Skip navigation
Sign up to follow your favorites on all your devices.
Sign up

MLB willing to give up “significant concessions” to get a worldwide draft

Buster Olney adds some info to the news we heard yesterday about the league and the union’s negotiations to institute an international draft:

Major League Baseball said by sources to be willing to give up significant concessions to union to make international draft happen.

— Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) March 19, 2013

In return for that international draft, union could get increased minimum salary, less service time required for arbitration, and more.

— Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) March 19, 2013

I still don’t get this. Teams simply don’t spend that much on international free agent signings. They do spend a lot in arbitration and all teams have lots of players making the minimum or thereabouts. It doesn’t seem like giving away things like that make financial sense when compared to the relative small dollars given to guys on the international market.

Meanwhile, the players have, historically, liked to see more guys subject to the draft and have always been willing to negotiate away the rights of others like this. So why do they need big giveaways? I know why they’d want them, but MLB can’t think it has to give away that much, can it?

Can someone tell me what’s going on here? Why, apart from being anti-free agency, politically speaking, are the owners so focused on this? Why, apart from being pro-draft for others, politically speaking, are the players so into it too?