Nationals

Quick Links

Nats miffed at Phillies over postponed game

ap_885665493145.jpg

Nats miffed at Phillies over postponed game

Updated at 6:15 p.m.

PHILADELPHIA — The Nationals are miffed at the Phillies after Saturday afternoon’s game began on-time, only to be postponed due to heavy rain that had been forecast all along after only 1 1/2 innings, a decision that forced the Nats to burn up starter Gio Gonzalez and find a fill-in starter for the nightcap of what will now be a Sunday doubleheader at Citizens Bank Park.

Asked how frustrated he was by Saturday’s events, Matt Williams didn’t withhold his emotions.

“Extremely,” the Nationals manager said. “Burned our pitcher. I’m not very happy about it.”

Heavy rain had been forecast all day, with a major system overtaking the entire East Coast, and games in Baltimore and Detroit had already been postponed, with a game in Pittsburgh delayed and a minor-league game in Harrisburg called off. The Phillies, though, elected to start the game on-time at 3:05 p.m., their right as the home team.

And what explanation were the Nationals given to why the game would proceed?

“That it was going to be playable,” Williams said. “The forecast was that it was going to be playable. Clearly it wasn’t.”

The first inning proceeded with only a few sprinkles, but then the rain picked up during the top of the second. By the time that half-inning ended, umpires met with the Citizens Bank Park grounds crew and called for the tarp to cover the infield as both teams retreated to their respective clubhouses.

One hour and 27 minutes later, the game officially was postponed, with the Nationals and Phillies scoreless but having each used their starting pitchers.

Gonzalez threw only one inning for the Nats, needing 18 pitches to complete a scoreless first. Rookie left-hander Adam Morgan tossed two scoreless innings for the Phillies.

“It’s unfortunate,” said Gonzalez, who now can’t pitch again for several days. “You’re put in a tough situation, and it just sucks. I’ve been waiting four days, and that’s what happens. I mean, this rain kind of caught us all off-guard. I mean, we didn’t know it was coming for like three days, so…”

Gonzalez’s sarcastic response represented the tenor throughout the Nationals clubhouse, and even the majority of the Phillies clubhouse, where players expressed shock the game ever began.

The Nationals would have been perfectly fine with a decision to postpone the game before it ever started, given the ominous forecast and the fact they were fielding a makeshift lineup that included only one regular (shortstop Ian Desmond). Outfielders Bryce Harper and Denard Span, plus third baseman Yunel Escobar, all were dealing with nagging injuries that prevented them from playing Saturday.

They also would have preferred the rainout be made up in September rather than Sunday’s scheduled 1:05 p.m. doubleheader, because now they must both find a fill-in starting pitcher while also playing two games back-to-back with an injury-plagued roster of position players.

Williams said Stephen Strasburg will start Sunday’s opener as originally planned. The Nationals won’t name their starter for the nightcap until the first game ends.

MLB allows teams to add a 26th player from the minors for the second game of doubleheaders, but the Nationals may not necessarily send that player to the mound to start Game 2. If Strasburg pitches deep into the first game, Tanner Roark could possibly start the second game, with a call-up available out of the bullpen.

“It depends on where we’re at and what we’re doing,” Williams said. “We’ll see how Game 1 goes and adjust from there. But we have to get through the first one first.”

The Nationals have a few options for that 26th position. Joe Ross, who impressed during his first three career starts earlier this month, just started Thursday for Class AAA Syracuse, which takes him out of consideration. Right-hander Taylor Jordan was scheduled to start Saturday night for the Chiefs in Indianapolis but was scratched about an hour before first pitch, likely setting him up to fly to Philadelphia and join the Nationals.

The Phillies will stick with scheduled starter Kevin Correia in Game 1 and will call up right-hander Severino Gonzalez to start the nightcap, which will begin 25 minutes after the first game ends.

Quick Links

Phillies’ manager Gabe Kapler says he’s ‘fascinated’ by Bryce Harper

Phillies’ manager Gabe Kapler says he’s ‘fascinated’ by Bryce Harper

LAS VEGAS -- Gabe Kapler commanded his nondescript, off-brown chair during his media session Monday at the Winter Meetings. He wore a black leather jacket, presumably the only MLB manager sporting such a look, spoke firmly and with projection when going over what went right, wrong and is to come for his Philadelphia Phillies.

The first question posed to Kapler was about...Manny Machado. Soon enough, Bryce Harper came up. Kapler said Harper “might be the best player in baseball” in September. Monday, he lauded a player his organization is rumored to be in hot pursuit of.

“I think -- in my opinion, Bryce Harper does a number of things well, but one of the things I found most fascinating about him last year was even through the times of his struggles, he still worked an incredible at-bat,” Kapler said. “So it wasn't like rolling over to the second baseman on the first pitch when he was struggling, although that happened from time to time. But when he struggled he still put together a quality at-bat. He still worked the pitcher. He still made the opposition uncomfortable. And sometimes he'd end that at-bat with a walk, which I think there's a lot of value in that."

“Now, when he's going good, he's one of the more difficult players to get out in the game. And I love the way he plays. I think there's so much to like about what Bryce Harper brings to the table.”

Kapler’s laudatory comments are not a surprise. And, Harper does appear an on-field fit in Philadelphia after their recent trade with Seattle which extracted Carlos Santana from first base, enabling Rhys Hoskins to move there from the outfield, where the Phillies played him out of necessity last season. That opens an outfield spot. Harper could easily slide in there.

Harper also makes sense in the Philadelphia lineup. He would pair nicely in front of or behind the right-handed Hoskins. Kapler said his initial thought is to hit Jean Segura second, Odubel Herrera third and Hoskins fourth. For all the progress they made last year, the Phillies still finished just 11th in National League OPS. They were 14th in OPS among right fielders. The No. 1 right field OPS in the National League last season? The Washington Nationals.

Miami in a vice

The Nationals and Phillies are sorting out their free agent plans with marquee players on the market. Atlanta won the division, added Josh Donaldson and has moves ahead. The Mets acquired Robinson Cano and closer Edwin Diaz. They are expected to do more in order to beef up their team as opposed to break it apart.

Then, there are the Marlins. Things are bad in Miami. They are set to remain so in 2019.

Monday, Marlins manager Don Mattingly, who is in the final year of his contract, was asked if he could definitively name a starting position player for 2019 outside of Starlin Castro at second base. He couldn’t.

“We knew it was going to be a tough year, but we needed to take steps forward,” Mattingly said.  “You see what's going on in the division, what's happening with all the other teams."

“And it's not going to get easier with the teams in our division. So it's hard to say anybody definitely in one spot. But I think our thought process is just continue, you gotta get better. And I think that's what [Michael Hill] has talked about, it's what Derek [Jeter] has talked about.”

Mattingly said he thinks catcher J.T. Realmuto, the team’s best player, is handling all the trade rumors about him well. Beyond Realmuto, the conversation centered on the bushel of prospects and young players Miami will be rolling onto the field in 2019.

Miami won 63 games last season. It finished 26 ½ games out of first place. Its best player will probably be gone by Opening Day. Other than that, everything is going well.

Baines, Smith ready for the Hall

Harold Baines and Lee Smith were surprise guests Monday at the Winter Meetings. Maybe not so much Smith, but certainly Baines.

Both were elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame on Sunday by the Today’s Game Era Committee, a 16-person panel not associated with the Baseball Writers’ Association of America, which also votes on Hall of Fame candidacy.

Baines piled solid numbers during a 22-year career. However, he never come close to inclusion by the writers. His chances changed once his candidacy was presented to the committee, which included Jerry Reinsdorf, who owns the Chicago White Sox. Baines played 14 of his 22 seasons for the White Sox.

Smith delivered 478 saves in his 18 seasons.

Both selections rankled the baseball community, to a degree. They also had a positive impact for players like Edgar Martinez, who are struggling to be voted in by the writers, but could find a more congenial path with the committee based on these two selections.

MORE NATIONALS NEWS:

Quick Links

Mike Rizzo left to clarify mixed messages on Harper

Mike Rizzo left to clarify mixed messages on Harper

LAS VEGAS -- Sixty stories above the street, Mike Rizzo was asked to clarify once more what the organization’s stance on Bryce Harper is.

The reason Rizzo is going through this again was born last Friday when Nationals managing principal owner Mark Lerner declared the team all but out on Harper. At the time, Rizzo was a few feet away saying the Nationals hadn’t determined anything. The door remained open. An initial offer was made, the organization would go from there. 

That sounded like a common-sense strategy. Offer a low, but respectable, deal. Let the sides work on other things. Circle back to an agent and player the organization has significant ties to.

Instead, Lerner’s comments made the pursuit sound concluded. The Nationals had done the best they could, he said. Other teams would present more cash, piles the Nationals could not -- or at least would not -- match. This was counter to Rizzo’s open stance.

Which is why Monday, Rizzo was trying to merge the sentiments and navigate back to a better place of public understanding.

“I didn’t make much of it,” Rizzo said of Lerner’s comments. “Mark was asked to speculate about Harp’s future and, the one thing I have learned doing this for a long time, I don’t speculate about free agents, where they are going, how much they’re getting. It’s just too difficult because there’s so many factors involved.

“Nothing’s changed with Harp since the end of the season except I think we’re a better team than we were at the end of the season. But we’re not closing the door on anything.”

Rizzo added they do not have a meeting in Las Vegas scheduled with Harper’s agent, Scott Boras, or Harper himself. So, there’s that, too.

The general view of Washington’s handling of Harper has been positive. He was thankful for his treatment since arriving as a 19-year-old comet. Rizzo defended him at all turns. The support moved into the offseason, during which Rizzo has said positive things about Harper to anyone who asked. He’s not playing semantics in that department, using his statements to negotiate or twist what may occur. He told NBC Sports Washington last week their relationship is one of “open dialogue” from both sides. Rizzo has backed Harper in all ways.

Hence, things were smooth. Until last week when Lerner’s comments emerged. They present layers of questions and complications. 

Here’s what the Nationals knew in July, if not sooner: Harper was going to become a free agent. Gio Gonzalez would not be back, leaving a hole for a left-handed starting pitcher in the rotation. Patrick Corbin and Dallas Keuchel would become the prime candidates to fill that spot. They would cost at least $100 million each. And, apparently, the organization’s max offer to Harper would be $300 million, one he would never accept. All this was clear.

So, why was he still here? 

The Nationals reportedly pulled back a mid-summer trade on the table at Lerner’s behest. Five months later, he would also say publicly -- we’ll get to the oddity of that decision in a minute -- the Nationals made their best offer to Harper. Which means he knew around the trade deadline Harper was not coming back via a too-low offer, yet kept him around anyway. That doesn’t add up. Not soundly, at least.

Maybe what Lerner said was part smoke. He wanted to make it appear the Nationals were fading away from Harper. That process was long anticipated for several reasons. Not the least of which is the glut of talented outfielders and more than half-a-billion dollars dedicated to the top three in the rotation.

But there’s no reason to say that in public. It’s a competitive disadvantage at a minimum. Rizzo’s framing allowed the Phillies to think the Nationals could still be around. Similar comments from ownership, which would ultimately make the decision, could supplement that idea. Pushing the price on Philadelphia may not have a direct result now. However, it could eventually kick it beyond the competitive balance tax in the future. It could complicate dealings with the next uber free agent, like Mike Trout or Mookie Betts. It at least doesn’t ease the situation. Seeds of doubt count as a pound of flesh when tussling with a division rival.

Instead, on a day the New York Yankees publicly backed away, when it appears Harper’s options are dwindling, the Nationals were forced to recycle a general sentiment in order to unwind ownership comments from three days prior.

They’re open, Rizzo said. And he seems to mean it. The question is if his owner does, too.

MORE NATIONALS NEWS: