Capitals

Quick Links

Blast from the past: Galiev back in the picture

usatsi_8508749_141983962_lowres.jpg

Blast from the past: Galiev back in the picture

From a broad perspective, the Capitals’ scouting and coaching staffs came away from last week’s development camp pleased with the progress of forward prospects Jakub Vrana, Zach Sanford, Chandler Stephenson and Riley Barber and defensive prospects Madison Bowey and Christian Djoos.

They also liked the potential they saw in 2015 draft picks Jonas Siegenthaler, Connor Hobbs and Colby Williams.

But there was another player– a proverbial blast from the past – whose name kept coming up, even though he was not in attendance.

Stanislav Galiev, once considered one of the top prospects in the organization, has crept back into the conversation as a solid contender for the Capitals’ 2015-16 roster. Considering where he was a year ago, that is no small feat.

“I think we’re going to give him a good shot,” Capitals general manager Brian MacLellan said. “We want to see the skill, we want to see the work ethic, the speed. We had him up for a short stint last year (two games, one goal) and I thought he played really well. He scored a goal, he’s got good hands, he shoots the puck well.

“We’ll give him a number of exhibition games to show what he can do and hopefully he sticks up (on the Caps’ roster).”

Taken by the Caps in the third round (86th overall) of the 2010 NHL draft, Galiev, 23, was an absolute force in back-to-back playoff years for the Saint John Sea Dogs of the Quebec League. In 2011 and 2012 QMJHL playoffs, Galiev recorded 26 goals and 35 assists for 61 points in 36 playoff games. Back then, Galiev was projected as a top-six forward in the NHL.

But an injury plagued 2013-14 season had Galiev splitting time between the ECHL Reading Royals and AHL Hershey Bears and the following season proved much of the same, with Galiev producing at the ECHL level (47 points in 46 games) but coming up short in the AHL (one assist in 17 games).

Considering his failed expectations over two years it was reasonable to assume that Galiev would play out the final year of his contract and break away from the Caps’ organization.

That all changed last season, which began with an incredible highlight reel goal and ended with him tied for the Bears’ lead with 25 goals and leading the AHL with 15 power-play goals.

The Caps rewarded Galiev with a late-season call-up to fill in for injured right wing Tom Wilson and, after being pranked by his teammates and skating onto the ice alone for pre-game warmups against the Bruins, Galiev netted his first NHL goal against Henrik Lundqvist and the Rangers in the final game of the regular season. But the real reward came on July 1 when the Caps re-signed Galiev to a two-year, two-way contract worth $1.15 million.

“He had an excellent season, from being a healthy scratch and playing in the ECHL, to maybe cracking the Caps roster,” Bears coach Troy Mann said.

“Is he ready? I guess we’ll find out in September if he can make that next step. But we were really impressed with his defensive awareness (at the NHL level). He’s really worked on becoming more of an inside player. One of his problems early on was he was really a perimeter player. Once he became that guy who would go into those traffic areas and be tough to play against, he showed that skill set and that’s a great combination.”

With T.J. Oshie, Justin Williams and Wilson projected as the Caps’ top three right wings, and with Marcus Johansson’s future with the Capitals in question, Galiev could push hard for the role of fourth-line right wing with a strong preseason.

“For us as coaches, we’d like to see him in Hershey,” Mann said. “But for the organization he would be a great story if he comes in here and has a great camp and is part of that 13 forward mix.”

MORE CAPITALS: Would Capitals walk away from Johansson?

Quick Links

Capitals return home still short-handed, but with momentum after strong road trip

usatsi_10625300.jpg
USA Today Sports Images

Capitals return home still short-handed, but with momentum after strong road trip

The Capitals return home to play the Chicago Blackhawks (7 p.m., NBC Sports Washington) after a successful road trip (3-1-0), but will still be without forwards Evgeny Kuznetsov and T.J. Oshie (upper-body injuries), who remain day-to-day, according to coach Todd Reirden.   

Here are four things to watch:

Holtby’s back

After missing three games with an upper-body injury of his own, Caps goalie Braden Holtby was thrown into the fire down 4-2 at Montreal on Monday. But he played lights out and matched Habs goalie Carey Price save-for-save, finishing with 22 as Washington rallied for a 5-4 overtime win. Holtby now feels good enough as he will start against the Blackhawks tonight. In his past four appearances, Holtby has stopped 116 of 122 shots on goal.

New-look Blackhawks

Chicago’s slow start cost Joel Quenneville his job on Nov. 6. An NHL coach getting fired is rarely news. But when it’s a guy who’s been in his post for more than a decade and has won three Stanley Cups it is still jarring. The results are mixed since Jeremy Colliton took over. Chicago lost his first two games behind the bench, but is 2-0-2 in its past four games. That’s a small step in the right direction, but the Blackhawks are in sixth place in the Central Division.

Wilsonnnnn!!!!!

This was supposed to be the day Tom Wilson returned to the lineup after his 20-game suspension. An arbitrator cut that short last week so Wilson played on all four games of the road trip and had a goal and four assists. Not a bad start. Wednesday he gets his first home game of the year and what should be a raucous reception from the faithful at Capital One Arena. 

Old mates

On Monday, the crowd at Bell Centre booed former Canadien Lars Eller, who promptly took the puck up ice and scored the game-winning goal in overtime. It was a great moment for a player who felt Montreal gave up on him way too soon when trading him to the Capitals. Michal Kempny knows how he feels. 

Languishing on the bench for most of last season in Chicago as a healthy scratch – he played just 31 games - Kempny sees his old team for the first time since helping Washington win a Stanley Cup. Quenneville is gone, but the defenseman would love to show the rest of the organization trading him was a mistake. 

MORE CAPITALS NEWS:

Quick Links

Capitals mailbag: What to do with Andre Burakovsky

usatsi_11599950.jpg
USA Today Sports Images

Capitals mailbag: What to do with Andre Burakovsky

It’s time for the weekly Capitals mailbag! Check out the Nov. 21 edition below. Have you got a Caps question you want to be answered in next week’s mailbag? Send it on Twitter using #CapsMailNBC or by email to CapitalsMailbag@gmail.com

Please note some questions have been edited for clarity.

Without a clear go-to guy on the faceoff anymore, who takes the draw has become much more situational.

One thing that was not talked about all that much when the team lost Beagle was that not only was he the best faceoff player on the team, he was also the only right-shot center. Why does that matter? Consider a faceoff in the right circle on a defensive-zone draw. A left-shot center is going to sweep the puck to the center of the ice which is not ideal in the defensive zone. It’s no coincidence that the team signed a right-shot center Nic Dowd in the offseason. Travis Boyd shoots right as well.

If you notice, there are even times when T.J. Oshie lines up in the faceoff circle in place of Nicklas Backstrom and I’m not talking about when Backstrom is kicked out of the draw. I haven’t asked Reirden about this, but I suspect it is because Backstrom shoots left and Oshie shoots right.

So to answer your question, there’s no one player the Caps are looking to get on the ice when they need a draw. It depends on if the puck is on the offensive or defensive zone and in the left or right circle. It’s all a matter of what direction the team wants the puck to go.

Kevin J writes: At what point do you cut bait with a player (Burakovsky) that isn’t meeting expectations? And what do you think you could reasonably get in return?

There’s no question the Caps need more production out of Burakovsky who has only two goals and four points in 20 games. In the final year of his contract, his low production inevitably brings up questions about his future in Washington.

First, when considering a trade, it’s important to remember that all the reasons you want to trade a player away, an opposing general manager will know that. Opposing GMs know he has four points, they know he’s a streaky player and they will certainly know his injury history. The problem with trying to move him now is that the team would be selling low. As frustrating as his production can be, Brian MacLellan is not going to simply trade a player away that the team drafted for pennies on the dollar. He has to be able to get value in return or there is no point.

It’s also important to remember that, unless you get an NHL player in return, you have to find someone to plug into his spot in the lineup. Wayne Gretzky is not sitting in the press box waiting to step in. Are the Caps prepared to give a player like Dmitrij Jaskin an every-day, third-line role? That is probably what a Burakovsky trade would mean.

You also have to consider that Burakovsky is a pending restricted free agent. This will mean the team will retain his rights if and only if he is offered a qualifying offer equal to his current deal of $3 million. If an opposing general manager does not think he’s worth that, he won’t want to make a trade for a player knowing he won’t offer him a qualifying offer. That would mean trading for a player who could walk in the summer.

MacLellan went to great lengths to keep his championship roster together in the offseason. Trading Burakovsky would be trading a piece of that and losing the Burakovsky, Lars Eller, Brett Connolly line that has been effective in the past. He will only do that for the right deal and I believe the return on a Burakovsky trade would be too low to justify at this point.

The Caps may need to at least be open to offers considering Burakovsky’s continued inconsistent production, but I’m not sure there will be that much interest in him until he starts racking up more points.

The Capitals currently have the maximum of 23 players on the roster and are very close to the salary cap ceiling. Obviously, if they acquire a defenseman, that would mean reassigning Jonas Siegenthaler back to Hershey, but that does not clear up much cap space. Washington also has two extra forwards on the roster, but the team is not going to move any forwards until Oshie and Evgeny Kuznetsov get healthy and return to the lineup.

So yes, the Caps do have room on the roster to trade for a physical defenseman when they get healthy on offense, but they do not have much cap space. Plus, given how well Madison Bowey and Siegenthaler have played, I do not anticipate MacLellan trying that.

There is no question the Caps lost a lot of their physicality when Wilson and Orpik were both out, but Wilson is back, the team’s young defensemen are playing well and there seems to be no need for the team to pull the trigger on a trade.

Nathan S writes: Why does the NHL get away with being so secretive with injuries? Other leagues such as the NFL have very strict reporting requirements. It would seem this would be in best interest of player safety.

The upper-body, lower-body injuries are certainly frustrating to fans (and the media considering how often we get asked what a player’s specific injury is), but that’s not going away anytime soon. Gary Bettman said as much at a recent press conference announcing the league’s partnership with MGM Resorts. While you may believe it is in the best interest of players for teams to announce specific injuries, the league disagrees. The fear is that if you announce a player has a hand injury, you will see opponents go after a player’s hand. If you announce a player has a shoulder injury, opponents will go after a player’s shoulder. By being cryptic, therefore, teams are protecting their players.

The only thing that I believe could possibly change this is sports gambling. The more the NHL dips its toe into the world of sports gambling, the more pressure the league could start to feel from partners over revealing the specific nature of injuries. Otherwise, this is not going to change and it will continue to give the media and fans alike upper-body injuries…er, I mean headaches.

Thanks for all your questions! If you have a question you want to be read and answered in next week’s mailbag, send it in to CapitalsMailbag@gmail.com or use #CapsMailNBC on Twitter.

Have a happy Thanksgiving, Caps nation!

MORE CAPITALS NEWS: