Nationals

Quick Links

Nats, NL East trade rumors

825821.png

Nats, NL East trade rumors

With another wild card added to the MLB playoff format, one could have guessed the weeks leading up to this years trade deadline would be a little crazier than years past. Teams that normally would be sellers are now in position to possibly make the playoffs and therefore have become buyers. The predictions have rung true with a few notable trades already having happened and one bizarre almost-trade involving Chicago and Atlanta.

It also seems there are, in general, more rumors this season than in recent years. Each team in the National League East, in fact, has been mentioned in various deals with each club with different reasons to trade.

Here is a roundup of what has been mentioned so far:

Nationals

With the expected shutdown of Stephen Strasburg, the Nats have been linked to several starting pitchers. Zack Greinke is the biggest name out there, but according to a recent report, the likelihood of him coming to D.C. is dwindling.

The possibility of a catcher has also come up with the absence of Wilson Ramos and the uneven play of Jesus Flores. A report last week mentioned Ramon Hernandez as a possibility and the Nats have been linked to Kelly Shoppach in the past. Catcher would seem to be a need for Washington, but nothing specific has been reported of late.

The other position thought to be on the Nationals radar is a middle infielder. Ian Desmond recently went to the disabled list, but they have Danny Espinosa and Steve Lombardozzi to hold down the fort. CSNs Mark Zuckerman has heard the Nationals may just stay put, here is his report.

Phillies

The Phillies continue to be among the most popular teams expected to be sellers at the deadline. Cole Hamels and Shane Victorino and been obvious names with expiring contracts, but now Hunter Pence is reportedly available.

Hamels and the Phillies continue to work through contract talks with their latest offer a reported 137.5 million. It would seem that if he is dealt, it will be a last minute move.

Marlins

Miami sent Omar Infante and Anibal Sanchez to Detroit for a top prospect earlier in the week, but that was just the beginning of their dealing. Early Wednesday morning they traded Hanley Ramirez to the Dodgers who is due 31.5 million over the next two seasons.

The Marlins may also trade the underachieving Josh Johnson if the price is right. The hard-throwing right-hander is the teams ace, but with the team trying to shed payroll could be a casualty.

Braves

The Braves were involved in the Ryan Dempster almost-trade that left them feeling rejected by his 105 rights. It was reported that Dempster wants to go to the Dodgers instead and turned down the offer to go to Atlanta. The Braves were offering one of their top pitching prospects in Randall Delgado.

Mets

New York has been sliding lately and is still without the injured Johan Santana, but still GM Sandy Alderson wont commit to being sellers. The Mets plan to keep their options open and may not make a deal bigger than the small one they made last week.

Quick Links

Why controversy surrounds Adam Eaton and the Minor League Pay Problem

adam-eaton-slide-usat.jpg
USA TODAY Sports Images

Why controversy surrounds Adam Eaton and the Minor League Pay Problem

Washington Nationals outfielder Adam Eaton found himself at the center of the Minor League pay problem issue this past weekend.

On Thursday, Washington City Paper published an article describing the living and working conditions of a handful of the Class A-Advanced Potomac Nationals, one of Washington's minor-league affiliates. The article, which credited Eaton with saying that he doesn't believe minor leaguers should be paid "big time," but they could be paid slightly more. 

Additionally, Eaton said that he believes the MLB shouldn't make conditions in the minor leagues "more hospitable," because otherwise players could get complacent and, supposedly, have less of an incentive or drive to make the majors. 

Eaton's argument is more nuanced than those few quotes, and on Monday City Paper published an article with the entirety of Eaton's interview available online. 

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH MINOR-LEAGUE PAY?

Four players sued MLB in 2014, alleging that its policies “artificially and illegally depressing” minor league salaries. The case was dismissed, but it elevated the concerns of minor league players and the disparity between the support for them and MLB players (here's a good place to start if you want to learn more about this fight). 

Many have had to live with host families or share small apartments with upwards of five teammates while in a major league team's farm system. Some, including Eaton, recall the abysmal food options provided to players by the teams, often including peanut-butter-and-jelly sandwiches. 

The issue of whether minor leaguers are paid a "livable wage" has become a more prominent issue since the suit was filed.  In 2018 President Donald Trump signed the "Save America's Pastime Act," which enables MLB to exclude most professional baseball players from the Fair Labor Standards Act and thus insulates the current system of pay between the major and minor leagues. 

While those drafted in the earlier rounds may receive signing bonuses upwards of $8 million, those who do receive signing bonuses make up only a small percentage of those in the minor leagues. 

Last year, the monthly minimum salaries for minor league players were: $1,100 in rookie ball and Single-A, $1,500 in Double-A and $2,150 in Triple-A, according to an article from the Associated Press

WHAT DID ADAM EATON SAY?

Eaton's argument is complicated and mainly based on personal experience. (The Nationals outfielder spent time in the Arizona Diamondbacks' minor league system after he was drafted in the 19th round of the 2010 MLB Draft. Since then he's also spent time in the Chicago White Sox and the Nationals' minor-league systems, mainly on rehab assignments.)

It's unfair to lay out Eaton's claim as one claiming that nothing should change and minor league players should continue to be exploited. Eaton explicitly said that he "doesn't disagree [minor leaguers are] being exploited," but added that "it's for the betterment of everybody."

The outfielder credited his experience in the "dog-eat-dog world" of the minor leagues as helping him appreciate the majors all the more, because it kept him from getting complacent and made him focus on baseball.

But Eaton also admitted that there is what he calls "wiggle room" in the minor-league salaries; the minor league teams could increase salaries a little bit (but not too much, according to Eaton). 

WHY IS THERE CONTROVERSY?

The problem stems from the fact that Eaton's argument is complex, and he repeatedly backtracked in his interview with City Paper. Plus, words are extremely subjective. So while Eaton said that if MLB made the minor league life "more livable," then players would get complacent, he also said that minor league players shouldn't be exploited and should make slightly more money. 

Many articles published have used headlines that amount to "click-bait," which shave Eaton's argument down to "minor-leaguers should be exploited because it's a good thing." That isn't Eaton's whole argument, though. 

Understanding where Eaton's argument fits into the entire pay problem is important in understanding why Eaton is under scrutiny right now. And to do that, what amounts to a "liveable wage" and "liveable conditions" must be better defined. Eaton argues that minor league players should make enough so that they're "literally not eating crumbs," but not so much that they grow comfortable. As he claims, it's those minor-leaguers who are "milled by pressure," the 30th and 40th round draft picks with no signing bonus and no guarantee they'll ever reach the majors, who ensure a "longevity in the big league." 

HAS EATON SAID ANYTHING ELSE?

Well, yes. Eaton took to Instagram Monday, after the City Paper article with the complete interview transcript was published, essentially cleaning up his argument and apologizing for offending anyone. 

MORE NATIONALS NEWS:

Quick Links

Max Scherzer to the Yankees? Probably not

maxscherzerblackeye.jpg
USA TODAY Sports

Max Scherzer to the Yankees? Probably not

Bryce Harper held a State of Bryce Harper press conference every spring. It occurred inside the cramped clubhouse in Viera, Florida, outside in the sunshine of a new facility in West Palm Beach, Florida, then, for the final time in 2018, in the bland press conference of the Ballpark of the Palm Beaches. Harper threatened to walk out that day if asked about his pending free agency.

No matter the location, New York reporters showed. Year after year, they asked Harper about the prospect of playing for the Yankees -- he, apparently, was the only person to ever like Mickey Mantle -- in order to produce new churn about the possibility of Harper to New York. It happened so frequently, and irked him so much, Harper managed his time accordingly when a New York team was in Washington or he was in New York. He was not around during those times, if he could help it.

This is how it goes with the Yankees, a truth earned by decades of titles and lore, as the preeminent franchise in baseball. Big-name player A is attached to the Yankees by thread or whim because they are the Yankees. This process was kickstarted last weekend for Max Scherzer via a report which said New York would do “whatever it takes” to acquire Scherzer. Ignore it. He’s not being traded.

Scherzer crept back into the National League Cy Young race by pitching with a damaged face last week and showing supreme command his last six starts: 0.88 ERA, 41 innings pitched, 27 hits, .179 batting average against, 59 strikeouts, eight walks and 70 percent of his pitches thrown for strikes. He leads the National League in strikeouts and FIP. He’s third in walk-to-strikeout ratio, fourth in ERA, sixth in WHIP and 11th in batting average against. Like the Nationals, Scherzer recently turned into something to take further notice of.

And even if the recent team surge is a mirage, Scherzer is unlikely to be traded. He’s the black-and-blue face of the team. Multiple other parts -- an unextended Anthony Rendon, Howie Kendrick, Brian Dozier, Matt Adams, Yan Gomes, even Michael A. Taylor -- could be moved out for several prospects. Trading those players does not necessitate a rebuild or rule out Rendon’s return. Trading Scherzer with two years remaining on his deal means the spine of the team is removed when his contract cost is about to modestly recede as the competitive balance tax threshold goes up.

The lone wrinkle is Scherzer’s current service time status: At the close of 2019, he will hold 10 and five rights -- meaning he has been in the league at least 10 years and five with the same team -- enabling him to veto any trade. He can’t do that now. However, it’s hard to envision that has enough onus to send him anywhere this season.

So, believe the Yankees would want to acquire Scherzer. Then envision a line with 28 other teams, scoff and move on.

MORE NATIONALS NEWS