AP source: Cubs-Angels trade falls apart


AP source: Cubs-Angels trade falls apart

The Chicago Cubs told closer Carlos Marmol the proposed trade to send him to the Los Angeles Angels for pitcher Dan Haren has fallen apart, a person familiar with the negotiations told The Associated Press.

The person spoke Friday night on condition of anonymity because the trade did not get completed.

Marmol's contract gives him the right to submit a list of up to five teams he can't be traded to without his consent. The person said Marmol told the Cubs he would consent to the trade, but would not say whether the reliever provided his written consent.

The deal was first reported by the Chicago Sun-Times. A spokesman for the Cubs declined to comment.

The Angels had until midnight EDT on Friday to exercise Haren's $15.5 million option for next season. He had a $3.5 million buyout. The 32-year-old right-hander went 12-13 with a career-worst 4.33 ERA in 30 starts this year and was on the disabled list for the first time.

Haren, a three-time All-Star from 2007-09, would be the second starting pitcher traded by the busy Angels in three days. Los Angeles shipped Ervin Santana to the Kansas City Royals on Wednesday for minor league left-hander Brandon Sisk.

Marmol, an All-Star in 2008, had 114 saves for the Cubs over the past five years. Yet he lost his job as the team's closer several times due to ineffectiveness and a lack of control.

The 30-year-old righty was 3-3 with a 3.42 ERA in 61 appearances this year. He had 20 saves in 23 chances but walked 45 in 55 1-3 innings.

Marmol is set to make $9.8 million next season and then can become a free agent. He had a career-best 38 saves in 2010, when he struck out 138 in 77 2-3 innings and finished an NL-high 70 games.


AP Sports Writer Ronald Blum contributed to this report.

Quick Links

Capitals mailbag: Where has all the hitting gone?


Capitals mailbag: Where has all the hitting gone?

It’s a new week, but Tom Wilson still seems to be on everyone’s mind. Let’s dive in to the mailbag. 

@cowgirl_bebop writes: Do you think with Wilson suspended for so long the Caps would consider calling up Shumakov if these other RW configurations don’t work out, especially since without any adjustments 43 still has about a month to go?

Not right away. The Caps committed somewhat to Dmitrij Jaskin when they claimed him off waivers and I believe they are going to give him more time to get his legs under him. Having said that, they aren’t going to wait much longer.

Through the Caps’ first five games, the only bottom-six forwards with goals are Nic Dowd and Lars Eller. Chandler Stephenson has scored as well, but he scored while playing on the top line. This team needs more depth scoring and they need it now.

On Friday, Sergei Shumakov scored two goals for the Hershey Bears. That’s an encouraging sign, but it is also important to remember that those are his only two points in five games so it’s not as if he’s been lighting it up in the AHL. He also suffered an upper-body injury on Sunday and had to leave that game early.

But, the bottom line is that Jaskin has shown little offensive upside at all to this point. I could definitely see the Caps recall Shumakov or someone like Shane Gersich in the near future to try and boost the offense on the third and fourth lines.

@jett_mahler writes: Caps found combining speed and physical play allowed them to be successful last year. Early this season the speed is there, but it seems like the physical play is missing. Is this the greater significance of missing Wilson?

The interesting thing about Wilson is that, with the NHL becoming a faster, more skill-based league, it actually makes Wilson an even more valuable player (when he’s not suspended). Wilson is a very good skater with offensive skill and who is an absolute wrecking ball on the ice. He can play and be successful in today’s NHL while also bringing that physicality the game is starting to lack. There just are not many players like him in the league anymore and that was especially true in the playoffs when no one really seemed to know how to deal with him.

The Caps are very conscious of the direction the league is going as is evidenced by the type of players they have drafted in recent years, but they also like being a physical team and found success doing that in the playoffs.

There has been less physical play from Washington to start and there’s no doubt in my mind that is largely the result of the most physical player being out of the lineup. I think it is no coincidence they picked up a player like Jaskin off waivers who, at 216 pounds, is among the bigger forwards on the team (Wilson is 218 pounds). If Jaskin had shown any offense at all, I think we may have seen Todd Reirden move him to the top line instead of Stephenson because adding that physical element there clearly works.

Nathan S. writes: On one hand the NHL came down very heavy on Tom Wilson for his dangerous head hit, yet in other ways the NHL has been slow to improve safety. Do you see NHL improving sorting this out or adopting new restrictions on fighting and head hitting any time soon?

There is undeniably something strange about suspending a player for a hit to the head while also being the only sport that allows fighting. OK, technically fighting is against the rules, but in most leagues taking a swing at an opponent would earn you a lengthy suspension rather than just a five minute timeout.

Let’s be fair. The league has made great strides in player safety as evidenced by the suspension to Florida Panthers defenseman Mike Matheson. Matheson checked Vancouver Canucks forward Elias Pettersson into the boards, pinned him, then intentionally slammed him down to the ice causing a concussion. It launched this weird debate within the hockey community about whether physicality was being taken out of the league, but hey, I’ve got a crazy idea. Maybe Matheson should have just checked him and not intentionally slammed a player down onto the ice in a way that absolutely could cause an injury? The NHL rightfully suspended Matheson, but I don’t think they would have 10 years ago or five years ago or maybe even three years ago. That’s progress.

The direction I believe the league is going is that eventually fighting is going to be a thing of the past and will ultimately be banned altogether. From the league perspective, it doesn’t make sense in terms of player safety to keep it in the game. From a growing the game perspective, clearly the culture is changing and people are less attracted to the violent aspects of the game (just ask the NFL). Even from a strategic standpoint, it doesn’t make much sense. Teams have already moved on from the fourth line goons who would play six minutes a night and contribute nothing offensively. That means instead of losing a fourth-line player with little value for five minutes, teams risk losing a contributor to the penalty box.

I say this as someone who grew up watching the game and players like Craig Berube, Brendan Witt and Stephen Peat. It made sense back then, but I don’t think there’s much of a future for fighting in the NHL.

Jedd H. writes: Aside from when McDavid comes to town, what non-divisional games are a must watch/attend this season?

For a non-divisional game, circle March 10 in the calendar. That’s the day the Winnipeg Jets come to town. Not only are the Jets one of the bright young teams in the league and considered among the Cup contenders, but Patrik Laine may well turn into the best goal-scorer in the NHL since Alex Ovechkin (if Auston Matthews ever stops scoring at the torrid pace he’s on).

Two other interesting games are Jan. 14 against St. Louis and Feb. 3 against Boston. It seems like there may be some bad blood between the Caps and Blues given that someone has gotten suspended in each of the last three preseason games these teams have played. We know there’s bad blood between the Caps and Bruins as well. The fact that Washington has to travel to St. Louis and Boston before either team makes a return trip to Capital One Arena takes some luster of those two games, but if there’s any holdover from what are sure to be contentious matchups, these will definitely be games to watch.

Thanks for your questions! If you want to have your question answered on next week’s mailbag post, send it  to  


Quick Links

Bryce Harper to the Dodgers? Looking at the chances Harper ends up in Los Angeles

Bryce Harper to the Dodgers? Looking at the chances Harper ends up in Los Angeles

Winter has been coming for quite a while for the Washington Nationals. Specifically, Winter 2018. And much like last season of HBO’s beloved Game of Thrones, winter has finally arrived.

Bryce Harper has potentially played his final game in a Nationals uniform, and all fans can do over the course of the next few months is play the waiting game. Instead of sitting around twiddling our thumbs, however, we’re going to take a look at some of the major players who will be active in Harper’s free agency this winter.

We’ll do our best to gauge how genuine each team’s interest in the superstar is (spoiler alert: they are all very interested) and try to guess how good their chances are of landing him. 

Bovada updated their odds on Harper’s ultimate landing spot after the regular season ended, and they’ve got the Nationals as the fifth-most likely team for him to (re)join. Number one on that list was the Chicago Cubs.

Number two? The Los Angeles Dodgers.

The Narrative

Some fans were surprised to see the Cubs top Bovada’s odds, and I expect even more will think the Dodgers at number two is curious. We don’t have years of subtle hints, personal connections, and conspiracy theories to link Harper with Los Angeles, like we did with Chicago. Still, there are a few dots here worth connecting. 

The most obvious (or, at least, the most recent) came this past August. After the Non-Waiver Trade Deadline in July, Major League Baseball teams have the month of August to trade players who pass through waivers. These are referred to as revocable waivers, because even if a player is claimed, the team that owns his rights is allowed to pull him back. 

When a player is claimed in August, the claiming team has 48 hours to try to strike a deal with the original team. It’s essentially a formality for every player to be placed on waivers in August, knowing teams can revoke them at any point. Still, fans online were all over Twitter when it was reported that the mystery team to have placed a claim on Bryce Harper was none other than the Los Angeles Dodgers.

No deal ended up being reached between the Dodgers and the Nats, and it’s entirely possible the Dodgers only made the claim to keep Harper from going to another National League contender. Still, it’s hard to view the near-move as anything other than a sign of interest from the team with the deepest pockets in baseball.

That last line is important, as it plays into the narrative for Harper-to-LA as well. The Dodgers are the Yankees of the West Coast (and, in reality, probably have more money to spend than the Evil Empire). Ever since an ownership group including Magic Johnson acquired the Dodgers in 2012 for a staggering $2.15 billion, the Dodgers have flexed their financial might over the rest of the baseball world. 

Let’s also not forget one of Harper’s biggest “flaws,” his rooting interests in Duke, the Cowboys, and yes, the Los Angeles Lakers. Playing in L.A. for a team owned by the greatest player in Lakers history has to appeal to him on some level, even if it won’t end up being the most important factor.

There are plenty of connections to make with Harper and the Nationals, Cubs, and Yankees, but more often than not, free agents tend to follow the money. If the Dodgers are inclined to pay whatever it costs to sign Harper, then it’s hard to imagine another team topping them. That’s narrative enough for them to be considered strongly in the mix.

The Roster

Of course, there’s still the question of if the Dodgers actually would be inclined to pay whatever it costs. Just because a franchise can afford to sign someone doesn’t always mean it makes the most sense, from either a financial standpoint or roster construction.

The Dodgers, as mentioned earlier, have more money than God. According to Spotrac, their Opening Day payrolls in the last few seasons are outrageous.

2018 - $199.5 million (3rd in baseball)
2017 - $259.1 million (1st)
2016 - $268.7 million (1st)
2015 - $301.7 million (1st)
2014 - $246.3 million (1st)
2013 - $239.8 million (1st)

Those numbers are just plain silly. In 2015, the Dodgers spent more than twice as much on payroll than all but five teams. Outside of a flukey “low” spending season this past year, they haven’t just lead the league for five straight seasons, but have run away with it year in and year out. Spending more than $300 million in a season is wild.

So, obviously, the Dodgers can throw money at any problem (or player). They’re probably itching to get back on top of the heap after not even cracking $200 million in 2018. But does it make sense from a team-building perspective?

None of the team’s pending free agents on Spotrac are outfielders, so there’s no obvious hole to fill. One of the strengths of the Dodgers is their positional versatility, which adds to their depth but makes it harder to evaluate their offseason outlook. Cody Bellinger started 50 games in the outfield in 2018, and appeared in 81, but while his versatility is a nice bonus, he’s ultimately an athletic first baseman, and he certainly wouldn’t get in the way of Harper playing for that reason.

That said, if the Dodgers retain Brian Dozier at second, then Max Muncy would need to play first, which pushes Bellinger to the outfield. Plus, Chris Taylor can play second, shortstop, third, and the outfield.  You can see where the headache comes in.

Still, for the purposes of this exercise, we’ll assume Bellinger is off the table for outfield playing time, but bear in mind that Taylor could find his way out there on occasion.

Yasiel Puig, Joc Pederson, Kiké Hernandez, and Matt Kemp are the remaining outfielders. Puig, Pederson and Hernandez are in their arbitration years, and almost certainly will be kept around at reasonable deals. It’s hard to evaluate the three of them relative to each other. Each hit 20-25 home runs, and each hit between .248 and .267. Pederson has struggled to live up to his immense talents, and the same could be said for Puig. Hernandez is yet another Dodger who plays all over the diamond.

Then you have Kemp, who would have been easy to rule out entering 2018 but then proceeded to have one of the best comeback seasons in baseball. He hit .290 and made his first All-Star game since 2012, and he’s owed a ton of money next season.

None of that includes Alex Verdugo, the Dodgers’ best prospect and one of the top 25 prospects in all of baseball. He probably already should have been an everyday Major League outfielder in 2018, and there’s no way Los Angeles can continue to keep him in the minors next year. He needs to play every day, and certainly will get that chance.

Ultimately, the Dodgers have a ton of bodies to play the outfield already. That said, Puig and Kemp will no longer be under contract after next season, and outside of Verdugo there are no clear-cut future standouts in the Dodgers outfield. The fit for Harper, position-wise, is fairly weak compared to the other contenders. 

At the end of the day, however, none of their current guys are necessarily better than Harper, and if the Dodgers are willing to deal with a crowded outfield for one season, things shore up nicely in 2020 and beyond. A future outfield with Verdugo and Harper would be pretty appealing to any team, especially considering how relatively cheap Verdugo will be until he hits free agency.

The Odds

Call it a gut feeling, but at the end of the day, I just don’t see Harper in Dodger blue. There are plenty of factors in which they are one of the top three choices for him, but they aren’t a clear leader in any. The Cubs have more personal connections, the Phillies are more of a positional fit, and the Nats are the “hometown” team. The one area in which they stand out, however, is possibly (probably) (okay almost definitely) the most important: money.

It will be telling to find out what their best offer ends up being, but for now, I think the +500 odds are actually pretty spot on. I’d take issue with the Cubs being so much further ahead of them as the betting favorites, but they should probably be ahead of the Dodgers at least. I just wouldn’t have them so far out ahead of the pack. 

The Dodgers have a lot going for them. Harper has always wanted to play in a big name city for a big name franchise, and he has always wanted to be the highest-paid player in the game. Plus, getting to play for Magic Johnson doesn’t hurt. The Dodgers can offer all those things. The only question remaining is if they want to?