Cubs

Cubs: Does Kyle Schwarber have a future at catcher?

Cubs: Does Kyle Schwarber have a future at catcher?

MESA, Ariz. – Of course, Kyle Schwarber’s run-through-a-brick-wall mentality means he wants to be a catcher. That can always be his passion, but the Cubs have to take a more clinical view and try to protect one of their most valuable assets.

As pitchers and catchers formally reported to the Sloan Park complex on Tuesday, Schwarber was scheduled to meet with Dr. Stephen Gryzlo, the team’s orthopaedist. Even if Schwarber gets the green light in that examination – 10 months after he underwent surgery on his left knee to reconstruct his ACL and repair his LCL – the Cubs will still proceed with caution.

“We’re not going to give him too much,” team president Theo Epstein said. “His future is too valuable. We want him to have the longest possible career. He makes such a great impact on us with his bat – and with the person that he is – that we don’t want to do anything to jeopardize the length and impact of his career.

“We’re just going to walk before we run. Or walk before we squat, I guess, would be the appropriate thing to say with catching, and just really, really ease into it.”

It sounds like the ideal would be Schwarber leaving Arizona as a viable third catcher for manager Joe Maddon – more in case of emergency than as part of a rotation with Willson Contreras and Miguel Montero. 

“If he’s medically cleared today to start introducing some catching, as we expect him to be, we’re going to really go slow with it,” Epstein said. “Like one or two days a week in spring training. That’s it. His primary focus is going to be as a left fielder.

“The goal, if he is cleared, would be to have him ready potentially at the end of spring training to fill that role of third catcher, so if there’s something that happens in-game, Joe can move him back there, or if there’s a certain rare occasion where it makes sense for him to start a game behind the plate.”

[SHOP CUBS: Get your Cubs gear right here]

The Cubs are committed to Contreras as their everyday catcher of the present and the future, with Maddon essentially saying Montero will be a $14 million backup who might start only once or twice a week. Schwarber – a gym rat who worked on scouting reports, broke down video and sat in the draft room during his rehab last year – will meet with the catching group each morning.

“He will be there thinking through the drills with the catchers,” Epstein said, “communicating with the catchers, being a catcher. But physically only probably doing it one or two days a week.”

Schwarber, who will play with a brace on his left leg all season, showed how much he needed spring training by wrecking his knee in an outfield collision in Game 3 last April and making a shocking return as the World Series designated hitter, hitting .412 with a .971 OPS against the Cleveland Indians. 

“We all know what he did in the World Series last year,” Maddon said. “People are going to look at that and base their entire Schwarber world around those last two games. But he’s still coming off a really significant injury and we have to be very careful with that.

“I would like to see him be able to play an entire season. It would be kind of nice to get a full season of Kyle Schwarber in Major League Baseball.”

MLB commissioner Rob Manfred: 'We weren’t going to play more than 60 games'

MLB commissioner Rob Manfred: 'We weren’t going to play more than 60 games'

MLB commissioner Rob Manfred made an interesting revelation Wednesday about negotiations between MLB and the players union. In an interview with Dan Patrick, Manfred said the 2020 season was never going to be more than 60 games given the spread of the coronavirus — at least by the time they got to serious negotiations two weeks ago.

“The reality is we weren’t going to play more than 60 games, no matter how the negotiation with the players went, or any other factor," Manfred said on The Dan Patrick Show. "Sixty games is outside the envelope given the realities of the virus. I think this is the one thing that we come back to every single day: We’re trying to manage something that has proven to be unpredictable and unmanageable.

"I know it hasn’t looked particularly pretty in spots, but having said that, if we can pull off this 60-game season, I think it was the best we were gonna do for our fans given the course of the virus."

Click to download the MyTeams App for the latest Cubs news and analysis.

Manfred unilaterally imposed a 60-game season after the two sides couldn't come to terms. The union rejected the owners' final proposal, retaining the right to file a grievance against the owners for not negotiating in good faith.

Whether Manfred's comments become a point of contention in any grievance the players might file is unclear. The league would likely argue Manfred was referring to negotiations after his face-to-face meeting with MLBPA executive director Tony Clark on June 16. Manfred's comments to Patrick's follow up question — if the league would have been willing to go to 80 games, had the players agreed to all their terms — also points to this.

"It’s the calendar, Dan. We’re playing 60 games in 63 days. I don’t see — given the reality of the health situation over the past few weeks — how we were gonna get going any faster than the calendar we’re on right now, no matter what the state of those negotiations were.

"Look, we did get a sub-optimal result from the negotiation in some ways. The fans aren’t gonna get an expanded postseason, which I think would have been good with the shortened season. The players left real money on the table. But that’s what happens when you have a negotiation that instead of being collaborative, gets into sort of a conflict situation.”

The players' final proposal called for a 70-game season. At this point in the calendar, 60 games in 69 days (Sept. 27 is the reported end date for the regular season) leaves room for a couple more games, not 70 (or more).

So, Manfred's right that 60 games on the current timetable was probably the most MLB can fit in amid the pandemic. But you have to wonder if the union will use those comments in a potential grievance. 

SUBSCRIBE TO THE CUBS TALK PODCAST FOR FREE.

Cubs fan base named second most loyal in MLB, only trailing Red Sox

Cubs fan base named second most loyal in MLB, only trailing Red Sox

When you wait more than 100 years for a championship, you must maintain a strong sense of loyalty to your favorite team. 

Cubs fans have done that, supporting the club through thick and thin, from the mediocre years to the curse-breaking 2016 World Series season. They pack the Wrigley Field stands, consistently ranking in the top 10 in attendance season after season.

That devotion led to Forbes naming Cubs fans the second most loyal fan base in Major League Baseball, second to only the Red Sox.

Click to download the MyTeams App for the latest Cubs news and analysis.

Per Forbes, the rankings are based on "local television ratings (per Nielsen), stadium attendance based on capacity reached, secondary ticket demand (per StubHub), merchandise sales (per Fanatics), social media reach (Facebook and Twitter followers based on the team’s metro area population) and hometown crowd reach (defined by Nielsen as a percentage of the metropolitan area population that watched, attended and/or listened to a game in the last year)."

All that science aside, does the 108-year wait for a championship warrant the Cubs being first on this list? In fairness, the Red Sox waited 86 years before winning the 2004 World Series, their first since 1918. Plus, in terms of attendance, the Cubs have only out-drawn the Red Sox in six of the past 10 seasons, a near-equal split.

Two historic clubs. Two historic ballparks. Two historic championships. In a loyalty ranking, you can't go wrong with either franchise. Here's how the list's top 10 panned out:

10. Braves
9. Phillies
8. Indians
7. Giants
6. Brewers
5. Dodgers
4. Yankees
3. Cardinals
2. Cubs
1. Red Sox

SUBSCRIBE TO THE CUBS TALK PODCAST FOR FREE.