Anthony Rizzo: New Cubs leadoff hitter?

Anthony Rizzo: New Cubs leadoff hitter?

Forget Jon Jay.

The Cubs' new leadoff hitter is the team's former No. 3 hitter: Anthony Rizzo.

Rizzo was on David Kaplan's radio show on ESPN 1000 Tuesday morning and said he is leading off in Tuesday's game against the New York Mets:

The Cubs released the lineup a few hours later and Rizzo is, indeed, leading off:

The Cubs have been searching for stability in the leadoff spot all season, as the Kyle Schwarber experiment has not worked out atop the order.

Ben Zobrist was moved into the leadoff spot when Schwarber was bumped down, but Joe Maddon would prefer to have Zobrist provide protection to Rizzo and Kris Bryant in the middle of the order.

Rookie Ian Happ was then moved atop the order, but after a blazing start, he's hit just .143 with a .238 on-base percentage over his last 19 games (63 plate appearances).

Jay spent the last two games leading off but Maddon also likes deploying the veteran outfielder off the bench. Plus, every start Jay makes means either Happ or Schwarber are on the bench and Maddon wants to keep giving those young guys opportunities to bust out of their slumps.

Rizzo has never led off in his career, but did campaign for a chance to lead off in spring training 2015

From strictly an OBP perspective, Rizzo makes sense as the leadoff hitter, as he currently sports a .390 on-base percentage despite only a .249 average. He is on pace for 105 walks and only 80 strikeouts.

The Cubs' offensive woes are not just related to the leadoff spot. They're last in baseball with a .214 batting average with runners in scoring position, eight points lower than the next closest team (Cleveland Indians - .222). The MLB average with RISP is .258.

Hey, who said the Cubs were out of buttons to press?

MLB commissioner Rob Manfred: 'We weren’t going to play more than 60 games'

MLB commissioner Rob Manfred: 'We weren’t going to play more than 60 games'

MLB commissioner Rob Manfred made an interesting revelation Wednesday about negotiations between MLB and the players union. In an interview with Dan Patrick, Manfred said the 2020 season was never going to be more than 60 games given the spread of the coronavirus — at least by the time they got to serious negotiations two weeks ago.

“The reality is we weren’t going to play more than 60 games, no matter how the negotiation with the players went, or any other factor," Manfred said on The Dan Patrick Show. "Sixty games is outside the envelope given the realities of the virus. I think this is the one thing that we come back to every single day: We’re trying to manage something that has proven to be unpredictable and unmanageable.

"I know it hasn’t looked particularly pretty in spots, but having said that, if we can pull off this 60-game season, I think it was the best we were gonna do for our fans given the course of the virus."

Click to download the MyTeams App for the latest Cubs news and analysis.

Manfred unilaterally imposed a 60-game season after the two sides couldn't come to terms. The union rejected the owners' final proposal, retaining the right to file a grievance against the owners for not negotiating in good faith.

Whether Manfred's comments become a point of contention in any grievance the players might file is unclear. The league would likely argue Manfred was referring to negotiations after his face-to-face meeting with MLBPA executive director Tony Clark on June 16. Manfred's comments to Patrick's follow up question — if the league would have been willing to go to 80 games, had the players agreed to all their terms — also points to this.

"It’s the calendar, Dan. We’re playing 60 games in 63 days. I don’t see — given the reality of the health situation over the past few weeks — how we were gonna get going any faster than the calendar we’re on right now, no matter what the state of those negotiations were.

"Look, we did get a sub-optimal result from the negotiation in some ways. The fans aren’t gonna get an expanded postseason, which I think would have been good with the shortened season. The players left real money on the table. But that’s what happens when you have a negotiation that instead of being collaborative, gets into sort of a conflict situation.”

The players' final proposal called for a 70-game season. At this point in the calendar, 60 games in 69 days (Sept. 27 is the reported end date for the regular season) leaves room for a couple more games, not 70 (or more).

So, Manfred's right that 60 games on the current timetable was probably the most MLB can fit in amid the pandemic. But you have to wonder if the union will use those comments in a potential grievance. 


Cubs fan base named second most loyal in MLB, only trailing Red Sox

Cubs fan base named second most loyal in MLB, only trailing Red Sox

When you wait more than 100 years for a championship, you must maintain a strong sense of loyalty to your favorite team. 

Cubs fans have done that, supporting the club through thick and thin, from the mediocre years to the curse-breaking 2016 World Series season. They pack the Wrigley Field stands, consistently ranking in the top 10 in attendance season after season.

That devotion led to Forbes naming Cubs fans the second most loyal fan base in Major League Baseball, second to only the Red Sox.

Click to download the MyTeams App for the latest Cubs news and analysis.

Per Forbes, the rankings are based on "local television ratings (per Nielsen), stadium attendance based on capacity reached, secondary ticket demand (per StubHub), merchandise sales (per Fanatics), social media reach (Facebook and Twitter followers based on the team’s metro area population) and hometown crowd reach (defined by Nielsen as a percentage of the metropolitan area population that watched, attended and/or listened to a game in the last year)."

All that science aside, does the 108-year wait for a championship warrant the Cubs being first on this list? In fairness, the Red Sox waited 86 years before winning the 2004 World Series, their first since 1918. Plus, in terms of attendance, the Cubs have only out-drawn the Red Sox in six of the past 10 seasons, a near-equal split.

Two historic clubs. Two historic ballparks. Two historic championships. In a loyalty ranking, you can't go wrong with either franchise. Here's how the list's top 10 panned out:

10. Braves
9. Phillies
8. Indians
7. Giants
6. Brewers
5. Dodgers
4. Yankees
3. Cardinals
2. Cubs
1. Red Sox