Redskins

Quick Links

OPEN THREAD: Redskins need run game help, but can they trust Matt Jones?

screen_shot_2015-11-09_at_12.23.35_pm.png

OPEN THREAD: Redskins need run game help, but can they trust Matt Jones?

Despite the focus of the coaching staff for two weeks during the bye, the Redskins run game remained off-track in New England. Washington managed just 37 yards on the ground against the Patriots, continuing a troubling trend for the team's impotent rush attack. In their last four games, Washington has failed to crack 52 yards on the ground. 

More troubling, while it appears rookie Matt Jones has more burst and vision than veteran Alfred Morris does, the Redskins have a trust issue with Jones. 

Sunday in New England, Jones lost a fumble, his third of the season. What's worse, it seems Jones' fumbles come at the worst times for the Redskins, particularly in losses. Against New England, Jones put the ball on the ground to end a promising Redskins drive, and all 'Skins fans remember the fumble in New York as he was jumping into the end zone.

MORE REDSKINS: RUSH ATTACK HASN'T JUST BEEN BAD, IT'S BEEN AWFUL 

It's fairly obvious Jones has been running better than Morris of late. On 74 attempts, Jones has rushed for 276 yards and three TDs, good for a 3.73 yards per carry average. So far this season, Morris has rushed 95 times for 312 yards, good for a 3.3 YPC.

What's worse, when the Redskins have slumped in the run game the last four games, Morris' numbers have been really poor. In the last four games, Morris has rushed 29 times for just 51 yards. That's a 1.75 YPC average. 

The offensive line has dealt with a number of injuries during that time, and in some of those games the score required the 'Skins to abandon the commitment to the run game. The struggles do not all fall on Morris, but the numbers also hold weight.

Does Washington need more from Jones? Yes. But can Jay Gruden trust the rookie? Remains to be seen. An early reputation as a fumbler will put a running back in a coach's doghouse, and once there, it can be awfully tough to get out.

Is it time for the Skins to give Jones more work? Or are the fumble concerns too important? Let us know in the comments. 

Quick Links

As money skyrockets, don't expect Kirk Cousins to give discounts on open market

kirk-cousins-gfx-usat.png
USA TODAY Sports

As money skyrockets, don't expect Kirk Cousins to give discounts on open market

Kirk Cousins repeatedly said his free agent decision will not be just about money. Be clear, however, that money will be a huge factor in this decision. 

After the Redskins traded with Kansas City to acquire Alex Smith before the Super Bowl, it became obvious Washington will move on from Cousins. Whether that means the quarterback simply walks away in free agency or the organization attempts a highly risky tag-and-trade scenario, regardless, Cousins will throw footballs for another franchise in 2018.

Cousins wants to choose where he will play via free agency, and might even file a grievance if the Redskins do deploy a third franchise tag to control his rights.

Assuming Cousins hits free agency, a new report out of New York suggests the Jets will pay "whatever it takes" to land the passer. That could even include a fully guaranteed contract, and will certainly get close to a $30 million a year price tag. 

A notion exists too that Cousins might take less to go to a winner, and many think that could be the Broncos. Denver won five games in 2017, same as the Jets, though the Broncos have a strong defense and have been getting particularly awful QB play. 

The important thing to remember for curious Redskins fans watching the Cousins saga unfold: Don't expect much, if any, discount. 

The quarterback himself made that clear. 

"There’s other quarterbacks that come after you and it would be almost a selfish move to hurt future quarterbacks who get in a position to have a contract," Cousins said last year on 106.7 the Fan.

The quotes came after the 2016 season but before the Redskins again used a franchise tag with Cousins for the 2017 season. Washington wanted to attempt a long-term deal with Cousins at that point, though the quarterback decided to not negotiate and instead play on the tag.

The point remains that Cousins, and his representatives, believe the quarterback has a duty to other players to maximize his earnings. 

"If you don’t take a deal that’s fair to you, then you’re also taking a deal that’s not fair to them and you’re setting them back as well. So there’s different reasons. You just do the best you can."

If he hits free agency, Cousins will likely sign the richest contract in NFL history. Those opportunities don't come around often, and the quarterback should take full advantage. 

Want more Redskins? Click here to follow JP on Facebook and check out @JPFinlayNBCS for live updates via Twitter! Click here for the #RedskinsTalk on Apple Podcastshere for Google Play or press play below. Don't forget to subscribe!

Quick Links

Need to Know: Could Ty Nsekhe be the Redskins' answer at left guard?

nsekhe_vs_cardinals.png
USA Today Sports Images

Need to Know: Could Ty Nsekhe be the Redskins' answer at left guard?

Here is what you need to know on this Monday, February 19, 23 days before NFL free agency starts.

Monday musings

—One possible solution to the left guard spot is perhaps being overlooked. Ty Nsekhe played there some last year, starting the game in Dallas and playing there until Morgan Moses got injured, forcing him to move to right tackle. Nsekhe is slated to be a restricted free agent but his return is likely. In December I asked Jay Gruden if Nsekhe might move to guard in 2018. “I think Ty is a big man and a very good tackle, but in the offseason when we have more time, maybe we can feature him at some guard when we’ve got all our guys back,” he said. “Feature him some” doesn’t mean that they will make him a starter; perhaps they want him to be the top option to fill in at four of the five OL positions. But it’s something to keep an eye on if they don’t land a left guard solution in free agency or the draft.

—When I posted about Albert Breer’s report that Kirk Cousins would file a grievance if the Redskins put the franchise tag on him in an effort to trade him, I pulled up a copy of the CBA to see the language on which Cousins could base his case. I read through the Article 10, which deals with the franchise tag twice and I saw nothing of it. But Mike Florio found it in Article 4, the one that deals with player contracts. “A Club extending a Required Tender must, for so long as that Tender is extended, have a good faith intention to employ the player receiving the Tender at the Tender compensation level during the upcoming season.” Since the Redskins clearly have no intention of employing Cousins after the Alex Smith trade, this seems to be a fairly simple case. In reality, it never is.

—I tweeted this last week:

However, possible cap casualties from other teams are not included in that group. That won’t turn the pool of players who will become available to sign into a bunch of potential franchise changers. Still, there could be a number of players in whom the Redskins could be interested in like RB DeMarco Murray, WRs Emmanuel Sanders and Torrey Smith, edge rusher Elvis Dumervil, and DL Brandon Mebane. A plus to signing players who have been waived is that they don’t count in the formula that determines compensatory draft picks. The Redskins have never really paid attention to that in the past but with potential high comp picks at stake if they lose both Kirk Cousins and Bashaud Breeland, this could be a good year to start.

Stay up to date on the Redskins. Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page Facebook.com/TandlerNBCS and follow him on Twitter @TandlerNBCS.

Timeline  

Days until:

—NFL Combine (3/1) 10
—NFL Draft (4/26) 66
—2018 NFL season starts (9/9) 202

Tandler on Twitter

In case you missed it