Redskins

Quick Links

Who can be on the Practice Squad?

Who can be on the Practice Squad?

Westbrook could spend a third year on the practice squad

During the live blog last night we got to discussing the practice squad and who could be on it and who couldn't. I found my PDF of the NFL collective bargaining agreement and found the rules on page 171. Here are the eligibility requirements for players to be on the Practice Squad:

  • Players may not have served more than two previous seasons on a practice squad
  • Players who do not have an accrued season of NFL experience.
  • Free agent players who were on the Active List for fewer than nine regular season games during the only Accrued Seasons.
  • An otherwise eligible player may be a practice squad player for a third season only if the club by which he is employed that season has at least 53 players on its active/inactive list during the entire period of his employment.
  • Three regular season or postseason games on the practice squad qualifies as a year.

Also, a player must clear waivers before being added to the practice squad and, during the season, a team can sign a PS player from another team with no compensation. In addition, after being waived a player cut by one team could sign with the practice squad of another team.

The primary misconception that I had was that players who had a season on the roster but were inactive virtually the entire year such as Colt Brennan or Chad Reinhart could not be on the practice squad. Since both were active for fewer than nine games during their only accrued seasons, they could be signed to the PS.

It says here that neither one of them will end up there. Reinhart should get another year, although it appears that he will be the second option should a guard go down; Jeremy Bridges will be the first. Colt's fate won't be decided until after Thursday's game but he clearly is on the bubble. If Chase Daniel does get the nod as the third QB I doubt that Brennan would wind up on the practice squad.

It's not that he's not worth keeping around but that there is no use for a fourth quarterback in the week to week operation during the regular season. Even with three you have an extra with the starter running the offense and another one running the scout team. The third one can throw to receivers in drills and handle other such chores. A fourth quarterback would be the proverbial fifth wheel.

It also appears that Byron Westbrook could be on the PS. He's been on there the past two seasons but since, as far as I know, the Redskins have had 53 players on the active/inactive roster every week. That seems like an odd twist to the rules since I've never heard of a team carrying fewer than 53 players. But apparently they don't want teams carrying practice squad players in lieu of having them on the roster.

Westbrook may or may not want to hang around for another year on the PS. The practice squad may not be a player's dream destination, but it's not a bad gig. The minimum pay is $5,200 a week or $88,400 if you stick the whole season. A team can play a practice squad member more but the salaries do go against the cap.

It's not as good a deal as being on the roster. The rookie minimum is $285,000 or $16,764 a week.

Quick Links

Need to Know: The Redskins week that was—All-Redskins mock, fast-fading interest in Dez

Need to Know: The Redskins week that was—All-Redskins mock, fast-fading interest in Dez

Here is what you need to know on this Saturday, April 21, five days before the 2018 NFL draft.  

The Redskins week that was

A look at some of the most popular posts and hottest topics of the week on Real Redskins and NBC Sports Washington

Should the Redskins pursue Dez Bryant? This topic was one like a meteor, very hot for a short period of time before it quickly faded out. It started to heat up as soon as the Cowboys cut Dez (about a month too late) and when it was reported that he wanted to play against Dallas twice a year it really picked up steam. But then people started to actually think and figured out that signing Bryant didn’t make much sense for the Redskins. Add to that the reports that the Redskins had no interest and would not look into signing Dez in the future and the Redskins fans quickly lost enthusiasm for the topic.

Seven-round Redskins mock draft—I think that most Redskins fans would be happy with this mock. Well, I’ll say some Redskins fans, most is a pretty strong word in this case. 

Is the draft pool deep enough for the Redskins to trade back? There is plenty of talk about the Redskins trading down in the first round to recoup the third-round pick they gave up in the Alex Smith trade. But they need to be careful. Many consider the draft to be top heavy and they may lose their chance to pick up an impact player if they trade back too far. The question then becomes one of quality vs. quantity. 

Three questions as offseason workouts get underway—There will be plenty more questions that we can ask about this team. But we don’t really know what to ask before the draft, particularly when it comes to the defensive line and running back. One the personnel settle into place we will know what we don’t know. 

Tweet of the week

On Chris Cooley’s thought that the Redskins might try to trade back and get Da’Ron Payne in the draft and the use the assets obtained to move up to get Derrius Guice. 

This is related to the questions about trading back. On paper it looks like a good idea, assuming the Redskins want Payne. We’re pretty sure they would like to have Guice but we haven’t heard as much about the Alabama defensive lineman. 

I had many reply that Guice won’t be there in the second round. It’s possible, perhaps even likely, but you just don’t know. There was zero chance that Jonathan Allen would be there at No. 17 last year, right? 

Stay up to date on the Redskins. Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page, Facebook.com/TandlerNBCS and follow him on Twitter  @TandlerNBCS.

Timeline  

Days until:

—OTAs start (5/22) 31
—Training camp starts (7/26) 96
—2018 NFL season starts (9/9) 141

In case you missed it

Quick Links

Redskins' schedule "rest disparity" is very fair in 2018

Redskins' schedule "rest disparity" is very fair in 2018

The NFL started taking into account a new factor when putting together its schedule this year. The concept is called rest disparity. It stems from a complaint made by the Giants last year. And, of course, when the Giants have a cold, the NFL sneezes and immediately does whatever it takes to cure the cold. 

Here is how Peter King laid it out this morning on the MMQB:

Last year, I heard the Giants were not pleased with their schedule because they felt they were too often playing teams more rested than they were. In consecutive October weeks, they played teams coming off byes, for instance. The NFL calculated a figure for every team based on the number of combined days of rest for their foes or for the team, calculating, for instance, in those two weeks, the Giants were a minus-14 (minus-seven for each of the foes, Seattle and Denver, coming off byes). In all, by my math, the Giants were a league-worst minus-22 in “rest disparity.”

So the schedule makers worked to minimize the rest disparity this year. According to King, the worst rest disparity in the league this year is minus-11. The Giants are minus-eight. 

The question that Redskins fans will have immediately here is if the Giants’ rest disparity was reduced at the expense of the team in burgundy and gold. The answer that will surprise many is no. 

The Redskins rest disparity in 2018 will be either minus-one or zero. The variance is due to the possibility that their Week 16 game in Tennessee will be flexed to a Saturday game (see details here). If the game stays on Sunday, they will be at minus-one in rest disparity. If it gets moved, they will have had exactly as much rest over the course of the season as did their opponents, in aggregate. 

If you're interested in the nitty-gritty, here is how it breaks down. In eight or nine of their games, they will have had the same amount of rest as their opponents. They play one game coming off of their bye, a Monday night game in New Orleans. The Saints play the previous Sunday, giving Washington a plus-seven in days of rest. That is canceled out when they play the Falcons in Week 9 after Atlanta’s bye. 

Due to their Thanksgiving game, they get three extra days off going into their Week 13 Monday night game in Philadelphia. Two weeks later the Jaguars will have those three extra days of rest when they host the Redskins, having played on Thursday in Week 14.

They lose a day relative to their opponents coming off of those Monday night games against the Saints and Eagles. The Redskins get an extra day prior to visiting the Giants in Week 8 as New York has a Monday night game in Week 7. 

So far, that comes to minus-one in rest disparity. That will remain in place if they play the Titans on Sunday, December 23. If the game is flexed to Saturday, they will gain a day of rest on the Eagles in Week 17, zeroing out the rest disparity for the season. 

More Redskins

Stay up to date on the Redskins. Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page, Facebook.com/TandlerNBCS and follow him on Twitter @TandlerNBCS.