Acciari a game-time decision for tonight for Bruins, Wagner may draw in

Acciari a game-time decision for tonight for Bruins, Wagner may draw in

BRIGHTON, Mass – It looks like as if the Bruins might be without a member of their fourth line when the puck is dropped against the Blue Jackets for Game 5 on Saturday night.

Noel Acciari (undisclosed) was missing from morning skate Saturday at Warrior Ice Arena with Chris Wagner skating in his place on the fourth-line right wing, and Bruce Cassidy said the hard-hitting forward would be a game-time decision. Certainly, there’s a small chance he could play, but it looks more like Wagner will skate in his third game in the series after going scoreless in Games 1 and 2 before becoming a healthy scratch.

“We gave Noel the morning off,” said Cassidy. “He’ll be a game-time decision for tonight. Chris Wagner will go in for him if he can’t go.”

Otherwise, it’s expected to be the same lineup for the Black and Gold after they played their best game of the series in a 4-1 win over the Blue Jackets on Thursday night in Columbus. Here are the projected line combos and D-pairings for the Bruins in Game 5, with a 7:15 puck drop at TD Garden:









Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of your teams and stream the Celtics easily on your device.

It's time for Bruins to bench Nick Ritchie, go with somebody ready to battle

It's time for Bruins to bench Nick Ritchie, go with somebody ready to battle

As feel-good as any Stanley Cup Playoff game undoubtedly is, there is also time for evaluation and improvement.

It will be a quick turnaround time for the Boston Bruins after they took a 4-3 overtime win over the Carolina Hurricanes on Wednesday afternoon in the Toronto bubble at Scotiabank Arena, and that won’t give the Bruins coaching staff much time to break things down. The biggest decision will be who they should go with between the pipes -- Tuukka Rask in a back-to-back situation or backup goaltender Jaroslav Halak.

There are good reasons to go with either one of them already up 1-0 over Carolina in the best-of-seven series.

Get the latest news and analysis on all of your teams from NBC Sports Boston by downloading the My Teams App

But there are other decisions to be made, and one that the Bruins should go with starting in Thursday’s Game 2 is the removal of Nick Ritchie from the lineup.

Ritchie came into this postseason as a real question mark after playing little more than a handful of games for the Bruins after arriving at the trade deadline from Anaheim in exchange for Danton Heinen.

In theory, the 6-foot-2, 235-pound Ritchie would provide needed physical thump to the Boston lineup and play the power forward game on the wing along with big, strong third line center Charlie Coyle. But Ritchie simply played like a weak link in Boston’s overtime win against the Hurricanes in his first real playoff experience with the Black and Gold.

Krejci lines dominates & other takeaways from Game 1

The 24-year-old Ritchie finished without a shot on net in 12:50 of ice time with the Bruins on Wednesday and had four hits while sometimes taking the body against the Hurricanes. But he wasn’t nearly a big enough physical presence, and even worse played a key role in a pair of goals against for the Bruins while making both mental and physical mistakes at crucial moments.

Bruins head coach Bruce Cassidy wasn’t going to hammer anybody for it after a playoff win, but Ritchie’s subpar performance certainly didn’t go unnoticed either.

“I think [the young guys] were looking after their own game. I think just one line was on the ice for a couple goals and this is Bjork’s first playoffs with us, Ritchie,” said Cassidy, referencing the third line being on the ice for a pair of goals against as well as Charlie Coyle’s second period goal for Boston. “[The veteran guys] were like ‘hey, listen stuff happens.’ Let’s make sure we tighten up the next time. Keep playing your game. They got a big goal for us, too, so there is a little bit of that communication to the new guys.

“We talked to Lauzy [Jeremy Lauzon]. Charlie [McAvoy] had to go to the dressing room for a second so Lauzy got a few extra shifts. You just battle and play. I think you have to get the first couple [of playoff games] under your belt. No one is tearing anybody down here. It’s not the time of the year to do that. We’re trying to motivate and encourage guys for sure, but the players are good that way. That’s why they’re winners. [Ondrej] Kase is another guy, first game. I thought he was fantastic. He’s on pucks all night, played his game. Had some good looks. A nice play on [David] Krejci’s goal. That line arguably was – you always look at the tape, whatever the tape after and they’re probably our most dangerous line tonight. So that is something that we talked about. Secondary scoring. Get a goal out of Charlie Coyle, third line.”

In the first period, Ritchie gave up on a play along the boards and drifted away from Warren Foegele as the entire unit of Bruins defenders puck-watched rather than working to get the puck out of the zone. Eventually it turned into a Joel Edmundson scoring point shot from the high point that Ritchie wasn’t able to put a body in front of on its way to the net. But the bigger issue was Ritchie simply giving up on a play when he was the closest to be able to give defensive support on a play that ended up going bad.

It was Ritchie again in the third period losing a battle along the boards to the much smaller Martin Necas that extended Carolina possession, and eventually ended with Haydn Fleury scoring on a point blast with a screened Tuukka Rask in front.

In both instances board battles were lost that ended up with pucks in the back of the Boston net. And if Ritchie isn’t even going to win the board battles, what is the point of his size and strength that’s bringing to the table?

Wednesday’s game was physical to be sure as a playoff opener, but it wasn’t overly nasty to the point where you need Ritchie for intimidation purposes. The Bruins would be much better off going with the speedy, two-way play of Karson Kuhlman in Game 2 on the third line while also sliding Anders Bjork to his natural left wing spot on the third line. That would give the Bruins a much faster third line that could better combat the speed and pressure that the Hurricanes are bringing to the table against the Black and Gold.

Perhaps a healthy scratch would also send a message that there’s no room for him in the lineup if he isn’t decisively winning his physical battles and playing up to the size/strength combo he was blessed with as a hockey player. Either way, the Bruins should learn from some of the mistakes that didn’t end up costing them permanently in Game 1, and Ritchie made way too many of them to stick around in the Boston lineup.

Bruins can take positives from Game 1 win, but lineup questions remain

Bruins can take positives from Game 1 win, but lineup questions remain

There's a cliché about needing your best players to be your best players. With one exception, that's why the Bruins beat the Hurricanes in Game 1 of their first round series.

The exception was David Pastrnak's horrid turnover on the power play to give Carolina a shorthanded goal, but let's focus on the positives: The Bergeron line scored two goals — including the game-winner in double overtime — in a game they played mostly against perhaps the most dangerous line in the league right now. Their performance will make headlines, but David Krejci was the best player on the ice.

Get the latest news and analysis on all of your teams from NBC Sports Boston by downloading the My Teams App

If the Bruins get dominance out of their top six and the usual performances from their back end and goaltending, they'll be good enough to beat the Hurricanes in a series. Philly? Tampa? Different story, but if the Bergeron line outplays the Aho line and Krejci is able to carry Jake DeBrusk and Ondrej Kase, we can at least quell our concerns about the B's being upset in the first round.

If DeBrusk or Kase bury the chances Krejci created for them, the Bruins will at least have a second line, which remains a major, major question for them. The third line needs some work (more on that below; guess who needs to sit?), but Bruins fans should be very encouraged by what they saw from Boston's top six.

If they build on what we saw Wednesday, the Bruins are in business. Then maybe we can ask for other things, like a power play that actually has a pulse. 

Beware, though, before we put our Paul Pierce hats on and declare the series over after a game: The Bergeron line smoked Tampa's Brayden Point line in Game 1 of the second round a couple years ago, then Point went off for the rest of the series as the B's fell in five games. That's to say this: This series isn't over.


The Bruins obviously stunk up the joint during the round robin and were hardly apologetic afterwards. If they came out, carried the play in the first game of the playoffs, blew a lead in the third period then lost in overtime? Hoo boy.

Led by young stars, the Hurricanes are better served to physically bounce back from a long game like Game 1. Had Carolina found a way to win, they might have the Bruins already on their heels. Plus, both we — and the Bruins themselves, deep down — would be wondering if they'd be able to snap out of their post-return slump.


The Hurricanes didn't have Sami Vatanen or Justin Williams for Game 1, as the players were given the blanket "unfit to participate" designation teams are using for everything. The big absence there was Vatanen, who'd been a top pairing defensemen for them until Dougie Hamilton returned to the lineup Wednesday. Hamilton's return was supposed to put Carolina over the top on the back end, and if Vatanen can play Wednesday, Carolina will boast a stronger lineup than we saw in Game 1.

The Bruins have two lineup questions they should be asking themselves: Does Tuukka Rask play a back-to-back that included double overtime and should Nick Ritchie sit?

Let's answer the easy one first: Ritchie's got to sit. He was passive the entire game, which cost the Bruins twice. He certainly isn't there for his speed or skill, so if he's gonna be such an easy beat in puck battles, he does nothing but harm the team. Put Karson Kuhlman in the lineup and flip Anders Bjork to the other side if need be.

As for Rask, Bruce Cassidy said after Game 1 that he didn't feel Boston's goalie was overly taxed Wednesday, and that with not having to travel, it would be much easier to play a goalie on a back-to-back than in non-bubble times. I get that, but I'd still go with Jaroslav Halak considering there's another potential back-to-back in Games 5 and 6.

You'd definitely want to go Rask in both games there, so split this one up if you're really planning on making a deep run.