Bulls notes: Hamilton productive in exceeding minutes limit


Bulls notes: Hamilton productive in exceeding minutes limit

BOSTON - Since he tore his left plantar fascia, Rip Hamilton was supposed to be on a minutes limit -- typically around 20 minutes a game -- but after Luol Deng had to leave Friday night's overtime win over Boston, Bulls head coach leaned on the veteran shooting guard, who scored a team-high 20 points on the evening.

"You know what's crazy? After the third quarter, usually I'm done. But with Luol going out, there was probably a chance that he would put me back in the game and 'Griff' Bulls assistant coach Adrian Griffin came up to me in the fourth quarter. He was like, 'Hey, man. Stay ready because Coach is going to put you back in the game,' so it was just one of those things where we didn't expect it going into the game, but with the circumstances, with Lu going out, he put me back in," Hamilton explained afterwards.

When asked by a Boston reporter about soaking his foot in an ice bucket postgame, Hamilton quipped, "Thibs...that's the reason why I'm doing it, because of Thibs. Thibs' practices."

"I can play heavy minutes. That's not a problem. That's just something that Thibs wants to do. That's one of the things that he talked about when I first came back. He asked me and I was like, 'Yo, I can play. I'm good,' and he was like, 'Hey, you know what? I'm going to keep your minutes down,' so I was just like, 'Hey, whatever you need me to do, that's what I'm going to do," Hamilton said.

Thibodeau was complimentary of Hamilton's play afterwards, though he didn't hesitate to mention the starter's high minutes, which totaled 32 on the night.

"Rip was very good. He scored the ball for us," he said. "He probably played a few too many minutes, so that led to a couple of turnovers - we've got to get the turnovers down - but I liked the way he played."

Key defensive play symbolizes Bulls' philosophy

With 9.4 seconds left in the fourth quarter, Jimmy Butler and Joakim Noah trapped Boston's Paul Pierce, forcing a held-ball situation with the Celtics ahead, 88-86.

Noah won the ensuing jump ball, which eventually led to Kirk Hinrich's game-tying jumper with two seconds remaining in regulation, sending the game into overtime.

Afterwards, the Bulls discussed the significance of the sequence, which went exactly how Thibodeau diagrammed it in the timeout leading up to it.

"Well, there's a few things you're trying to get done. But before you just get to the foul part, you want to see if you can make a play. Sometimes, there's a bobble, a slip, so you're looking for that," Thibodeau explained. "Joakim and Jimmy are pretty good in those situations and we almost had the one before that, and Marquis just missed it."

When asked about the Bulls' strategy, Butler added: "When they throw it in, make them throw it my way. Then, Jo just trapped, don't foul.

"Literally, the play happened exactly like Thibodeau drew it up. Make them throw the ball towards the corner, and me and Jo go and trap. Jo went and trapped, and won the jump ball," he continued. "It's crazy because we worked on situations like that. Jo being an aggressive defender, myself being an aggressive defender. I felt like it was bound to happen."

Referring to Pierce, a seasoned veteran, Noah chimed in: "Veteran or rookie, in that situation, when you're trapped in the corner with time running out, it's not an easy situation to get out of, no matter who it is."

"It was a huge play, I think the basketball gods were definitely on our side. It was a competitive game. We got a few bounces to go our way, but the great thing is a lot of people stepped up tonight and we competed as a team the whole way, so it was a great game to be part of."

As for Hinrich, who fouled in the overtime period, he downplayed his big shot, telling CSNChicago.com, "It just rolled to me and I just let it go."

Robinson excited about return to Boston

Bulls backup point guard Nate Robinson was a member of the Celtics when Boston returned to the NBA Finals in 2010, losing to the Lakers.

Still, he regards that period of his career as a special time. Prior to Friday night's Bulls win, Robinson told CSNChicago.com that the contest was his first game back in the TD BankNorth Garden since the Celtics traded him to Oklahoma City in 2011.

"They made sure they had my Finals jersey...

"It was great memories, man. The fans here were always great. They were always nice, cheered, supported. For me, this is my first game back since I got traded from the Celtics. For me, it's going to be fun to be out there. It's going to be interesting to see how the fans react to me coming back, but it's not about me. It's about us getting a win," he told CSNChicago.com. "It helped me a lot with Doc and when Thibs was over there. They helped me out with preparing myself properly for the game. It's been helping me in the last few years of my career and hopefully, it can take me to an even higher level with my game as a player, as a person and on top of that, as a competitor. Right now, Coach has been on me in making sure that I know where everybody is on the court and being more of a leader, and to me, it's making me more of a better player."

Robinson contributed 11 points Friday, but before the game, he was ecstatic that the Celtics equipment managers left his NBA Finals jersey in his stall in the visiting locker room.

Celtics' Garnett, Rondo praise Bulls' Deng, Noah

Although the Bulls and Celtics have a fairly intense rivalry, there's a lot of respect between the two squads. That was evident before Friday night's overtime thriller, as Celtics head coach Doc Rivers and future Hall of Famer Kevin Garnett cited Bulls teammates Joakim Noah and Luol Deng as worthy of All-Star Game consideration.

"Luol's always played to a top notch. I think Noah's play is starting to increase. I think he's getting better," said Garnett, who also mentioned the injured Derrick Rose. "Those are the people who stand out right away."

Rivers added: "You named them Deng and Noah all. You're doing my job for me.

"But yeah, I think both of them deserve it, especially with their record. I'd be surprised if both of them are not on it," he continued. "Carlos Boozer is playing well, but I think the first two are the two that I honestly have my focus on."

Rivers went on to talk about the dinner he had Thursday evening with Bulls head coach Tom Thibodeau on the night of his former assistant's 55th birthday.

"Well, I had to pay last night because it was his birthday and our new deal is if it's in Boston, I pay. If it's in Chicago-uh, uh-he pays. That was the old deal. I paid both places, but now, he picks up in Chicago. Now, I've got to get him to pick up the phone when he's in Chicago," he quipped. "I think he's done an exceptional job. We went to dinner last night. The first thing I told him was, 'By the way, your team's pretty good without Derrick.' I said, 'That's No. 1,' but he is their best player and when you take off the best player off the team, and they still do what they're doing, that says a lot about Thibs, in my opinion, and obviously, the players, too. They can't do it without him, but I think his intensity and his belief that you're going to win with a man down has to spill over to them. All he cares about is winning and I think they feel that."

The ever-secretive Thibodeau insisted he didn't do anything for his birthday - "Got ready for the game" - but then joked, "It sure is a boring birthday, but that's me."

NBA issues statement on Bulls-Raptors game

The league issued a statement Friday about the ending of Wednesday night's Bulls win over the Raptors in Toronto: "With one second remaining in overtime of the Chicago Bulls-Toronto Raptors game on January 16, officials called a foul on Chicago's Joakim Noah as Toronto's Amir Johnson gathered the ball while driving to the basket. The officials ruled the foul was on the floor but upon review at the league office, the video replay confirmed that the foul should have been called a shooting foul with Johnson receiving two free throws."

The Bulls aren't trading for Kawhi Leonard, but what would a potential deal look like?


The Bulls aren't trading for Kawhi Leonard, but what would a potential deal look like?

The Bulls aren't trading for Kawhi Leonard.

Let's get that out of the way before continuing on.

At this stage in their rebuild the Bulls are interested in acquiring pieces - they dealt a Kawhi-like Jimmy Butler 12 months ago for three core parts - and have two picks in next week's NBA Draft.

The Spurs will have myriad options on where to send Leonard, the two-time All-Star and 2014 Finals MVP, and offers will pour in from everywhere. Leonard could also dictate where he plays next season, as he has one year remaining on his deal and will be a free agent after the 2019 season. Certainly a team giving up the assets required to get Leonard would want to know their All-Pro intends on staying.

So that's why. Whichever team deals for Leonard (assuming he is dealt) will be able to put together a more enticing package than the Bulls could (think Boston, the Lakers, Philadelphia). Leonard also reportedly prefers to play in Los Angeles or New York. No mention of Chicago.

But! It's Friday afternoon and we can only churn out so much draft content before our own heads begin spinning. So we figured we would put together the best deal the Bulls could offer for Leonard.

First off, the Bulls would need a gaurantee from Leonard that he intended to re-sign. Like Butler, Leonard wouldn't be able for the supermax extension if he leaves the Spurs. Instead, Leonard could sign a five-year, $188 million max deal with the Bulls, averaging $37.6 million per year.

The Bulls would get a 26-year-old All-Pro just about to enter the prime of his career. Make no mistake about it: Kawhi Leonard is a superstar. It's easy to forget because he played in just nine games last year, but Leonard is just a year removed from a season in which he averaged 25.5 points on 48 percent shooting, 5.8 rebounds, 3.5 assists and 1.8 steals in 33.4 minutes. Oh, and he's won two Defensive Player of the Year awards in 2015 and 2016.

The Bulls would have Leonard through his age 31 season and would give the Bulls a souped-up version of Jimmy Butler, and perhaps one that could get them closer to contention in an Eastern Conference that may be without LeBron James.

The price would be steep. All-Rookie Lauri Markkanen would be the centerpiece of any deal. The Spurs have utilized versatile, small-ball lineups well in the past and adding Markkanen would be like a cheat code for Gregg Popovich. He'd slot in well next to LaMarcus Aldridge, who played 62 percent of his minutes at center last year, according to Basketball Reference. That was the most minutes he had played at center since his rookie season.

The Bulls would also have to include the 7th and 22nd picks in next week's draft, which only makes the deal more unlikely (from 0.01 percent to 0.005 percent). San Antonio could pursue a wing like Mikal Bridges or Kevin Knox and add him to a core that would include Dejounte Murray, Markkanen and Aldridge. The Spurs also have the 18th pick, so they could conceivably have five core players (Markkanen, Murray, 7, 18, 22) 21 years or younger to complement the 32-year-old Aldridge, who bounced back in a big way last season (ironically without Leonard).

Adding Justin Holiday's $4.615 million salary to the deal makes the money work and gives the Spurs another perimeter shooter.

What would the Bulls look like? Well, needless to say they would have found their wing.

Building around Leonard would include Kris Dunn, Zach LaVine and Bobby Portis. With Markkanen gone, Portis would be in line for a significant contract extension and a much larger role in the offense; his per-36 numbers were on par with Kevin Love's and Joel Embiid's a year ago.

PG: Kris Dunn
SG: Zach LaVine
SF: Kawhi Leonard
PF: Bobby Portis
C: Robin Lopez

Alas, this deal is not happening. We can only hope to have angered some of you at this hypothetical, fun mock trade.

A history of teams moving in to the top 5 of the NBA Draft and what it might cost the Bulls


A history of teams moving in to the top 5 of the NBA Draft and what it might cost the Bulls

It’s difficult to move up in the NBA Draft. Like, really difficult. More often than not it costs more than it should – like free agency – because teams are aware you’re moving up to go after a specific player. Few, if any, teams move up in the draft to position themselves better on draft night. So, you want Player X and don’t think he’ll be around when you pick? Ante up. Show us how much Player X means to your franchise.

Moving up in the top 5 is even more difficult and expensive (duh). The most recent examples are Philadelphia dealing with Boston last year, going from No. 3 to No. 1. The cost was Sacramento’s 2019 first-round pick, which will likely be in the first half of the lottery. In 2009 the Timberwolves dealt two key rotation pieces – Randy Foye and Mike Miller – to the Wizards for the No. 5 pick. In retrospect that doesn’t seem like much, but Foye was three years removed from being the No. 7 pick and had just averaged 16.3 points in 70 games; Miller was 28 and one of the better 3-point shooters in the league.

And when trying to move inside the top 5, you have to go all the way back to 2005. And that’s where Bulls fans should start paying attention.

The Utah Jazz were in desperate need of a point guard after cycling through the likes of Carlos Arroyo, Raul Lopez, Howard Eisley and Keith McLeod (who?) in the two years after John Stockton’s 2002 retirement. Utah had the fifth best odds in the Lottery after a 26-win season and, like the 2018 Bulls, were bumped back a spot after Milwaukee jumped from sixth to first.

Moving back one spot didn’t seem like much on the surface, but it was significant; there were three point guards near the top of the class – Illinois’ Deron Williams, Wake Forest’s Chris Paul and North Carolina’s Raymond Felton – who all had the chance to go in the top 5, along with the consensus top pick Andrew Bogut and the potential-oozing freshman Marvin Williams. Utah GM XXXXXX said the team was interested in Paul or Williams.

So here the Jazz were, sitting at No. 6 with the potential to see the three point guards go ahead of them. In hindsight, the next point guard wouldn’t be taken until Nate Robinson at No. 21. There were three clear-cut top point guards in the class, and Utah needed one of them.

So they found a trade partner. The Portland Trail Blazers had selected high school phenom Sebastian Telfair with the No. 13 pick the previous season, and were ready to hand him the keys to the offense with Damon Stoudamire set for free agency. Not necessarily needing a point guard, Portland became the perfect trading partner for a team looking to move up. Enter the Jazz.

In addition to the No. 6 pick, Utah also had the 27th pick thanks to a draft-night deal the previous season with Dallas.

Armed with assets, hours before the start of the 2005 draft the Jazz sent No. 6, No. 27 and a future first-round pick to the Blazers for the No. 3 pick. The caveat here – as it will later pertain to the Bulls – is that the future first was actually Detroit’s first-round pick in 2006; the Jazz had traded point guard Carlos Arroyo to the Pistons for a first-round pick, which was widely expected to be near the end of the first round. Detroit went 64-18 in ’05-06 and the pick wound up being No. 30; Utah kept its own pick in 2006, which wound up being No. 14.

That was the cost. Three first-round picks, though admittedly No. 27 and the contending Pistons’ pick weren’t oozing with value. Utah selected Williams over Paul, Portland got Martell Webster at No. 6 and used the other two picks on Linas Kleiza and a year later Joel Freeland.

How does this affect the Bulls? They’re in a similar situation as Utah…kind of. The Jazz had missed the playoffs each of the previous two seasons post-Stockton but felt they were turning a corner with 23-year-olds Carlos Boozer and Andrei Kirilenko leading the way. In fact, their eight leading scorers from the previous season were 28 or younger. They were on the right path if they could find a point guard to play with Boozer, Kirilenko, Matt Harpring, Mehmet Okur and Raja Bell.

The Bulls aren’t exactly one specific piece away like Utah clearly was – they’d miss the playoffs the following year but then win between 48 and 54 games each of the next four seasons after. But they could be targeting someone specific in the top 4 of the draft. And they just so happen to have assets, and just so happen to have two teams reportedly willing to move back in a deep class.

Memphis reportedly would like to move back, and if possible add Chandler Parsons’ absurd contract to a deal. This seems like a plausible idea at face value, but the Grizzlies are going to want something substantial in return. They tanked hard – Marc Gasol “rested” eight games after the All-Star break, with Memphis losing all eight of those – for a reason, and they aren’t going to attach their main asset to a deal just to get rid of Parsons’ remaining $49 million. Freeing up cap space is nice, but at what cost? Memphis isn’t in a positon to win now. True, they’d like to try and contend with Gasol (two years left) and Mike Conley (three years left) but attaching the 4th pick to Parsons is different from the Raptors attaching two picks to DeMarre Carroll in a trade with Brooklyn last year; that Raptors pick wound up being No. 29, as the Raptors knew they’d be contending.

The Bulls might entertain a deal of the Nos. 7 and 22 picks for No. 4 and Parsons. If Parsons weren’t included in the deal, it could still get done if Bobby Portis were added. The Bulls love Portis, but he’ll need a significant contract extension in 13 months and Lauri Markkanen has the power forward position on lockdown.

The Hawks are also a potential trade option. They reportedly are looking to move down and still be able to draft Trae Young, who could supplant a disgruntled Dennis Schroder at the point. Again, a package of the Nos. 7 and 22 picks plus Portis could be enough to get the deal done; Atlanta drafted forward John Collins a year ago but he doesn’t offer much as a pick-and-pop power forward. Portis would give them a solid complement. Then again, Atlanta couldn’t be sure Young would be available at 7, especially considering Orlando is picking No. 6 and has a serious need at the point.

Who would the Bulls be targeting at No. 3 or No. 4? Rumors are everywhere so it’s difficult to pinpoint. Michael Porter Jr. could now go as high as No. 2 to the Sacramento. That would mean international sensation Luka Doncic falls. Marvin Bagley’s name has been quiet for a while, while Jaren Jackson Jr. is having “monster workouts” that have him flying up draft boards. We won’t speculate.

For now just know that trading in to the top 5 is difficult. You need the assets to do it (check), a team with enough talent that moving up will push the franchise forward (check), a willing trade partner (check) and a player you really want (check?). The pieces are there for a potential move-up, but actually pulling the trigger is far more difficult than just writing about it.