Washington Football

Quick Links

DeSean Jackson signed with Redskins in 2014 in part to spite Chip Kelly and the Eagles

DeSean Jackson signed with Redskins in 2014 in part to spite Chip Kelly and the Eagles

When the Redskins signed wide receiver DeSean Jackson in 2014 following his surprising release from Philadelphia, one common desire the two sides shared above all else helped get the deal done: wanting to beat the Eagles.

For Washington, Jackson's market availability meant a chance to no longer be tortured by the speedy receiver that had constantly burned them twice a year for six seasons. The pass catcher was coming off his best NFL season at the time, 82 receptions for 1332 yards and nine touchdowns, and the Redskins were not going to miss the chance to give the Eagles a taste of their own medicine.

That was evident in their recruitment of Jackson, which the once again Eagles wide receiver shared on his teammate Lane Johnson's "Outside the Lane" Instagram Live Show. From planes to special appearances, Washington pulled out all stops.

"I remember the Redskins were one of the teams that hopped in and was really trying to sign me because of all the damage I did to them earlier in my career. Dan Snyder personally sent me his private jet. I was in L.A. and he sent me his private jet, he was like, ‘Get on the plane and we’ll figure out the contract,'" Jackson told Johnson, via NBC Sports Philadelphia. "RG3 actually came to my house in Calabasas and he was like, ‘Man, please bro, just come play with me.’"

The Redskins clearly made an effort to make Jackson feel wanted, something Philadelphia didn't show toward the end of his first stint there. That was great, and helped with the decision, but one of Washington's main selling point was that their schedule would allow him to seek revenge on the team that had just slighted him.

"I just wanted to go play against y’all twice a year," Jackson said, referring to the Eagles. "I’m staying in the division because I want them to see me twice a year. … I was going to let them see what they were missing out on."

CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE REDSKINS TALK PODCAST

His spite toward the franchise he entered the league with was largely due to how things came to a close in 2014. Despite his phenomenal play on the field, head coach Chip Kelly, who held final say over the roster, was not keen on keeping Jackson. Reports swirled that Philadelphia was concerned with Jackson's friends in California, something that filled him with anger and resentment.

He could understand being released due to financial or physical reasons but felt that the Eagles were cowardly in their decision to let him go.

"Honestly, bro, the past is the past, but I will say when I was released by the Eagles it was definitely a shove in my face, you know?” Jackson said. “The story that was made up and the reason behind it was hard for me to respect. I would have respected it a lot more, man, if they would have just came to me and just told me basically it’s a money issue or we’re going a different route. But no, you want to come up and say I’m a hoodlum and I’m doing all this crazy (stuff)? That (stuff) was personal to me."

Both Jackson and the Redskins got their wish, as the two did join forces in 2014 giving Washington another weapon and the wide receiver a chance at his former team. Jackson tallied two 1,000-yard seasons during his three years in the Burgundy and Gold, and Washington made the playoffs once in that span. However, the match was never as fruitful as it could have been.

The veteran is now back with the Eagles and looking to rebound in 2020 after only appearing in three games last season due to injuries. His ability to hurt the Redskins is still as potent as ever, as he went for 154 yards and two touchdowns against them in Week 1 of 2019.

Stay connected to the Capitals and Wizards with the MyTeams app. Click here to download for comprehensive coverage of your teams.

MORE REDSKINS NEWS

Quick Links

Ex-Washington GM believes Dan Snyder will use name change as a 'chip' to build stadium bigger than Cowboys'

Ex-Washington GM believes Dan Snyder will use name change as a 'chip' to build stadium bigger than Cowboys'

After receiving immense public pressure from major sponsors earlier this month, Washington announced in a statement on Monday that the team would retire the name 'Redskins' and its logo. The change was likely not one owner Dan Snyder wanted to make, as he stated in 2013 that the team would "never" change its name.

However, former Washington GM Vinny Cerrato believes there might have been another reason Snyder agreed to finally move on from the name.

In an interview on ESPN's 'Golic and Wingo,' Cerrato explained that he believes Snyder will try and use the name change as a "chip" to eventually build a new stadium in Washington, D.C., one "bigger and better" than his good friend Jerry Jones' 100,000-seater in Dallas.

"Ever since Jerry [Jones] built his stadium...we're playing the Cowboys, and we flew down and had dinner in Jerry's box," Cerrato said. "Jerry gave us a tour of the stadium, he's pushing the button opening and closing the roof. Ever since then, [Snyder said] 'I'm going to have one bigger and better.'"

CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE REDSKINS TALK PODCAST

Cerrato said that now that the name has been retired, Snyder will be able to turn his dream stadium into a reality.

"Trust me when I tell you this, Dan will have one bigger and better," Cerrato said. "He'll use it as a chip to get that land where RFK was, to change the name. I would bet that it's somewhere involved in there. The name change is also probably helping him get the property he really wants."

RELATED: THEISMANN HOPES WASHINGTON CAN BE AN EXAMPLE OF ACTING ON SOCIAL CHANGE

Prior to the name change, it's been no secret that the owner wants a new stadium, specifically one in downtown Washington at the team's old RFK site. However, the process of building a new stadium may not be so easy.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said in June that she believes the name must be changed and that the team won't be allowed to build a new stadium in D.C. until that happens. Even after Washington's statement earlier this week, Mayor Bowser said there are still plenty of hurdles that remain for Washington to build a new stadium at the old RFK location.

Washington's current lease as FedEx Field in Landover, Md., is set to expire at the end of the 2027 season.

Only time will tell if the name change ends up helping Snyder build his "bigger and better" stadium in D.C. Despite that, Cerrato believes the owner will look back on the name change and wonder why he took so long to make it.

"For where we are at in society, I think it was an absolute that needed to be done. I think he realized that," Cerrato said. "His business partners, Dwight [Schar], Rob Rothman and Fred Smith, they tried to push upon on him recently. So I think it was something that needed to be done. In five years when Dan thinks back about it, he'll probably think 'Why did I wait so long?"

Stay connected with the MyTeams app. Click here to download for comprehensive coverage of your teams.

MORE TEAM NEWS

Quick Links

Joe Theismann hopes Washington can serve as example of taking action on social change

Joe Theismann hopes Washington can serve as example of taking action on social change

Following the killing of George Floyd on May 25, the fight for social justice and racial equality has been at the forefront of issues in the United States.

The current social justice movement in America has impacted Washington's NFL team, as the organization announced on Monday it would retire the name 'Redskins' -- a slur that some Native Americans find offensive and racist -- and the team's logo. The change -- something Washington owner Dan Snyder said he would "never" do in 2013 -- is felt to be overdue by many.

Former Washington quarterback Joe Theismann hopes that the team's eventual name change can be used as an opportunity for the organization to serve as an example by taking action for social change.

"I think that what we've proven with the new name of the Washington football franchise is that we need people to take action on the things that they want to get done," Theismann told ABC7's Scott Abraham.

"There's so many things socially that people talk about doing... but we're not really getting the results. In this case, I hope the Washington name and the change that's taking place can be an example to people."

CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE REDSKINS TALK PODCAST

Additionally, the Super Bowl-winning QB explained that he wants those upset by the change to understand that things don't say the same. Sometimes, change is necessary.

"Things are always changing in one place, in one way or another," Theismann said. "We're experiencing this now through the pandemic and all the things that are happening socially around the country and really around the world. And I think what we have to do is listen, open our hearts, open our minds to what's going on."

Asked if he was upset or angry by the change, Theismann said that he doesn't have any regrets personally with the franchise.

"I don't have any regrets... I was very proud to put on that uniform and represent, what I felt like were the Native Americans," Theismann said. "As a matter of fact, in 1982 when we won the World Championship, I was given a chief's headdress by one of the tribal individuals. And it's a cherished item."

Plus, the quarterback also stated he would continue to wear his 'Redskins' gear, saying  he will "explain to people, to me it represented a proud tradition of the people that I spoke to who were Native Americans."

RELATED: FORMER WASHINGTON KICKER MARK MOSELEY UPSET BY NAME CHANGE

However, Theismann made sure to emphasize he is fully embracing the change and the current social movement.

"I think it's a time to get excited," Theismann said. "Let's embrace what's here in front of us, let's embrace this young group of guys."

Stay connected with the MyTeams app. Click here to download for comprehensive coverage of your teams.

MORE TEAM NEWS