Cubs

Rockies could have Cubs bench coach Dave Martinez on their radar

Rockies could have Cubs bench coach Dave Martinez on their radar

Cubs bench coach Dave Martinez hasn’t heard anything directly from the Colorado Rockies – and didn’t know about his name being linked to their manager’s job until a reporter mentioned it to him before Sunday night’s World Series Game 5 at Wrigley Field.

“The only thing I’m concerned about is today,” Martinez said. “I haven’t heard a word.”

That could be Colorado – as a professional courtesy – waiting to see what happens between the Cubs and Cleveland Indians. Jon Heyman of FanRag Sports and MLB Network identified Martinez and Cleveland coaches Brad Mills and Sandy Alomar Jr. as among those expected to be on the Rockies’ radar after they forced out Walt Weiss (283-365 record in four seasons).        

Martinez has been Joe Maddon’s bench coach for nine years, beginning with the Tampa Bay Rays shocking the baseball world and reaching the 2008 World Series. Martinez understands how to develop young talent and apply statistical analysis and possesses the instant credibility that comes from playing 16 seasons in the big leagues.

Martinez does the bad-cop routine so Maddon doesn’t have to – and still helps spread the manager’s good-vibes, be-yourself message through dress-up trips and Party Room celebrations. Over the years, he has already interviewed for managerial jobs with the Cubs, Indians, Rays, Los Angeles Dodgers, Washington Nationals and Toronto Blue Jays.

“Davey’s not afraid to have the tough conversation,” Maddon said. “His job is to be the conduit, the liaison, whatever, between this office and the rest of the clubhouse and to really put out the fires before they ever get here.

“So when a guy does the bench-coaching thing properly, I absolutely believe that it helps set him up to become a manager.”

After winning 103 games and the franchise’s first National League pennant in 71 years, Maddon expects the entire coaching staff to be invited back for next season, though the manager hasn’t specifically discussed that topic in depth with team president Theo Epstein yet.

[SHOP: Buy a "Try Not to Suck" shirt with proceeds benefiting Joe Maddon's Respect 90 Foundation & other Cubs Charities]

Martinez never played in a postseason game with the franchise that originally drafted him in 1983 – and now seems positioned to become an October fixture for years to come.

“It’s a surreal feeling,” Martinez said. “To see this organization come from (where it was) when I was here in the 80s to what it is now – it’s unbelievable. I have nothing but admiration for this group of guys, the way they go out and play every day. They never quit. They’re relentless. They come out and they play hard every single day. That’s all you can ask.”

Nolan Arenado would ‘love’ to play for Cubs, should Rockies move him

arenado-226.jpg
USA TODAY

Nolan Arenado would ‘love’ to play for Cubs, should Rockies move him

The outcome of Kris Bryant’s service time grievance is in, with an MLB arbitrator ruling in favor of the Cubs. With Bryant losing the grievance, the club can move forward with potential trade talks, now knowing their star third baseman has two more years of club control and therefore more value.

One deal that has reportedly been discussed, at least in earnest, is a one-for-one that would send Bryant to Colorado in exchange for Rockies third baseman Nolan Arenado.

Shortly after breaking the result of Bryant’s grievance, ESPN’s Jeff Passan appeared on NBC Sports Chicago’s David Kaplan’s radio show. Kaplan proposed a trade that would send Bryant, Jason Heyward, Willson Contreras and a prospect to the Rockies for superstar third baseman Nolan Arenado.

According to Passan, the Rockies would hang up the phone if the Cubs offered that package. However, he made one thing certain: Arenado would love to play for the Cubs.

“I don’t think they are at the top of the list right now, even though Nolan Arenado would love to come and play in Chicago,” Passan said of the Cubs. “And I mean he would love it.”

The difficulty of adding Arenado for Bryant straight up is it doesn’t shed any salary, one of the Cubs’ offseason objectives. Arenado is owed $234M through 2026 and $35 million annually through 2024. Bryant will make $18.6 million in 2020.

Kaplan’s proposal would shed salary, though as Passan said, Heyward’s $86 million — or even half of it — would be too much for Colorado. Passan said a more likely scenario is the same deal but including Tyler Chatwood ($13 million salary in 2020) rather than Heyward.

The financial gymnastics of a Bryant-Arenado swap will make a deal difficult to achieve. If Arenado grows increasingly disgruntled with the Rockies, perhaps a trade becomes more likely.

Trading Kris Bryant for Mookie Betts solves literally nothing but it absolutely needs to happen

0909_mookie_betts_jd_martinez.jpg
USA TODAY

Trading Kris Bryant for Mookie Betts solves literally nothing but it absolutely needs to happen

Kris Bryant lost his grievance case this morning, which was a big win for the Cubs. Congrats on further alienating one of your best players! Any time you get the chance to ruin your relationship with the only player to ever win the Golden Spikes, Minor League Player of the Year, Rookie of the Year, and MVP in consecutive years, you've just gotta. Take THAT, Scott Boras! 

So what happens next? Given the Cubs' track record this offseason, probably absolutely nothing – but that doesn't make for an interesting article. So here's my idea, and friends, it is dumb: 

The Cubs and the Red Sox are sort of in the same position regarding these two. Both front offices are sufficiently spooked by the idea of market value, which means both players have found themselves fully wrapped up in the trade rumor mill. So why not trade them for one another? (this is rhetorical please stop yelling) Cubs fans deserve something this offseason besides shrewd minor league contracts. 

Here's the Cubs' logic/common sense in general: Mookie Betts is probably the best position player in baseball not named Mike Trout. He's coming off a "down" year in which he posted a 135 wRC+, which was only the 23rd best mark in 2019. What value! He was roughly a 6-win (6.6 fWAR) player in 2019. To put that in perspective, Kyle Schwarber, Nick Castellanos, and Jason Heyward were worth 6.5 wins combined. All of Statcast's fancy numbers say that Betts was basically the same as Heyward in right field last year, too. So Betts, at least last year, was quite literally a combination of Jason Heyward's glove and Kris Bryant's bat (135 wRC+). They're clearly itching to stop paying both of them, a bill that'll end up costing them about $41 million this season; Betts will run the Sox $27 million. Getting the same amount of production for $14 million is quite literally the Ricketts' dream.

There are lots of problems. That move, in a vacuum, would get the Cubs under the luxury tax – but just barely. It'd require the Red Sox, who are ALSO looking to get under the luxury tax (being a big market team is just such a burden), to probably take on an albatross of a contract that prevents them from that. The Sox also have Rafael Devers at third, and just brought Mitch Moreland back to handle first base. Jackie Bradley Jr. and Andrew Benintendi are by no means blocking Bryant from those spots, but the organization specifically brought new GM Chaim Bloom on to avoid these types of deals. 

Both teams would want prospects, too. Neither farm systems are particularly flush with established talent at the moment, but there's actually a lowkey-fun fit there. The Red Sox system's Top-10 is RHP-heavy, which has been the bane of Chicago's existence. There's quietly more upside in the Cubs' minors than they get credit for, so maybe that's a starting point? The Cubs get some righties for The Pitch Lab, and the Sox get some high-ceiling guys that can help better fill out their Top-10. 

To be clear, this won't happen. Bryant-for-Betts doesn't make nearly as much sense as, say, Bryant-for-Arenado might, and trading for Betts would mean shedding even more salary than they already have. But it'd be FUN, and that's something that Cubs baseball could undoubtedly use. I told you guys this was dumb. There's a reason no one liked the Tweet.