Blackhawks

Hawk Talk: Speaking offensively

Hawk Talk: Speaking offensively

Sunday, May 30, 2010
11:38 PM

By Brett Ballantini
CSNChicago.com

CHICAGO Raise your hand if you thought the first game of the Stanley Cup Finals would result in 11 goals, the most in 18 yearssince the last Stanley Cup Finals game played in Chicago, in fact.

OK, now, hold it up for awhile, because the IRS is on its way for a thorough audit, a sitdown with the lie detector and a date with the breathalyzer.

To be sure, the gritty Blackhawks and Philadelphia Flyers went for a very light sandpaper grade for the first 50 minutes of the game, resulting in 10 goals through just two periods and two rosters of completely discombobulated skaters.

There was a lot of action: Shootout at the OK Corral, said a relieved Blackhawks coach Joel Quenneville postgame. Things settled down as the game progressed, but certainly, I dont think anybody envisioned 5-5 heading into the third period.

Quennevilles forwards, while enjoying the scoring thrust from their own side, were just as mystified.

When it was right around 4-3, 4-4, I looked up and said, What is going on out there? admitted Blackhawks forward Patrick Sharp, who scored the clubs game-tying third goal. I dont think either club drew the gameplan up like that.

When we came off after the second I looked up, said the author of Chicagos game-tying fourth goal, winger Kris Versteeg, spinning a similar tale of shock and awe. I saw it was 5-5 and said, 'Holy crap, what is going on?'"

It certainly wasnt the game anyone expected. Yes, the Flyers entered action having scored more goals than anyone in the 2010 postseason and the Blackhawks had already scored five or more goals five times in 16 playoff games. But with blue line stalwarts on and aggressive forechecking forwards on both clubs, not to mention goalies who had combined to stop shots at a .950 clip in their conference finals, offense looked to be offset, bigtime.

While acknowledging Chicagos blueliners would need to buck up as the series progresses, Blackhawks alternacap Duncan Keith put the defensive debauchery in perspective.

Giving up five goals is bad, he acknowledged. But giving up six is worse.

And its that simple. In the end, the Blackhawks can say they played poorly in a number of areasfirst-line scoring, misbegotten penalties, turnovers, goaltending, lazy defense and forecheckingand still have a win to show for it. Putting one in the left-hand column makes it easier to grin about the way Game 1 played out.

There was one big difference, said Versteeg with regard to how his first true Stanley Cup game played out vs. the 1,000 road hockey Cups he won growing up. I dont think we ever scored as many on the driveway as we did tonight.

Brett Ballantini is CSNChicago.com's Blackhawks Insider. Follow him @CSNChi_Beatnik on Twitter for up-to-the-minute Hawks information.

What to make of Blackhawks moves on NHL trade deadline day

What to make of Blackhawks moves on NHL trade deadline day

ST. LOUIS — The Blackhawks were always going to be sellers leading up to the NHL trade deadline, but the real question was to what degree? Chicago got its answer on Monday.

After a quiet morning, the Blackhawks struck two deals in the final hour: Erik Gustafsson to the Calgary Flames in exchange for a third-round pick in 2020 and, more notably, Robin Lehner to the Vegas Golden Knights for a second-round selection in 2020, goaltender Malcolm Subban and defenseman prospect Slava Demin. The Blackhawks also retained 50 percent of Lehner's salary in a complicated three-way deal that saw Toronto eat 44 percent of that for a fifth-round pick in 2020 to help Vegas become cap compliant.

And the immediate impressions on the return? Pretty underwhelming. But, at the same time, the market played a big role in that and it didn't favor the Blackhawks by any stretch.

The Carolina Hurricanes had two first-round picks and were as desperate a team as ever to acquire a goaltender at the deadline after relying on a 42-year-old Zamboni driver to get them through their last game. No doubt the Blackhawks were hoping to land at least a first-rounder for Lehner, but if the Hurricanes weren't biting on that price tag, neither was anyone else.

Six first-round picks were traded in February and not one of them was moved for a rental player. Five of those skaters had term left on their contract and the other signed a long-term extension after the trade, which helped justify it.

[MORE: Blackhawks Talk Podcast: Trade deadline recap plus Stan Bowman 1-on-1]

The reality is, the decision came down to whether the Blackhawks wanted to risk letting Lehner walk for nothing this summer or take the best offer on the table and just accept they won't get 100 cents on the dollar, especially if they weren't seeing eye to eye on a potential extension, and they chose the latter. Whether the Blackhawks should've re-signed Lehner is a separate discussion, but both sides could always revisit things on July 1 if they choose.

It's also difficult for Chicago to get excited about the return for Gustafsson after several similar-type impact defensemen were traded last week for more than that, and rightfully so. Did the Blackhawks wait too long to move him? Probably. But he wasn't going to fetch much on his own to begin with, and you have to wonder how hard the Blackhawks tried to package Gustafsson with another asset to help sweeten the deal and get the first-round pick they were looking for.

There's a large portion of the fanbase that felt Gustafsson should've been dealt in the summer when his value was highest after he turned in a breakout 60-point campaign. And that's fair. But the Blackhawks were hoping to make the playoffs this season and subtracting a key piece from their roster wasn't something that would've aligned with those goals.

In the end, the Blackhawks went into trade deadline day hoping to recoup some draft picks and prospects and continue building from within. They did that.

But the expectation in Chicago was this could've served as a prime opportunity to restock the pipeline with future assets and get fans excited about the retooling process. And while the Blackhawks didn't exactly strike out, they didn't hit a home run, either.

"The goal was to try to get some asset value in return for them and we certainly did that," GM Stan Bowman said in a conference call. "Going into a period like this at the trade deadline, you have to try to manage your assets going forward. When you have expiring assets and you talk around the league to teams and find out if there’s interest in them, then you do your best to try and get the maximum return you can. "

Attention Dish and Sling customers! You have lost your Blackhawks games on NBC Sports Chicago. To switch providers, visit mysportschicago.com.

Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of your teams and stream the Blackhawks easily on your device.

Blackhawks Talk Podcast: Trade deadline recap plus Stan Bowman 1-on-1

stan_bowman_deadline.png
AP

Blackhawks Talk Podcast: Trade deadline recap plus Stan Bowman 1-on-1

The Blackhawks traded goalie Robin Lehner and defenseman Erik Gustafsson ahead of Monday's NHL trade deadline. Pat Boyle discusses all that went into the trades with Steve Konroyd, Jamal Mayers, and NBC Sports Chicago Blackhawks writer Scott King.

To further provide details on the trades, Blackhawks Insider Charlie Roumeliotis goes 1-on-1 with GM Stan Bowman on why he made the moves.

(1:00) - Blackhawks trade Lehner and never offered him an extension?

(5:30) - Could the Hawks sign Lehner in the offseason?

(10:12) - Why the Hawks had to trade Gustafsson

(14:07) - Stan Bowman 1-on-1 after the trade deadline

(19:42) - Reaction to Bowman 1-on-1 interview

(23:17) - Overall assessment of what the Hawks got back in the trades

Listen here or in the embedded player below.

Blackhawks Talk Podcast

Subscribe:

Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of your teams and stream the Blackhawks easily on your device.