Here is what you need to know on this Tuesday, February 17, one day before the Washington Redskins and the rest of the NFL assemble in Indianapolis for the NFL Combine.
Question of the day
We’re changing up the format of Need to Know for the offseason. Every day I’ll give an in-depth answer to a question submitted by a fan on my Twitter feed, via the Real Redskins Facebook page, or in the comments section here. On Twitter address the questions to me at @Rich_TandlerCSN with the #NTK hashtag. There will be a comment thread set up on the Facebook page and if you’re asking your question here, put “for NTK” at the start of the comment.
Today's question is from Twitter:
@Rich_TandlerCSN #NTK 10 was not mentioned in the fan letter, but of the ones that were: 11,46,71,91 which do you pick as the face of skins?— Mike (@MFrank74) February 14, 2015
With the NFL Combine starting tomorrow, this is a good question to ponder as the Redskins start the process of adding new players to the roster. The hope that someone they draft can get to be good enough to be considered to be the face of the franchise.
And since we’re talking about the draft I think you have to eliminate DeSean Jackson from the list of face of the Redskins contenders. Perhaps you don’t need to be drafted by the team but you at least have to have spent your prime seasons in Washington. Jackson is arguably the team’s best player but he can’t be the face.
I think that a lot of fans identify with Alfred Morris, a sixth-round draft pick who helped the Redskins to the division title as a rookie. He might be the most popular player on the team. But he has minimal contact with fans through the media (Morris does do more than his fair share of work in the community). That’s his option but I think that a critical part of being the face of a franchise is to be a team leader, to be out talking to the media in good times and bad. If not, you have to be very, very good, Hall of Fame good (think Barry Sanders) to be the face of a franchise. Again, there’s nothing wrong with preferring to keep to yourself, but that’s not what a face of the franchise does.
On the other hand, Trent Williams and Ryan Kerrigan are front and center in the locker room during the week and after a game, win or lose. Although they are only in their sixth and fifth years with the team, respectively, they are senior members of the team. Most hard-core Redskins fans would recognize them if saw one of them walking around the street.
But Robert Griffin III would be recognized by causal fans, even non-fans, if he was walking down the street. Ditto with fans of other teams. Would, say, a Packers fan recognize Williams in a grocery store? Would a Seahawks fan ask Kerrigan for his autograph in a restaurant?
Is being recognized by most NFL fans and by many casual fans and non fans a requirement for being the face of a franchise? I suppose not, especially if you think that every team has to have a player who is the face. But the reality of life for the Redskins is that they have a famous guy who isn’t playing well and some who play well but aren’t well known.
My opinion is that the Redskins don’t have a face of the franchise right now, no player who is recognizable on the field (i.e. you could tell who it is even if he wasn’t wearing a jersey number) and off the field. If forced to name one I’d say Kerrigan only because he plays the more glamorous position. But if you have to name a face of the franchise by default, you really don’t have one.
—It’s been 51 days since the Redskins played a game. It will be about 208 days until they play another one.
—Days until: NFL free agency starts 21; Redskins offseason workouts start 62; 2015 NFL Draft 72
If you have any questions about what's going on at Redskins Park, hit me up in the comments. And I'm always on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN.
In case you missed it