Bears

Mitch Trubisky fans may want to look away

Mitch Trubisky fans may want to look away

It's easy to understand why football fans want to believe in a quarterback who was selected with a high first-round pick, who has a likable personality and who by all accounts has the necessary work ethic to become a successful pro. That's who Mitch Trubisky is, and that's why Bears fans are forcing themselves to believe that 2020 can be different than his massive letdown last season. They're keeping the faith, hoping for a turnaround when there's no evidence to suggest one's coming.

Bears fans rally around a simple war cry. It was the playcalling! The offensive line! The wide receivers running the wrong routes! Translation: it was everything but Mitch. 

Sounds crazy, right?

That's because it is. Trubisky hasn't produced enough positive plays in his three seasons as a starter to deserve the benefit of the doubt. In fact, he should be considered the source of any doubt that surrounds this team's upside in 2020.

But back to those pesky fans. They want to believe, and that belief will last until Trubisky's final snap as the Bears starter, whenever that might come.

Social media is a great place to go to get outside the bubble of Bears fandom and gather a better sense of what the national opinion of a player is. In the case of Trubisky, that opinion isn't a positive one, as proven in a poll posted by Evan Silva, a nationally respected fantasy football writer.

Silva posed a simple question

You are GM of an NFL franchise. You have no access to Patrick Mahomes, any actually good quarterback, or any fountain of rookie hope. These are your only 3 available building-block QB options and you must pick from them & them only: Mitch Trubisky, Taysom Hill or Jameis Winston?

The results are pretty astonishing, even for those of us who've deboarded the Trubisky train. More than 73% of the 23,000 votes favored Winston. Then came Hill, with over 17% of the votes. Bringing up the rear was Trubisky, who was hovering around 10%. 

What does all this mean? First, it goes to show how little respect Trubisky has from football fans as a viable starter in 2020. Second, it may be time to consider Winston a legitimate option as a replacement. His upside is worth the risk of his turnover downside. And finally, let's get real with what went wrong in 2019.

Trubisky wasn't good. It's just that simple. He missed basic, routine throws and many of his completions went for fewer yards than they should've because of poor ball placement. Was he banged up? Sure. But that's also becoming a trend for a player who needs to be consistently available in the starting lineup if he wants to be consistently great.

It's hard to admit this, right? It isn't easy to say the franchise quarterback is anything but that right now. No one wants to give up on a player who's supposed to be the face of the franchise. It's painful, and that pain stings even more when considering who Ryan Pace could've drafted in 2017 instead of Trubisky.

The sooner Chicago moves on from Mitch, the sooner that wound will heal. It sounds insane, but it's true. The best medicine for a mistake as massive as the Trubisky pick is the strength and courage it takes to admit it. 

Pace doesn't need to get behind a microphone and vomit apologies to Bears fans for picking the wrong guy. All he has to do is sign the right guy in free agency to replace Trubisky in 2020. If he does, then he can keep swinging on quarterback prospects in the draft until he gets it right. 

Bears fans will forgive him. They'll move on. But they can't move on until the team moves on, and that takes courage. We'll soon find out if this front office has any.

Does Raiders QB Derek Carr want to join Bears?

Does Raiders QB Derek Carr want to join Bears?

The Bears' trade for then-Oakland Raiders pass-rusher Khalil Mack on the eve of the 2018 regular season was one of the biggest transactions in franchise history, and instantly changed the outlook of football in Chicago in both the short and long-term. Now entering an offseason with big questions at quarterback, could another Bears-Raiders trade be on the horizon?

Similar to Mitchell Trubisky, Las Vegas quarterback Derek Carr is facing a shaky offseason. It seems pretty obvious that he is not Jon Gruden's guy, and there's at least a chance that Gruden and GM Mike Mayock will make an effort to trade him before the 2020 NFL Draft.

Carr's $21.5 million cap hit will complicate things but where there's a will, there's a way. And if Carr's recent post on Instagram is any clue, he might just have the 'will' to play in Chicago.

RELATED: Austin Hooper dubbed Bears' ideal free-agent target

Carr has started 94 games for the Raiders since 2014 and suffered through some pretty low times in Oakland. But he's coming off of back-to-back 4,000-yard seasons and has completed nearly 70 percent of his passes over that span. Simply put, he'd be an upgrade over Trubisky.

In order for any of this to become reality, the Bears have to be willing to part ways with one of their early draft picks as trade compensation. It's unlikely that Ryan Pace will deal either of his second-rounders for Carr but Chicago could offer up a fourth-round pick (assuming the compensatory selection is awarded). Will the Raiders deal Carr for so little in return? It seems highly unlikely, which makes a potential trade a longshot at best.

Still, if Carr wants to be a Bear, then Pace has to at least consider him as the "competition" Bears fans are expecting at quarterback this offseason.

Which cuts should the Bears make to free up cap space for free agency?

Which cuts should the Bears make to free up cap space for free agency?

With less than a month until the NFL’s free agency period begins, the Bears have a paucity of cap space — a little under $15 million, per the NFLPA’s public report. They also have significant needs at tight end, right guard, inside linebacker and safety, as well as quarterback. 

Add in the need for changes coming off a disappointing 8-8 season, and the Bears will have some difficult decisions ahead as Ryan Pace re-tools his 2020 roster.

The Bears have 10 players who, by cutting or extending them, would net at least $1 million in 2020 salary cap savings (this list does not include Akiem Hicks and Eddie Goldman, who could net cap savings but aren't going anywhere and also aren't due for extensions). Some of the decisions to cut these players will not be difficult; others will be. A look at these players, and what the Bears’ verdict on each should be (all cap savings figures are via Spotrac):

Outside linebacker Leonard Floyd (potential cap savings: $13.222 million)

The case for cutting: Floyd’s fifth-year option is guaranteed for injury only and does not carry any dead money, so the Bears could nearly double their cap space without any monetary drawbacks. Floyd only had three sacks in 2019, his fourth year in the NFL, and has not made good on his top-10-picked upside as a fearsome speed rusher. His sack totals have decreased every year he’s been in the league despite playing full 16-game seasons in 2018 and 2019. 

The case for keeping: Pace has valued Floyd’s versatility from the day he drafted him, and the Bears still appreciate the things the former No. 9 overall pick can do that don’t involve rushing the passer. He’s good against the run and can be trusted to drop into coverage, and to his credit hasn’t missed a game since a freak season-ending knee injury in 2017. 

The verdict: The Bears could present Floyd with an ultimatum to either sign a contract extension — one which lowers his cap hit for 2020 but doesn’t provide significant guarantees after, say, 2021 — or be released. Floyd wouldn’t command $13 million per year on a deep open market headlined by Jadeveon Clowney, Dante Fowler Jr. and (possibly) Yannick Ngakoue. While he does do some important things in a 3-4 defense, his inability to win one-on-one matchups while Khalil Mack is double- and triple-teamed make that $13.222 million figure feel too high. If he’s not interested in an extension and wants to bet on himself in 2020, the Bears can get cheaper and better here. 

Wide receiver Allen Robinson (potential cap savings: $13 million)

The case for cutting: There is none. Robinson was one of the select few players on the 2019 Bears to improve off his 2018 season, and he’s a critically important piece for the Bears’ efforts to improve their offense in 2020. 

The case for keeping: The Bears should sign Robinson to a contract extension to not only lock him up for the next few years, but to lower his 2020 cap hit from its current $15 million figure. Just spitballing here: How about a four-year, $68 million offer with over half the money guaranteed? The 26-year-old Robinson earned a rich extension based on what he’s done both on the field and off the field since coming to Chicago two years ago. 

The verdict: Signing Robinson to an extension should be the Bears’ No. 1 priority before they begin exploring other ways to create cap space in 2020. 

Cornerback Prince Amukamara (potential cap savings: $9 million)

The case for cutting: That’s a lot of money to be saved for a guy who hasn't had an interception in three of his last four seasons. Amukamara turns 30 in June and may not be a candidate for an extension based on his age. Replacing him with a cheaper free agent and a draft pick would make sense. 

The case for keeping: Amukamara’s ability to cleanly play press coverage is not an easily-replaceable trait. He committed only one penalty after Week 3 of 2019, and while he doesn’t make game-wrecking plays, his skills allow Chuck Pagano to do some different things with his coverages and blitzes. The Bears' defense likely will be worse off without Amukamara. 

The verdict: Amukamara is the player the Bears should have the most difficult time cutting or keeping. He’s an important voice in the locker room as a former Super Bowl winner, and his ability to avoid being penalized while playing physical coverage is valuable in a league that can over-emphasize pass interference flags. But: the Bears could plug two holes with the cap savings generated by releasing Amukamara, and his contract was designed with the possibility of releasing him before 2020 in mind. It'd be a tough, but reasonable, decision. 

Wide receiver Cordarrelle Patterson (potential cap savings: $4.75 million)

The case for cutting: Patterson didn’t become the explosive offensive weapon the Bears imagined he could be a year ago. He averaged 6.6 yards on his 28 touches — both the second-lowest numbers in his seven-year career — and played fewer than 10 offensive snaps in seven of 16 games. His special teams play was outstanding, but as Matt Nagy said after the Bears signed him last March: “If we were bringing him here just to return kicks … I mean, I'd be lying to you.”

The case for keeping: Patterson was an All-Pro kick returner, and his special teams impact extended beyond that into some standout play in punt coverage. His average of 29.5 yards per kick return ranked second in the NFL, and he had a 102-yard return score against the New Orleans Saints in Week 7. With special teams ace Sherrick McManis a free agent, the Bears may not want to drain reliable talent from Chris Tabor’s special teams units. 

The verdict: If signing a, say, starting safety like Vonn Bell means needing to cut Patterson, it’s a move the Bears should make. But he’s a guy who does impact games, and if the Bears can keep him without taking away from the starters they need to sign, they should do it. 

Wide receiver Taylor Gabriel (potential cap savings: $4.5 million)

The case for cutting: Gabriel missed seven games due to a pair of concussions in 2019 and has limited additional upside, averaging 7.4 yards per target in each of his last three seasons. He’s shown flashes as a deep threat, but his average of 2.7 yards after catch per reception would’ve ranked 148 out of 155 qualified receivers had he played enough in 2019. Not all of that is his fault, with quarterback and scheme issues diminishing his effectiveness, but $4.5 million could be used elsewhere. 

The case for keeping: Gabriel was a sneakily-effective weapon in 2018 as someone who could make touch catches at the sticks and haul in the occasional deep ball. If healthy, he’s a reliable No. 3 or No. 4 target in an offense, and he does have a good rapport with Mitch Trubisky — which does matter if Trubisky still is the starter in 2020. 

The verdict: Cutting Gabriel would mean needing to find a speed threat while also relying on 2019 fourth-round pick Riley Ridley and/or 2018 seventh-round pick Javon Wims more within the offense, but saving $4.5 million in cap space for a guy who did miss nearly half of last season feels too enticing for the Bears to pass up. 

Left tackle Charles Leno Jr. (potential cap savings: $2.918 million)

The case for cutting: Only four offensive linemen committed more penalties than Leno’s 13 in 2019, while he’s underrated as a pass blocker he hasn’t been a solution for the Bears’ run blocking woes. 

The case for keeping: Leno carries a dead cap figure of $7.376 million, and it’d be difficult for the Bears to find a better player than him with their meager amount of cap space, other needs on the roster and lack of draft capital. Leno is still only 28, is remarkably durable and currently has the 17th lowest cap hit among left tackles in 2020. 

The verdict: There’s no reason for the Bears to move on from Leno in 2020. He stays. 

Punter Pat O’Donnell (potential cap savings: $1.75 million)

The case for cutting: That figure may not seem like much, but for a cap-strapped team like the Bears swapping O’Donnell for a young, league-minimum punter might make sense. For what it’s worth, Pro Football Focus rated O’Donnell as the NFL’s second-worst punter in 2020. 

The case for keeping: If other cuts are made elsewhere, the Bears may not need to pinch pennies here. Tabor’s internal evaluation of O’Donnell may not match up with PFF’s, too, and the Bears may not want to create uncertainty at an otherwise-stable position. 

The verdict: It may be easier said than done to cut O’Donnell and find an undrafted free agent to punt for six figures in 2020, but it’s a path the Bears should try — especially if it means they can hang on to someone like Patterson. 

Tight end Ben Braunecker (potential cap savings: $1.468 million) 

The case for cutting: Braunecker has 13 receptions over his four years with the Bears and landed on injured reserve with a concussion last year. The Bears' overhaul at tight end began this week with the reported signing of Demetrius Harris, who might be a better version of Braunecker: A guy who can play both the "U" and "Y" while contributing on special teams. 

The case for keeping: As with Patterson, cutting an important special teams player while losing someone like McManis feels a little risky, especially with Braunecker’s 2020 cap hit coming in well under $2 million. If he's the Bears’ fourth or fifth tight end, that’s a good spot for someone who knows the offense and does well to contribute on special teams. 

The verdict: If the Bears' tight end depth chart has Trey Burton, a different No. 1 at the "Y," Harris, J.P. Holtz and a draft pick, Braunecker could be squeezed out of a roster spot. But he's worth keeping around through OTAs and training camp and should not be among the Bears' pre-free agency cuts. 

Tight end Adam Shaheen (potential cap savings: $1.271 million)

The case for cutting: Shaheen has not lived up to his hyperbolic “Baby Gronk” potential, catching just nine passes for 74 yards in 2019 before being shut down due to ineffectiveness and then injury halfway through the season. The writing has been on the wall for Shaheen to be released since he was a healthy scratch last November. 

The case for keeping: He’s cheap? Pace’s end-of-season comment about liking what he’s seen from Shaheen when he’s played was disingenuous at best and misguided at worst. If the Bears really want to see if he can still make good on his upside, he's inexpensive enough to keep around through the offseason program and training camp, but Pace cannot approach 2020 counting on Shaheen to contribute. 

The verdict: The Bears need to find multiple new tight ends over the next two and a half months, and won’t have a place on the roster for Shaheen. Investing his cap savings into a different backup tight end, or some depth at safety or inside linebacker, would be a better use of those funds. 

Tight end Trey Burton (potential cap savings: $1.05 million)

The case for cutting: Burton’s 2019 was a disaster, with the “U” tight end neither healthy nor effective during his second year with the Bears. The Bears cannot afford to have a tight end take up $8.55 million in cap space to average 3.5 yards per target, as Burton did in eight games last year. The position Burton plays is pivotal for the health of Nagy’s offense, and an upgrade there is necessary. 

The case for keeping: A shade over $1 million — with $7.5 million in dead cap — is not enough to justify releasing a guy who, in 2018, was a solid part of the Bears’ offense. The Bears’ best bet is to see if Burton is healthy in training camp before making a decision on his future with the team. Better depth behind him is a must, but he could still be part of the solution to the Bears’ tight end woes. 

The verdict: Keep Burton around and, if he’s not healthy or effective by Labor Day weekend, think about releasing him them. But the money says the Bears need to give Burton another chance this summer, even if they also go out and sign someone like Eric Ebron to also play the "U." 

Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of the Bears.