Redskins

Quick Links

Redskins’ proposed rule changes deserve serious consideration by NFL

Redskins’ proposed rule changes deserve serious consideration by NFL

The NFL announced 19 proposed rule changes for the 2016 season plus some procedural changes. They will be considered during the owners meetings starting on Sunday. Let’s look at some of them, including some proposed by the Redskins, and give them a thumbs up or down.

Permanently moves the line of scrimmage for Try kicks to the defensive team’s 15-yard line, and allows the defense to return any missed Try.

Thumbs up—The move of the point after touchdown back to the 15 last year was a temporary change. It added some interest and excitement to the PAT so it should stay. Second part should be to move the line of scrimmage for a try for two to the one yard line to encourage that more.

Disqualifies a player who is penalized twice in one game for certain types of unsportsmanlike conduct fouls.

Thumbs up—This would be ejection for multiple instances of taunting, throwing punches, etc., not for personal fouls committed before the whistle. This conduct is presumably in the player’s control and if he is out of control he should be ejected.

By Baltimore; to amend Rule 5, Sections 3, Articles 1 and 2 (Changes in Position) to require players to wear jersey vests with numbers appropriate for their positions.

Thumbs down—Really, Ravens? Vests over the jersey when a tackle lines up as a tight end? You’re better than that.

By Baltimore; to amend Rule 15, Section 2, Articles 1, 4, and 5 (Instant Replay) to provide each team with three challenges and expand reviewable plays

Thumbs down/up—In favor of expanding replay to everything except a list of defined plays including offensive and defensive holding, illegal contact, and pass interference, among others. If the call was wrong and there is indisputable visual evidence to indicate that it should be changeable. But with automatic replays on scoring plays and turnovers there is no need for a coach to have three challenges.

By Washington; to amend Rule 16, Section 1, Articles 1, 4, 6 and 7 (Overtime procedures) to eliminate overtime periods in preseason games. 14.

Thumbs up—I don’t know why this needs to be debated at all. There is absolutely no point in risking injuries by playing for a pointless “win” in a meaningless game. But the Redskin proposed this last year and it was rejected.

By Washington; to amend Rule 15, Section 2, Article 4 (Reviewable Plays) to subject personal foul penalties to Instant Replay review. 15.

Thumbs up—I might oppose this if the officials were not told to throw the flag when in doubt, to err on the side of player safety. If you’re creating a gray area like that you need to have a mechanism to correct it.

By Washington; to amend Rule 15, Section 2, Article 1 (Coaches' Challenge) to eliminate the requirement that a team be successful on each of its first two Instant Replay challenges in order to be awarded a third challenge.

Thumbs down—They want a third challenge if either of the first two challenges is successful. As noted above, with automatic challenges you don’t need extras. In fact, I’d go the other way. Give each coach one challenge and if they are successful on that they get another one. This will encourage coaches to save them for critical situations and prevent these “oh, what the heck” challenges over five-yard gains.

If you want to peruse all of the details of all of the proposed playing rule changes you can find the 62-page PDF here. The Redskins also proposed some procedural changes; these are detailed on Redskins.com. Let's look at a couple of those:

The Redskins are proposing an increase in the number of Active List players for regular season games played on a day other than Sunday or Monday (excluding the opening weekend of the season) and for games played in another country from 45 to 49 players per club. They cite player safety for this proposal.

Thumbs down—This is mostly for Thursday night games. I think with just four inactives, as you go on later in the season there will be too many situations where one team will be able to dress more players than the other, creating a competitive imbalance. Perhaps a compromise with 47 players active for Thursday nights would be more equitable.

The Redskins are proposing to permit a player who has suffered a concussion and has not yet been cleared for participation to be placed on the club's Exemption List and be replaced by a player on the team's practice squad on a game-by-game basis until the injured player is cleared.

Thumbs up—Baseball has a similar rule in place and if MLB is a step ahead of you, it’s time to take a serious look at making a change. This is a smart change and I’m not sure why it should even be debated.

Quick Links

Wanting increased playing time, Junior Galette intends to pursue free agency, per source

Wanting increased playing time, Junior Galette intends to pursue free agency, per source

Redskins outside linebacker Junior Galette intends to pursue free agency to find a team that will give him plenty of snaps, per a source with knowledge of the situation.

Galette's contract will expire once the 2017 regular season ends, and while the 29-year-old pass rush specialist appreciates the Redskins organization and fans, he wants to play. 

After suffering season-ending Achilles injuries in 2015 and 2016, Galette has stayed healthy throughout the 2017 season. 

Still, he hasn't been on the field much.

Ryan Kerrigan leads the Redskins with 358 snaps in pass rush situations, and Preston Smith ranks second with 297, according to Pro Football Focus. 

Galette has played only 197 snaps this season in pass rush situations. 

For comparison, rookie Jonathan Allen logged 112 snaps in pass rush situations. Allen played in just five games before heading to the injured reserve with a Lisfranc injury. Galette has played in all 13 Redskins games this year, and hasn't appeared on the injury report once. 

Compounding the issue, Galette has been effective when on the field. 

Pro Football Focus rated him the third best defender on the Redskins this season, behind only Kerrigan and cornerback Kendall Fuller. 

As Rich Tandler noted, there will be a market for Galette. All NFL teams need pass rushers, and it appears Galette still has plenty left after his two-year layoff. Remember, in 2013 and 2014 Galette had 22 sacks for the New Orleans Saints.  This season, he has two sacks. 

The Redskins deserve credit for sticking with Galette after two lost seasons, though Galette deserves credit too for working back from not one but two Achilles injuries. 

Washington's coaches and front office speak highly of Galette, and there haven't been off field issues. For whatever reason, the playing time just hasn't been there. 

Looks like that will change next year. 

Want more Redskins? Click here to follow JP on Facebook and check out @JPFinlayNBCS for live updates via Twitter! Click here for the #RedskinsTalk on Apple Podcastshere for Google Play or press play below. Don't forget to subscribe!

Quick Links

Robert Griffin III listed the best places for Kirk Cousins to end up, and he left off the Redskins

kirk_rg3.jpg
USA TODAY Sports

Robert Griffin III listed the best places for Kirk Cousins to end up, and he left off the Redskins

Of course this was going to happen. 

The moment it became known that Robert Griffin III was going to be on ESPN's shows for a few appearances this week, you knew he was going to be asked about Kirk Cousins at some point.

And, surely enough, come Wednesday afternoon, the stars aligned and the question was asked on NFL Live: Where, in Griffin's opinion, was the best place for Cousins to land this offseason?

"I think it depends on what he's trying to do," Griffin began.

"If he's trying to make the most money, he goes to Cleveland," he said. "If he's trying to be in the best situation, he goes to one of these teams that have a great defense that isn't gonna put it all on his shoulders."

MORE: POWER RANKINGS - REDSKINS FALL LOWER THAN THEY HAVE ALL 2017

Don't worry, he doesn't stop there. In fact, he saved the good stuff for the latter half of his answer.

"He's had it all on his shoulders in Washington, and we've seen the result," Cousins' draft classmate continued. "But if he's got a great defense like, say, Denver, say, Jacksonville, it makes it easier for him as a quarterback. Whereas in Cleveland, he's gonna have to go in and he's gonna have to do more of the workload."

So, the Browns, Broncos and Jaguars are among the teams Griffin considers options for Cousins. But, uh, what about the one he's on right now?

"I don't think it's Washington, just because of, you've seen what's been going on," he said. "Do they want him there? Does he want to be there?"

This isn't to say that the former rookie of the year doesn't bring up valid points; Cousins has had to play with below-average defenses for much of his career in D.C. and the franchise hasn't exactly shown a ton of admiration for him.

But nevertheless, it was interesting to see Griffin declare wish such confidence that his old backup needs to bolt from the Redskins and head elsewhere.

And thus concludes another chapter of the Griffin-Cousins-Redskins saga. You can leave your comments about how you don't care about it below, even though you made the choice to click on the story in the first place.