Patriots

Patriots Mailbag: Why send Michael Bennett to Dallas ahead of Pats-Cowboys matchup?

Patriots Mailbag: Why send Michael Bennett to Dallas ahead of Pats-Cowboys matchup?

The Friday Bag is back, friends. Every week I'll be answering your questions be they Patriots-related, NFL-related or otherwise. This week, the focus for many of you was -- no surprise -- the Michael Bennett trade. We'll start there...

Hey, Mark! In all likelihood, it was the return. The Patriots and Cowboys will meet in a month, but better that than trading him to an AFC contender they may see in the playoffs. (A non-contender in either conference probably wouldn't be interested in picking up Bennett's contract.) I don't know if the Patriots had narrowed their potential trade partners to NFC contenders only, but if they did, the Cowboys made a lot of sense because he's an easy fit in their scheme. The haul wasn't great, obviously, but the Patriots were in a bit of a bind. Bennett was barely playing. Teams knew Bennett wasn't happy. Belichick and Nick Caserio didn't appear to have much leverage in trade negotiations. Getting a Day 3 pick and some cap relief... Beggars can't be choosers. Call it the Patriots just trying to make the best of a bad situation. 

Great question, Robert. First, let's just do a quick Cover-0 review. That's when the defense does not have a safety deep, there's an all-out blitz coming, and defenders are in man-to-man coverage across the board. The Patriots have turned to their Cover-0 looks quite a bit through the first seven games, often deploying that defense against young quarterbacks who are forced to make quick decisions with the football before the pressure gets home. Bill Belichick and his defensive staff called for Cover 0 -- also known as the "zero blitz" -- time and time again against Sam Darnold, toying with him once it was clear he was uncomfortable. I reached out to our friends at Pro Football Focus to give us an idea of just how often the Patriots have called on Cover 0. According to PFF, they're running that call 12 percent of the time (34 total snaps). Last year, including playoffs, they were at 9 percent. That may come down as the Patriots face talented passers like Deshaun Watson and Patrick Mahomes later in the season, but it's clear Belichick and his coaches trust their secondary to plaster in coverage and prevent any big plays while in Cover 0. That's the risk. If the quarterback has enough time to get the ball out, if the catch is made, and if a tackle is missed, it could go for a touchdown with no safety. But the Patriots have a sound tackling secondary and arguably the best group of man-to-man cover corners in the game. PFF's Mike Renner wrote Thursday that the Patriots are allowing just 5.1 yards per attempt while in man this year and a 51 percent completion percentage. While in Cover 0 specifically, the Patriots have allowed a 12.4 passer rating. Ridiculous. It might not be a great defense against a team with big-play wideouts like the Browns and receivers Odell Beckham and Jarvis Landry, but it's certainly a big part of what the Patriots do and a big part of why they've been as successful as they've been. 

https://twitter.com/tpalladino34/status/1187406905611821058

The Patriots have cleared a little bit of cap space over the last few days. They restructured Shaq Mason's deal. They traded Michael Bennett. They aren't swimming in cap room by any means, but they should have enough to swing a trade if they want to (They also might have about $1 million coming off their books after the trade deadline if Josh Gordon and his contract get claimed on waivers). If they are looking for a low-cost option at tight end, Tyler Eifert is relatively interesting. We know he's been consistently banged-up over the last few years. But he'd be very inexpensive -- half a season would cost the Patriots about $500,000 -- and he played his college ball at Notre Dame for Charlie Weis so there may be some familiarity with the terminology the Patriots use. Lance Kendricks might make sense after he spent the summer with the team. He's played only four snaps for the Chargers over the last two weeks. He'd be Ben Watson insurance. If the Patriots wanted to poke around on a more valuable Chargers tight end, Virgil Green might make some sense. He's played 23 and 11 snaps in his last two games and is taking a back seat to starter Hunter Henry. His cap hit would be about $1.25 million for half a season. The Chargers (2-5) would, of course, have to be comfortable selling off a piece to the team that ended their 2018 season. Chargers GM Tom Telesco is a John Carroll University football guy. 

Hey, Ed. I think there were a number of things at play when it came to Josh Gordon being placed on IR. We went through them here. But $1 million in cap relief, solving the glut at receiver, clearing a path for N'Keal Harry, keeping Eric Tomlinson... None of those, in my opinion, really rose to the level necessitating a parting of ways with a talented athlete at a position the Patriots have been desperate to fill the last two years. I think it's fair to wonder if -- for a player who has had a hard time being dependable for a variety of reasons beyond his control -- the team determined Gordon was not meeting their standards when it comes to overall dependability. Plus, they just got deeper at receiver by adding Mohamed Sanu, and they have talent returning to the roster in Harry. If you remember, Belichick released a statement following Gordon's reinstatement by the NFL saying that he would decide to do what was best for Gordon and the team in making a call on Gordon. The Patriots didn't sound like they were tripping over themselves then to bring him back at that point, but they did because they needed him. If they like their depth now that they have some reinforcements at that position, then perhaps that helped them make the call to put Gordon on IR...

...That said, the timing of the decision is still curious. We don't know what happened after Wednesday's practice that led to Gordon's placement on IR. We don't know IF anything happened following Wednesday's practice that led to his placement on IR. It seems like something happened because the team told Eric Tomlinson he was released, told him to stick around because they wanted to bring him back soon, then brought him back a few hours later without ever making his release official. That's unusual. It was a sequence of events would suggest to us something happened. That "something" could've been as simple as Belichick changing his mind. But we don't know for sure.

Hey, BXP. If he's released off of IR following next week's trade deadline -- and there are a few reasons the Patriots would probably like to do that -- then he'll go through waivers and be able to be claimed by another team. I wouldn't anticipate Gordon returning to them this season.

Phil, my man, I asked him last week if he'd be lobbying for an offensive role now that Elandon Roberts has been on the field offensively. I was half kidding. Van Noy is obviously a good athlete with good size. The Patriots have done it before with a number of players, not just Mike Vrabel. He's pretty busy as it is right now, though, playing 85.2 percent of the snaps this year (not including Week 1, which he missed for the birth of his son). Belichick probably isn't looking to put too much more on his plate right now.

We'll probably get this question every week for the rest of the year, but I don't think you should hold your breath, Matthew. Put it that way. 

I'll go with Sanu, Tim. He plays a highly-productive position in the Patriots offense. He's a veteran who understands coverages. The Patriots gave up a second-round pick for him for a reason; they needed him, and they felt like he was worth it. I think Harry, if healthy, can provide something similar to what Gordon gave the Patriots through Week 7. But I'd go with Sanu as No. 1 on this list. While Sanu-for-Gordon shouldn't be viewed as a one-for-one on-the-field swap, putting Sanu in the slot and getting Harry back makes the overall position group deeper. That probably made the Patriots feel better about cutting ties with Gordon. I don't believe it was THE reason. If it was, the Patriots would've put Gordon on IR right off the bat when they acquired Sanu. Both players were on the practice field together on Wednesday.

He's been tremendous in a reduced role, Ryan. I wasn't sure he was going to be on the team to start the year. I believed he was a good trade candidate because he doesn't fit the mold of a classic 3-4 lineman. But in sub situations -- and consistently in run-game situations as well -- Wise has made his presence felt. I could see him getting a little more work in the second half of the year. I don't think he'll get to Lawrence Guy's snap-count numbers any time soon, but why not play him a little more while he's on this hot streak just to see how it goes?

I'm going off the board, Jacob: Jermaine Eluemunor. He's been the jumbo tight end when the Patriots have called on that role recently. Ferentz is a good guess, too. He's been with the team a while now. Veteran guy. I could see Belichick enjoying watching him get into the end zone. 

I'm still going with the Patriots, Juan. There seems to be a "dance" going on right now between the quarterback and the team, as Tom E. Curran put it on our most recent Patriots Talk Podcast. Eventually, the music will stop, Brady will have to decide if he wants to play again, and if he does he'll have to decide if he's willing to go to a lesser program for more money. He might be willing to. I don't think we should ever take Adam Schefter's reporting lightly. But that's my take on it for now: He'll be back. If they run the table and win the Super Bowl, though, I'll be firmly entrenched in the, "He's going to retire, isn't he?" camp. 

LISTEN TO THE FULL PATRIOTS TALK PODCAST HERE:

The only way they can free up cap space with Gordon, Dave, is to hope another team picks him up on waivers. For that to happen, he'll have to be released off of IR following the Oct. 29 traded deadline. If the Patriots outright released Gordon before the deadline, they'd be on the hook for his money. 

He saw a couple more targets than the ones that landed in the box score last week, IOTD, drawing two penalties to give the Patriots key yards. Seven targets in all aren't bad. He caught all five of his official targets. I don't know if in an offense that also includes Julian Edelman and James White anyone else should ever expect anything close to double-digit targets. In all likelihood, because of Sanu's addition and Harry's impending return, Meyers will see fewer targets than he has the last few weeks. But all it takes is an injury or two to potentially land him a bigger role once again. 

https://twitter.com/Aubdec/status/1187517644192256003

I think my pick would be Dont'a Hightower. When he's sent after the quarterback, and when he's healthy, he's so explosive at the point of attack that he's hard to block. Jamie Collins is probably the most athletic rusher they have so his first step is sometimes all he needs to get to quarterbacks. Kyle Van Noy, meanwhile, has a great combination of strength, quickness and motor that gets him to quarterbacks consistently. What's interesting is that if you watch the Patriots pass rush, they rarely do so in a one-on-one fashion. That's part of the reason Bennett didn't work here. He often collided with teammates when asked to stunt or run games. All three of the linebackers I mentioned above, meanwhile, have gotten to quarterbacks based on schemed-up pressure that required them to work in concert with a defensive lineman or two. It's a synchronized endeavor, getting to quarterbacks for the Patriots.

Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of your teams and stream the Celtics easily on your device.

Next Pats Podcast: Will Patriots go mobile at QB if Tom Brady leaves?

next_pats_podcast.png
NBC Sports Boston Illustration

Next Pats Podcast: Will Patriots go mobile at QB if Tom Brady leaves?

There's one big question that New England Patriots are facing this offseason. Who is going to be their starting quarterback in 2020?

For the past 20 seasons, the team hasn't really had questions at the position. It has always been Tom Brady's job. But with the 42-year-old set to hit free agency, the Patriots can't necessarily count on him returning unless they want to pay him what he's worth.

So, now the question for the Patriots becomes, what will life look like if Brady departs?

LIVE stream the Celtics all season and get the latest news and analysis on all of your teams from NBC Sports Boston by downloading the My Teams App.

On the latest episode of The Next Pats Podcast, which returns for its first episode of the 2020 offseason, Phil Perry is here to explore that question. And really what it all boils down to is what the Patriots are looking for in a potential successor.

Click here to listen and subscribe to Phil Perry's Next Pats Podcast:

As Perry notes, it's likely to be one of two types of quarterback: The traditional pocket passer or a more mobile athlete in the mold of some of the recent success stories at the position.

Do the Patriots look for the next Brady? Uber-accurate, somebody who's going to sit in the pocket and absolutely dissect every little aspect of the defense that he is looking at. Or, do they go a different route? Do they go with an athlete? Do they get more mobile? Because talking to people this offseason, I'm getting a whiff -- I'm getting a scent that people believe the pocket passer might be dead.

Perry is joined by guests including Pro Football Focus' Steve Palazzolo, Greg Cosell of ESPN and NFL Films, and NFL Network's Kurt Warner to answer questions about Brady's future and what his game has looked like in recent seasons.

For more thoughts about the Patriots offseason, check out the latest episode of the Next Pats Podcast, available as part of the NBC Sports Boston Podcast Network.

David Ortiz says leaving Patriots wouldn't impact Tom Brady's legacy

David Ortiz says leaving Patriots wouldn't impact Tom Brady's legacy

Over the past 20 years, Tom Brady has established himself as one of the greatest and most beloved athletes in Boston sports history.

But if Brady leaves New England for a new team in free agency this offseason, would that leave a stain on his Patriots legacy? Fellow Boston sports legend David Ortiz doesn't believe so.

The former Red Sox slugger recently spoke with Rob Bradford of WEEI.com about Brady's impending free agency. According to Ortiz, leaving Foxboro behind ahead of his age-43 season won't take away from anything Brady has accomplished with the Pats in the past two decades.

LIVE stream the Celtics all season and get the latest news and analysis on all of your teams from NBC Sports Boston by downloading the My Teams App.

"His legacy has already been built. It’s always there," Ortiz told Bradford. "That’s not the problem. His problem is not going to be legacy. He could go and play somewhere else for the next 10 years when he returns to New England his legacy is going to be there.

"It’s a good thing to do but you also have to look at your options. I hope he stays with the Patriots, but it’s not up to what I say. It’s his decision. Sometimes an offer at home might be a couple of million less than what you could get on the road. It’s up to you whether you think it’s worth it."

Brady will officially become an unrestricted free agent if he and Patriots don't agree to a contract extension by March 18. Several teams are expected to be in the mix to sign the six-time Super Bowl champion, with the Tennessee Titans and Las Vegas Raiders as two of the most likely destinations.

Listen and subscribe to Tom E. Curran's Patriots Talk Podcast here: