Redskins

Quick Links

Need to Know: Was tumultuous week a distraction for the Redskins?

Need to Know: Was tumultuous week a distraction for the Redskins?

Here is what you need to know on this Sunday, November 3, the day the Washington Redskins host the San Diego Chargers.

Potential distractions abound but players should have no excuse

It was one of those weeks at Redskins Park.

It started with a loss to the Broncos that may have been closer than the 45-21 final would indicate but there were plenty of issues. Denver scored 38 unanswered points in the second half so there was plenty for the defense to be concerned about. But Robert Griffin III couldn’t get untracked, posting the worst passer rating of his career, so it wasn’t all on the defensive side of the ball.

In the locker room after the game Pierre Garçon lamented the state of the Redskins’ passing game saying, “If you suck at passing, you suck at passing.” He said that he wasn’t blaming Griffin exclusively but certainly some luster has come off of last year’s rookie of the year.

Then on Monday, Brandon Meriweather returned from his one-game suspension and said that he was going to have to start hitting offensive players lower, possibly risking torn ACLs. For good measure, he took a shot a Bears receiver Brandon Marshall, bringing up a previous domestic violence incident.

The trade deadline came and went on Tuesday and little-used tight end Fred Davis was still a Redskin. That promoted an odd session with the media on Wednesday in which he admitted that he has “nodded off” during meetings but he still thought he may have been made inactive in the last two games due to a clause in his contract that pays him $500,000 if he is on the game-day active list 12 times during the season.

On Thursday, Post columnist Sally Jenkins published a piece that took some unveiled shots at Griffin, calling him “an unteachable know it all” who has “the owner on speed dial” and is “calling all the shots” on the Redskins. Although Jenkins lives in New York and is rarely around Redskins Park, she does have connections in the organization so it would be a mistake to dismiss the column out of hand.

Going on sort of in the background all week was a war of words between former Redskins tight end and current radio talker Chris Cooley and ex-Redskins defensive tackle and current, well, nothing really, Albert Haynesworth. In the exchange, Haynesworth took a shot at Mike Shanahan, calling him, among other things, “conniving”. That prompted a response by Shanahan, who said that Haynesworth had the triple crown of issues: “lazy, lack of passion and a lot of times a lack of character.”

That drew a good laugh from many in the media and fans who remember the bad old days when Haynesworth was lying down on the field while the Eagles’ Mike Vick was scrambling circles around the defense. But it was one more layer of potential distraction in a week that was full of them.

It didn’t seem like the players who weren’t directly involved in the various incidents paid much attention to them. Players in the locker room were asked about what Meriweather said about going for the knees and about the topic of the emphasis on high hits in general. That’s part of the game. But if players were asked to respond to “suck at passing”, Davis nodding off, Griffin as an “unteachable know it all”, or Cooley and Shanahan vs. Haynesworth it was very limited and not enough to be an issue.

If the Redskins do lose to the Chargers it will be because Griffin still isn’t quite sharp enough to break through San Diego’s bend-but-don’t-break defense or because Philip Rivers is playing out of his mind or due to some other on-field factor. It won’t be because of some things that distracted the fans and media but didn’t have much of an effect on the players who will line up today.

Like Real Redskins on Facebook!

In case you missed it

Sunday 10.27

Monday 10.28

Tuesday 10.29

Wednesday 10.30

Thursday 10.31

Friday 11.01

Saturday 11.02

Quick Links

Need to Know: The Redskins week that was—All-Redskins mock, fast-fading interest in Dez

Need to Know: The Redskins week that was—All-Redskins mock, fast-fading interest in Dez

Here is what you need to know on this Saturday, April 21, five days before the 2018 NFL draft.  

The Redskins week that was

A look at some of the most popular posts and hottest topics of the week on Real Redskins and NBC Sports Washington

Should the Redskins pursue Dez Bryant? This topic was one like a meteor, very hot for a short period of time before it quickly faded out. It started to heat up as soon as the Cowboys cut Dez (about a month too late) and when it was reported that he wanted to play against Dallas twice a year it really picked up steam. But then people started to actually think and figured out that signing Bryant didn’t make much sense for the Redskins. Add to that the reports that the Redskins had no interest and would not look into signing Dez in the future and the Redskins fans quickly lost enthusiasm for the topic.

Seven-round Redskins mock draft—I think that most Redskins fans would be happy with this mock. Well, I’ll say some Redskins fans, most is a pretty strong word in this case. 

Is the draft pool deep enough for the Redskins to trade back? There is plenty of talk about the Redskins trading down in the first round to recoup the third-round pick they gave up in the Alex Smith trade. But they need to be careful. Many consider the draft to be top heavy and they may lose their chance to pick up an impact player if they trade back too far. The question then becomes one of quality vs. quantity. 

Three questions as offseason workouts get underway—There will be plenty more questions that we can ask about this team. But we don’t really know what to ask before the draft, particularly when it comes to the defensive line and running back. One the personnel settle into place we will know what we don’t know. 

Tweet of the week

On Chris Cooley’s thought that the Redskins might try to trade back and get Da’Ron Payne in the draft and the use the assets obtained to move up to get Derrius Guice. 

This is related to the questions about trading back. On paper it looks like a good idea, assuming the Redskins want Payne. We’re pretty sure they would like to have Guice but we haven’t heard as much about the Alabama defensive lineman. 

I had many reply that Guice won’t be there in the second round. It’s possible, perhaps even likely, but you just don’t know. There was zero chance that Jonathan Allen would be there at No. 17 last year, right? 

Stay up to date on the Redskins. Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page, Facebook.com/TandlerNBCS and follow him on Twitter  @TandlerNBCS.

Timeline  

Days until:

—OTAs start (5/22) 31
—Training camp starts (7/26) 96
—2018 NFL season starts (9/9) 141

In case you missed it

Quick Links

Redskins' schedule "rest disparity" is very fair in 2018

Redskins' schedule "rest disparity" is very fair in 2018

The NFL started taking into account a new factor when putting together its schedule this year. The concept is called rest disparity. It stems from a complaint made by the Giants last year. And, of course, when the Giants have a cold, the NFL sneezes and immediately does whatever it takes to cure the cold. 

Here is how Peter King laid it out this morning on the MMQB:

Last year, I heard the Giants were not pleased with their schedule because they felt they were too often playing teams more rested than they were. In consecutive October weeks, they played teams coming off byes, for instance. The NFL calculated a figure for every team based on the number of combined days of rest for their foes or for the team, calculating, for instance, in those two weeks, the Giants were a minus-14 (minus-seven for each of the foes, Seattle and Denver, coming off byes). In all, by my math, the Giants were a league-worst minus-22 in “rest disparity.”

So the schedule makers worked to minimize the rest disparity this year. According to King, the worst rest disparity in the league this year is minus-11. The Giants are minus-eight. 

The question that Redskins fans will have immediately here is if the Giants’ rest disparity was reduced at the expense of the team in burgundy and gold. The answer that will surprise many is no. 

The Redskins rest disparity in 2018 will be either minus-one or zero. The variance is due to the possibility that their Week 16 game in Tennessee will be flexed to a Saturday game (see details here). If the game stays on Sunday, they will be at minus-one in rest disparity. If it gets moved, they will have had exactly as much rest over the course of the season as did their opponents, in aggregate. 

If you're interested in the nitty-gritty, here is how it breaks down. In eight or nine of their games, they will have had the same amount of rest as their opponents. They play one game coming off of their bye, a Monday night game in New Orleans. The Saints play the previous Sunday, giving Washington a plus-seven in days of rest. That is canceled out when they play the Falcons in Week 9 after Atlanta’s bye. 

Due to their Thanksgiving game, they get three extra days off going into their Week 13 Monday night game in Philadelphia. Two weeks later the Jaguars will have those three extra days of rest when they host the Redskins, having played on Thursday in Week 14.

They lose a day relative to their opponents coming off of those Monday night games against the Saints and Eagles. The Redskins get an extra day prior to visiting the Giants in Week 8 as New York has a Monday night game in Week 7. 

So far, that comes to minus-one in rest disparity. That will remain in place if they play the Titans on Sunday, December 23. If the game is flexed to Saturday, they will gain a day of rest on the Eagles in Week 17, zeroing out the rest disparity for the season. 

More Redskins

Stay up to date on the Redskins. Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page, Facebook.com/TandlerNBCS and follow him on Twitter @TandlerNBCS.