Patriots

Salary cap chaos could be coming to the NFL in the wake of COVID-19

Salary cap chaos could be coming to the NFL in the wake of COVID-19

A financial hurricane is headed straight at the NFL. It will make landfall. 

The only question is whether it weakens and causes minor inconvenience or if it strengthens and wreaks havoc. 

What kind of havoc? A massive drop in the salary cap leading to a wave of big-name player releases. A little bit of labor strife. Hell for cash-strapped, smaller-market teams. A widening of the salary gap between elite players and the minions. Complications with the next round of TV deals. Basically, a ripple effect that could impact the league for a decade. 

How badly would all this hurt the Patriots franchise? Actually, it might help them. 

Download the MyTeams app for the latest Patriots news and analysis

Here’s the situation. The 2020 salary cap is $198.2M, up from $188.2M in 2019. The cap’s risen by at least $10M every year since 2012. Growth has been strong and uninterrupted and — since there’s been no reason to do otherwise — contracts have been written with that steady cap growth in mind. 

The formula is pretty easy. Players get 48 percent of aggregate revenues (AR). Prior to the new CBA which was just ratified in March, they got 47 percent. If you want to read all about it, here’s the CBA.  

According to the CBA, “AR means the aggregate revenues received or to be received on an accrual basis, for or with respect to a League Year during the term of this Agreement, by the NFL and all NFL Clubs (and their designees), from all sources, whether known or unknown, derived from, relating to or arising out of the performance of players in NFL football games."

The CBA also states: “AR shall be subdivided into three categories for purposes of calculating the Player Cost Amount and Salary Cap: (1) League Media AR; (2) NFL Ventures/Postseason AR; and (3) Local AR.”

League media is, mainly, the TV deals with the major networks (of which NBC is one). NFL Ventures/Postseason AR is, basically, all NFL-sponsored media (NFL Network, NFL Films, NFL Enterprises, etc.) Local AR is everything else. 

With everything surrounding the NFL’s 2020 season in doubt — training camps, the preseason, the regular season — all the buckets may take a hit but the “local AR” bucket could get decimated if there are no fans in the stands, no concessions, no parking, fewer local advertisers etc. 

Jason Fitzgerald, founder of the site OverTheCap.com, looked at the Green Bay Packers’ financials from 2019. Since the Packers are the only franchise that is publicly owned, they’re the only one whose financials we can see. But since all 32 teams get the same cut, Fitzgerald did some ciphering and came up with this.   

“Last year the Packers received National revenue of $274.3 million with $203.7 million coming from local income. … a fair estimate is that 45% of the league revenue is made up of local revenues and the rest comes from the revenue share from the big media packages…. Based on the recent growth I think the Packers would likely have expected around $208 or $209 million in revenues (in 2021). Lets just call it $210 and pretend that that goes for all teams. If you eliminate 70% of that figure about $78M of the losses would be attributed to the owners and $69M would be attributed to the players. 

“Currently there is about an 80-20 split between salary cap and benefits for the player distribution which would mean we would be look at a decrease of around $55 million in cap space, assuming that the benefits are not sunk at a certain number, in which case the cap loss would be more. If you lost all local revenues you would probably be looking at an $80 million loss in cap space while a 40% loss would result in a $31 million drop in cap room.”

The upshot? If the revenue loss is that significant in 2020, the cap could potentially drop from $198M this year down to a worst-case scenario of about $130M. 

Listen and subscribe to Tom E. Curran's Patriots Talk Podcast — or watch the latest episode on YouTube:

According to Fitzgerald’s 2021 projections based on current contracts, all but four teams in the league would be over the cap in that scenario. The four: Colts, Chargers, Jaguars annnnnnd Patriots. Which would mean that — if nothing were done — every team in the league would have to start renegotiating deals and throwing players overboard. 

“It would be a pretty chaotic situation,” Fitzgerald told me last week. “Teams will have to scramble to get salary cap space and you’re talking about a real big potential drop. Typically, teams budget with a gain of probably $10-to-$12M a year on the salary cap. Maybe they were expecting a little bit more with new television deals coming in (after 2020). And now you’re talking about a scenario where the cap could drop anywhere from $20M to $40M to $60M depending on if fans are allowed at games and how they’ll be able to spend money if they’re in those games. … (The local AR) is basically anything the NFL makes money on that’s not national and a lot of it is based on the fact that you need fans in the stadiums.”

To be sure, this is not coming as news to either the teams or the players. 

In fact, there’s a provision in the CBA that accounts for cancelled games.  

(xii) Cancelled Games. If one or more weeks of any NFL season are cancelled or AR for any League Year substantially decreases, in either case due to a terrorist or military action, natural disaster, or similar event, the parties shall engage in good faith negotiations to adjust the provisions of this Agreement with respect to the projection of AR (all revenues) and the Salary Cap for the following League Year so that AR for the following League Year is projected in a fair manner consistent with the changed revenue projection caused by such action. (CBA, Pg. 99)

No doubt, the owners and NFLPA are already working on plans to address this with the aforementioned “good faith negotiations.” Or are at least noodling on how to do it. But with so much uncertainty and so many hypotheticals, there’s been only silence so far.  

Still, we are already seeing this affecting business. Rookie contracts for this year are being signed at an historically slow pace. The Patriots were the first team to get its entire rookie class under contract. Few have since followed suit.

“I think a big part of that is that a good portion of the signing bonus those guys get — which is a large portion of their contracts — gets paid within two weeks of signing so I think teams are looking to horde cash right now just to prepare for the unknown," Fitzgerald added. "If they can push things with a rookie until August, they’re probably gonna do that.” 

Teams with big-ticket players seeking long-term deals — like Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott — have to be sweating how to structure those deals. Meanwhile, smaller-market teams that have less cash-on-hand are going to be even more challenged. 

Pete Kendall, a 12-year NFL veteran from Weymouth who went to Boston College and was a first-round pick in 1996, was a key figure in the NFLPA as a player. His acumen and perspective was so valued by the union that, in 2011, he was asked by NFLPA President DeMaurice Smith to help guide the last CBA negotiations. 

“There’s a couple of ways this could go,” said Kendall. “You’re almost certainly going to see a decline in revenue from ‘19 to ‘20 so how does that get adjusted in '21? I think that there’s a mechanism in the CBA that would, if it were allowed to run its course, account for a reduction in the salary cap but that could bring on a whole host of problems including teams having to let go of players they don’t want to let go of knowing there will be a market around the corner in some other city for them.

“You could do what was done in the early days of the previous CBA which is to borrow against future years' caps. Would that lead to some owners having to take out some loans in order to fund the cap going forward? My suspicion is no, but I don’t know the inner workings of all 32 clubs. Then, how would that expense be recognized by the players?”

Agent Joe Linta, who represents Joe Flacco and has had a number of Patriots as clients through the years, speculated the NFL could soften the blow of the expected drop in 2021 by spreading the loss over a three-year period. 

“I do think there is motivation and incentive for both sides not to allow a precipitous drop on the cap if the revenues fall as much as they might with empty stadiums,” said Kendall. “Both sides will try to do whatever they can to make any drop palatable and digestible. I don’t think it’s a good look for the league, quite frankly, to be talking about a salary cap that’s almost $200M to talk about a cap that falls below $150M.” 

Fitzgerald agreed with Linta’s speculation. 

“(Linta’s) right about the way they should approach it or will approach it, which is to have the cap stagnate for a couple years and then paying back whatever that shortfall is,” he said. “My guess is it would be over a three-year period just because of the way rules are set up for how much the teams have to spend in a three-year period as a percentage of the cap, so it may run from 2021 to 2023. It’s not a good situation for anybody.”

No it’s not. But for a small number of teams — the Patriots at the head of that list — it’s not only less dire, it could present an opportunity. 

This year, they are extremely tight to the cap and are carrying significant dead money from players no longer with them like Tom Brady, Stephen Gostkowski, Michael Bennett and Antonio Brown. 

But next year, they project to have just $124M allocated to the 55 players currently under contract.  

They have some significant players with expiring deals: Joe Thuney (currently franchised), Dont'a Hightower, Mohamed Sanu, Jason McCourty, James White, Lawrence Guy, Adam Butler, Rex Burkhead and David Andrews. But Thuney, White, Butler and Andrews are the only ones under 30 at this time so the team may be saying so long to some of the others. 

If the team had a big-ticket quarterback to pay — like the Cowboys do with Prescott and the Chiefs with Patrick Mahomes — or if they signed on for another year of Brady, they’d be worse off. But currently, the team is paying a combined $3.5M for Jarrett Stidham, Brian Hoyer, J’Mar Smith and Brian Lewerke. 

There are 35 quarterbacks across the NFL who will make more in 2020 than the Patriots' four quarterbacks make combined. 

And if it comes to pass that most of the league has to make painful cuts? The Patriots are in prime position to go shopping.

“It’s a tough situation for the players and it’s why (the two sides) have to come to some kind of agreement by the beginning of August as to how to handle this,” said Fitzgerald. “If they don’t do that, if you’re a team next year like the Eagles, Falcons or Steelers that’s looking at being $5M over the cap in 2021 (currently) … to go from that to being $50M over the cap, you need to start cutting players this August to get under the cap if that’s going to happen. If you have veterans that are making $4M or 5M that are kind of bubble guys, getting 30 percent playing time you probably want to look at cutting those players this August if you have no idea how this is going to play out.”

At this point nobody does. But it’s coming. One way or another.

Why N'Keal Harry could be the most important non-quarterback in the Patriots offense

Why N'Keal Harry could be the most important non-quarterback in the Patriots offense

Found myself building up to what might be considered a lukewarm take on "Boston Sports Tonight" earlier this week.

The crescendo dragged ... a tad. No surprise then that I was promptly played off the stage, so to speak (probably because I can't hear my producers telling me to "WRAP!" over the sound of my own bloviating), to get to a commercial.

So here we are. Take still holstered.

Thankfully, on the internet, every take has a home. This one comes as a result of a question posed by NBC Sports Boston producer extraordinaire Dave Cherubin: Which non-quarterback is the most important player on the Patriots offense in 2020? 

My answer: N'Keal Harry. 

Download the MyTeams app for the latest Patriots news and analysis

That's right. The guy who missed more than half of last season. The guy who finished his rookie year with 12 catches for 105 yards and two touchdowns. The guy whose first full offseason as a professional was mostly wiped out by COVID. That guy.

Calling Harry "most important" doesn't mean "best," mind you. To me it means that if he doesn't take a leap, it'll be difficult for the Patriots passing game to end up among the league's most efficient. If he does, it could.

Julian Edelman, the other receiver for whom there is an argument as "most important," put together a remarkable 2019. At 33 years old, he posted 100 catches for 1,117 yards and six touchdowns. 

The Patriots offense, however, was stuck in neutral for long portions of the season despite Edelman's efforts. Not his fault. Tom Brady peppered Edelman with targets in part because his other options weren't yet trusted. The offensive line played with replacements at left tackle (eight games) and center (16), which led to a semi-toothless running game and an increased reliance on quick-hitters through the air. Edelman was the least of that group's problems. 

But even in what was arguably his best season, the Patriots offense didn't approach anything close to the levels it achieved, say, two seasons prior when Brady was named MVP and threw for 505 yards in Super Bowl LII.

They were seventh in points thanks in part to opportunistic defense and special teams units. But they were 14th in passing offense DVOA last year, per Football Outsiders, 15th in weighted offensive DVOA, and 23rd in yards per pass attempt. Brady's adjusted completion percentage was 20th among quarterbacks with at least 390 dropbacks, per Pro Football Focus, and his rating on deep attempts ranked 14th (10th among 12 playoff quarterbacks). According to Sharp Football Stats, the Patriots ranked 17th in explosive play rate.

Edelman was indeed the best non-quarterback in the Patriots' offensive huddle last year, but getting every last drop out of his mortal coil was not enough to push the offense into the NFL's upper reaches of passing-game productivity. Brady needed more help. 

The Patriots offense has been at its best — Brady won MVPs in 2017, 2010 and 2007 — when the team had an Edelman-type in the slot as well as another more explosive option sharing the huddle.

In 2007, it was Wes Welker inside and Randy Moss down the field. In 2010, it was Welker and two dynamic rookie tight ends. In 2017, it should've been Edelman and Rob Gronkowski. Edelman suffered a season-ending injury in preseason, though, which left slot duties to Danny Amendola. But Amendola filled in capably (61 catches on 86 targets, 10.8 yards per reception), particularly in the postseason. With Gronkowski still near the peak of his powers, the Patriots remained a force.

Compare those years to 2013, for example, when Gronkowski suffered a torn ACL and Brady experienced a statistical dip. Edelman had a career year — it was the only other time he notched 100-plus catches (105) — and yet the Patriots still drafted Brady's replacement-to-be the following spring.

Patriots Talk Podcast: Measuring the toll that opt-outs took around the NFL | Listen & subscribe | Watch on YouTube

Whoever elevates to become a legitimate threat alongside Edelman still won't be the most dependable weapon in Foxboro. Edelman, if healthy, should retain that title. He'll be a third-down monster, one can safely assume, a crutch in key situations.

But most important? That has to be a player who helps draw coverage. It has to be someone who is a chunk play waiting to happen, who has the ability to take a short gain and turn it into a long one. It has to be a player who can complement the slot option while doing things the slot simply can't. 

Unfortunately for Josh McDaniels, there aren't many names on the Patriots roster who fit that description at the moment. 

Mohamed Sanu has for large stretches of his career been a slot player himself. James White is crucial to the overall operation, but not necessarily a consistently explosive threat. The tight ends — I'd pick Devin Asiasi to be the bigger-play possibility — are rookies and facing an uphill climb to contribute come September after a shortened offseason.

Marcus Cannon's replacement will have an argument as "most important," as will left tackle Isaiah Wynn, given the nature of their jobs. But the value of a very good receiver, generally, trumps that of a very good tackle in the NFL. (Just look at the franchise tag numbers at the two positions to see how those spots are valued by the league at large.)

Harry's rookie season was all but lost when he had to sit out the first eight games on injured reserve. When he returned, he tried to jump aboard a moving treadmill with the game's most accomplished quarterback barking at him to dial-up the incline. Outside of a few flashes that showed what someone with Harry's physical skill set — strong hands for contested catches, a hard-to-bring-down 6-foot-4, 225-pound frame — could accomplish, it was not a resounding success. 

But Harry remains a talented player who profiled similarly to Josh Gordon in terms of his height, weight and speed coming out of Arizona State. Harry's traits could have him used like San Francisco's young phenom Deebo Samuel, who was taken four picks after Harry in 2019. 

Plus, with a quarterback like Cam Newton, who spent portions of his career in Carolina getting comfortable throwing to big-bodied targets — guys like Greg Olsen, Kelvin Benjamin and Devin Funchess — Harry should see his fair share of opportunities. Meanwhile, Newton has much less experience throwing to a prolific slot. Jarius Wright led the Panthers with 47 slot targets in Newton's last extended action in 2018. Jericho Cotchery was the primary interior receiver during Newton's MVP campaign in 2015 (43 slot targets). It's unclear just how often he'll rely on Edelman, who saw 101 slot targets a season ago with Brady, according to Pro Football Focus.

This much we know: The Patriots offense will be different under Newton. But it's hard to say upon which of his teammates the offense will hinge. Perhaps the offensive line and running game will be so improved that a very good slot can carry a productive passing offense. Perhaps a big-play receiver won't be as valuable because the big plays will come from Newton's legs.

But odds are the Patriots are going to need a more explosive target in the passing game in order to reach a higher level in 2020. Whoever that is — and it may have to be Harry given the composition of the roster — will be more important than anyone else in the Patriots offense other than the guy delivering him the football.

Patriots reveal first photo of Cam Newton in full uniform, new jersey

Patriots reveal first photo of Cam Newton in full uniform, new jersey

New England Patriots fans wondering what Cam Newton would look like in the team's new uniforms no longer have to wait.

The Patriots unveiled headshots of each player earlier last week, and on Tuesday they posted photos of all the players in full uniform. The Patriots, of course, will debut new jerseys during the 2020 NFL season.

Download the MyTeams app for the latest Patriots news and analysis

Here's a look at Newton in the Patriots' home blue jersey:

The Patriots also tweeted a link to check out photos of every player in the new jerseys.

Newton signed a one-year contract with the Patriots a little more than a month ago, and if he's able to stay healthy, the former league MVP is the favorite to win the starting quarterback job over Jarrett Stidham and Brian Hoyer.

The Patriots are expected to have their first training camp practice Wednesday.