Chicago Bears

Is Kyle Fuller the Bears' best 1st-round pick since 2010?

Is Kyle Fuller the Bears' best 1st-round pick since 2010?

The 2020 NFL draft is quickly approaching, and unfortunately for Bears fans, it'll mark the second year in a row that Chicago will be without a first-round pick. Then again, that's the price a team must pay to land a generational talent like Khalil Mack.

Still, the draft is more fun when the Bears have a first-rounder. 

But that fun has more often than not quickly turned into disappointment. Chicago's first-round success rate hasn't been very good, especially over the last 10 years.

Here's Chicago's first-round breakdown over the last decade:

2010: NONE
2011: Gabe Carimi (OL, Wisconsin)
2012: Shea McClellin (Edge, Boise State)
2013: Kyle Long (OL, Oregon)
2014: Kyle Fuller (CB, Virginia Tech)
2015: Kevin White (WR, Va Tech)
2016: Leonard Floyd (Edge, Georgia)
2017: Mitch Trubisky (QB, UNC)
2018: Roquan Smith (LB, Georgia)
2019: NONE

First, let's look at the obvious problem: Two of the last 10 drafts resulted in zero first-round picks. Not great. 

Of the remaining eight picks, five are no longer with the team (Carimi, McClellin, Long, White, and Floyd). While Long was a solid starter during his tenure in Chicago, Carimi, McClellin, White, and Floyd were downright busts.

Then there's Trubisky, who might be the most important first-round selection in franchise history. His career is on life support after the Bears traded for Nick Foles this offseason. He's trending in the wrong direction.

Smith, who's flashed elite playmaking upside during his first two seasons in the league, had some bizarre off-field issues in 2019 that impacted his growth as a starter last year. His arrow is still pointing up, but he has to prove he can be relied on for 16 games.

That leaves Fuller, who was recently dubbed the Bears' best first-round pick of the last decade.

Since being drafted 14th overall in 2014, Fuller has been a starter at corner from nearly day one. With the exception of a 2016 season wiped out by a knee injury, Fuller has started all but two games over five years.

The 28-year-old has 18 career interceptions, including seven in 2018 (which tied for the NFL lead). In each of the past two seasons, the former Virginia Tech standout has been named to the Pro Bowl

It's a fair assessment of Fuller's impact, especially when compared to the rest of his first-round brethren. Chicago's failure to hit on first-round picks has been a big reason why they've struggled to sustain success in recent years and will continue to be why they won't be taken seriously as a Super Bowl contender.

The Bears' first selection in the 2020 NFL draft won't come until the second round, No. 43 overall, but with two picks in the top 50, Pace has a chance to add two impact players to a roster that isn't far away from competing for an NFC North title.

    Kyle Long anxious for 'true' QB competition with Nick Foles, Mitch Trubisky

    Kyle Long anxious for 'true' QB competition with Nick Foles, Mitch Trubisky

    Former Bears offensive lineman Kyle Long knows Mitchell Trubisky very well. They were teammates for the last three years in Chicago. 

    But even Long is anxious to see how the Bears quarterback will respond after general manger Ryan Pace traded for Nick Foles last month.

    “I've never seen Mitch Trubisky in at true, true, true quarterback competition,” Long told NBC Sports Chicago this week. "And if that's what they're going to brand this thing as, then I hope to see that really happen."

    Foles has the trust of the coaching staff, having played for head coach Matt Nagy, offensive coordinator Bill Lazor and quarterbacks coach John DeFilippo in the past. And for that reason, many people are doubting Trubisky’s chances of actually winning the QB competition.

    “If they're bringing in a guy to take his position from Day 1, so be it, but let's not up and say it, so we're clear,” Long said. “It's like being in a relationship with somebody. You set boundaries, you communicate, and that's how you understand. But if you've got two guys competing, and that's a true competition, I'm anxious to see what Mitch is going to respond like.”

    That seems to be the big question. As Long said, Trubisky has never really been threatened for his job ever since he took it from Mike Glennon in 2017. And no one is really doubting how Foles (who played with Long’s brother, Chris, in Philadelphia) will handle the situation.

    “We all know how Nick will be. He's going to be Nick Foles,” Long said. “(Chris) says he's a great competitor. A winner. Obviously a Super Bowl champion. A really good guy. He likes Nick a lot.”

    And like many fans, Long was happy to see a move at quarterback, even if it meant a competition for his friend and former teammate.

    “Kudos to the Bears for making a move and shutting some people up in Chicago,” he said. 

    Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of the Bears.

    Catching up with Allen Robinson about QB competitions, CBA complaints, and COVID-19

    Catching up with Allen Robinson about QB competitions, CBA complaints, and COVID-19

    Even while quarantined, there's a lot going on in Allen Robinson's life right now. While dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic, the Bears' star receiver is also in the middle of contract extension talks with a team that also just so happened to trade for another quarterback. On Thursday afternoon, Robinson chatted with NBC Sports Chicago about all that's been going on during one of the most unique – not to mention challenging – offseasons in football's history:

    So, how easy is it to follow your normal offseason routine while being quarantined? 
    You know, it’s easy to follow some of it. The biggest thing is not getting as much running in as I’d like to get in, but for the most part, lifting wise, and some of the plyometric things, are what I’ve been able to do. 

    Where were you when you heard about Nick Foles?
    I was actually in New York, and I was quarantined there. I ended up driving back to Chicago. Free agency time is always so tough because you have players going out and players coming in, so you lose some of the teammates that you had and that you’ve played with for an extended period of time. Guys like Taylor Gabriel, Prince Amukamara, Nick Kwiatkoski – guys that I’ve played with for a couple of years and really got to grow with and bond with. When you lose guys like that, it’s always tough. 

    For me, hearing about Nick from some of my teammates from Jacksonville, it’s been nothing but positive things about him, and Jimmy Graham. It should be exciting to get those guys in a locker room to just try and continue to improve our winning culture. 

    It seems like there's a quarterback competition coming to Halas Hall in 2020. How often does a WR room feel any ripple effects from that competition? 
    I think as a receiver, you can’t let it have too much validity on everything. At the end of the day, you’ve got to go out there. No matter who’s throwing the ball, you’ve got to make sure that you’re doing what you’re supposed to. I think if you continue to put yourself in the right position and the right place timing wise, whatever the assignment is for you, I think everything plays out fine. I don’t think you can wrap too much into this or that – whoever’s throwing the ball, you just have to go out there and do your job. 

    It’s also easy to see a world where the Bears don’t publicly name a starter any time soon. In the locker room, though, do players expect more clarity than that? 
    That’s tough to say. Honestly, for me, I haven’t truly been a part of that. I don’t foresee it being like that. I think everybody understands. Especially for us, with our team, we have a lot of vets in our locker room. So everybody understands the football side and the football aspect of it. I think at the end of the day, I think guys are just going to go out there and do their thing. Everything else is up to the coaches. That’s their decision to make. For us, we just try and go out and do what we can. I think especially it’s especially important for us because we have a lot of vets, and when you have a lot of vets – guys who have been around the game a while and seen a lot of football – things like that, however they’re handled, don’t really mess with locker room. I think that guys understand that we just want to go out there and win games. So whatever our coaches feel, whatever anybody feels, if it’s going to help us win games than that is what it is. I don’t think that we can wrap our minds and opinions around that too much. 

    You’ve been a vocal critic about the new Collective Bargaining Agreement. What’s your biggest issue with the new deal? 
    I think the biggest issue is that there were a lot of non-negotiables from the other side. That was a big thing. For us, as players, when we sat in different meetings and things like that, everything that we wanted to negotiate was deemed non-negotiable. For us, it didn’t give us a chance to have much of a voice our opinion on anything. Especially with playing more games and things like that, because that’s pretty big. I tell everybody: now that it’s 17 regular season games and an extra playoff game, there will never be 16 games again. In the next CBA, I’m sure the owners will probably propose 20 games, 18 games. You don’t know what that may be. So when you look at that, I figure that’s pretty big because the number of games is only going to continue moving forward. 

    It does seem like a lot of the discussion under-emphasizes the physical cost of expansion. What sort of tolls do you expect even one more game to take on players? 
    It’ll take a lot. I think the biggest thing is people don’t understand that it only takes one game for someone to get hurt. Depending on where a player is in their career – statistically, for a lot of the guys in their first or second year that suffer what’s deemed as season-ending injuries, the chances of playing football that following season are very slim to none. So whenever you get more games involved, the percentage of injuries go up. It’s a game that’s 100% going to have injuries. The more snaps you play, the more chances you have to put yourself at risk and get injured. 

    How closely were you following the negotiations? What was your day-to-day in regards to talking with teammates about it?
    Well I’m not an official team rep or an official PA rep, but for us, they would have guys from the NFLPA come in and talk to the team. Just kind of present different opinions and explain where we were at and different things like that. So for me, I had my opinion. Like I said before, the biggest thing was when I found out that the owners wanted 17 games. The questions I was asking were, “OK, so for us, what can we possibly gain from a 17th game? And the percentage of revenue was already non-negotiable for them. Some of the other things – like not having lifetime healthcare – were also non-negotiable. So there were a lot of things deemed non-negotiable. The only thing that we could possibly negotiate was work hours. I think for us, that would have had to have been a pretty extreme give by the owners. I won’t say my opinion about what should have been proposed work hours wise, training camp, regular season, everything. You know, seeing that we didn’t have much leverage to negotiate anything else – because so much was deemed non-negotiable – we didn’t have much to negotiate on our end. That’s why I think a lot of guys saying no were saying no, because we aren’t negotiating anything. We’re pretty much being given a contract that says either we’re going to sign it or not. The things we wanted to talk about were non-negotiable. 

    Did you ever get a clear explanation of why they were deemed non-negotiable?  
    It was just what the owners wanted. For them, in contract talks for the new CBA, 17 games was non-negotiable. Increasing the revenue north of 48.5 was non-negotiable. Not having lifetime healthcare was non-negotiable, and there were a few other things in there. So when it’s all said and done for us, it wasn’t much that we could talk about. Maybe some benefits here and there, some different things like that, but for the most part, I don’t think it was enough. It wasn’t a true negotiation in my opinion. It was just us kind of being given something and being told, ‘OK, we can maybe benefit a little bit here and a little bit there,’ but it wasn’t us truly negotiating. It wasn’t us coming with a 50-50 kind of agreement. 

    And now we’re not even sure if the NFL will play 16 regular season games in 2020. Do any of the rumored solutions (no fans, single stadium, etc) sound feasible to you? 
    That’s tough to say. And the reason why that’s so tough to say is because I think for us, the first game is in the first week of September, which is an extreme amount of time out. I know they’re projecting that the coronavirus may be back in the fall, so it’s just so hard to project with us having our season out so far. For us, being professional athletes, it’s a little different than it is in college because we really have time off until the beginning of July. Then we have 2 weeks of training camp right into preseason. For us, you’re looking at a time frame of August – I’m not sure how things will be by August, but I’m assuming everyone hopes that we have this thing kind of figured out by then. If we don’t I have absolutely no idea what would be the best course of action. I’m assuming that everyone NFL-wise is predicting and playing out different scenarios as  far as things may go. My overall hope is that we have this thing under control by then.