Quick Links

Nats offered four players for Adam Jones


Nats offered four players for Adam Jones

Over the offseason the Nationals were linked several times to Orioles' center fielder Adam Jones. Washington GM Mike Rizzo even commented publicly on how well he would fit in their plans at the position. Nothing ended up happening of course, Jones stayed an Oriole and his now in line for a huge extension after an MVP-like start to the year.

But now that Jones looks like an Oriole for the foreseeable future, a trade offer from months ago has surfaced. The Nationals reportedly offered Baltimore starter John Lannan, closer Drew Storen, infielder Steve Lombardozzi, and a center fielder. The Orioles declined the trade and the rest, as they say, is history.

In hindsight the trade offer looks pretty pathetic on the Orioles' end. Storen has since been injured and has yet to play this year, and Lannan has struggled mightily at Triple-A Syracuse. Lombardozzi has had a solid year with a .300-plus batting average, but he wasn't a centerpiece in the deal.

At the time the offer was a little more of a close call, but you can see the Orioles' reasoning in keep Jones. Assuming they knew they had a chance to sign him long-term, Jones is one of the best players at his position and a true star in the league.

In 2011 Drew Storen saved 43 games and John Lannan held a 3.70 ERA in 184.2 innings pitched. Jones, however, is a fan favorite in Baltimore and it would have taken more to get him, even before his amazing start to this season.

The possibility does remain intriguing though, even in hindsight. Did the Orioles make a counter offer? Would the Nationals offer more than what they did for the right player? We may never know, but for now it is fun to think about.

Quick Links

Nationals Game 5 meltdown yet another reminder why D.C. can't have nice things

USA TODAY Sports Images

Nationals Game 5 meltdown yet another reminder why D.C. can't have nice things

On Thursday night, a Washington, D.C. pro sports team did something Washington, D.C. pro sports teams are very good at doing: fall short of making a league or championship game.

The Nationals' disastrous fifth inning against the Cubs in Game 5 of the National League Divisional Series was the beginning of the end, not to mention yet another in a long line of disappointing playoff results for Washington, D.C. sports teams.

You see, Washington, D.C. is the only city with at least three major pro sports teams to not have a single one make a conference or league championship game since 2000.

To make matters worse, Washington, D.C. sports teams have now lost 16 consecutive playoff games in which a win would've advanced the team to the conference or league championship. 

Think about that for a second. Four teams. Zero conference championship appearances since 1998. 

Here's the list.

Washington, D.C. sports fans are not greedy. We can't be. We've had some very good teams recently, with the type of talent, coaching and intangibles needed to win a championship. 


The last time a major Washington, D.C. pro sports team won a world championship was in 1992 when the Redskins won Super Bowl XXVI.  The last time a major Washington, D.C. pro sports team even made a conference championship game was in 1998, when the Capitals advanced to the Eastern Conference Final, defeating the Sabres to advance to the Stanley Cup Final.

Washington, D.C. isn't allowed to have nice sports things.

Sure, we have great players and great teams, but when the playoffs roll around, all the nice things go away. We aren't privy to plucky upstarts who run the table and we aren't privy to dominant teams that make long postseason runs.

Washington, D.C. will have its day, eventually. Sure it may only be a conference championship appearance, but for us, that's fine. We don't expect world championships. We just want something to get invested in.

Early playoff exits are rarely worth the investment.

Quick Links

With contractual decisions looming, Nats missed chance at stress-free World Series run

With contractual decisions looming, Nats missed chance at stress-free World Series run

"This is the year."

That's the motto for almost every D.C. sports fan when their team is headed for the postseason.

The Nats led a weak NL East the entire season and clinched a spot to play October baseball early into September.


The team overcame the obstacle of being plagued with injuries and with pitchers like Stephen Strasburg and Max Scherzer having a strong bullpen to back them up, the stars were aligning for the team to go all the way.

But now with players like Bryce Harper and Daniel Murphy having contracts up for grabs in 2019, Nationals reporter Chelsea Janes says 2017 was really the last chance for the team to win a stress-free title.

"I think those questions you've raised like Bryce [Harper's] contract, [Daniel} Murphy may be leaving, you know Rizzo's contract's up after next year, I think those are the things they didn't have to deal with this year that made this such a free chance," Janes said on the Sports Junkies Friday.

"It was a free chance to just feel good and do it now and not have everyone say this is your absolute last chance, and next year it's their absolute last chance for a little while, I think."

"I mean they're not going to be awful in '19, but they're going to be different and I think they've sort of wasted their free pass here and there's legitimate and kind of unrelenting pressure on them next year to make it happen."

It's hard to make sense of what a team will look like one day after a devastating series loss. One thing that is fairly certain is that time is ticking for the Nats to make it happen with arguably the most talented group of players they've ever had.