Quick Links

Giants—After Further Review

Giants—After Further Review

Fishing a few nuggets out of last night's stream of consciousness.


--Dallas lost which, as I said earlier, is OK with me. If—and it's a big if—the Redskins' chances of making the playoffs comes down to the last game, I'd rather it mean something to the Cowboys. After last week's near-miss against the Lions and today's dud against Philly, they're running into choppy waters for the first time of the year and at the worst time of the year. Not only that, the Redskins went toe to toe with them in Dallas last month. Bring 'em on.

I got a comment last night lamenting the fact that Dallas may not have the top seed wrapped up when they go to FedEx on the eve of New Year's Eve. And I certainly can understand that point of view. Who wouldn't rather face Brad Johnson and Sam Hurd than Tony Romo and TO? Still, I hate games that have no meaning for one or both teams. It would be great to force the Cowboys to travel to Lambeau to play in the NFC title game.

That is, if they make it that far. They haven't exactly looked like one of the best teams out there the last couple of weeks, needing a late score to beat a reeling Lions team and failing to post a TD in losing at home to the Eagles.

First Quarter

12:10—McIntosh is down with an injury. He's sitting up and it doesn't appear to be that bad, but the way this season is going for the Skins on the injury front anything is possible.

As we now know, it was quite serious. His year is done and training camp seems to be in jeopardy after suffering multiple torn knee ligaments. H. B. Blades and, in passing situations, Khary Campbell played well in Rocky's spot. This team was being panned for having no depth at the beginning of the year. McIntosh with be the 12th of the 22 opening-day starters to miss a start. He is the sixth of that group to suffer a season-ending injury (counting Jason Campbell, who may or may not be back for the playoffs, and, of course, Sean Taylor in that group). The fact that they're 7-7 and in the playoff hunt is quite a tribute to their depth.

A low line drive by Suisham gets the Skins on the board.

FG Suisham 50
Redskins 3, Giants 0

It was officially a 49-yarder and it would have been good from 55. Suisham is getting his leg back under him and he's again looking like a valuable asset. Still, he's far from proven. I'd like to see him with a 40+ yard attempt with the Skins trailing Dallas by two in the fourth quarter.

Second quarter

14:10—Collins is now 0-8. He's been getting some pressure, but he's been misfiring with time to throw, too.

Yes, Collins started out poorly and wasn't spectacular at any point. Eventually, he seemed to figure out the wind's effect on the ball and he dropped a couple into the arms of Moss to get things going. The important thing was that he didn't put the ball anywhere near a Giant's hands.

Who says the third-down draw won't work?

Betts 14 run (Suisham kick)
Redskins 13, Giants 0

I was thinking, of course, of the pure hell that Gibbs and Saunders caught for calling a draw play in the fourth quarter of the Eagles game in Week 10. It was third and goal at the seven with the Redskins up by two. Portis was stuffed, the Skins settled for a field goal and Philly was able to come back for the win. This one was on third and nine at the 14 with the Redskins up by six. Is there a difference in the two play calls other than one of them worked and one didn't? When it works, you're a genius, when it doesn't you're an idiot.

1:51—Bad, bad play by Landry after a great, great play. He pops the ball out of Burress' hands and then taunts him. Dumb, dumb, dumb. The rookie needs to grow up.

At least when he popped the Bears receiver late he gained a little bit of an intimidation factor in exchange for the 15 yards. Wagging your finger at a receiver doesn't get you anything except laughed at.

Landry cost them three points. I think Joe Gibbs was very tempted to use words stronger than "buns" when he saw that penalty.

You could make a case that he didn't really cost the Skins three points, at least not in net terms. If the Giants punt there the Skins probably are pinned back well inside the 20 with about 1:45 to go. Maybe they drive for a field goal from there, maybe they don't. It was a lot easier to do so after getting the kickoff return to the 30, that's for sure. So, it's possible that the Redskins carry a 13-point lead into the locker room regardless of Landry's penalty. That doesn't make it OK by any means, but the net result wasn't too damaging.

Third Quarter

Portis has 16 carries for 88 yards after a slow start. If he hits near those same numbers in the second half and the Redskins continue to play with what I'll call intelligent aggression, the Skins will win. Oh, and the D needs to adjust to NY's halftime adjustments.

Portis ended up with 25 carries for 126 so he had nine for 38 in the second half, so his production did drop off in the second half. Actually, the team's offensive output after the opening drive of the second half was minimal. They had 197 in the first half, 46 on the drive that made it 22-3 and just 66 after that.

1:47—Thank you, Amani Toomer. He smoked Springs and then flat-out dropped a pass in Washington territory.

A couple of New York and national media outlets have been saying that Toomer dropped a sure touchdown here. No. Landry was playing his deep safety position and he was in the vicinity of Toomer, who isn't going to outrun anyone, much less Landry. New York would have had the ball in Redskins territory, but not very deep and certainly not anywhere near the goal line.

Fourth Quarter

13:10—Tynes (I think I've misspelled his name earlier once or twice) goes wide left on a 38-yard try. I still think the Skins will need another score, but a 12-point lead looks pretty nice right now.

That was more the lack of confidence caused by so many second-half collapses than logic talking there. That, and a memory of Manning going from looking awful to leading the Giants back in the fourth quarter against Chicago a couple of weeks ago. Still, for all intents and purposes, the Tynes miss sealed it for the Redskins. Even if he'd hit it it still was a two-score game.

5:10—Portis for four. A big third and six coming up here. I'm not sure what the call will be, which is a good thing. A few weeks ago, I knew it would be a run.

Again, not really being rational here. There was a zero percent chance that Collins was going to drop back there. The only way the Giants were going to get back into the game was with a turnover and quick score.

1:54—Ironic, isn't it? Betts was in at the end in September against the Giants and he couldn't score. Today, he gets three carries and the Skins go into victory formation.

Of course, it was a very, very different situation compared to when Betts couldn't get into the end zone in Week 3, but there was a touch of irony there.

Quick Links

Bashaud Breeland the latest former Redskin to fail a physical; won't be signing with Panthers

USA Today Sports Images

Bashaud Breeland the latest former Redskin to fail a physical; won't be signing with Panthers

The Redskins had to say good bye to several key players as the 2018 NFL free agency period began.

Cornerback Bashaud Breeland was one of those players.

On Tuesday, Breeland reported agreed to a 3-year, $24 million deal with the Carolina Panthers.

But on Friday afternoon it was reported that Breeland failed a physical, which means he won't be signing with the Panthers, per Panthers reporter Bill Voth.


If this sounds familiar, it's because it is familiar.

Redskins wide receiver Ryan Grant intended on signing a four-year, $29 million deal with the Ravens. But a failed physical just a day before his introductory press conference meant a voided contract and back to the drawing board.

According to multiple reports, Breeland's failed physical was due to a recent non-football injury. Breeland and the Panthers could still come to an agreement, but the former Clemson star is now back to being a free agent and will have to pass a physical before officially signing with a new team.

According to ESPN's David Newton, Breeland injured his foot on vacation in the Dominican Republic and will need his skin grafted in order to repair the injury.

The Redskins were one of the NFL's most injured teams in 2017, and that trend appears to have extended to the offseason.


Quick Links

With Zach Brown back, a look at the Redskins' inside linebackers depth chart

USA Today Sports

With Zach Brown back, a look at the Redskins' inside linebackers depth chart

The Redskins went into the offseason with their inside linebacker position very much up in the air. Starters Zach Brown and Mason Foster and top backup Will Compton were all heading into unrestricted free agency. They faced the prospect of needing to start all over.

Things started to look better in late January when Foster re-signed, agreeing to a two-year deal. “I had unfinished business here,” Foster said at the time.

As long as Brown remained unsigned, the Redskins also had unfinished business. They got it done yesterday as Brown inked what is reported to be a three-year deal worth $24 million. We will need to see some details to know just what the contract entails but it looks like a fair deal for both sides.


Compton remains unsigned. With Brown and Foster back he will not be in line for a starting job. We will see how things shake out for him.

Looking at the players under contract, the Redskins have Zach Vigil, who played well as a starter late in the season after injuries struck, Martrell Spaight, and Josh Harvey-Clemons.  

Vigil was released on the final roster cut and returned on November 15 after Compton went to injured reserve. He had 55 total tackles in seven games. If you project that out over a 16-game season that’s 126 tackles, which would have placed him in the top 10 in the NFL. He also plays special teams well. Vigil went from expendable last September to a very valued reserve at this point in time.

Spaight has been a spot starter when starters have been injured. This will be an important year for him as he goes into the final year of the contract he signed after the Redskins made him a fifth-round pick in the 2015 draft.


The Redskins might have been happier if Harvey-Clemons, a 2017 seventh-round pick, didn’t have to play all last year but injuries forced him into a regular role. He was converting from college safety to NFL nickel linebacker and was very much considered to be a project. Harvey-Clemons still needs to add some weight and he has a lot to learn. Still, even if injuries don’t hit this year he should play considerably more than the 93 snaps he logged as a rookie.

The Redskins usually carry nine total linebackers, going with either five inside and four outside or vice versa. So they could be set or perhaps they will bring back Compton or sign another veteran to compete with Spaight for the last roster spot.  

Stay up to date on the Redskins. Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page and follow him on Twitter @TandlerNBCS.