Quick Links

Winning a Super Bowl doesn't require a quarterback on a cheap deal

Winning a Super Bowl doesn't require a quarterback on a cheap deal

Lamar Jackson, for the next two seasons, is on perhaps the most valuable contract in the National Football League. 

Jackson, the league’s reigning MVP, is two seasons away from his fifth-year option kicking in. He’ll make just 1.3, then 1.4 percent of the Ravens’ cap in the next two seasons before a fifth-year option. Then, he’ll likely be handed the keys to the Ravens’ kingdom. 

After that, though, he’s due a large payday. And that doesn’t mean the Ravens should be concerned, it just means they'll have to adjust.

The success of young quarterbacks across the NFL of late has led to the belief that teams can only win a Super Bowl with a quarterback on a rookie deal. Or, at the very least, they can’t pay a quarterback top dollar, as it will cripple the general manager’s ability to build a competitive team.

That’s not necessarily the case. 

Of course, it’s much easier to compete in the NFL with a quarterback outplaying the value of his contract. Cheap, productive quarterbacks put teams at a decided advantage in a sport that requires strong quarterback play above all else. 

Quarterbacks in the NFL account for four of the top five highest-paid contracts, in terms of contract value, and nine of the top 11 across the league. That can lead to some weird comparisons when evaluating contracts.

Derek Carr’s contract ($125 million) costs more than Von Milller’s ($114.1 million). Jared Goff and Carson Wentz ($134 million and $128 million) each make about $35 million more than wide receiver Michael Thomas ($96.25 million). 

But that’s the going rate for a good quarterback. A deeper dive into that list, however, begins to make the theory fall apart. 

Aaron Rodgers has been to two NFC Championship games since 2014. Cam Newton played in a Super Bowl. Matt Ryan played in a Super Bowl. Drew Brees was a horrifically blown call away from playing in a Super Bowl. 

If you flipped a few close plays, that entire list would be moot. 

Sure, winning a Super Bowl while playing with one of the league’s most expensive players is naturally a difficult task. But refusing to pay a quarterback that could elevate your team from good to great is even riskier.

Since 2010, 15 different quarterbacks have played in a Super Bowl. Tom Brady, Russell Wilson and Peyton Manning have played in multiple. And 12 of those 15 quarterbacks weren’t drastically underpaid. 

In that timeframe, three quarterbacks have won the Super Bowl on rookie deals. That number does not include the 2017 Eagles, who had second-year quarterback Carson Wentz at the helm for a majority of the regular season before Nick Foles, who made $1 million in base salary, took over after a Wentz injury.

Wentz’s contract took up just 3.6 percent of the Eagles’ cap space in 2018. That’s nearly five percent less than the average of Super Bowl-winning quarterbacks over the last decade. On average, the last 10 Super Bowl-winning quarterbacks have accounted for 8.4 percent of a team’s salary cap, according to overthecap.com. 

Super Bowl winners since 2010, with cap percentage:

2020: Patrick Mahomes: 2.4% (Rookie)

2019: Tom Brady: 12.4%

2018: Nick Foles: 1.0% — Carson Wentz 3.6% (Rookie)

2017: Tom Brady: 8.9%

2016: Peyton Manning: 12.2%

2015: Tom Brady: 11.1%

2014: Russell Wilson: 0.6% (Rookie)

2013: Joe Flacco: 6.6% (Rookie)

2012: Eli Manning: 11.7%

2011: Aaron Rodgers: Uncapped season

2010: Drew Brees: 8.7%

That average number can be a bit skewed, considering Brady could have easily demanded more money than what he received from the Patriots for his entire career. Still, while he took a discount, his contract in New England was always around 12 percent of the team’s cap.

He’s played in five of the last 10 Super Bowls and has made less than 10 percent of his team’s salary cap twice in those years. The Patriots are 1-1 in those Super Bowls. Other years, he’s on par with some of the league’s highest paid quarterbacks.

For the 2020 season, there are obvious bargains at the position who have yet to reach payday: Mahomes, Jackson and Deshaun Watson are all expected to see exponential increases in their salary in the coming years. But the highest paid quarterbacks haven’t exactly crippled their team’s ability to compete for a Super Bowl, at least in the public’s eye.

Mahomes, the reigning Super Bowl MVP with a league MVP already under his belt, will eat away 2.7 percent of the Chiefs’ cap space in 2020. In 2021, it will jump to 11.6 percent before an explosion in 2022. 

All three of those quarterbacks will deserve the contracts they earn. The Chiefs, Ravens and Texans won’t be wrong to hand out, essentially, blank checks either. 

In terms of salary cap value, the 10 highest paid quarterbacks in the 2020 season will make anywhere from 15.9 percent to 10.9 percent of a team’s cap space.

Top 10 2020 quarterback contracts:

-Dak Prescott ($31,509,000): 15.9%

-Russell Wilson ($31,000,000): 15.6%

-Jared Goff ($28,842,682): 14.6%

-Jimmy Garoppolo ($26,600,000): 13.4% 

-Philip Rivers ($25,000,000): 12.6%

-Tom Brady ($25,000,000): 12.6%

-Ben Roethlisberger ($23,750,000): 12.0%

-Drew Brees ($23,650,000): 11.9%

-Ryan Tannehill ($22,500,000): 11.4%

-Aaron Rodgers ($21,642,000): 10.9%

Of those teams: the Cowboys, Seahawks, Rams, 49ers, Colts, Buccaneers, Steelers, Saints, Titans and Packers, nearly all are certainly thought of as playoff contenders. Some even Super Bowl contenders. 

The Saints and 49ers' over/under for wins in 2020 is listed at 10.5, third and fourth best in the NFL behind the Ravens and Chiefs. The Cowboys are fifth-best at 9.5, as are the Seahawks and Buccaneers. The Packers follow with nine. 

So while paying a quarterback big money restricts cap flexibility, it isn’t necessarily a death knell, though it clearly takes away a team’s wiggle room. When compared with the Super Bowl winning quarterbacks of the last 10 seasons, the salary cap percentage for 2020 quarterbacks, and even Super Bowl-losing quarterbacks, isn’t far off. 

Super Bowl losing quarterbacks 

2020: Jimmy G: 10.6%

2019: Jared Goff: 4.3%

2018: Tom Brady: 8.4%

2017: Matt Ryan: 15.3%

2016: Cam Newton: 9.1%

2015: Russell Wilson: 0.6% (Rookie)

2014: Peyton Manning: 14.2%

2013: Colin Kaepernick: 1.0% (Rookie)

2012: Tom Brady: 11.0%

2011: Ben Roethlisberger: Uncapped season

2010: Peyton Manning: 17.2%

If Ryan’s Falcons didn’t blow a 28-3 lead, or if Manning’s Colts held on to a fourth-quarter lead, they both would have raised the Lombardi Trophy. Ryan’s cap percentage of 15.3 would’ve put him third in the 2020 quarterback list. Manning’s would’ve put him first.

And of teams that handed out big money contracts on this list, very few regretted their decision. The Seahawks wouldn’t take back their contract with Wilson, nor the Steelers with Roethlisberger, nor the Falcons with Ryan. 

Wilson is consistently one of the best quarterbacks in the league. Roethlisberger is a sure-fire Hall of Famer and Ryan was one horrific quarter away from claiming a Super Bowl title and perhaps game MVP. 

The fact of the matter is once a team finds the right quarterback, it makes more sense to pay him whatever it takes and figure the rest out later. 

The lesson here is clear: You need a good quarterback to compete for a Super Bowl much more than you need a cheap quarterback. And it’s OK to overpay for a quarterback that will give you elite, great, or even good, production.

Teams had just better be sure that their particular quarterbacks can provide it.

Stay connected to the Capitals and Wizards with the MyTeams app. Click here to download for comprehensive coverage of your teams.


Quick Links

Mark Ingram sees COVID-19 issues in MLB, preaches 'positive midset' for Ravens locker room

Mark Ingram sees COVID-19 issues in MLB, preaches 'positive midset' for Ravens locker room

Like most of us, Mark Ingram has taken notice of Major League Baseball's coronavirus problem. And much like the rest of his NFL peers, has to face the reality that the NFL's return-to-play plan is eerily similar to MLB's. 

So how can the NFL avoid outbreaks that may threaten the 2020 season? If you ask Ingram, it starts with positivity and simply following team protocols. 

"Yeah you see the [MLB] stuff, there’s cases, you try to stay positive," Ingram said. You try to stay with the protocols our team has set for us, and when you leave the facility, be safe as possible. Stay at home and take precautions that you’re not exposing yourself unnecessarily."

The Miami Marlins had 20 reported cases in their locker room following their first series of the 2020 season in Philadelphia. They're scheduled to play their first game on Tuesday against the Orioles, nine days after their last contest. In response, Commissioner Rob Manfred warned to shut down the season if teams didn't manage the coronavirus better moving forward. 


The NFL has an advantage in that games are only played once a week, but the challenges of preventing an outbreak will seemingly be greater given the nature of the game and its player-to-player physicality as well as the roster size for each team.

"You just try to have a positive mindset, and honestly we're aware of [MLB], we're cautious of it," Ingram said. "We're trying to do the best we can with the circumstances and stay hopeful."

NFL teams are already dealing with positive cases one week after the start of training camp. The Bills had to send their rookies home Thursday after five positive tests, while Eagles coach Doug Pederson tested positive Sunday. 

Based on what we've learned with MLB, players following health and safety protocols off the field will be critical for the NFL to successfully execute their 2020 campaign. They aren't in a bubble like the NBA and NHL, so the margin for error is smaller. Hopefully more players share Ingram's mindset on the situation. 

Stay connected to the Ravens and Orioles with the MyTeams app. Click here to download for comprehensive coverage of your teams.


Quick Links

Report: Ravens to sign former Texans and Saints tight end Jerell Adams

Report: Ravens to sign former Texans and Saints tight end Jerell Adams

The Ravens look like they have acquired the veteran tight end they've been looking for. 

Jerell Adams only registered snaps in one game for the New Orleans Saints last season, but Baltimore has been in the market for a veteran tight end presence to shore up the depth chart, according to NFL Network's Ian Rapoport. 

The South Carolina product could provide blocking relief for the Purple and Black, as the Ravens traded Hayden Hurst to the Falcons for a couple of drafts picks back in March. 

The report comes just hours after ESPN's Josina Anderson reported Baltimore was looking to add another tight end, with former Washington TE Jordan Reed and Delanie Walker rumored to be options. 

Adams was selected with the 184th pick in the 2016 NFL Draft by the New York Giants before making a stop in Houston during his three-year career. 

Stay connected to the Ravens and Orioles with the MyTeams app. Click here to download for comprehensive coverage of your teams.