Cubs

Kyle Schwarber ascending at pivotal point in Cubs season: 'It's as good as I've seen him'

Kyle Schwarber ascending at pivotal point in Cubs season: 'It's as good as I've seen him'

With the division on the line and Javy Baez out of the lineup all week with an injured thumb, the Cubs need all the offense they can get.

The returns of Ben Zobrist and Willson Contreras have helped and Nicholas Castellanos continues to endear himself to Cubs fans with a huge five weeks at the plate.

But Kyle Schwarber has been one of the club's most important hitters, right up there with Castellanos. Since the latter's first game in the Cubs lineup on Aug. 1, their stats are eerily similar:

Castellanos: .343/.372/.708 (1.080 OPS), 13 HR, 25 RBI
Schwarber: .287/.314/.691 (1.082 OPS), 10 HR, 27 RBI

It got to the point where Cubs manager Joe Maddon felt he had to move Schwarber up in the order in Friday's game against the Brewers. That bumped Kris Bryant down to the No. 5 spot in the lineup, where he has not hit all season. Maddon also explained the alternating left-right dynamic came into play, in that he wanted to make things tougher on the Brewers bullpen by ensuring lefties like Schwarber and Anthony Rizzo weren't back-to-back.

The results weren't what the Cubs wanted, as Castellanos provided the only offense with a solo homer in a 7-1 loss. Schwarber didn't collect a hit in four trips to the plate and the Cubs didn't even have a hit in the final six innings of the game after Castellanos' third-inning blast.

The bump up in the order came a day after Schwarber doubled, walked and hit an absolutely monstrous grand slam off Brewers reliever Drew Pomeranz:

"It's real. That was real tonight," Maddon said Thursday. "That's a tough lefty and that ball was beyond properly struck. The back wall's not there, that's somewhere over, shoot, I don't know, what's on the other side of the lake? That ball was kilt. It was k-i-l-t. It was kilt. And that's against an elevated fastball and if they can't go there no more, heads up."

It was apparently the highest pitch Schwarber ever hit for a homer and historically, he's had trouble laying off balls above the strike zone and doing damage on pitches at the top of the zone.

What's more is the grand slam came against a left-handed pitcher. Over his career, Schwarber has performed significantly worse against southpaws (.671 OPS vs. .860 OPS), but with his recent resurgence, he has become more of a neutral splits guy.

His season splits after Thursday's game:

vs. LHP: .236/.327/.494 (.821 OPS)
vs. RHP: .240/.333/.532 (.865 OPS)

"I think it's confidence, but I also think it's a better physical approach at the plate," Maddon said. "He's done a lot of nice things with the swing. It's a much more controlled swing — hands-ier, stay behind the ball. If he maintains what he's doing right now for the next several years, it's gonna get real dangerous. 

"It's better than it was in the beginning of the year. It's as good as I've seen him approach a thrown baseball and he's had some nice moments. He looks really good to me at the plate right now."

Schwarber acknowledged he feels good at the plate and is simply aiming to consistently hit the ball hard, regardless of whether it's in the air or on the ground or to any specific area of the field. 

In regards to that homer Thursday night, Schwarber said he watched Rizzo's at-bat earlier in the inning against Pomeranz when the Cubs first baseman stayed on top of a high fastball and lined a go-ahead sacrifice fly to right field. 

"I saw Rizz, he was very flat to the ball there," Schwarber said. "That kinda told me, like, hey, be able to stay on top of the ball here. Work on top of it. Great job by Rizz there getting the run in and it kinda hinted to me that that's what I needed to do there."

Schwarber's blast drew rave reviews from his teammates and coaches — Rizzo called it an "incredible swing" — and Maddon firmly believes the Schwarber we saw in April and May of this year would not have hit that same pitch 442 feet into the right-center bleachers.

Count Ben Zobrist among those blown away by Schwarber's improvements, as the veteran sees a different hitter now than the one he saw a few months ago.

"I've seen him before miss those pitches in past years and he was so short and quick to that ball," Zobrist said. "Just really, really impressive watching him the last few games — line drives, but hitting the ball to all fields and taking a pitch like that on a lefty, bases loaded, was really impressive."

How a shortened MLB season could impact the Cubs and White Sox

How a shortened MLB season could impact the Cubs and White Sox

Nothing appears imminent. And the thought of starting as soon as next month seems over-ambitious, if not implausible.

But Major League Baseball on Tuesday acknowledged reported discussions with the players over plans that might include opening the season with all 30 teams playing in Arizona, using spring training stadiums, the Diamondbacks’ Chase Field and possibly other sites.

Various reports suggest these games would not allow fans in attendance, would be staged in quarantine-like conditions (players housed without families at hotels and traveling only to stadiums) and that the season might include electronic strikes zones and doubleheaders with seven-inning games.

Myriad logistical considerations must be resolved before anything close to this is possible, not the least of which involves the establishing of an ability to test frequently and in high volume — along with contingencies to allow for continued league play in the case of a positive test.

But the discussions offer a glimmer of possibility, if not the start of a blueprint, for an actual season this year.

With that in mind, we take a look at how this possible plan for an abbreviated season — along with the recent MLB agreement with players on service time and other financial issues — might impact Chicago’s two baseball teams (beyond the shared advantages of being among the teams with existing infrastructure in Arizona).

Cubs Insider Gordon Wittenmyer and White Sox reporter Vinnie Duber break it down. (And don’t miss their discussion on the subject on the Cubs Talk Podcast.)

What about a shorter season and shorter games in any doubleheaders (assuming added roster spots)?

Gordon: This could work out in favor of the Cubs, who have an aging rotation, a rebuilt, uncertain bullpen and not a lot of proven depth across the entire pitching staff. Lean more on starters knowing they’ll pile up fewer innings over the season? Only seven innings to navigate with a late lead in doubleheader games? And if Jose Quintana’s annual stellar two-month run happens out of the chute, watch out.

Vinnie: Long relief, specifically, could be a concern for the White Sox with few options to rely on while starters build up to full strength. If starters are only going three or four innings early on, will the White Sox have enough to bridge the gap to the back end of the bullpen? The good news with a late start is Michael Kopech and the other pitchers returning from Tommy John surgery that the team figured to be midseason additions could instead be early season additions and provide greater starting depth.

And if they employ electronic strike zones?

Gordon: This already figured to be a boon in waiting for the Cubs, whose two-time starting All-Star catcher has only one nagging flaw in his game: receiving/framing. Eliminate the need to try to steal strikes, and Willson Contreras can use his athletic ability behind the plate any way he wants to better block pitches or to cheat on pop time to gain an even bigger advantage with his big arm. Will it help a starting staff that relies more on command for outs? Maybe. Either way it puts Contreras in position to take his All-Star game to another level.

Vinnie: It would have the opposite effect for the White Sox, who just signed Yasmani Grandal in part because of his elite framing ability. Only two catchers rated higher than Grandal in pitch-framing in 2019, a huge upgrade after James McCann ranked dead last in that category during his All-Star season a year ago. Grandal’s value goes well beyond simply pitch-framing with what he can do both at the plate and behind it. But while robotic umpires have long seemed a matter of when not if, the White Sox might have at least benefited from Grandal’s framing skills for part of his four-year contract. Now? Perhaps none of it.

If luxury tax statuses and penalty phases are frozen for a year, how does that impact a Cubs team that went over the penalty threshold last year and a White Sox team that is positioned well, especially with several projected core players signed to modest long-term extensions?

Gordon: Unlike the Red Sox, the Cubs did not dump salary to reset their luxury-tax liability schedule after last season, which looked good for the Red Sox and not so good for the Cubs two months ago. Now? It puts the Cubs at least in position to kick the can down the road into next winter — like they did last winter — and ride out the wave with this core through whatever amounts to the entirety of this season. That’s a big advantage over the midseason evaluation that might have led to an ugly trade-deadline selloff of at least one or two fan favorites. Would ownership be willing to step up next winter and spend to win in what might be the final year with the likes of Kris Bryant, Javy Baez, Kyle Schwarber and Anthony Rizzo — and the final year of the collective bargaining agreement? That might be the biggest question that arises out of the strange circumstances of this season.

Vinnie: The White Sox face the opposite problem, not trying to cram one last ride into their contention window but waiting at the starting line for the thing to open. Those extensions for Eloy Jimenez, Luis Robert and Yoan Moncada seemed genius moves at the time from a team-control standpoint. Now, one year of the team control on those contracts shrinks and could potentially get lopped off entirely. The White Sox future doesn’t get any less bright, nor does their contention window get significantly smaller. But as Cubs fans well know, one year during that window can make a big difference.

What about the fact that players on 40-man rosters who are still in big-league camps have been assured of service time for lost time on the schedule — including a full season of credit if the season is canceled?

Gordon: Other than the fact it means Kris Bryant doesn’t get screwed by the system a second time (already having lost his grievance over service-time manipulation)? Say hello to Nico Hoerner, Cub fans. Hoerner was expected to open the season at Triple-A Iowa if only because of playing-time concerns and other issues involving some of the other numbers games related to the roster of spring infield candidates. And while service time is only one small part of the equation with the rookie who debuted last fall in emergency duty, the apparent lack of a minor-league season plan, the expanded rosters and the need for more players in Arizona heat all would contribute to making Hoerner a big-league part of this team whenever the season were to start — and making the Cubs a better team in the process.

Vinnie: Allow me to discuss the potentially ridiculous case of Luis Robert, who got a contract extension in January that keeps him under club control through the 2027 season. He’s yet to accrue a single day of major league service time, and if there is no 2020 season, he won’t get any service time this year, either. That chops one full year of team control off the contract, already stinging the White Sox a little. But how about this dispatch from an alternate future? If there is no season in 2020 and the White Sox had opted to pull a Cubs and delay Robert’s debut by a few weeks into the 2021 season, they could have controlled him for as long as they do now for many millions less.

Beyond what the proposed conditions might mean for the rookies, any bold predictions about how this plan might impact others on the roster in a way that might even get into Cy Young or MVP consideration?

Gordon: Two words: Yu. Darvish. The four-time All-Star finished last year with one of the most dominant second halves in the majors, and early indications this spring suggested he was poised to pick up where he left off. But remember, for a guy who has earned four All-Star selections, Darvish has been hard-pressed to put together a full, dominant season for various reasons during seven seasons in the big leagues. He has put together several big halves of seasons. A half-season in 2020 might be built for him — maybe even a Cy Young push.

Vinnie: Not sure if he will end up in the AL Cy Young conversation, but a shortened season would seem to present an opportunity for Michael Kopech and for the White Sox, who would have the ability to use him much differently than they were planning to in a normal season. Kopech is healthy after a year-plus spent recovering from Tommy John surgery, but he still hasn’t thrown more than 134.1 innings in a pro season, the reason the White Sox are cautious about his workload. But with fewer games and fewer innings to throw, Kopech might not start the season in the minors, and workload might not be as big a concern. The worry that he might approach his limit when games got really meaningful in September and maybe October might get thrown out the window, allowing Kopech to not just pitch in those crucial games but perhaps pitch at full go in dominating, fireballing fashion.

Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of your teams and stream the White Sox easily on your device.

Ranking the 9 worst trades in Cubs franchise history

donaldson_thumb.jpg
USA TODAY

Ranking the 9 worst trades in Cubs franchise history

WIth the 2020 MLB schedule potentially being tightened/shortened, it's unknown how the July 31 trade deadline will be affected.

We're nearing the three-year mark of the Cubs swinging a deal with the White Sox for José Quintana. That trade isn't looked back on kindly, but by no means is it the worst in team history. 

Last week, I named the top trades in Cubs franchise history. The club's transaction record through the years isn't perfect, however, as is the case for every team.

With that, here are the nine worst trades the Cubs have made in their history.

9 worst trades in Cubs franchise history

Click here to download the new MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of the Chicago Cubs easily on your device.