Celtics

30 teams in 30 days: Is this the last time Cavaliers will rely on LeBron James?

cavs-lebron-30-teams-in-30-days-82917.jpg

30 teams in 30 days: Is this the last time Cavaliers will rely on LeBron James?

We’ll take a look at all 30 teams in the next 30 days as they prepare for the 2017-2018 regular season, which is when the real fireworks begin! Today's team: The Cleveland Cavaliers.

Even though Boston and Cleveland have yet to make their trade official due to Isaiah Thomas’ still-gimpy hip, there’s little reason to believe that this deal will blow up.
 
That’s why if you visit either team’s website, you’ll see Kyrie Irving on the Celtics’ page while Thomas, Jae, Crowder and Ante Zizic are all wearing Cavalier uniforms.
 
Just as the conclusion of this trade has been odd, the fact that the top two teams in the East are involved in such a blockbuster of a trade is just as strange.
 
And because there’s still a glimmer of uncertainty as to the deal getting done, that makes it impossible to gauge what to expect from the Cavs this season.
 
But for argument’s sake, we’re going to work on the premise that the deal will be completed soon because frankly, both teams have been operating of late as though it will get done.
 
It’s all but a given that Isaiah Thomas will not play at the start of the season, so the Cavs will find themselves once again leaning heavily on LeBron James to carry them early on.
 
The upside this season is that James will have some help with the addition of Derrick Rose, a former league MVP who had a solid season last season in New York. Appearing in 64 games, Rose averaged 18.0 points per game, his highest scoring average since 2012. And he did so while shooting 47.1 percent from the field which was his highest mark since 2010.
 
And the addition of Jae Crowder gives Cleveland some defensive versatility that they have lacked in past years, not to mention another catch-and-shoot option for James to play with this season.
 
The trade with Boston was about more than just trying to get something of value for Irving who asked to be traded last month. It was about putting together a roster that could once again compete for a spot in the NBA Finals, which might be enough to convince James to stay beyond this upcoming season.
 
James can opt-out and become a free agent in the summer of 2018, with heavy speculation that he’ll take his talents to Los Angeles and play for the Lakers.
 
However, a strong run with a core group of himself, Kevin Love, Tristan Thompson, Thomas and Crowder along with potentially adding the number one player in a top-heavy draft via the Brooklyn pick Boston sent Cleveland’s way as part of the Irving trade, might be what convinces James to re-up with the Cavs.
 
Key free agent/draft/trade additions: Derrick Rose (Chicago); Isaiah Thomas (Boston); Jae Crowder (Boston); Jeff Green (Orlando).
 
Key losses: Kyrie Irving (traded to Boston); Deron Williams (free agent); Derrick Williams (free agent).
 
Rookies of note: Cedi Osman; Ante Zizic.
 
Expectations:
60-22 (First in the Central Division, first-place tie in the East)
 


 

Celtics injury report: Kyrie Irving out for Tuesday vs. Cavaliers

Celtics injury report: Kyrie Irving out for Tuesday vs. Cavaliers

The Celtics will be without Kyrie Irving on Tuesday when they visit the Cavaliers.

According to the C's injury report released Monday afternoon, Irving will be held out due to loan management. Robert Williams is listed as doubtful with a low back contusion, and both Al Horford (left knee soreness) and Jayson Tatum (right low back contusion) are questionable.

Irving was asked following Sunday night's loss to the Spurs if going back to Cleveland meant anything to him, to which he responded, "No, not at all." Tuesday night's matchup marks the Celtics’ seventh game in Cleveland since Irving was dealt to Boston (1 preseason, 3 regular season, 3 playoff). He’s played in one game there: Opening night 2017.

The Celtics ride a four-game losing skid into Cleveland as they hope to get back on track vs. the lowly Cavs, who sit in 14th place in the Eastern Conference.

Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of your teams and stream the Celtics easily on your device.

No simple fix for Celtics but clear something has to change

No simple fix for Celtics but clear something has to change

BOSTON — One of the more curious aspects of the Boston Celtics’ maddening 2018-19 season has been Brad Stevens’ penchant for letting his team play through its struggles.

That’s long been Stevens’ philosophy but it’s been amplified by Boston’s inconsistent ways, both in the micro (in-game, when opponents go on big runs) and macro (sticking with lineups, rotations despite underwhelming recent returns). 

It reflects the unwavering confidence that Stevens has in his players but, in the absence of results, it’s fair to wonder if this team simply needs a shorter leash than those past teams that Stevens could let fight through what ailed them.

We’ve seen instances of Stevens being more aggressive with his timeouts lately in hopes of quelling the staggering amount of 12-0 type runs that opponents seem to routinely launch. But Stevens has remained reluctant to alter his starting lineup (outside of injuries and rest, at least) and it’s fair to wonder if time is running out on any potential experimentation that could have been done before the postseason arrives.

After Sunday’s latest eyesore of a loss to the San Antonio Spurs, Stevens was asked directly about the lineup and maintained that it’s something he thinks about often but also suggested that any lineups he’d like to explore are further limited by player availability.

MORE CELTICS

Stevens was asked if there had been any thought to going back to the original starting 5 — Kyrie Irving, Jaylen Brown, Gordon Hayward, Jayson Tatum, and Al Horford — which would offer Boston its most skilled and versatile five-man group, albeit one that struggled mightily out of the gates of the season.

"I think about that every day. But I don’t know if it’s the original starting lineup,” said Stevens. "I don’t know if it’s better rotations. I think you’re always thinking about [lineup tweaks]. And, inevitably, you can make a case for everything. And you could go through every game this year and make a case and look at it because we have a lot of guys that are fairly alike. 

"The one thing as we move forward, we are going to need, based on our matchup, to settle on the best things for each series. I don’t know that that will be our starting lineup that we’ve been starting. But I’m more worried about the last 42 minutes than the first 6, so I do think that’s another factor in that.”

There’s a lot to digest there. Let’s start with Boston’s current preferred stating 5 that features Marcus Smart and Marcus Morris with Irving, Tatum, and Horford. That original lineup flip in late November spurred some of Boston’s best basketball of the year and, especially as Hayward and Brown started to thrive in bench roles, seemed to offer the sort of great potential that encouraged Stevens to endure these bumps.

But as the Celtics have fizzled since early February, so too has that starting group. Boston’s starting 5 has logged 162 minutes together in 12 appearances since the All-Star break — no other lineup has played more than 26 minutes together in that span — and own a gruesome net rating of minus-6.7 in that span, which includes a defensive rating of 112.1 (or 5.2 points per 100 possessions worse than Boston’s season rating). The Celtics are 5-7 in those games.

Stevens has routinely noted that the first six minutes of games are not a concern for him. Maybe they should be. Since the All-Star break, the starting 5’s net rating in first quarters is minus-7.9 over 70 total minutes, which includes an anemic offensive rating of 96.8. While it’s undeniable that decent starts don’t always ensure Celtics success — see all the double-digit leads the team has kicked away recently — it simply feels like this team is overdue to explore tweaks that might force it outside the malaise that exists now and potentially restore the level of defensive intensity that’s gone missing.

The notion of shuffling Morris and/or Smart back to a bench role shouldn’t suggest they are at fault for the team’s inconsistencies, in much the same way that Brown and Hayward shouldn’t have been the fall guys earlier in the year. Morris is marred in an obvious shooting slump that, much like many of his teammates, has bled into his defensive consistency. They need him playing at a high level in the postseason, regardless of role. But as Brown and Hayward make strides with their own play — particularly with a much-needed dash of aggression towards the basket — it’s simply interesting to wonder how the team might respond to a re-infusion.

As Stevens is quick to point out, we all obsess too much over who starts games. What matters is how it all works together. But it’s clear, right now, that this current iteration has sputtered and something needs to give.

MORE CELTICS

Sometimes teams just need a change. There seems little harm in experimenting when you consider the wheels have already come off and this team is grinding down the Mass Pike with sparks flying from both axles. What complicates matters is that there are only eight games remaining and Stevens must balance finding rest for his players before the postseason grind starts. 

True as ever, this team never quite makes anything easy on itself.

It was interesting to hear Stevens acknowledge that he’s likely to tweak lineups when the postseason arrives. This isn’t all that unexpected, not from a coach who famously deployed the likes of Gerald Green and Semi Ojeleye in must-win playoff games in recent seasons.

Some of Boston’s best basketball recently has come with two-big lineups. It’s a tiny sample size but, since the All-Star break, Horford and Aron Baynes own a net rating together of plus-39.7 in 26 minutes of floor time, with a glitzy defensive rating of 93.1. 

It speaks again to Baynes’ impact, particularly for a Boston team that has lost a bit of its defensive identity while Baynes has navigated an injury-plagued season.  It feels like Baynes is going to be quite important to Boston in the postseason, particularly considering the bigs they might encounter.

Finding other two-man units that inspire confidence recently is tricky, though it’s worth noting that the Hayward-Tatum (plus-19.7, 176 minutes since Feb. 1) and Hayward-Irving (plus-13.6, 191 minutes since Feb. 1) pairings have both been stellar during Boston’s funk. It seems to scream for Hayward to rejoin the first unit to see how that group reacts to his presence.

Based on his play, Brown deserves to elevate as well but, if considering his bench impact at the moment, it’s understandable if he stays in a backup role.

Ultimately, there are no easy answers here. It’s fair to wonder if Boston’s problems are more mental than necessarily who’s on the court. As Stevens pointed out after Sunday’s loss, he’s never coached a team that’s solely reliant on whether it makes shots to dictate its intensity level. 

“I don’t want to be a team, and I’ve never been a part of a team, that was solely reliant on whether you make shots or not,” said Stevens. “And, right now, in the last month, that’s our deal. We’re just relying on whether we make shots. 

"Instead of being a buckle-down, get stops, find a way to win. Nothing better than winning when you’re 5 for 35 or 7 for 35 from 3. That means you’ve figured out what’s important and you’re going to play to that every night.”

Stevens needs to figure out what groups give this team the best chance to restore its identity and play consistent two-way basketball. There’s no obvious, quick-fix solution but this team cannot continue to hope that the arrival of the postseason will trigger the urgency that the regular season has so clearly lacked.

Something needs to change, or the results will stay the same.

Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of your teams and stream the Celtics easily on your device.