Bruins

Bruins' 5-on-5 struggles played pivotal role in Stanley Cup loss to Blues

Bruins' 5-on-5 struggles played pivotal role in Stanley Cup loss to Blues

There are a few reasons why the Boston Bruins, despite having more talent and depth than the St. Louis Blues, still lost the 2019 Stanley Cup Final in seven games. Perhaps the most glaring issue for the B's was their struggles at 5-on-5.

The Bruins lost the 5-on-5 battle and it proved costly. So, let's break down some of the numbers.

We'll start with the most important one: goals scored. The Blues had a 15-10 edge in goals scored during the 337:11 of 5-on-5 ice time through seven games. St. Louis had a 7-4 edge in 5-on-5 goals in the last three games, including a 6-2 advantage in Game 5 and Game 7 in Boston combined. The Bruins were a very good 5-on-5 goal-scoring team in the first three rounds, earning a 32-23 advantage over their opponents and a 58.18 goals for percentage. The B's had a 40.00 goals for percentage in the Cup Final.

Scoring chances were another area where the Bruins got worse in the Cup Final compared to the previous three rounds. Boston had a 50.88 scoring chances percentage at 5-on-5 through the Eastern Conference Final, compared with a 49.20 scoring chance percentage against the Blues. The total count was 127-123 in favor of St. Louis in 5-on-5 scoring chances. The Blues also held a 48-44 edge in high-danger scoring chances created during 5-on-5 play versus the B's, as well as a 9-4 edge in goals scored on those high-danger chances.

Goaltending at 5-on-5 also was an issue for the Bruins. Tuukka Rask gave up 15 goals on 143 shots for an .895 5-on-5 save percentage. He allowed nine goals on 39 high-danger shots for a .769 save percentage. Rask posted an excellent .946 save percentage at 5-on-5 through the first three rounds and a high-danger save percentage of .918 over the same span. Blues goalie Jordan Binnington had a .939 save percentage at 5-on-5 (10 goals allowed on 164 shots) in the Cup Final, as well as a .882 high-danger save percentage (four goals allowed on 34 shots).

The Bruins probably wouldn't have made it to a Game 7 without their power play. The unit was a bit inconsistent, but the B's did have a 7-1 edge in power play goals in the series, and four of them came in their 7-2 victory in Game 3. Boston's penalty kill was excellent.

The Blues were outscored 22-18 in the series overall, but they won the 5-on-5 battle, and when most of the series obviously is played 5-on-5, it's not hard to figure out why they left Boston with the Stanley Cup on Wednesday night.

*All 5-on-5 stats found on Natural Stat Trick

Struggles at the Garden cost Bruins in Cup Final loss>>>

Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of your teams and stream the Celtics easily on your device.

Bruins bring back Chris Kelly as player development coordinator

chris_kelly.jpg
USA TODAY Sports

Bruins bring back Chris Kelly as player development coordinator

Chris Kelly is back on the Boston Bruins, but he's trading in his hockey gear for a suit.

The Bruins announced Thursday they have hired Kelly as player development coordinator, while also adding Andrew Dickson as an amateur scout.

Kelly came to the B's as a player in 2011 and won a Stanley Cup during his first season in Boston. He went on to play 288 games for the Bruins over six seasons, tallying a total of 43 goals and 58 assists as a third-line forward.

The 38-year-old last played for the Anaheim Ducks during the 2017-18 season and spent last season as a development coach for the Ottawa Senators -- his first NHL team as a player -- before coming to Boston.

Dickson spent the last seven seasons as an amateur scout for the Detroit Red Wings.

Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of your teams and stream the Celtics easily on your device.

Is McAvoy really in line for 'a huge contract' with Bruins? Maybe not

Is McAvoy really in line for 'a huge contract' with Bruins? Maybe not

There’s quite the interesting debate going on these days about just how much Bruins RFA defenseman Charlie McAvoy should get on his second contract.

NBC’s Pro Hockey Talk tweeted out a story proclaiming that both McAvoy and Columbus Blue Jackets D-man Zach Werenski should be in line for “huge contracts” and conjured up some numbers that put those two young defenseman in a class with Drew Doughty and Erik Karlsson at the same stage of their careers.

Certainly the 21-year-old McAvoy and 21-year-old Werenski have shown promise as excellent puck-movers and developing two-way D-men in their short NHL careers. But to lump the two of them together into the same class is not something I’m sure the Bruins would do at this point in their separate negotiations.

First off, both Doughty and Karlsson were Norris Trophy finalists before they got their massive contracts. Secondly, do you know how many games Doughty missed with injuries before he signed his eight-year, $56 million contract?

He missed seven NHL games with injuries in his first three seasons with the Kings, including just one in his first two seasons in Los Angeles. Doughty also put together a 16-goal, 59-point masterpiece sophomore season, all while averaging 24 plus minutes of ice time per game over those first three NHL seasons in L.A.

All due respect to a special talent in McAvoy who idolizes Doughty, but he hasn’t even been close to that kind of dominance yet in his very promising, young NHL career. He was brilliant in the Stanley Cup Playoffs and he's shown big time flashes for the B's, but he's also missed almost 50 games with injuries over the last two years. 

Werenski has averaged 13 goals and 40 points in his three NHL seasons with Columbus and missed a total of nine NHL games in his first two seasons before playing the full 82-game schedule this past season for the Blue Jackets. He’s a lot closer to Doughty in terms of a comparable situation at this point in his young NHL career.

Werenski has the ability to be offer-sheeted by other prospective NHL teams, and has all the makings of an RFA who could cash in on something similar to the massive eight-year, $60 million deal signed by Florida’s Aaron Ekblad a couple of seasons ago.

McAvoy, on the other hand, has topped out at seven goals and 32 points in the better of his two NHL seasons (his rookie campaign) and has missed a whopping 47 games due to injuries in his first two seasons. McAvoy also can’t be tendered with an offer sheet by other NHL teams because he has fewer than three full years of NHL service based on the 40-game rule adopted by the league when it comes to restricted free agents.

So really there are very few parallels between Werenski’s negotiating leverage right now and McAvoy’s situation headed into his third NHL season with Boston.

If McAvoy wants to get the “huge contract” with the B’s then he’s going to have to earn it with a dominant, healthy season that he has yet to put together at the NHL level. It’s really as simple as that, regardless of his Corsi numbers when he has been healthy over the last two seasons.

The best course of action for both the Bruins and McAvoy?

It would be sign a bridge contract for a couple of years where the young D-man gets the $5-6 million per season based on his closest comparable players (Esa Lindell, for one), and puts together the kind of years that would put him closer to the Doughty/Karlsson/Ekblad max contract neighborhood that he’s clearly aspiring to at this point.

Basically, McAvoy at this point will need to sign the qualifying offer given to him by the Bruins or sit out until he agrees to a long-term second deal with the Boston. The reality is this: The Bruins young D-man has zero leverage this time around in negotiations aside from being a key player for the B's in both their present and future plans. Then again, the Bruins did pretty well in the first half last season when McAvoy was barely a presence while battling through concussion-related issues, and before he put together a very strong second half and postseason during their run to Game 7 of the Cup Final.

There’s no reason to think they can’t do the same this season with a Stanley Cup Final-worthy group if McAvoy’s camp plays hardball and holds out ahead of NHL training camp.

All signs point to McAvoy getting a big raise and eventually getting the cap-busting contract that he’s clearly going to be looking for, and he could get it as soon as a year from now at this time. But the 21-year-old needs to earn it first, and shame on Don Sweeney and the Bruins if they shell out tens of millions of dollars on an admittedly talented, highly-gifted player before he’s done the kind of things that earn players that type of money at the NHL level.

Why Heinen signing left B's with cap questions>>>>

Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of your teams and stream the Celtics easily on your device.