Bears

Bears Grades: Defensive line sacks Blaine Gabbert four times

12-6-eddie-goldman-bears-49ers.png

Bears Grades: Defensive line sacks Blaine Gabbert four times

The front got to Blaine Gabbert for four sacks, the third time the Bears have had four or more sacks in a game; they lost all three.

Eddie Goldman caved in the 49ers middle for a third-quarter sack. Goldman repeated the effort in the fourth quarter, getting an edge on 49ers center Marcus Martin and getting enough depth to prevent Gabbert from stepping into any throw and getting away from edge rushes from Houston and Young. The results gave Goldman 4.5 sacks for a solid rookie season.

[MORE GRADES: Quarterback ¦ Defensive backs]

Two of Goldman’s three tackles were for losses and he added an additional hit on Gabbert.

Willie Young cleaned up for a first-quarter sack when Jarvis Jenkins and Lamarr Houston collapsed the pocket and Young took down Gabbert. The rush was again in Gabbert’s lap through the first quarter as Jenkins in particular was able to bull-rush early and force the 49ers to turn to quick-release pass plays that got the football out of Gabbert’s hands with a minimum of risk.

[NBC SHOP: Gear up Bears fans!]

“The game plan basically revolved around him, trying to keep him out of tough situations,” Young said. “Early they were trying to keep us out of the nickel package because we were getting pretty good pressure on the quarterback. They did everything they could to keep us off the field for the most part. But we’ve got to just figure out a way to get that win.”

“For the most part we had our opportunities to get there. We collapsed the pocket for the most part and that’s why they wanted to keep us out of our nickel package.”

Mitch Unrein was a surprise starter at one of the end spots with the Bears able to open in their preferred 3-4. Unrein closed down while holding the point to stuff a first-down run with solid technique and pad level against Pro Bowl LT Joe Staley.

Moon's Grade: B

Bears still see Dion Sims as a valuable piece to their offensive puzzle

5-27dionsims.jpg
USA Today Sports Images

Bears still see Dion Sims as a valuable piece to their offensive puzzle

Dion Sims is still here, which is the outcome he expected but perhaps wasn’t a slam dunk — at least to those outside the walls at Halas Hall. 

The Bears could’ve cut ties with Sims prior to March 16 and saved $5.666 million against the cap, quite a figure for a guy coming off a disappointing 2017 season (15 catches, 180 yards, one touchdown). But the Bears are sticking with Sims, even after splashing eight figures to land Trey Burton in free agency earlier this year. 

“In my mind, I thought I was coming back,” Sims said. “I signed to be here three years and that’s what I expect. But I understand how things go and my job is come out here and work hard every day and play with a chip on my shoulder to prove myself and just be a team guy.”

The Bears signed Sims to that three-year, $18 million contract 14 months ago viewing him as a rock-solid blocking tight end with some receiving upside. The receiving upside never materialized, and his blocking was uneven at times as the Bears’ offense slogged through a bleak 11-loss season. 

“The situation we were in, we weren’t — we could’ve done a better job of being successful,” Sims said. “Things didn’t go how we thought it would. We just had to pretty much try to figure out how to come together and build momentum into coming into this year. I just think there were a lot of things we could have done, but because of the circumstances we were limited a little bit. 

“… It was a lot of things going on. Guys hurt, situations — it was tough for us. We couldn’t figure it out, along with losing, that was a big part of it too.”

Sims will be given a fresh start in 2018, even as Adam Shaheen will be expected to compete to cut into Sims’ playing time at the “Y” tight end position this year. The other side of that thought: Shaheen won’t necessarily slide into being the Bears’ primary in-line tight end this year. 

Sims averaged 23 receptions, 222 yards and two touchdowns from 2014-2016; that might be a good starting point for his 2018 numbers, even if it would represent an improvement from 2017. More important, perhaps, is what Sims does as a run blocker — and that was the first thing Nagy mentioned when talking about how Sims fits into his offense. 

“The nice thing with Dion is that he’s a guy that’s proven to be a solid blocker,” Nagy said. “He can be in there and be your Y-tight end, but yet he still has really good hands. He can make plays on intermediate routes. He’s not going to be anybody that’s a downfield threat — I think he knows that, we all know that — but he’s a valuable piece of this puzzle.”

Bears logo ranked in bottom five of NFL in recent fan poll

bearsfans.png
USA Today

Bears logo ranked in bottom five of NFL in recent fan poll

The Chicago Bears logo has withstood the test of time. In a sports era full of uniform changes, the Bears have maintained the classic orange 'C' for most of their nearly 100 years in Chicago.

Unfortunately, tradition doesn't equate to popularity.

Chicago's logo ranked 28th in the NFL, according to a recent poll of nearly 1,500 football fans. Only the Redskins (29), Bengals (30), Jets (31) and Browns (32) were worse.

I’m not sure how I feel about the underbite on the “C.” I can see how this would be a polarizing feature of this logo. I wish to an extent that it met up more evenly. I think they could have had the bottom meet up in a more even fashion and still maintained the sharpness, of the “C,” which I like. I don’t mind the point [ON THE BACK SIDE OF THE “C”], without the point it would be super boring. The point actually does add something from a design standpoint that makes it stand out.

Bears fans will take exception with the results. Wins have been hard to come by in recent seasons, but there's still something special about seeing the familiar navy and orange on Sundays in the fall. The 'C' is arguably the biggest part of that. Sure, it's not a complex design overflowing with colors, but it represents a long and storied history. 

It's interesting that each of the bottom five teams have struggled to string together winning seasons. On the flipside, teams like the Saints, Falcons, Rams, Vikings and Eagles rank in the top six. Maybe it's recency bias.

In the NFC North, the Lions rank No. 2 (which is a shocker) and the Packers are No. 20.