Union chief Michael Weiner has been making the rounds in Florida, and yesterday he said two things of note. First: stronger penalties may very well be in the offing:
Second, even if that’s what the players want and what ultimately happens, he’s not certain that tougher penalties are the way to go. After noting that baseball’s first time penalty -- 50 games -- is proportionately harsher than that of the other sports, he opines that better policing, rather than sentencing, is the true deterrent to cheating:
Weiner is not an ideologue, so if the players want tougher penalties, tougher penalties are going to happen.
I agree, however, with the idea that better policing is more effective than stronger punishment in deterring bad acts. We’ll see how the policing stuff works this year when increased testing -- including the institution of a blood test for HGH and the cataloging of testosterone baselines for players -- is implemented.
My guess, though: the necessarily greater number of suspensions from the enhanced testing will cause people to think that the drug problem is getting worse (as opposed to thinking that more existing cheaters are being caught), which will lead to more grandstanding and hand-wringing which will in turn lead to tougher penalties.