Fire

Fire and David Arshakyan mutually terminate contract

arshakyan-1218.jpg
USA TODAY

Fire and David Arshakyan mutually terminate contract

Once heralded as a potential diamond in the rough when he was signed in the summer of 2016, the Chicago Fire and forward David Arshakyan mutually agreed to terminate the Armenian player’s contract on Monday.

Arshakyan was initially signed upon the recommendation of coach Veljko Paunovic, who was credited with identifying the player. He signed on Aug. 3, 2016, less than two weeks before his 22nd birthday, from Lithuanian club FK Trakai.

The 6-foot-4 forward failed to score in nine games, three starts, in 2016 and saw his playing time diminish in 2017. Arshakyan made seven regular season appearances totaling 27 minutes. His 20-minutes sub appearance in the playoff defeat to the New York Red Bulls was his longest appearance of 2017. He finishes his Fire career without scoring a goal.

“I saw a couple of games that he played,” Paunovic said soon after Arshakyan’s arrival in 2016. “I found him very interesting in terms of his soccer qualities. Of course the profile he has, a big guy who can keep the ball, who can score goals, which is most important for a striker. The profile is something what we need.”

When the Fire picked up Arshakyan’s option this offseason it was seen as a surprise, but things have since changed. General manager Nelson Rodriguez gave a direct comment in the club’s press release about the transaction.

“Despite the best efforts of both sides, these past 16 months did not work out as either would have hoped. We wish David the best of luck as he continues his career,” Rodriguez said.

According to a club source, there was no buyout and the move will not make a hit on the Fire’s salary cap. Arshakyan’s departure will free up an international slot and clear up some cap room. He earned $178,850 in guaranteed compensation 2017, according to the MLS Players Union salary numbers.

The Fire are now somewhat thin at forward with Nemanja Nikolic and Luis Solignac the only healthy true forwards on the roster. Solignac players multiple roles in 2017, including playing on the wing. Michael de Leeuw is another option at forward, but is expected to miss the first few months of 2018 after tearing his ACL late in the 2017 regular season. Look for Rodriguez to add a forward, if only for depth, before the new season begins.

Chicago isn't hosting the 2026 World Cup, but fans should still be excited

Chicago isn't hosting the 2026 World Cup, but fans should still be excited

After failing to qualify to play in this summer’s World Cup, the United States’ pain was alleviated on Wednesday morning after earning a joint bid to host the 2026 World Cup.

But why is this bittersweet for Chicagoans?

Even though the World Cup will be hosted by the U.S., Mexico and Canada in eight years, matches will not be played in Chicago.

The city chose not to be one of the potential hosts of the world’s largest sporting event, despite using Soldier Field as a venue for the 1994 World Cup.

One of the reasons could be the low seating capacity of Chicago’s historic stadium. Soldier Field would be the second smallest spot out of any World Cup host option, seating only 61,500. The massive competition also draws enormous crowds, possibly causing logistical concerns for a highly-populated place like Chicago.

Ten out of 17 different cities in the United States will be gifted the opportunity to host 2026 World Cup games. The list includes Cincinnati (Paul Brown Stadium), Kansas City (Arrowhead Stadium) and Nashville (Nissan Stadium), which are the closest domestic locations to Chicago.

The bright side is that fans from the Midwest won’t have to travel very far to see a match. For bigtime soccer fans in the Chicago area, having the chance to attend world-class matches in United States could be exciting enough.

Out of the 80 games taking place in 2026, 60 of them will be located in the United States.

Can this bid with Mexico and Canada at least help the relevancy of U.S. Soccer in the Chicago area?

The U.S. men’s national team missed this year’s World Cup at a very unideal time, just when it seemed like the sport of soccer was gaining more and more popularity in the United States.

Plus, the United States might not even get an automatic bid to play in their own World Cup as hosts.

But becoming a member of the first trio in FIFA history to host the World Cup, coupled with the expanded 48-team field in 2026, could help the United States retain the fans they have across the nation and around Chicago.

The World Cup might not be coming to the Windy City, but Chicagoans will still have something to be excited about in 2026 with games being played right around the corner. If the U.S. can qualify for the upcoming World Cups, having the tournament in North America will be much sweeter.

Until then, the 2018 World Cup kicks off this Thursday night in Russia.

Ever wonder what a Portillo's soccer jersey would look like?

portillos.jpg
@JTHAZZARD

Ever wonder what a Portillo's soccer jersey would look like?

Portillo's has become a staple in the Chicagoland area due to its popular hot dogs, Italian beef sandwiches and now, its soccer jerseys.

OK, maybe one of these does not belong with the others. Regardless, Twitter user @JTHazzard created mock-up soccer jerseys mashing MLS teams and restaurants based in that team's city, and the Portillo's jersey is sweet. 

From the Portillo's logo taking center-stage to the picnic blanket pattern to the discrete Chicago Fire logo, this jersey is absolutely brilliant. The only change this writer would make is including the logo below instead.

Valspar is the current sponsor featured on the Fire's uniforms. If the team ever needs a new sponsor, though, Portillo's would be an excellent replacement.