White Sox

Adam Eaton's walk-off homer lifts White Sox to win over Blue Jays

eaton-sox-walkoff-insider-0708.png

Adam Eaton's walk-off homer lifts White Sox to win over Blue Jays

The way Will Ferrell debated in ‘Old School’ is how Adam Eaton described his walk-off home run on Wednesday night.

“I blacked out,” Eaton said.

Eaton said he intentionally swung for the fences when he led off the 11th inning and his solo shot off Roberto Osuna propelled the White Sox to a 7-6 victory over the Toronto Blue Jays in front of 17,032 at U.S. Cellular Field.

The second walk-off of Eaton’s career helped the White Sox to their sixth win in eight tries as the offense finally broke out of a long slumber at home. The White Sox finished with 16 hits and snapped a franchise-record streak at 24 straight home games with four or fewer runs scored, a stretch that dated back to May 9.

“I thought the next one was going to be a heater,” Eaton said of a 1-0 pitch that resulted in his sixth homer. “I have to admit that was the first time I tried to hit a homer, and for some reason, I don’t know, I blacked out. But it happened to work out well.”

[SHOP: Buy an Adam Eaton jersey]

Eaton’s walk-off homer was the first by a White Sox leadoff man since Scott Podsednik ended Game 2 of the 2005 World Series with a ninth-inning solo homer off Houston’s Brad Lidge.

The 362-foot drive is as rare as the night it ended for the White Sox offense.

A group that has languished for 81 games, averaging 3.41 runs per contest, got going early with three first-inning runs against Toronto starter Drew Hutchison. Melky Cabrera had a sacrifice fly and Adam LaRoche doubled in two more to give the White Sox a 3-0 lead.

“We are putting a dent in that first-inning deficit,” White Sox manager Robin Ventura joked. “Guys were swinging it and it’s nice to see.”

Avisail Garcia, who had a season-high four hits, singled in a run in the third inning to tie the score at four after Jose Abreu reached on a gift, one-out double when center fielder Kevin Pillar lost track of a routine flyball.

The White Sox also battled back from a 6-4 deficit in the sixth inning, all with two outs. LaRoche, who had two hits and a walk, and Alexei Ramirez both singled to start the inning. Carlos Sanchez’s single to left scored LaRoche to make it a one-run game before Eaton’s infield RBI single tied it.

[ALSO: White Sox in wait-and-see mode heading into trade deadline]

John Danks couldn’t make the early lead hold up against a powerful Blue Jays lineup that chased him from the game by the fifth inning.

Down 3-0, Toronto started the third inning with five straight hits to tie the game. Danks’ own misplay led to the third hit, an infield single by Devon Travis, as the pitcher failed to cover first base on a grounder to LaRoche. Jose Reyes then singled in two runs to make it a 3-2 game and Josh Donaldson doubled in a run. Edwin Encarnacion’s sac fly gave the Blue Jays a 4-3 lead.

Two innings later, Donaldson had a one-out RBI double and Jose Bautista singled to make it 6-4.

But the offense and bullpen came through for Danks, who allowed six earned runs over 4 1/3 innings.

Scott Carroll stranded a pair of runners for Danks with a strikeout of Encarnacion and a Chris Colabello groundout. Carroll pitched 2 2/3 scoreless innings, striking out three.

Zach Duke pitched two scoreless innings. David Robertson and Zach Putnam (3-3) each had one for the White Sox.

“The offense picked us up,” Danks said. “Picked me up. We showed up to the ballpark trying to win a ballgame and we did that. It wasn’t pretty but a win is a win and we’ll take that.”

Eaton reached base four times in six trips to the plate. Similar to the way Ferrell couldn’t recall how he bested James Carville, Eaton had few details on the point of impact.

He didn’t, however, have as much difficulty remembering his thoughts as he raced around the bases.

“Holy you know what,” Eaton said. “Very exciting. I had one in Arizona, as well. They’re very special.”

Let's compare birthday boy Dan Pasqua to Daniel Palka

1017_dan_pasqua.jpg
GOOGLE IMAGES

Let's compare birthday boy Dan Pasqua to Daniel Palka

Daniel Palka was a phenomenon in 2018. But before there was Daniel Palka, there was Dan Pasqua. You might have heard the Palka/Pasqua comparisons on White Sox game broadcasts or within White Sox fan circles. Both are lefty sluggers with a similar build: Palka listed at 6-foot-2 and 220 pounds, Pasqua at 6-foot-0 and 203 ppounds. Both led the White Sox in home runs in their age-26 seasons: Pasqua with 20 in 1988, Palka with 27 in 2018. And hey, they have the same first name and last initial!

Pasqua, nicknamed “The Hammer,” turned 57 years old Wednesday. Let’s learn a few more things about him.

— He was a teammate of John Elway (for four games with Oneonta of the New York-Pennsylvania League in 1982), Bo Jackson (with the White Sox from 1991 to 1993) and Michael Jordan (for four games with Birmingham of the Southern League in 1994).

— He was the 1985 International League MVP with the Columbus Clippers.

— He homered in his MLB debut on May 30, 1985, with the Yankees

— He was Sports Illustrated’s 1987 preseason pick to lead the American League in home runs. He finished with 17, only 32 behind Mark McGwire.

— He hit a Comiskey Park roof shot on May 30, 1989.

— He hit the last triple (and had the last RBI) in Comiskey Park history on Sept. 30, 1990.

— He hit a 484-foot home run, the third-longest by a White Sox player in Guaranteed Rate Field history, on April 27, 1991.

— He finished his MLB career with 117 home runs, tied with all-time great outfielders Ty Cobb, Tris Speaker and Ichiro Suzuki.

And finally, let’s compare Pasqua to Palka statistically. Since Palka had 449 career plate appearances through the end of the 2018 season, here's the duo's numbers through their first 449 career MLB plate appearances.

Could Manny Machado's NLCS shenanigans impact White Sox potential free-agent pursuit?

1017_manny_machado.jpg
USA TODAY

Could Manny Machado's NLCS shenanigans impact White Sox potential free-agent pursuit?

"It's a dirty play by a dirty player."

That was Christian Yelich, the all-but-sure-to-be NL MVP, describing Manny Machado, who's about to become one of the best-paid players in baseball history, after Game 4 of the NLCS, a game in which Machado once again grabbed headlines for all the wrong reasons.

Machado's Los Angeles Dodgers and Yelich's Milwaukee Brewers have played four games in this NLCS, and after three of them, the focus has been on Machado. Not because of his bat or his glove but because of lack of hustle and certain methods on the base paths that weren't exactly on the up and up.

After Game 2, he was criticized for not hustling on a ground ball to shortstop. In something straight out of a public-relations person's nightmare, he defended himself by saying that hustling really isn't his cup of tea. During Game 3, he twice attempted to break up double plays by interfering at second base and was, upon review, busted for it the second time. In extra innings in Game 4, he appeared to intentionally drag his leg across Jesus Aguilar's at first base. That play cleared the benches, got Machado called "dirty" in the Brewers' clubhouse and earned him the reputation of postseason villain.

And so Machado's impending free agency gets to be discussed in a brand new light. There's now more baggage attached to the 26-year-old superstar with a fantastic bat and a stellar glove.

The question is: Will the White Sox, one of many teams that could be mulling a contract offer worth hundreds of millions of dollars, care?

As much as it’s talked about building a perennial contender of the future by developing the on-field skills of their fleet of highly touted prospects, the White Sox brain trust has discussed developing a culture, a way of doing things, to go along with all that talent and all that skill. Unsurprisingly that conversation has focused on the oft-used phrase of “doing things the right way.”

Does what Machado has been doing count as “doing things the right way”? It seems easy to assess that it doesn't. It's far more difficult to determine whether it will end up making a difference or not.

Not hustling is one of Rick Renteria's biggest bugaboos. He sat down multiple players on multiple occasions throughout the 2018 season — starting with Avisail Garcia in a spring training game and including a veteran like Welington Castillo as well as a young star like Tim Anderson — for not running to first base on pop ups and line outs and ground outs. Would Renteria's tune suddenly change if Machado and his preference for not hustling arrived on the South Side in what would surely be the biggest free-agent deal in club history?

Renteria got fired up over the issue at the end of July, when he benched Anderson for not hustling on what the shortstop believed was a line out.

“We tell these guys, don’t assume anything. ... It’s as simple as that, and he understands it. He knows it. We’ve talked about it. He comes out of the box, he doesn’t stand there. But we just reiterated to make sure that you allow the umpires to make the calls and you allow the other clubs to go ahead and ask for reviews. We run.”

But asked about not running out his ground ball in Game 2, Machado shared pretty much the opposite philosophy.

"Obviously I'm not going to change, I'm not the type of player that's going to be 'Johnny Hustle,' and run down the line and slide to first base and … you know, whatever can happen," Machado told The Athletic's Ken Rosenthal. "That's just not my personality, that's not my cup of tea, that's not who I am."

What about Machado's interferences at second base? It was that exact play that sent Anderson into an on-field tiff with umpire Joe West during the second Crosstown series of the season just last month. Javy Baez slid into second base, and Anderson thought Baez did something he shouldn't have, raising his arm to interfere with a double-play turn, that sequence of events ending with Anderson screaming at West on the field. Would Anderson be cool with playing alongside — and potentially vacating his position at shortstop for — an infamous interferer?

And what about being a "dirty player," a villain? The White Sox always seemed fine — heck, they loved it — having one of baseball's greatest irritants in A.J. Pierzynski on the roster. Perhaps no player wore the "villain" title as a badge of honor more than the catcher on the 2005 World Series team. But remember that Pierzynski took the punch, he didn't throw it. Being baseball's version of a "villain" and being a guy who makes dangerous plays that could hurt somebody are two different things.

The point being: Do Machado's actions in this postseason series make him anathema to the "Ricky's boys don't quit" mantra? If the White Sox were to turn a blind eye to the events of this NLCS, would it qualify as a betrayal of their quest to establish a high-effort, high-character culture?

Or do they value that culture so much that they stay away from Machado this offseason?

Here's Rick Hahn from September of last year.

"It’s the culture that Ricky and his coaching staff have been able to create in that clubhouse. I cannot tell you how many various fans have stopped me, or emailed me or mentioned to me that they’ve never been this excited over a 60-win team. Or they’ve never been excited about a team that isn’t going to the playoffs. And I think so much of that is based on how Ricky and the coaches have them playing day in and day out. You see them fighting for 27 outs, you see them prepared every night. Sure, we’re going to get out-manned at portions during this process, but the fight and competitiveness and the style of play is the kind of thing that is going to endure year in and year out. And that is extremely important for us to establish at the big league level for all of us."

Machado's talent would make any team he's a part of more competitive. But for the White Sox, who talk an awful lot about hustling and refusing to quit, perhaps all these postseason shenanigans make it so Machado just isn't their cup of tea.