Donovan McNabb, Andy Reid or Joe Banner for not winning us a Super Bowl before now.

At the parade, as we all remember, Jason Kelce sang “no one likes us, we don’t care!” But he was wrong. I care.

Maybe I’m not used to the feeling yet. Maybe it’s because I’ve been chasing this my whole life, and at this point, what else is there to chase? Maybe this sort of existential despair is what I’ve been fearing all along.

Nah, who am I kidding. It’s Cris Collinsworth.

Anyway, here’s my solution for the quarterback thing: Play Carson Wentz, AND Nick Foles. At the same time. Defenses won’t know what hit them, and besides, I’ve got a feeling if it comes down to it, Foles would make a hell of a wide receiver.

So don’t trade Foles. But DO trade Nate Sudfeld. I bet Cleveland would give up a 1 and a 4.

Other Philly sports takes:

- I’ll tell you what, Markelle Fultz caught a break. If not for the Eagles making a Super Bowl run and winning, he’d be all we had to talk about for the past month.

- The Michael Carter-Williams trade was three years ago this week, and let me tell you, I’m still mad about that.

- Jason Kelce appeared in Clearwater for the start of the Phillies’ spring training this week. I just wish he’d go through the entire Phils roster and list everyone’s faults and weaknesses.

Follow FakeWIPCaller on Twitter

Mike Francesa admits to not really knowing what he was talking about with Kelce's speech

Mike Francesa admits to not really knowing what he was talking about with Kelce's speech

Mike Francesa probably wears flip flops in the city in the middle of winter.

The former radio host absolutely tore into Jason Kelce last week for his legendary speech on the steps of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Francesa even went so far as to say Jeff Lurie should cut Kelce for it.

Now, Francesa did a total 180 on it. 

Just to refresh, here's what he said last week:

“Should have stayed home, the jerk," Francesa begins on Kelce. "Why is that I have to be in my car when these guys win championships, and they decide that they are going to grace the audience with this profanity-laced stupidity. You gotta turn it off, your kids can’t even listen it. He sounded like a total moron. How about going up there and acting like a champion and not acting like a total moron? I turn that stuff off. I’ve seen LeBron James do that, now I’ve seen him do that. You know what? It’s not the time or place. You ever heard of winning like a champion? Somebody should have taken a hook and pulled him off.”

And here's what he had to say today as a guest on Angelo Cataldi's morning show on 94 WIP:

Bottom line is, I went back last night and watched the thing in its entirety, and I have to say, it was not as bad as I thought it was when I watched it and got to see it. I wish he hadn’t used any profanity because it would have been a classic, it was really well done, he did a great job. I thought it was one that would last and could be used a long time. I know it’s popular in Philly even with the profanity but to me those are such special moments that I wish they would raise their level. I’d like to see them do it so they can be used time and time again. Take the profanity out of it.

No. 1, I overreacted. I wouldn’t cut him. I take that back, I apologize to Kelce for that. No. 2, it was not as bad as I thought. I just wish he had raised his vocabulary a little. That was a great speech. He did a great job. 

"Should have stayed home, the jerk!" to "That was a great speech. He did a great job." Okay.

I guess the first step is admitting you have a problem.

You can listen to the full interview here.