49ers

49ers, Seahawks in danger of being without key players Monday night

49ers, Seahawks in danger of being without key players Monday night

Both the 49ers and Seahawks have multiple key players whose status for Monday night's game truly is up in the air. In fact, it's difficult to say which side would be more adversely affected if they were forced to play without those players.

On San Francisco's side, neither tight end George Kittle (knee, ankle) nor kicker Robbie Gould (quadricep) practiced Friday. That's quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo's No. 1 target, and the man in charge of the kicking game in what is expected to be a tightly fought contest.

Seattle's injury report isn't any better. Standout defensive lineman Jadeveon Clowney (toe, knee), whom the Seahawks acquired in a trade from the Texans earlier this season, and left tackle Duane Brown (biceps, knee) both missed practice the last two days, while receivers Tyler Lockett (hip) and Josh Gordon (ankle) got in a limited session Friday. That's Seattle's best pass rusher, the man in charge of protecting quarterback Russell Wilson's blind side and the Seahawks' two most intimidating receivers.

If any of the aforementioned players misses Monday's game, it could have a drastic effect on the outcome.

The 49ers arguably have the NFL's best defensive line. Seattle's offensive line can be characterized as average at best, but it would get a downgrade if Brown didn't play Monday night. In that event, San Francisco edge rushers Dee Ford and Nick Bosa will be licking their chops.

Offensive tackles Joe Staley and Mike McGlinchey are expected to return to game action for the 49ers against the Seahawks, and you can be sure they'd prefer not to have to go up against Clowney. On the flip side, Seattle sure would love to have Clowney available to take advantage of any lingering rustiness.

Kittle leads the 49ers with 46 receptions for 541 yards and 28 first downs. Rookie receiver Deebo Samuel ranks second in all three categories with 22, 227 and 10, respectively. Remove Kittle from the equation, and Garoppolo's life gets a whole lot tougher.

[RELATED: Kittle's status still in doubt as 49ers-Seahawks nears]

The last time these teams played, Gould kicked a game-winning field goal in overtime. He hasn't been his typically reliable self this season, but if he can't go Monday night, it would be difficult for 49ers coach Kyle Shanahan to have much faith in the kicking game.

Both teams have another practice Saturday, after which they'll have to issue their injury reports for Monday night's game. If any of those marquee players don't participate, it won't bode well for their chances of playing in the NFC West rivalry showdown.

How Patriots trading Jimmy Garoppolo earlier would've affected 49ers

watsonjimmygusatsi.jpg
USATSI

How Patriots trading Jimmy Garoppolo earlier would've affected 49ers

The New England Patriots' ideal Tom Brady successor is the franchise quarterback for Brady's childhood team.

The Patriots dealt Jimmy Garoppolo to the 49ers for a second-round draft pick in 2017, to coach Bill Belichick's reported chagrin. He envisioned Garoppolo leading the Patriots into another decade of dominance, but owner Robert Kraft ordered Belichick to trade Garoppolo and keep Brady, ESPN's Seth Wickersham reported in 2018.

Neither Brady nor Garoppolo will be in New England when the 2020 season starts, as the former signed with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers (that's still weird to type and say out loud) as a free agent last month. The Patriots' QB depth chart currently consists of Jarrett Stidham and former 49er Brian Hoyer, which doesn't exactly inspire dynasty-building confidence.

That left NBC Sports Boston's Phil Perry to wonder if the Patriots would've been better off trading Garoppolo sooner, when then-Cleveland Browns coach Hue Jackson stopped just shy of holding a neon sign over his head indicating he would trade the No. 12 pick before that year's draft for Garoppolo.

"On its face, making that move made sense for both sides," Perry wrote Friday. "The Browns were desperate for a competent quarterback. They were flush with picks. The Patriots, meanwhile, didn't have a first or a second-rounder that spring. For them, trading Garoppolo with a year left on his contract represented an opportunity to bolster their 2017 rookie haul with a top-15 talent."

The ripple effects, as Perry noted would've been far-reaching.

Jackson would've had his quarterback of the future, and thus the Browns might not have drafted Baker Mayfield No. 1 overall -- or even had the pick -- in 2018. The 49ers, who Kyle Shanahan admitted were focused enough on acquiring Kirk Cousins as a free agent in 2018 that they passed on Patrick Mahomes in the 2017 draft, then likely would've gone all-in on Cousins. The Patriots, then, could've drafted Deshaun Watson at No. 12 overall -- the same pick the Houston Texans used after acquiring it from the Browns -- as Brady's successor.

Thankfully for fans sick of New England winning titles, that didn't happen. It's also fair to wonder if any of the teams involved other than the Patriots actually were better off.

Acquiring Garoppolo could've saved Jackson's job in the short-term, but the Browns didn't become a team who failed to meet lofty expectations until after Jackson's firing. The 49ers, had they signed Cousins to the same contract he signed with the Vikings in 2018, would've had more flexibility in the first season but less in the second when compared to Garoppolo's extension. Neither Cousins nor Garoppolo is a clear upgrade over the other, and it's not like you can guarantee Cousins wouldn't have torn his ACL in 2018, either.

[RELATED: Kittle's 49ers rise didn't shock fellow Iowa star Hanks at all]

The Patriots can (and surely will) kick themselves all they want for not maximizing Garoppolo's trade return, but the Browns might not view a hypothetical Garoppolo deal with the same regret since that still would've meant not picking Watson.

The 49ers, assuming they still signed Cousins, surely would've been happy either way.

George Kittle's 49ers rise didn't shock fellow Iowa star Merton Hanks

George Kittle's 49ers rise didn't shock fellow Iowa star Merton Hanks

Tight end George Kittle already is the 49ers’ best fifth-round draft pick since 1991.

Kittle has picked up two Pro Bowl selections and a First-Team All-Pro award in his first three NFL seasons. The 49ers have not experienced that kind of success from a player in the fifth round since the selection of defensive back Merton Hanks, a four-time Pro Bowl player and starter on the 49ers’ Super Bowl champion team in the 1994 season.

Kittle, like Hanks, played college ball at Iowa.

“I think that’s a great symmetry,” Hanks said this week on The 49ers Insider Podcast.

“The 49ers do pretty well with fifth-round draft picks from the University of Iowa. We tend to knock it out of the park a little bit there.”

Listen and subscribe to the 49ers Insider Podcast:

Hanks, who now works as senior associate commissioner of Conference USA, described himself as a first-round talent who fell in the draft due to a bad performance at the NFL Scouting Combine. He apparently scared teams with his reported time of 4.77 seconds in the 40-yard dash.

Kittle had an impressive combine. He had all the measurables, but he did not post great numbers as a pass-catcher during his four-year college career. In 25 games over four seasons, Kittle caught just 48 passes for 737 yards and 10 touchdowns.

In his first 45 regular-season games with the 49ers, Kittle has 216 catches for 2,945 yards and 12 touchdowns.

“I can’t say I’m surprised at all,” said Hanks, who referred to Iowa as “Tight Ends U."

[RELATED: How ex-49er Merton Hanks channeled 'Sesame Street' in iconic dance]

Iowa produced two tight ends in the first round of the 2019 draft: T.J. Hockenson, chosen No. 8 overall by the Detroit Lions, and Noah Fant, whom the Denver Broncos picked at No. 20.

“Coach (Kirk) Ferentz had NFL ties," Hanks added. "He understands the NFL game and what tight ends have to do to be successful, not only on the collegiate level, but the NFL level.”