Red Sox

Will Mookie Betts get paid in free agency this winter? Signs point to no

Will Mookie Betts get paid in free agency this winter? Signs point to no

Mookie Betts has bet on himself throughout his career and been richly rewarded for it.

Then COVID-19 happened.

When the Red Sox traded Betts to the Dodgers this winter, it was because they knew they couldn't afford the impending free agent. He had already turned down a long-term offer of roughly $300 million, pegging his worth at closer to $400 million.

Get the latest news and analysis on all of your teams from NBC Sports Boston by downloading the My Teams App

After six years of contract tenders and arbitration raises, Betts found himself only months away from free agency and a haul virtually guaranteed to make him baseball's second-highest-paid player behind Mike Trout of the Angels.

Now there's a pandemic and all bets are off, leading to a difficult question: what will Betts' market be this winter?

Hall of Fame writer Peter Gammons has already posited that Betts will be lucky to make $250 million, but in conversations with league executives, even that number feels high. The dual whammy of the pandemic and looming CBA negotiations suggests this coming winter will be a free agent wasteland.

"The landscape has completely changed," said one AL executive. "No one knows what it's going to look like."

Considering the premium ownership has placed on reining in salaries while stadiums remain empty, it's easy to envision a winter where money is scarce and even superstars like Betts are forced to play on short-term deals in the hopes of scoring a better long-term contract once the game's finances stabilize.

Unfortunately, with a second wave of virus potentially hitting this fall and a vaccine nowhere in sight, the current economic conditions could remain in place for 2021 and beyond.

Every action baseball's owners have taken during the negotiation to start the 2020 season has focused on limiting player pay. Their first handful of proposals capped salaries at 35 percent of original pay, and about a quarter of the league's owners were reportedly in favor of canceling the season rather than paying the players anything.

To think that this same group would then turn around and open their checkbooks this winter defies common sense.

So where does that leave Betts? The odds of him returning to the Red Sox are low, because his former team is trying to clear payroll to begin a messy rebuild and has already decided it couldn't afford him once. Even if his price came down to $250 million, he'd be more likely to take that money in Los Angeles than Boston.

Call it the Jon Lester Principle — trading a player during a contract dispute decreases the odds of a return.

Because so few teams could afford Betts to begin with, his best bet might be staying in Los Angeles. If it's a long-term deal, it won't be for the Trout-Manny Machado-Bryce Harper money that Betts would've command in normal times. He could effectively extend arbitration by playing for one year and $30 million, but that puts him back into free agency in 2021 a year older (28) and thus a year less desirable for a long-term extension.

Making matters worse, the 2021 season is the last under the current CBA, and if the past three months have been any indication, getting the players and owners to agree on the day of the week, let alone how to divide billions in revenue, is a recipe for a work stoppage.

That means Betts might not reach true free agency until 2023, at which point he'll be entering his age-30 season, when his earning power will be considerably decreased.

That's nothing like the scenario he envisioned when he repeatedly declined long-term offers from the Red Sox in order to secure nearly $60 million in arbitration decisions.

What once looked like the offseason of Mookie may end up becoming the winter of his discontent.

Ranking the Top 10 biggest brawls in Red Sox history

Ranking the Top 10 biggest brawls in Red Sox history

The 2020 MLB season is already going to look different.

Teams will only play 60 games instead of 162. There likely won't be any fans in the stands. The National League will use a DH. Extra innings will start with a runner on second base.

But thanks to the realities of the coronavirus and the need to stay socially distanced, we're unlikely to see one staple of the baseball season: bench-clearing brawls.

Get the latest news and analysis on all of your teams from NBC Sports Boston by downloading the My Teams App

Tempers often rise along with the temperatures, and when the bad blood boils and pitches start flying high and tight (or sometimes behind) batters, teams mix it up and start throwing punches.

That doesn't mean we can't look back at some of our favorites, however. The Red Sox have been no strangers to fisticuffs over the years, from Billy Martin jumping Jimmy Piersall in a tunnel before a game in 1952 to Machine Gun Joe Kelly beckoning Tyler Austin to join him on the mound in 2018.

This list was originally going to be top five, but there were too many memorable options and no shortage of worthy candidates the ended up on the cutting room floor -- David Ortiz vs. the Orioles' Kevin Gregg was a good one, for instance. So enjoy this list and don't be surprised when a number of entries are accompanied by a jolt of adrenaline.

Click here for the gallery of the Top 10 Red Sox brawls of all-time.

Red Sox boast most loyal fans in MLB, according to this Forbes ranking

Red Sox boast most loyal fans in MLB, according to this Forbes ranking

The last few months have seriously tested baseball fans' patience. But don't expect Boston Red Sox supporters to bail on their team, even in the face of a global pandemic.

As Major League Baseball (finally) prepares for a coronavirus-shortened 2020 season, Forbes published a ranking of the league's most loyal fanbases.

And wouldn't you know it, the Red Sox top the list, three spots ahead of the rival New York Yankees.

Get the latest news and analysis on all of your teams from NBC Sports Boston by downloading the My Teams App

Here's the top 10, per Forbes:

1. Boston Red Sox
2. Chicago Cubs
3. St. Louis Cardinals
4. New York Yankees
5. Los Angeles Dodgers
6. Milwaukee Brewers
7. San Francisco Giants
8. Cleveland Indians
9. Philadelphia Phillies
10. Atlanta Braves

Forbes determined its rankings by analyzing the following metrics: local television ratings, stadium attendance (based on percent capacity), secondary ticket demand, merchandise sales, social media reach and "hometown crowd reach," defined as the percentage of a city's population that watched, listened to and/or attended a game in the past year.

Based on those metrics, it makes sense why Sox fans top this list. Regardless of what you think about Fenway Park's "sellout streak," the Red Sox consistently fill their home seats (even in leaner years), while Sox fans travel notoriously well to opposing ballparks.

Simply put, the Red Sox matter in Boston a lot more than many MLB teams do to fans in their respective cities. Oh, and to state the obvious: You're more likely to continue supporting your team after enduring an 86-year championship drought.

As Forbes noted, Boston's passionate fanbase isn't without its issues, as Torii Hunter recently revealed he was the subject of repeated racist taunts at Fenway Park. The Red Sox acknowledged Hunter's experience in a statement and vowed to address the "larger systemic issues" of racism that Hunter highlighted.