Capitals

Seton Hall defeats DePaul 73-72

Seton Hall defeats DePaul 73-72

ROSEMONT, Ill. (AP) Fuquan Edwin converted the game-winning layup with 6.9 seconds remaining to give Seton Hall a 73-72 win against DePaul on Wednesday night.

Aaron Cosby led Seton Hall (12-2) with 24 points.

Jamee Crockett of DePaul missed a wide open 3-pointer with four seconds left to seal Seton Hall's win in the Big East conference opener for both teams. A turnover gave Seton Hall the ball with 26 seconds remaining as they trailed DePaul, 72-71.

DePaul (9-5, 0-1) chipped away at Seton Hall's 40-32 halftime lead. DePaul guard Durrell McDonald made a 3-pointer as the shot clock expired to tie the game at 52 with 9:42 remaining.

Less than a minute later the Blue Demons took the lead on Brandon Young's three-point play. From then on, the teams traded baskets as neither squad led by more than five points the rest of the game.

Quick Links

Capitals Mailbag Part 1: What's the plan in net beyond 2020-21?

Capitals Mailbag Part 1: What's the plan in net beyond 2020-21?

It’s time for a new Capitals mailbag! Check out Part 1 below.

Have a Caps question you want answered in the next mailbag? You can submit your questions here at the Capitals Mailbag submissions page on NBCSportsWashington.com.

Please note, some questions have been edited for clarity.

Justin Cade writes: It seems like the general consensus between the pipes for 2020-21 is that Braden Holtby walks and a proven backup comes in to help Ilya Samsonov settle in as an NHL #1. How do you see the future of the goaltender position in Washington beyond next season? If Samsonov proves to be a reliable starter, do the Caps call up Vanecek to back him up for years to come?

The Caps’ goalie pipeline currently consists of Pheonix Copley and Vitek Vanecek in Hershey and Mitchell Gibson who is playing college hockey at Harvard. I am not really sure what to make of Gibson yet. He was OK, but not great in the USHL, but was really good in his freshman year at Harvard. I don’t know what the potential is there yet.

As for Copley and Vanecek, I see the ceiling for both as being NHL backups, at least in the traditional sense. As the NHL goes more and more toward tandems, that complicates things. I think Copley is a traditional backup, but I don’t want a situation where he is playing 30+ games per year. I think Vanecek has the higher ceiling, but I don’t see him as an NHL starter so I think there could be potential for a Samsonov-Vanecek tandem in the future with Samsonov being the primary starter. But I don’t know if that’s how the Caps see it.

If the team does indeed go the experienced backup route for next season, just how long that backup is signed for could be an indication for what Brian MacLellan views Vanecek’s future with the franchise will be. A three-year deal for an established No. 2 probably means Vanecek will be playing somewhere else before too long.

CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE CAPITALS TALK PODCAST

Scott Egbert writes: Would Alex Ovechkin retire soon?

Ovechkin has given no indication that he is going to retire soon or that he is even fading as he currently sits tied with David Pastrnak for the league lead in goals with 48. Could he be a Barry Sanders and walk away while still being one of the best in the game? I really don’t see it. I think his love for the game of hockey and fierce competitiveness will drive him to continue on. He may not want to talk about it, but he has laid the groundwork for a possible run at Wayne Gretzky's goal record. It is going to be really hard for him to walk away from that.

When Nicklas Backstrom discussed his five-year extension, he mentioned that Ovechkin was asking him all the time about it. I don’t think that was because he wanted to make sure Backstrom was around just next season. I think he was looking down the road.

No, I do not see Ovechkin retiring any time soon. Then again, he is 34 so we are definitely on the back-end of his career so it is fair to wonder just how many more years he has left.

Justin Cade writes: Which Caps player do you think is most likely to be lost to Seattle in the expansion draft?

Assuming that Washington elects the option of protecting seven forwards, three defensemen and one goalie, my best guess would be we see the Caps protect Alex Ovechkin, Nicklas Backstrom, Evgeny Kuznetsov, Tom Wilson, Lars Eller and Jakub Vrana. Notice that is only six forwards. I don’t really see any other forwards they would really need to protect. They may have the flexibility to protect T.J. Oshie if they wanted, but he will be 34 years old at that point and still have an additional four years left on his contract with a cap hit of $5.75 million. He is a marketable player that I think Seattle could have some interest in, especially given his ties to the area, but only if his production hasn’t fallen off a cliff by that point.

On defense, the situation is a bit hazier.

First, per my understanding, neither Alex Alexeyev nor Martin Fehervary will be eligible to be selected so Washington won’t need to protect either of them. John Carlson absolutely will be protected, but the two players after him are a question mark. If it were me, I would protect Jonas Siegenthaler and I ultimately believe that is what they will do. Then it is a choice between Dmitry Orlov and Michal Kempny.

I think Orlov is a very good, top-four puck-moving defenseman who is frequently underrated by fans who just point to his turnovers and see nothing else. To me, he is worth protecting. That seems like an easy call now with how much Kempny has struggled this year, but this becomes much more difficult if Kempny returns to form.

So to summarize, I believe the two most likely players to be taken will be either Oshie or Kempny.

Thanks for all your questions! Part 2 of the mailbag will be coming on Thursday. If you have a question you want to be answered in the next mailbag, you can submit it here at the Capitals Mailbag submissions page on NBCSportsWashington.com.

Stay connected to the Capitals and Wizards with the MyTeams app. Click here to download for comprehensive coverage of your teams.

MORE CAPITALS NEWS:

Quick Links

Why the Redskins did what they did in free agency, as explained by Ron Rivera

Why the Redskins did what they did in free agency, as explained by Ron Rivera

While Ron Rivera surely hopes his tenure with the Redskins lasts a long time, most of the free agents the coach brought in before his first season are joining his team on short-term deals.

Aside from Kendall Fuller and Wes Schweitzer, every single player Washington signed in March agreed to one- or two-year contracts. Even Schweitzer's deal, though technically three seasons in length, is effectively of the one-year variety, too.

On a Tuesday conference call with reporters, Rivera explained why the Burgundy and Gold went with that approach in free agency.

"A lot of these guys want to come in and say, ‘Hey give me an opportunity to compete, let me prove myself,'" Rivera told the media. " I love that guys are betting on themselves, that they’re going to come in and prove that they belong, that they deserve an extensive contract."

Rivera's only been in charge of the Redskins since the start of January, but it's already more than clear he loves competition. In fact, you can call him obsessed.

So while additions like JD McKissic, Cornelius Lucas and Logan Thomas aren't the familiar names many fans were likely hoping for, Rivera and VP of Player Personnel Kyle Smith appear content with throwing all of them onto the field next to the current roster and seeing who ultimately rises to the occasion. The ensuing battle to survive through the preseason may be cage match-y, minus the chairs.

CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE REDSKINS TALK PODCAST

Now, this haul would be very different if the Redskins were successful in their push to land Amari Cooper. He would've cost the organization a "substantial" amount of cash and secured more money a year than a handful of their eventual signings will combined.

In the end, though, Cooper remained in Dallas and the Cowboys' rival was a lot quieter overall. But if Rivera's instincts come through, he does expect at least a few of his acquisitions to make some noise for their new franchise.

"One of the things that we tried to do when I was in Carolina, we looked at guys and IDed guys that were on the cusp of becoming solid starters," he said Tuesday. "Not a flash in the pan type guy that you’re hoping for, but a guy who’s done it steadily over a couple of years. We IDed a few of those guys and we went out and brought those guys in and had them become a part of our football team."

That kind of description seems to apply to defenders like Sean Davis and Ronald Darby, among others. If healthy, coached up and focused, those are some lesser-known names around the league who could deliver for Rivera and his staff.

In summing up the Redskins' plan for this portion of the NFL calendar, the 58-year-old was sure to point out that he's viewing this rebuild as a real project as opposed to a quick fix. It's like he's wearing binoculars when scoping out his end goals, not glasses.

That's one more reason he's pleased with what was accomplished the past few weeks. Once 2020 wraps up, he'll be ready to figure out which short-term options deserve to stick and which don't. 2020 itself isn't necessarily the primary objective.

"We think it’s a good mix right now," Rivera said. "Again, as we develop and grow, it’s not going to happen overnight. That’s one of the things that we feel we have: more time to be patient and develop these guys.”

Stay connected to the Capitals and Wizards with the MyTeams app. Click here to download for comprehensive coverage of your teams.

MORE REDSKINS NEWS