Phillies

Should Phillies pursue another castoff closer in Greg Holland?

Should Phillies pursue another castoff closer in Greg Holland?

Could the Phillies, constantly in need of bullpen help this season, go after another castoff closer?

The Diamondbacks designated Greg Holland for assignment this week following a month's worth of poor performances. Holland allowed 12 runs in 9⅔ innings from June 29 to Aug. 5, resulting in his removal from the closer's spot. The D-backs replaced him with Archie Bradley.

Prior to that, though, Holland had been effective, posting a 2.08 ERA and 12 saves through the end of June. 

Because Holland is a National League player, he must pass through only nine teams to reach the Phillies, the nine teams behind them in the NL. Holland's contract pays him a total of $3.9 million this season (he's already reached a $650,000 games finished incentive), so a claiming team would be on the hook for the remainder of that salary.

If Holland clears waivers, which seems a tad unlikely even given his recent struggles, any team would be free to sign him and that team would not be on the hook for his remaining 2019 salary. Instead, the new team would pay him the prorated league minimum.

Holland has struggled with control since 2015 but has still been able to have some dynamic seasons, and he's always done a good job of keeping the ball in the park. He was well on his way to another strong year before the midsummer struggles.

The Phillies are in no position to decline any external help for the bullpen. Holland would at least be an improvement over pitchers like Juan Nicasio and perhaps Blake Parker and Mike Morin as well.

Click here to download the MyTeams App by NBC Sports! Receive comprehensive coverage of your teams and stream the Flyers, Sixers and Phillies games easily on your device.

More on the Phillies

Jeff Francoeur: 'Shame on' MLB owners and players if they don't figure this out

Jeff Francoeur: 'Shame on' MLB owners and players if they don't figure this out

When Jeff Francoeur gazes at his crystal ball, he sees baseball.

This summer.

"I think we're going to end up with baseball being played," the former Phillie and 12-year big-leaguer said. "We need baseball."

Francoeur, now a member of the Atlanta Braves television broadcast team, was a guest on our Phillies Talk podcast Wednesday, a day after baseball owners proposed a salary structure for a shortened 2020 season that was quickly panned by the players.

"My crystal ball says the owners and players will figure this out in the next seven to 10 days," Francoeur said. "There might be a couple shots thrown in the media, but you know what? Baseball's always withstood that. If they open up on July 4, families sitting around with a beer and barbecue watching a baseball game, I think we'll look back and say, 'We did a pretty damn good job with this.'"

The sporting world shut down in mid-March as the coronavirus health crisis surged. Now, leagues are plotting a course to return. Major League Baseball would like to come back in July with an 82-game schedule. For health reasons, fans will not be permitted in ballparks — at least for a while — and players will have to do their best to observe rules of social distancing and other sanitary practices, such as no spitting.

Everybody seems OK with all of this.

Except for one thing.

The money.

Owners have already suffered revenue losses and playing games in empty stadiums will equal more loss. They have proposed sliding-scale salary cuts that could have the game's most highly paid marquee stars making about one-fifth of their 2020 salaries. To wit, Bryce Harper, with an average annual salary just under $25.4 million, would make about $6.5 million.

Management's proposal is viewed by most as a starting point in negotiations that must happen quickly because teams would need to be in "spring training" camps by mid-June to pull off an early July return. 

Francoeur, who retired after the 2016 season, was asked point-blank if he believed either side had "the guts" to call off the season.

"I don't," he said. "I don't. Because I know, as a player, I would be fighting my tail off to tell (union boss) Tony Clark to tell the players, 'We've got to figure something out.' I think the thing that stinks now is (the instant reaction of) social media. If you could put the owners and the players together in a room for three days and say, 'figure it out,' without everybody else knowing one thing or another. That's the worst part, that this is going to play out in the media. I just tell people, 'Look, it's going to run its course.' Eventually, in the next week, you're going to see them come to an agreement and I do believe that in the middle of June, teams are going to be fired back up for spring training.

"As a former player, I'll always be a player, a union guy. Those are my guys, my buddies. But I'll tell you this: There's going to have to be concessions on both sides. Baseball has to figure it out. And if it doesn't, I'll be the first one to say it, shame on them, shame on the owners and shame on the players if they don't figure this out."

Francoeur offered a potential solution.

"I'm not a huge fan of the sliding scale," he said. "I think the best way to do it is deferments. In two or three years, make up the money on the back end for your high-profile, high-paid guys. They don't need the money right now. But I also understand you're asking some of these guys to basically take an 80 percent pay cut. 

"It's tough because you're talking about billionaires talking to millionaires with 30 to 35 million people unemployed. They don't want to hear it and I think we all get that. The whole health protocol, they're going to figure that out. But if there's no baseball because of the financial aspect, if they don't come to an agreement, I'll tell you what, that's going to be sad when all these other sports get playing. Baseball has a chance to be the focal point this summer. I said from Day 1, could you imagine an opening day on July 4? On the biggest independence holiday here, to not have baseball would be a shame.

"If this is green-lighted to go from a health standpoint and you can't get out there because of finances, then shame on baseball."

Subscribe and rate the Phillies Talk podcast:
Apple Podcasts / Google Play / Spotify / Stitcher / Art19 / YouTube

More on the Phillies

Phillies Talk podcast: Jeff Francoeur on MLB’s financial dispute and 2020 season

Phillies Talk podcast: Jeff Francoeur on MLB’s financial dispute and 2020 season

Former Phillie, Brave and Met Jeff Francoeur joined the Phillies Talk podcast to talk about the return of baseball.

• Francoeur's unique perspective on the dispute between owners and players

• Thoughts on the proposal made to the MLBPA on Tuesday

• Will there be a season?

• Jeff's memories of Philadelphia

• His recollection of the infamous "white towel" game

Subscribe and rate the Phillies Talk podcast:
Apple Podcasts / Google Play / Spotify / Stitcher / Art19 / YouTube

More on the Phillies